
Football vs Golf
#31
Posted 18 September 2012 - 07:12 PM

#32
Posted 28 September 2012 - 08:21 AM
#35
Posted 29 September 2012 - 09:34 PM

#36
#37
Posted 01 October 2012 - 12:54 PM
#39
#41
Posted 01 October 2012 - 03:15 PM
its just a little ribbing man, be easy.
Edited by bubbagump, 01 October 2012 - 03:18 PM.
#42
#43
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:19 PM
Onyx Z, on 01 October 2012 - 03:20 PM, said:
That's why they play the games.
Regardless, there's no way a team with a 75% winning percentage is #1 over a team with 100% winning percentage. I may not be a mathematician but I know that s***
#44
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:40 PM
hebron1427, on 01 October 2012 - 07:19 PM, said:
That's why they play the games.
Regardless, there's no way a team with a 75% winning percentage is #1 over a team with 100% winning percentage. I may not be a mathematician but I know that s***
I was just kidding dude. Relax....
But, fwiw records right now dont really indicate best teams. IMO there are more than a few 3-1 teams and possily a few 2-2 teams that are better teams than one if not two of the unbeatens right now. We shall see how it plays out.
#47
Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:57 AM
bubbagump, on 02 October 2012 - 05:00 AM, said:
Sorrry mr serious.......
the statement was never "who's better." the statement was "they're #1." it was always asinine to say that a team with a worse record is "#1." you continue to say "it's just a joke" while then following up with justifications for why you said it. if it was a "joke," you'd let it go and quit trying to justify what you said.
oh, btw, i was only being sarcastic. i guess you can't discern that. [/sarcasm]
#48
Posted 02 October 2012 - 08:22 AM
#51
Posted 04 October 2012 - 11:23 PM
bubbagump, on 01 October 2012 - 03:15 PM, said:
its just a little ribbing man, be easy.
if that was the case the bears would have tons of rings, defense wins games but it doesnt win chanpionships
#52
Posted 05 October 2012 - 05:26 AM
prestiege, on 04 October 2012 - 11:23 PM, said:
bubbagump, on 01 October 2012 - 03:15 PM, said:
its just a little ribbing man, be easy.
if that was the case the bears would have tons of rings, defense wins games but it doesnt win chanpionships
If it wasnt the case, the Packers or Patriots would have ran away with a title last year. Last place defenses hold back even the most prolific offenses.
Obviously it has to be a mix and you have to be able to score some points, but its better to have a stout D and mediocre O then high powered Offense and no Defense.
#53
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:56 AM
#56
Posted 16 October 2012 - 08:29 AM
hebron1427, on 15 October 2012 - 10:38 PM, said:
i have no comment...
#57
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:23 AM
Some teams have harder schedules than others, and a loss(es) arent that big of a deal. Right now all that matters is making the playoffs. From there everybody is 0-0. Look at the Giants last year, doesnt matter what your record is.
Edited by bubbagump, 16 October 2012 - 09:31 AM.
#58
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:45 AM
bubbagump, on 16 October 2012 - 09:23 AM, said:
Some teams have harder schedules than others, and a loss(es) arent that big of a deal. Right now all that matters is making the playoffs. From there everybody is 0-0. Look at the Giants last year, doesnt matter what your record is.
generally agree, except that teams that are 6-0 almost invariably make the playoffs. only two teams in the last 30 years have gone 5-0 and missed the playoffs. you've got to get to the playoffs before you can do anything with it.
and, like i said before, it's never been about what matters, or who's best, or what they might win. it's always been about who's #1. Falcons--the only undefeated team after week 6. #1. Period.
#59
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:55 AM
I'm not too worried about a 5-1 start. With the Ravens coming to town this week without Ray Lewis and Ladarius Webb, we should be good to go.











