
Thief Alert - cstone72
#1
Posted 01 June 2012 - 08:13 PM

#6
Posted 01 June 2012 - 10:03 PM
raddawg, on 01 June 2012 - 08:13 PM, said:
cstone72, on 01 June 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:
#13
Posted 01 June 2012 - 10:11 PM
#21
Posted 01 June 2012 - 10:23 PM
Medic, on 01 June 2012 - 10:17 PM, said:
Someone said this thread needs to be locked up - I am inclined to agree. I believe "innocent until proven...." applies gents.
Why should it be locked already? There have been people with a heck of alot more feedback that he has and they went rogue. I'm not siding with either party I just think we shouldn't ASSUME that either party is innocent or guilty until we hear both sides
#23
Posted 01 June 2012 - 10:40 PM
Stinger82, on 01 June 2012 - 10:23 PM, said:
Why should it be locked already? There have been people with a heck of alot more feedback that he has and they went rogue. I'm not siding with either party I just think we shouldn't ASSUME that either party is innocent or guilty until we hear both sides
Points well taken Stinger. Not assuming anything myself here but there are a lot of people who read one side of the story, believe it word for word, and are ready to hang someone. There is definitely more to this mess than any of us who were not involved really know. You are right in that the thread should not be locked until both sides have been able to clear the air a little, tell their sides if they choose, and hopefully work things out.
#27
Posted 02 June 2012 - 02:29 AM
raddawg, on 01 June 2012 - 08:13 PM, said:
^raddawg's side of the story
cstone72, on 01 June 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:
^cstone72's side of the story
Somethings lacking here......
Not taking sides, just saying....




This topic is locked










