
IN HAND PICS! 2012 Mizuno MP-64 Irons, MP-H4 Irons and MP-T4 Wedges!!!
#63
Posted 18 July 2012 - 08:48 AM
Another new addition to the Mizuno range looks to be the new MP-H4 - a hybrid-style long iron designed to replace the MP-Fli Hi
Mizuno's Tour reps have been showcasing the new head to their staff players at The Open Championship, where a lot of players traditionally ditch their hybrids for long irons because of the wind and the firmer turf.
The MP-H4 looks to be designed to offer the best of both worlds in terms of the forgiveness of a hybrid but the control off the tee of a long iron.
#64
Posted 18 July 2012 - 09:02 AM
Edited by Onyx Z, 18 July 2012 - 09:03 AM.
#67
Posted 18 July 2012 - 09:57 AM
station2station, on 18 July 2012 - 09:50 AM, said:
These angles are pretty damn nice. Pics snapped at the Open Championship:
Absolutely Stunning! I fully agree! Best MP irons to date. I truly love the 62's , but these are just stunning! Again... all I ask is that Mizuno adds some really interesting custom shaft options and this will truly top off the cake!
These will be in my bag for sure!
#68
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:11 AM
While I don't see myself changing next season I know the 64's maybe a 2014 addition when my 63's are done. If you have not tried the FLI-HI irons...you really do not know what you are missing.
I hit the 2 235-240 off the tee and 225ish off the deck...its a just a pure stick.
Joe
#69
Posted 18 July 2012 - 10:26 AM
Mizzy23, on 17 July 2012 - 08:43 PM, said:
There's really not a big difference between the 64's and the 60's. Both have identical perimeter weighting. Mp 62 + 63=64, the classic look of the 62, and diamond bar of the 63. Your purchase would be just something new to look at.
Agreed, if the MP-62 and MP-63 had a baby it would look like the MP-64. Great looking head!!
#71
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:38 AM
designdog, on 18 July 2012 - 07:28 AM, said:
make it four of us (plus i'm sure plenty of others).
i don't know which model will be lefty, as we traditionally don't get both.
on one hand you could guess we would get the 64's because we did not get the mp-69 so the most blade style iron in the current lineup for lefties is the mp-59. however, lefties did not get the 62's or 63's so maybe that would mean mizuno does not feel there is the demand for this niche of iron for lefties.
you could also guess that we would get the h4's if they truly are the replacement of the 53's. however, if they are meant to be replacement of the tweener jpx/mp iron (think mx-300, jpx 800 pro), then lefties never got either of those. also, mizuno did not make the latest version of the mp fli-hi for lefties, which maybe means we will get the h-4's because it will allow them to kill two birds with one stone and offer the fli-hi replacement and an iron set, but maybe not.
finally, it is possible we could get both sets or neither sets. mizuno has never been the most friendly lefty company so who knows.
throw in the previously mentioned jpx 825 non-pro/pro, which may or may not be coming out, and it seems it's still all up in the air.
#73
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:08 PM
Rebel420, on 18 July 2012 - 06:35 AM, said:
#74
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:11 PM
npark, on 17 July 2012 - 10:40 PM, said:
I agree completely. I was set on buying the H4 to replace my 53's but she looks a bit chunky. I'll give them a look when i can get them in hand but Im leaning towards passing at this stage.
#77
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:37 PM
#78
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:00 PM
Mizzy23, on 17 July 2012 - 08:43 PM, said:
There's really not a big difference between the 64's and the 60's. Both have identical perimeter weighting. Mp 62 + 63=64, the classic look of the 62, and diamond bar of the 63. Your purchase would be just something new to look at.
The changes are so subtle is there any nonhoing reason to get these if you've got an mp set less than 5 yrs old? Seems to be a variation of a variation
#81
Posted 18 July 2012 - 04:06 PM
The H4s look hideous, and I had heard a rumor that the long clubs weren't going to be forged - how could this be? It's Mizuno we're talking about, and even their GIs have been forged.
#82
Posted 18 July 2012 - 04:18 PM
pdaero, on 18 July 2012 - 04:06 PM, said:
While I would love to be able to game the mp-69s, but that's not happening. Building a set that morphs from the MP Fli-His in the long irons to conventional short irons makes sense for a lot of mid-cappers who might have pretty good swings most of the time, but don't want a lot of offset. For me, beauty is as beauty does. I will try them, but they will need to perform.
#83
Posted 18 July 2012 - 04:24 PM
Bullroarer Took, on 18 July 2012 - 04:18 PM, said:
pdaero, on 18 July 2012 - 04:06 PM, said:
While I would love to be able to game the mp-69s, but that's not happening. Building a set that morphs from the MP Fli-His in the long irons to conventional short irons makes sense for a lot of mid-cappers who might have pretty good swings most of the time, but don't want a lot of offset. For me, beauty is as beauty does. I will try them, but they will need to perform.
#84
Posted 18 July 2012 - 05:09 PM
freddyottawa, on 18 July 2012 - 08:30 AM, said:
This is exactly the type of comment a TM hater would say. Many o which in the same post say that Mizuno is what the poster wants. "after all, the mp-59 were just released, therefor Miz releases new clubs every 6 months ago". Comparing apples to oranges, mp64 are different category than mp59, just as TMs RBZ that were released 6 mos after R11, even though different categories.
My point was just a tongue and cheek comment meant to show how absurd some of the hate comments are.
Personally, I like TM gear. I also have no problem with Miz. One works a little better for me than the other, but IMHO,most major mfr equipment is about equal quality, it's all a matter of taste. And yes, they all follow similar release cycles -- 18 to 24 months, baring cases where sales just aren't there and an improvement can bring them where they need to be
#86
Posted 18 July 2012 - 05:30 PM
Rebel420, on 18 July 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:
freddyottawa, on 18 July 2012 - 08:30 AM, said:
This is exactly the type of comment a TM hater would say. Many o which in the same post say that Mizuno is what the poster wants. "after all, the mp-59 were just released, therefor Miz releases new clubs every 6 months ago". Comparing apples to oranges, mp64 are different category than mp59, just as TMs RBZ that were released 6 mos after R11, even though different categories.
My point was just a tongue and cheek comment meant to show how absurd some of the hate comments are.
Personally, I like TM gear. I also have no problem with Miz. One works a little better for me than the other, but IMHO,most major mfr equipment is about equal quality, it's all a matter of taste. And yes, they all follow similar release cycles -- 18 to 24 months, baring cases where sales just aren't there and an improvement can bring them where they need to be
You're the only one on this thread mentioning any other brand than what is being discussed. It's just pictures of new clubs.
#87
Posted 18 July 2012 - 05:46 PM
npark, on 17 July 2012 - 10:40 PM, said:
Hollow irons, really? TM Tour Preferred circa 1980's. Agree with you totally.
#88
Posted 18 July 2012 - 06:43 PM
Like an earlier poster said, I can see the 64 and the wedges (in bronze) in the bag in the future.
#89
Posted 18 July 2012 - 07:08 PM
Rebel420, on 18 July 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:
freddyottawa, on 18 July 2012 - 08:30 AM, said:
This is exactly the type of comment a TM hater would say. Many o which in the same post say that Mizuno is what the poster wants. "after all, the mp-59 were just released, therefor Miz releases new clubs every 6 months ago". Comparing apples to oranges, mp64 are different category than mp59, just as TMs RBZ that were released 6 mos after R11, even though different categories.
My point was just a tongue and cheek comment meant to show how absurd some of the hate comments are.
Personally, I like TM gear. I also have no problem with Miz. One works a little better for me than the other, but IMHO,most major mfr equipment is about equal quality, it's all a matter of taste. And yes, they all follow similar release cycles -- 18 to 24 months, baring cases where sales just aren't there and an improvement can bring them where they need to be
Seems like you are arguing with yourself















