Jump to content

Welcome, Guest. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with existing members and access to certain forums. Join our community today and enter into a chance to win a free regular giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

The 2012 Masters champion could have easily been a different lefty


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 zakkozuchowski

zakkozuchowski
  • ClubWRX Media Staffer
  • 689 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 59676
  • Joined: 07/05/2008

Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:54 PM

6427997.bin.jpeg

The 2012 Masters champion could have easily been a different lefty

By Zak Kozuchowski

GolfWRX Managing Editor

It's said that a player needs a break to win a major championship. In Phil Mickelson's case at the 2012 Masters, it took two bad breaks for him not to win.

Mickelson did something neither Bubba Watson nor Louis Ooosthuizen did during the 72 holes of this year's Masters tournament. He made a triple bogey. Actually, he made two, and he still only finished two shots out of the playoff and a possible fourth Green Jacket.

Not to take anything away from Bubba, whose creativity allowed him to make 19 birdies at Augusta National Golf Club without carding anything worse than a bogey. But Mickelson was the original Bubba, or the "Second Seve," depending on your generation.

Pure Mickelson, to me, was the third shot Lefty played on No. 15 in Round 3 of the tournament. Mickelson bombed a drive down the middle of the par-5 15th, but his second shot bounced over the green, setting up one of the most delicate chip shots on the course. From a tight lie with water behind and little green to work with, Mickelson made a full slash with his wide-opened 64-degree wedge, which seemed like an impossible amount of swing speed for such a short shot. A nod to the gods? No, this shot went high enough to touch them. And when the ball came down, it landed a few feet from the cup and set up a short birdie putt that Mickelson converted in route to his third-round 66.

But with Mickelson, there are most always high highs and low lows. In Round 1, he found disaster at No. 10, a 495-yard par 4, where he hit his tee shot miles left into the trees. Despite the huge gallery that he always draws, no one was able to find his ball. If they had, Mickelson could have likely found a way to salvage at least bogey or double-bogey. But a little bad luck sent him back to the tee and resulted in a triple-bogey seven.

On Sunday, Mickelson had three chances to make birdie putts on the first three holes, but was unable to convert any of them. The leaderboard had changed dramatically in that short time. Oosthuizen holed out for double eagle on No. 2, the first deuce recorded on No. 2 in Masters history, vaulting him to the top of the leader board at 10-under. Third-round leader Peter Hanson got off to a sluggish start, falling to 7-under after three holes, three shots back of Oosthuizen and one back of Mickelson.

Mickelson said that his strategy as he approached No. 4, a 240-yard par 4, was to hit a 4 iron either on the left edge of the green, in the left bunker or even on the hill to the left of the bunker. From there, he could easily get up and down for par, he said. But his shot struck the metal railing of the grand stands to the left of the green and bounded into the trees. A shot in the grand stands would have been fine -- he would have gotten a free drop. A shot that landed just short in the crowd would have been fine as well. With his short game, Lefty would have probably made at worst a bogey, probably a par. But's that's not what happened.

Mickelson was in a tough spot. His ball was buried deep enough that he was forced to lift his ball to identify it. Once he was sure it was his, had had to choose between three unpleasant options.

No. 1 -- Play the shot right handed, and try to chop his ball a few yards forward into an unobstructed area where he could pitch over the greenside bunker and onto the green.

No. 2 -- Take an unplayable lie, which he said did still not allow him to make a backswing.

No. 3 -- Go back to the tee and try again (he would be hitting his third shot).

Mickelson, as he almost always does, went with the riskier shot, No. 1. He flipped his lefty club upside down and chopped at his Callaway right handed. The ball moved a foot or so forward -- not much improvement. He was forced to play a similar shot, again right handed, one that almost hit him in the left leg as it scampered a few yards toward the green. Mickelson, now playing his fourth shot from tight, trampled down grass, attempted his signature super flop, but was not as successful as he was the previous round. He hit the shot slightly fat, which put him in the greenside bunker lying four. He nearly holed that shot, setting up a tiny putt for triple-bogey six.

A conservative estimate is that Mickelson's two bad breaks cost him three shots -- one shot in Round 1 where he lost a ball, two shots in Round 4 where he hit the grand stands. In reality, however, the bad breaks probably cost him more. But the conservative estimate of three shots still would have given him his fourth Green Jacket.

Should Mickelson have gone back to the tee on No. 4 in the fourth round, which should have resulted in no worse than a double-bogey on the hole? Probably. But that's not Mickelson's style. Fans think of Lefty as a swashbuckler -- a gambler who sometimes doesn't know when to fold 'em. But like his flop shot in Round 3 on No. 15, Mickelson pulls off shots other players can't, and more importantly, he prepares as thoroughly as anyone to help his imagination become reality.

A good example of Mickelson's meticulous nature is an iron shaft switch he made during the final round of the WGC-Cadillac Championship. Since the mid 1990s, Mickelson had been using Project X shafts in his irons. But at Doral, he put a set of KBS shafts in his 4-PW. The change was helped by the relationship between Mickelson and Kim Braly, designer of KBS (Kim Braly shafts). Braly was lead designer of the Project X iron shaft as well, and the person that fit Mickelson for his iron shafts more than a decade ago. In 2008, Braly started KBS, and Mickelson briefly tried the company's KBS Tour shafts at that time. He liked the shafts in his long irons, but said his mid irons and short irons put too much spin on the ball, and opted to return to his Project X shafts.

Braly and his team worked hard to develop a lower-launching, lower-spinning product for Mickelson, which became the KBS Tour V2. The midsection of the stepped shafts is slightly wider in diameter than the KBS Tour shafts (about 0.1 inch), which accounts for the difference in performance.

What separates Mickelson from other players on Tour is the way Mickelson tests his irons. Lefty tests each club individually, where as a player like Ernie Els switched to a full set KBS shafts after hitting a few shots with his 6 iron. Mickelson's testing process resulted in him using the original KBS Tour shaft in his 3 and 4 iron (x-flex, 130 grams, tipped 1 inch), while using the KBS Tour V2 shafts in his 5-PW. But Mickelson's shafts weren't the only things to change -- the switch also forced him to change the lie angle on his irons. During testing, Mickelson noticed that his shots were flying more consistently, but slightly to his right at launch. Braly said that this was because the new and more stable shaft doesn't "droop" as much at impact, and he suggested that Mickelson have his clubs bent 1 degree flatter to account for the change.

"A lot of players would have seen the ball start a little off their target line and gone back to what they were comfortable with," Braly said. "But not Phil. He's very excited about the new shafts, and worked hard to get them right."

Braly and Mickelson still have some work to do according to Braly to get the 3 iron and 4 iron shafts perfect, and fit Lefty for KBS shafts in his 56-degree and 64-degree wedges.

Like the game of golf itself, equipment changes seem to be a never-ending quest for perfection for Mickelson. After all, he's the guy who switched equipment sponsors shortly before the 2004 Ryder Cup, played two drivers when he won the 2006 Masters and played the 2008 U.S. Open without a driver in the bag. He's not scared to try any club, and likewise, not scared of any shot.

This week Mickelson should have won his fourth Masters title, but for one reason or another, it wasn't meant to be. But one thing's for sure -- at 41, he's still trying to get better. And win or lose, he's always fun to watch.

You can follow Zak on Twitter @zakkoz.



#2 pga43

pga43

    GolfWRX.com's Tour Photographer

  • ClubWRX Media Staffer
  • 4,164 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 123025
  • Joined: 02/25/2011
  • Location:Nashville, TN

Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:10 PM

Very nice article, Zak!
View Sig

#3 Sean2

Sean2

    Wait...what?

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 9,285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 29539
  • Joined: 05/23/2007
  • Location:South of Boston
  • Ebay ID:None

Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:20 PM

Thanks for posting. I wasn't aware how meticulous Phil was when it came to his shafts.
View Sig

#4 Vision54fan

Vision54fan
  • Advanced Members
  • 798 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 39015
  • Joined: 09/08/2007
  • Location:Marinette, WI

Posted 09 April 2012 - 07:44 PM

Gotta love Phil for being Phil!
View Sig

#5 The GreekGrind

The GreekGrind

    Invictus

  • Advanced Members
  • 799 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 4403
  • Joined: 08/04/2005

Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:39 PM

Zak you've written some great articles.  This one's my favorite.  And not just because it has Phil in it.   ;)

Really well done.   :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:

PS: Tell KB I love KBS shafts (just not for Lefty).  :D

Edited by The GreekGrind, 09 April 2012 - 11:42 PM.

View Sig

#6 Sing Golfer

Sing Golfer
  • Advanced Members
  • 368 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 126977
  • Joined: 04/18/2011
  • Location:Singapore & Australia

Posted 10 April 2012 - 04:08 AM

If Phil went back to the tee, he's playing three - and it's a very tough shot. However, let's say he hits the left edge of the green (best case scenario and roughly where he wanted it first time round). He 2 putts for a 5.

So really, his decision has cost him a shot.

Had he got it out first time - he may have got it up and down (although he didn't when playing his 4th) and made bogey.

At the end of the day - it was just a very unlucky break to hit the railing and wind up in the bamboo. 3 inches different with the tee ball and he is trying to get up and down for par - bogey at worst.

However, he did seem to rush it. Compare the time spent playing those against the time spent deciding on 5 or 6 iron into the 15th.  Quite a difference.

#7 DLiver

DLiver
  • Advanced Members
  • 1,570 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 55921
  • Joined: 05/16/2008

Posted 10 April 2012 - 05:29 AM

How do you tip a tapered shaft 1"?

#8 Dominator

Dominator
  • Members
  • 4 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 86284
  • Joined: 06/22/2009

Posted 10 April 2012 - 09:09 AM

Great article. Good depth and insight!
Well done

#9 webber

webber

    Webber

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,084 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 7667
  • Joined: 11/11/2005
  • Location:Danville, CA
  • Ebay ID:tywebber

Posted 10 April 2012 - 10:43 AM

View PostDLiver, on 10 April 2012 - 05:29 AM, said:

How do you tip a tapered shaft 1"?

You cut the tip 1"......ha ha.  If you cut 1/2" it will still fit in a .355 hosel fine.  Never tried trimming an inch off a taper shaft but if they did I assume they just bored out the heads a little bit or he is using .370 shafts (doubtful) with .370 reemed hosels.  Who knows except for KB and PM.
View Sig

#10 Jamboy72

Jamboy72
  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 3,197 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 51683
  • Joined: 03/18/2008

Posted 10 April 2012 - 11:02 AM

Great article...thanks for the insights!


#11 spitfisher

spitfisher
  • Advanced Members
  • 1,263 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 73111
  • Joined: 01/18/2009

Posted 10 April 2012 - 02:05 PM

Great article, thaks for writing and sharing it.

To go back to michelsons shot decisions, with so much control and statements that he made of where he wanted to land the ball, for an up and down. I watched the masters, saw where the  pin was, saw other players play that hole.  My question to Phil is " with that much accuracy of where you wanted to play your shot from, why didn't land it on the green and take your chances with a birds putt?  He himself said there were certain holes that par is fine and other ones where he would attack pins for birdies.

My conclusion based on what he said, is he hit a terrible shot left, and couldn't admit to anyone that he did so, instead he made some story up that that's where he was aiming.

Hey Phil we weren't born yesterday.
View Sig

#12 TheGeekGolfer

TheGeekGolfer
  • Advanced Members
  • 152 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 103159
  • Joined: 02/08/2010

Posted 11 April 2012 - 02:01 PM

Great info on the shafts and how much detail Phil goes into on his shafts for all his clubs.  

Regarding the above post that Phil "made up some story", I don't buy that.  Phil has always been very straight and forthcoming in his dealings with the press.  I'm sure he pushed it a little farther left than he wanted, but is was still within his 'zone' he was aiming for.

I also don't buy it that if he went back to the tee the 'worst' he would make is a 5.  It was almost impossible to get it anywhere close with that pin placement, so it would've been a good 2-putt to card a 5.  He was figuring he could probably salvage a 5 (at worst) out of the brush and had the possibility to make a 4.  Making a 4 going back to the tee was not possible, so he was taking his chances hoping to salvage a 4.

#13 DLiver

DLiver
  • Advanced Members
  • 1,570 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 55921
  • Joined: 05/16/2008

Posted 11 April 2012 - 05:27 PM

View PostTheGeekGolfer, on 11 April 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:

Great info on the shafts and how much detail Phil goes into on his shafts for all his clubs.  

Regarding the above post that Phil "made up some story", I don't buy that.  Phil has always been very straight and forthcoming in his dealings with the press.  I'm sure he pushed it a little farther left than he wanted, but is was still within his 'zone' he was aiming for.

I also don't buy it that if he went back to the tee the 'worst' he would make is a 5.  It was almost impossible to get it anywhere close with that pin placement, so it would've been a good 2-putt to card a 5.  He was figuring he could probably salvage a 5 (at worst) out of the brush and had the possibility to make a 4.  Making a 4 going back to the tee was not possible, so he was taking his chances hoping to salvage a 4.

I agree. 6 was a real possibility if he went back to the tee. He would be hitting three, and if he missed the green (70% chance) and didn't get up and down, that's a 6.

#14 playsted

playsted
  • Members
  • 17 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 163527
  • Joined: 02/15/2012

Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:28 PM

The bounce off the grand stand might of been a bad break I guess.  He hit that shot way left, going off the back left of the grand stands.  If the stands weren't there it would have been in the woods anyway.

The lost ball on #10 certainly wasn't a bad break.  I was standing on the tee box when he hit that and it was MILES left.  He then proceeded to knock another one badly.

Also, everyone gets bad breaks and good breaks on the course.  I'm sure Phil got his fair share of good kicks/breaks on the course.  You can play the "what if" game for everyone in the Masters...




GolfWRX Sponsors