larrybud, on 08 April 2012 - 08:32 PM, said:
The problem wasn't the tee shot, it was the next 3.
I can't believe he couldn't get in there and hit the ball 10 feet out left handed.
The announcing was horrendous, the caliber of Tirico/Strange when Van de Velde hit the rail and they failed to emphasize what ridiculous bad luck it was, virtually the worst possible place the ball could end up, returning to the other side of the burn. Today's break was not at that level but a comfortable second place. Even if it hits the rail, the odds of bouncing away from the hole and ending up without a swing, or place to drop with benefit, are extremely low. Baker-Finch was actually very good, by his standards. But Faldo needed some of the Johnny Miller theme from a couple of years ago, that if he caddied for Phil he'd use an electrified collar.
Phil acts as if he's showing off with the club turned upside down. Invariably he decides too quickly and the shot doesn't pay dividends. I saw that in person in the right bushes on #12 at Doral a few years ago, and Phil did it in a subsequent event when two balls were dislodged.
The last time we saw a quick opposite way choice in a major it turned into Dustin Johnson's second hole disaster at Pebble Beach.
Phil spent very little time looking at his lefty options. Not at all on the third shot. The way it worked out it was like losing with your backup quarterback.
I felt sick for him because I doubt we'll see his full game at that level again in a major. There were no missed shorties to speak of. He drove the ball beautifully, particularly on the scoring holes. Swing timing looked great. How often can you expect to birdie 18 three times?
I'm not big on overlooking how seldom players win majors in their 40s. This was a huge missed opportunity. From the tentative birdie putt on the first hole, and relatively short birdie misses on 2 and 3, you could sense it wouldn't be Phil's day on the greens.