
#9
#11
Posted 03 June 2012 - 07:53 AM
If they didn't make competitive* equipment, people wouldn't buy it.
If people didn't buy their constant releases, they would not continue to do it.
*Sometimes competitive is more about price than design... I'm willing to be some people LOVE the Burner 3... it's not designed for gearheads, it's designed for people who shop for golf equipment at Dicks.
Their marketing annoys me, but I just don't buy their products. I've tried most of their stuff out curiosity, but was not enamored with any of it.
Oh well.
I have not heard of the R11x, but it seems like a logical name for their newest offering... I don't think they are done with the R11 name as R12 sounds weird to me, and R13 probably won't ever happen.
Edited by Myherobobhope, 03 June 2012 - 07:53 AM.
#12
Posted 03 June 2012 - 10:53 AM
In 2007 they released the R7 (a bunch of models)
In 2008 they released the R7 Superquad
In 2009 they released the R9, R9 TP and R9 460.
In 2010 they released the R9 Supertri, R9 Supertri TP and Superdeep TP.
In 2011 they released the R11 and R11 TP.
In 2012 they released the R11s and R11s TP.
In odd numbered years they introduce a new line named R-year#.
The following year they release a variation/expansion of that R line "superquad" "supertri" and "s"
This means they will not release a new R series driver until 2013 which will be called the R13.
The expansion seems to always be more adjustable and they like to use S.
Why all the speculation when we already know what is coming?
#13
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:11 AM
Late4ttime, on 03 June 2012 - 02:15 AM, said:
TM: thanks for buying the R11- but now it's obsolete because after 6 mos- we now have the R11s- thanks for another $400, sorry for the $100 trade in value on your R11- dude it's been 6mos already- give me that $100 R11s and you'll only owe $300 for the new and improved R11xdswl guaranteed to be the longest straightest driver we've ever made! Well at least for 6 mos, until the new R11rdtfds comes out through a new partnership with 7-11, the shaft comes filled with a slurpee of your choice!
AND that doesn't include the RBZ line or the Dicks exclusive! I would think that their customer base would eventually get tired of it.
Late-
Great rant. Really original thinking! You obviously don't care for their business model or their clubs. Why not just move on? I find it so amusing that success breeds such contempt. I recently just picked up a superfast 2.0 TP and it's the only TM club in my Bag right now so I am no brand loyalist. I just find these criticisms to be so short sighted. Why bother opening the thread if an R11X is something you have no interest in? BTW, per the PGA value guide. The trade in value of Ping G20 is 127.XX and the R11TP, released the same year, is 113.XX
Edited by KYMAR, 03 June 2012 - 11:12 AM.
#14
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:29 AM
KYMAR, on 03 June 2012 - 11:11 AM, said:
Late4ttime, on 03 June 2012 - 02:15 AM, said:
TM: thanks for buying the R11- but now it's obsolete because after 6 mos- we now have the R11s- thanks for another $400, sorry for the $100 trade in value on your R11- dude it's been 6mos already- give me that $100 R11s and you'll only owe $300 for the new and improved R11xdswl guaranteed to be the longest straightest driver we've ever made! Well at least for 6 mos, until the new R11rdtfds comes out through a new partnership with 7-11, the shaft comes filled with a slurpee of your choice!
AND that doesn't include the RBZ line or the Dicks exclusive! I would think that their customer base would eventually get tired of it.
Late-
Great rant. Really original thinking! You obviously don't care for their business model or their clubs. Why not just move on? I find it so amusing that success breeds such contempt. I recently just picked up a superfast 2.0 TP and it's the only TM club in my Bag right now so I am no brand loyalist. I just find these criticisms to be so short sighted. Why bother opening the thread if an R11X is something you have no interest in? BTW, per the PGA value guide. The trade in value of Ping G20 is 127.XX and the R11TP, released the same year, is 113.XX
#16
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:42 AM
simple36, on 03 June 2012 - 11:29 AM, said:
KYMAR, on 03 June 2012 - 11:11 AM, said:
Late4ttime, on 03 June 2012 - 02:15 AM, said:
TM: thanks for buying the R11- but now it's obsolete because after 6 mos- we now have the R11s- thanks for another $400, sorry for the $100 trade in value on your R11- dude it's been 6mos already- give me that $100 R11s and you'll only owe $300 for the new and improved R11xdswl guaranteed to be the longest straightest driver we've ever made! Well at least for 6 mos, until the new R11rdtfds comes out through a new partnership with 7-11, the shaft comes filled with a slurpee of your choice!
AND that doesn't include the RBZ line or the Dicks exclusive! I would think that their customer base would eventually get tired of it.
Late-
Great rant. Really original thinking! You obviously don't care for their business model or their clubs. Why not just move on? I find it so amusing that success breeds such contempt. I recently just picked up a superfast 2.0 TP and it's the only TM club in my Bag right now so I am no brand loyalist. I just find these criticisms to be so short sighted. Why bother opening the thread if an R11X is something you have no interest in? BTW, per the PGA value guide. The trade in value of Ping G20 is 127.XX and the R11TP, released the same year, is 113.XX
So wait, a 2 year product cycle for you is what determines a "quality product"? Explain that to me please. ever hit an I15 slightly off center? Talk about unforgiving junk. How does frequency of product release take away from the quality of the clubs in some inherent way? That's just a ridiculous suggestion and it exposes your bias. I have only experienced the SF 2.0 TP i have now but you are the first person i have seen refer to any of that line of drivers as terrible. This thing kicked out both my FT-9 tour and my 9015D. Straight, piercing drives that go forever.
#17
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:56 AM
#18
Posted 03 June 2012 - 12:11 PM
#19
Posted 03 June 2012 - 12:12 PM
Myherobobhope, on 03 June 2012 - 07:53 AM, said:
If they didn't make competitive* equipment, people wouldn't buy it.
If people didn't buy their constant releases, they would not continue to do it.
*Sometimes competitive is more about price than design... I'm willing to be some people LOVE the Burner 3... it's not designed for gearheads, it's designed for people who shop for golf equipment at Dicks.
Their marketing annoys me, but I just don't buy their products. I've tried most of their stuff out curiosity, but was not enamored with any of it.
Oh well.
I have not heard of the R11x, but it seems like a logical name for their newest offering... I don't think they are done with the R11 name as R12 sounds weird to me, and R13 probably won't ever happen.
Well I am not saying anything more that this. Refer back to this thread when it comes out. The R13 is the new driver that is coming out, and will be offered in white and matte black. I have already seen it, and we will just leave it at that, no other details.
TMAG has them coming out to match the release years.
R7 = 2007
R9 = 2009
R11 = 2011
R13 = 2013
#20
Posted 03 June 2012 - 12:15 PM

#21
Posted 03 June 2012 - 12:20 PM
If you have insider knowledge, it's probably right... unless it isn't.
I think TM has positioned itself to get more market share by having unique driver models across the board... they have "something for everyone" which allows them to sell lots of each, which allows them economy of scale, which increases their profit margins, which allows them to pay more golfers, which increases their sales... The multiple products are part of their market strategy, and it's clearly been effective for them.
#22
Posted 03 June 2012 - 12:25 PM
simple36, on 03 June 2012 - 11:56 AM, said:
Do you really feel you have enough insight to know that how long each one of these companies takes to design a club head? Do you really think it takes 2 years? These claims are nonsense and aren't even the reasons Ping or Titleist would give you for their business model and product release schedule. Plus, most OEM's are working on designs now that are slated for release years into the future. And when referring to TM and the clubs they release, keep in mind that those new clubs are directed at a certain market segments. I LOVE the choices they give the consumer. You seem to HATE that the consumer plays them at such an alarming rate. If the product sucked, was cheaply made, or didn't perform then it wouldn't matter if they released a new driver every other Friday. The fact is, most of the drivers being produced by the OEM's today are made from quality designs, quality materials and are backed by quality customer service. the idea that one company is inferior because they offer MORE choices and sell MORE than the others is rooted in envy IMO
#23
Posted 03 June 2012 - 12:37 PM
simple36, on 03 June 2012 - 11:56 AM, said:
Well if you want to look at it another way TaylorMade hits on a Higher Ratio of drivers than Ping or Titleist does. The Titleist 907 was ehhh same with the 909. The i15 was awful (if you miss the sweetspot).
I am all for the choices that TM allows. Have you ever been fit into their drivers? They work for some but not others just like every driver on the planet. The Ping G20 just does not work for me it does not make it a bad driver it just does not fit me.
#24
Posted 03 June 2012 - 12:37 PM
UGotHustled, on 03 June 2012 - 12:12 PM, said:
Myherobobhope, on 03 June 2012 - 07:53 AM, said:
If they didn't make competitive* equipment, people wouldn't buy it.
If people didn't buy their constant releases, they would not continue to do it.
*Sometimes competitive is more about price than design... I'm willing to be some people LOVE the Burner 3... it's not designed for gearheads, it's designed for people who shop for golf equipment at Dicks.
Their marketing annoys me, but I just don't buy their products. I've tried most of their stuff out curiosity, but was not enamored with any of it.
Oh well.
I have not heard of the R11x, but it seems like a logical name for their newest offering... I don't think they are done with the R11 name as R12 sounds weird to me, and R13 probably won't ever happen.
Well I am not saying anything more that this. Refer back to this thread when it comes out. The R13 is the new driver that is coming out, and will be offered in white and matte black. I have already seen it, and we will just leave it at that, no other details.
TMAG has them coming out to match the release years.
R7 = 2007
R9 = 2009
R11 = 2011
R13 = 2013
So cruel man, so cruel...
#25
Posted 03 June 2012 - 01:02 PM

#26
Posted 03 June 2012 - 01:26 PM
KYMAR, on 03 June 2012 - 11:11 AM, said:
Late4ttime, on 03 June 2012 - 02:15 AM, said:
TM: thanks for buying the R11- but now it's obsolete because after 6 mos- we now have the R11s- thanks for another $400, sorry for the $100 trade in value on your R11- dude it's been 6mos already- give me that $100 R11s and you'll only owe $300 for the new and improved R11xdswl guaranteed to be the longest straightest driver we've ever made! Well at least for 6 mos, until the new R11rdtfds comes out through a new partnership with 7-11, the shaft comes filled with a slurpee of your choice!
AND that doesn't include the RBZ line or the Dicks exclusive! I would think that their customer base would eventually get tired of it.
Late-
Great rant. Really original thinking! You obviously don't care for their business model or their clubs. Why not just move on? I find it so amusing that success breeds such contempt. I recently just picked up a superfast 2.0 TP and it's the only TM club in my Bag right now so I am no brand loyalist. I just find these criticisms to be so short sighted. Why bother opening the thread if an R11X is something you have no interest in? BTW, per the PGA value guide. The trade in value of Ping G20 is 127.XX and the R11TP, released the same year, is 113.XX
Who peed in your Cheerios? I thought the white heads was a great marketing strategy- everyone knows that's a TM product when they see it.
I posted in this thread because I can, I have an opinion and I wanted to share it- that's what forums are for.
You are right that I could careless about TM equipment- but I'm in the industry so I read about new products.
It's my opinion that if they continue to dilute their offerings to their customer base by releasing a new and improved every 5 minutes, eventually it will end and their fan base won't buy their latest and greatest. But as of right now- the buying public is eager to throw down 400 bones for a new driver every 6 months- so good for TM.
Late
#27
Posted 03 June 2012 - 01:41 PM
bigmoneyp, on 02 June 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
I am not sure the Burner 3.0 is a terrible driver. Are you sure? If what you are looking for is a long, straight, non-adjustable driver this might be a great one. It is just that I like all the adjustments. The ability to easily switch shafts. That is why I didn't put the Burner or the Burner 2.0 in the bag. The RBZ was a different beast. I could switch shafts and really had to decide which one I really had the most confidence in. From my results yesterday, I should have picked the RBZ.
Edited by 2659edward, 03 June 2012 - 01:43 PM.
#28
Posted 03 June 2012 - 03:51 PM
UGotHustled, on 03 June 2012 - 01:02 PM, said:
Thanks for the early info. Sounds like it is going to be an expensive sucker from what you have described. I'm sure TM will have another hit like always.
#29
Posted 03 June 2012 - 05:19 PM
Late4ttime, on 03 June 2012 - 02:15 AM, said:
TM: thanks for buying the R11- but now it's obsolete because after 6 mos- we now have the R11s- thanks for another $400, sorry for the $100 trade in value on your R11- dude it's been 6mos already- give me that $100 R11s and you'll only owe $300 for the new and improved R11xdswl guaranteed to be the longest straightest driver we've ever made! Well at least for 6 mos, until the new R11rdtfds comes out through a new partnership with 7-11, the shaft comes filled with a slurpee of your choice!
AND that doesn't include the RBZ line or the Dicks exclusive! I would think that their customer base would eventually get tired of it.
Late-
who said you need to keep buying a new driver? it's not like the technology is obsolete, it's just a variation.











