
Bridgestone J40 445 v. J38 Driver 40
#1
Posted 28 February 2012 - 06:26 PM

#2
Posted 28 February 2012 - 06:43 PM
The J40 445 has been a solid performer thus far (with what little I've played it over the winter).
#3
Posted 28 February 2012 - 06:49 PM
Skaffa77, on 28 February 2012 - 06:43 PM, said:
The J40 445 has been a solid performer thus far (with what little I've played it over the winter).
Thanks, that's what I wanted to find out. I just could not get along with the J38 and I still use my J33 460 as a back-up to my R9 but I bought a J40 445 on Ebay and am curious to find out.
#4
Posted 28 February 2012 - 08:16 PM
#5
Posted 29 February 2012 - 01:22 PM

#6
Posted 01 March 2012 - 06:02 PM
theothertwo, on 28 February 2012 - 06:49 PM, said:
Skaffa77, on 28 February 2012 - 06:43 PM, said:
The J40 445 has been a solid performer thus far (with what little I've played it over the winter).
Thanks, that's what I wanted to find out. I just could not get along with the J38 and I still use my J33 460 as a back-up to my R9 but I bought a J40 445 on Ebay and am curious to find out.
I loved my J33r 460. The J38 driver was a bit of a disappointment for me although the J38 fw were decent. I had my J38 driver shafted with a Motore VC 7.1. It just never agreed with me...I've since pulled the shaft and had it installed in a 909D2...and it is showing great promise.
The J40 445 (w/Project X) has been pretty good thus far...mid launch that flattens out pretty nicely and hits the ground with some role. I've only had limited opportunities to play it, but the experience has been pretty positive. I also own the 3 wood and have liked it thus far.
Edited by Skaffa77, 01 March 2012 - 06:03 PM.











