
Ask Thrillhouse!
#62
Posted 06 May 2012 - 05:00 PM
MtlJeff, on 06 May 2012 - 04:38 PM, said:
Thrillhouse, on 06 May 2012 - 04:32 PM, said:
MtlJeff, on 06 May 2012 - 04:18 PM, said:
so who you going with here?
Like, without the consequences of the sequels? Because I really want to be Gordon Bombay at the end of the the first Mightly Ducks movie when he is going away to work back towards the NHL which will surely happen because he has now finally merged the pressure of Coach Reilly telling him he could have been one of the greats with the support of Hans telling him that he really loved to play. Plus Charlie's mom is SMOKIN and it is implied that that relationship will continue.
The problem is that at the beginning of the second movie coach Bombay blows out his knee in a minor league game and his career is over, so if I have to blow my knee out before I get back to the NHL and things don't work out with Charlie's mom then I have to pick another movie because I don't want that.
since you would become him, yes any sequels after the movie you're referring are not in play.
My answer is Nicholas Cage at the end of National Treasure. He's a multi millionaire, has a smoking hot Diane Kruger as his girlfriend (who is also a brainiac history buff in that movie, i mean hot and smart?), plus he's famous for making one of the most significant discoveries of modern times. Which means he's famous with smart people, and not idiots.
I dare someone to beat Nicholas Cage at the end of that movie!
haha, Mighty Ducks....classic. BTW who steals a kid mid-season from his current team. a KID...not cool Bombay. You shoulda left the star player where he was. You don't win like that
Billy Madison.
I win. You lose.
#64
Posted 06 May 2012 - 05:07 PM
driverwedge, on 06 May 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
The one from Rocky IV is flat out annoying. "happy birthday paulie - happy birthday paulie - happy birthday paulie", thats it? what the **** is that? You're the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world and this is what you get me? Hey Balboa, how bout a freakin Lexus?
So yeah, im going with the robot from revenge of the nerds, but who I really want to pal around with is sonny from irobot.
#67
Posted 06 May 2012 - 05:15 PM
Thrillhouse, on 06 May 2012 - 05:07 PM, said:
driverwedge, on 06 May 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
The one from Rocky IV is flat out annoying. "happy birthday paulie - happy birthday paulie - happy birthday paulie", thats it? what the **** is that? You're the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world and this is what you get me? Hey Balboa, how bout a freakin Lexus?
So yeah, im going with the robot from revenge of the nerds, but who I really want to pal around with is sonny from irobot.
#69
Posted 06 May 2012 - 05:47 PM
#71
Posted 06 May 2012 - 07:00 PM
Thrillhouse, on 06 May 2012 - 06:57 PM, said:
Myherobobhope, on 06 May 2012 - 05:46 PM, said:
Pepsi, its not even remotely comparable to Coke in any way shape or form yet for some reason they are direct competitors. Coke might as well be competing with RC cola, or industrial sludge.
Strangely enough the most underrated thing ever is crystal Pepsi.
Ha. That's an exceptional answer.
Diet Pepsi especially is the worst stuff in the world.
I had Crystal Pepsi once... it was a summer in Texas... I was 12?
Good times.
#72
Posted 06 May 2012 - 07:02 PM
heggy, on 06 May 2012 - 05:47 PM, said:
Is this even a contest? The answer is Statler and Waldorf. The answer to any question which asks which is better, a muppets character (or characters) and anything else is the muppets character. The muppets are awesome, they were the best part of my childhood, everything else in life has gone downhill since.
#73
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:22 PM
Thrillhouse, on 06 May 2012 - 07:02 PM, said:
heggy, on 06 May 2012 - 05:47 PM, said:
Is this even a contest? The answer is Statler and Waldorf. The answer to any question which asks which is better, a muppets character (or characters) and anything else is the muppets character. The muppets are awesome, they were the best part of my childhood, everything else in life has gone downhill since.
Are we like brothers now?
#74
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:36 PM
Thrillhouse, on 06 May 2012 - 06:57 PM, said:
Myherobobhope, on 06 May 2012 - 05:46 PM, said:
Pepsi, its not even remotely comparable to Coke in any way shape or form yet for some reason they are direct competitors. Coke might as well be competing with RC cola, or industrial sludge.
Strangely enough the most underrated thing ever is crystal Pepsi.
i prefer coke to pepsi. But MUCH prefer diet pepsi to diet coke. Diet coke just tastes like watered down coke. Diet pepsi has it's own unique taste
A good question is whether or not "new coke" was brilliant or idiotic. You could make the case for either. It was a massive failure, but made people love original coke again
#76
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:46 PM
MtlJeff, on 06 May 2012 - 08:36 PM, said:
i prefer coke to pepsi. But MUCH prefer diet pepsi to diet coke. Diet coke just tastes like watered down coke. Diet pepsi has it's own unique taste
A good question is whether or not "new coke" was brilliant or idiotic. You could make the case for either. It was a massive failure, but made people love original coke again
New coke was idiotic, you don't mess with perfection like that, anyhoo here is my rundown of the best diet pops (or "sodas")
1. diet orange crush
2. diet dr pepper
3. diet a and w root beer
4. diet pepsi (you got that one right, diet pepsi is good stuff)
5. diet coke
6. coke zero
7. diet mr pibb
#77
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:49 PM
MtlJeff, on 06 May 2012 - 08:42 PM, said:
LOL, I know, its pretty fun. A lot of people have said to me that they "wonder whats going on in my head", now you sorta get to see.
#79
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:56 PM
#81
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:59 PM
Nice call on the diet soda rankings by the way. Diet Dr Pepper is the best thing ever.
#83
Posted 06 May 2012 - 09:22 PM
MtlJeff, on 06 May 2012 - 08:51 PM, said:
You know what's awesome is that Stewart's lime soda and orange crush. There's a bakery near my place that has that stuff and i always have it with sandwiches
LOL, my deli has that stuff too, its AWESOME! I love orange pop, nothing like a reuban and an orange pop I tell ya.
Avenue Deli in Marda Loop in Calgary if anyone cares, that place is awesome!
#86
Posted 06 May 2012 - 09:42 PM
Thrillhouse, on 05 May 2012 - 11:53 PM, said:
poizster, on 05 May 2012 - 11:33 PM, said:
This has actually been addressed in an earlier post (seriously!)
Im Julian, MTLJeff is Ricky, and isaacbm is bubbles.
And there are two things that you need to know about J to the R-O-C. I spin more rhymes than a lazy susan, and i'm innocent until my guilt is proven. PEACE!
#87
Posted 06 May 2012 - 10:14 PM
#88
Posted 06 May 2012 - 10:24 PM
threejack, on 06 May 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:
That is an interesting question, and im glad we have the chance to explore it.
I guess the first question is are these stray dogs or dogs with owners who are "out"? Because if they have owners it is likely that they are dogs who are allowed to come and go as they please, so in this scenario it is the owner of the animal who "let the dogs out". If the dog is stray then the situation gets much more complicated.
Ecologists find it important at times to distinguish among urban free-ranging dogs, rural free-ranging dogs, and feral or wild dogs. Rural free-ranging dogs that rarely if ever leave a settlement are called village dogs. They are considered neither wild nor feral, and have less impact on the surrounding ecosystem than other rural free-ranging dogs. They pose a different set of environmental pressures than feral or wild dogs, or even free-ranging farm dogs. The term 'pariah dog' has been used inconsistently, but is sometimes synonymous with 'free-ranging dog'. Originally referring to the landrace of free-ranging dogs native to India and other Asian countries, it later came to be used for free-ranging dogs in general. Experts in the area of free-ranging dog control sometimes distinguish between stray dogs and feral dogs. The former is used to refer to lost and abandoned pets or others that had been socialized to humans before taking to the free-ranging life, and the latter to those who have lived all their lives apart from people. This distinction is important to them because stray dogs can be relatively easily taken into captivity, whereas feral dogs are more fearful and difficult to keep as pets, and so are more often captured, spayed or neutered, and released back into in the parks, vacant lots, and other hiding places on the margins of human society where they are most commonly found. The term 'wild dog' may refer to wild and feral domestic dogs; to any of several wild canine species commonly called 'dogs' or 'wild dogs' but which are not true dogs; or even, in the broadest sense, to any wild canid - any member of the dog family of carnivores, the Canidae; including wolves, jackals, coyotes, foxes, and many more which are commonly contrasted with 'dogs' in other contexts. [6] It is also used as a common name for several specific canine species which are not true dogs. In scientific literature, free-ranging dogs such as Australian dingoes are considered to be 'wild animals' rather than 'feral' to the extent to which they are not 'commensal': dependent on handouts and cast-offs from humans; and instead hunt and scavenge in the wild. Ecologically, wild dogs are integrated into the ecosystem, often as top predators. Evolutionarily, wild dogs are more profoundly changed by many generations apart from people. Both wild dogs and adult feral dogs are less easily kept as pets than free-ranging or captive dogs that have been socialized to humans. Unlike feral dogs, however, wild dogs tend to maintain their wild nature even when taken in as puppies.
Long story short, either their owners let the dogs out, or society let the dogs out.
#89
Posted 06 May 2012 - 10:32 PM
#90
Posted 06 May 2012 - 10:33 PM












