
Just something I was wondering about while teaching my neighbor how to play golf:
If you're counting every putt during a round, and assuming you are a decent putter (no 3 putts, 2nd putt to gimmie distance), 36 putts means you made none. But did you really take 36 putts? You made 18 attempts to hole a putt and 18 tap-ins you could have done with a wedge.
Now let's assume you have a good short game and a good iron player so you hit 14 GIR and chip the other 4 to gimmie distance. That means you really only putted 14 times.
That's the number of times you would use the driver on a typical course. The difference being the putter covered about 140 yards (assuming average putt is about 30 feet) while the drivers covered 3,500 yards (250 yard average drive). Add to that the danger of missing a putt is a tap-in while missing a driver could mean multiple strokes (or none at all), could it be argued that the driver, and not the putter, is the most important club in the bag?
If you're counting every putt during a round, and assuming you are a decent putter (no 3 putts, 2nd putt to gimmie distance), 36 putts means you made none. But did you really take 36 putts? You made 18 attempts to hole a putt and 18 tap-ins you could have done with a wedge.
Now let's assume you have a good short game and a good iron player so you hit 14 GIR and chip the other 4 to gimmie distance. That means you really only putted 14 times.
That's the number of times you would use the driver on a typical course. The difference being the putter covered about 140 yards (assuming average putt is about 30 feet) while the drivers covered 3,500 yards (250 yard average drive). Add to that the danger of missing a putt is a tap-in while missing a driver could mean multiple strokes (or none at all), could it be argued that the driver, and not the putter, is the most important club in the bag?












