Jump to content

Welcome, Guest. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with existing members and access to certain forums. Join our community today and enter into a chance to win a free regular giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

TEE xcg5 4 wd vs. RBZ 17* fw


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 collingsom1a

collingsom1a

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 662 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13616
  • Joined: 03/22/2006
  • Location:Omaha, NE
  • Handicap:6
  • Ebay ID:c10sbg
GolfWRX Likes : 18

Posted 04 February 2012 - 05:07 PM

I have read so much about the RBZ.  Didn't know if it was hype or not - all the added distance, etc.

I custom ordered the TTE Tour AD shaft at the same shaft length as the RBZ 3 wood with 17* loft.  Stock RBZ shaft.  Both Reg flex.

Spent lots of time  on the course (my favorite par 5 - perfectly flat hole )hitting balls and comparing both clubs' distance.  I was hitting E6 Bridgestone balls with both - the RBZ with yellows, the TEE with orange balls.

I hit about 60 balls with each, in batches of 15.

I am 63, 6 handicap, usually hit a 4 wood off the fairway about 200 - 215 yds.

I hit the RBZ first.  My initial impression was good - nice, high balls flight - higher than I normally hit it.  Very solid feel - but allot louder than I am used to, kind of a higher pitch to it - annoying.  I then hit the TTE.  It definitely has a lighter feel, swings like butter.  Great solid soulid and feel.  Trajectory with the TTE xcg5 is about the same as RBZ but a bit more of a rainbow like trajectory,  did not balloon as much as the RBZ.

I can never see balls land, and so I had no idea which one I hit further, but my guess was that the RBZ was longer.  When I drove up to the balls, I was surprised to find that there were no yellow balls (RBZ) longer than the TTE - there were 4 or 5 orange balls (TTE) past the Yellow balls (RBZ).  One ball was about 12 yds longer......the rest about 2-3 yds.

I continued to hit batches of 15 balls each until In hit 60 balls with each club.

The results with the remaining balls were more or less the same pattern as the first batch (only in the 1st batch did I have a ball way, way, way out in front of the others).  Only twice did I have a yellow ball past an orange ball, an only at a 1 or 2 yard difference.

My general observations are that I hit them both about the same distance with a tiny edge to the TTE.

I am going to bag the TTE because: 1. it feels better.  2.  I don't like white headed woods. 3.  I was able to swing the TTE was allot less effort , giving me as good or better results over the RBZ..  I am really high on the TTE 42g Tour AD  shaft.

I also plan to cut the TEE 4 wood back down to its normal length over 43", not 43.5".........you don't need the extra shaft length.  FW wood are about accuracy not always about length.  TEE are plenty long, long enough for the average guy.  

So much for the RBZ hype!!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited by collingsom1a, 05 February 2012 - 07:58 PM.

Hey man, I'm the dude

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with existing members and access to certain forums. Join our community today and enter into a chance to win a free regular giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

#2 Qegurezi

Qegurezi

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,200 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 29176
  • Joined: 05/19/2007
GolfWRX Likes : 95

Posted 04 February 2012 - 08:13 PM

Sounds like the RBZ spun too much (obviously if it was ballooning).The Tour would arrest this. I'm skipping the standard and just going to try the Tour model.

#3 Hattori Hanzo

Hattori Hanzo

    Tour Winner

  • Jr. Boomers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 768 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 148219
  • Joined: 11/23/2011
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA
GolfWRX Likes : 86

Posted 04 February 2012 - 08:20 PM

View PostQegurezi, on 04 February 2012 - 08:13 PM, said:

Sounds like the RBZ spun too much (obviously if it was ballooning).The Tour would arrest this. I'm skipping the standard and just going to try the Tour model.

Trying the Tour model might fix this, or maybe try a different shaft. I haven't hit the RBZ, but in the past, I've found a lot of TMs stock shafts to spin WAY too much.
Cleveland Classic 290 9* Tour AD-DI 6s
Tour Edge Exotics CB2 15* Tour AD-DI 7s
Adams Idea Pro 18* Aerotech Steelfiber
Mizuno MP-33 3-PW TTDG S300
Cleveland 588 Forged 56*, 64*
Never Compromise Sub 30 Type 40

#4 Sting'

Sting'

    Imagine there were no hypothetical situations.

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 639 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 115030
  • Joined: 09/17/2010
  • Location:USA
GolfWRX Likes : 13

Posted 04 February 2012 - 10:11 PM

I am not suprised the TEE is longer......they will be a hard club to beat in the DISTANCE department.

I love the XCG line, more forgiveness, but if you think that XCG5 is long, try hitting the CB line from TEE..........looooong........Posted Image


Anyways, excellent choice going with the XCG5......people  are ALWAYS shocked when they hit a tour edge fairway.......

Edited by Sting'ray, 04 February 2012 - 10:15 PM.


#5 dplevin

dplevin

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 525 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 113631
  • Joined: 08/27/2010
  • Location:MN
GolfWRX Likes : 74

Posted 04 February 2012 - 10:16 PM

First off, great review.  But from your experience with these, which was more "forgiving" (in terms of easier to hit straight)?


#6 collingsom1a

collingsom1a

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 662 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13616
  • Joined: 03/22/2006
  • Location:Omaha, NE
  • Handicap:6
  • Ebay ID:c10sbg
GolfWRX Likes : 18

Posted 05 February 2012 - 06:26 PM

View Postdplevin, on 04 February 2012 - 10:16 PM, said:

First off, great review.  But from your experience with these, which was more "forgiving" (in terms of easier to hit straight)?
About the same. The point of my post was to show that the RBZ's are long, just not the longest out there like all their ads would have you believe.

Edited by collingsom1a, 05 February 2012 - 07:54 PM.

Hey man, I'm the dude

#7 leo the lion

leo the lion

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 536 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 131659
  • Joined: 06/26/2011
  • Location:Denver, CO
GolfWRX Likes : 22

Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:16 PM

Yep, TEE's are still up there...............My XCG-V won't be replaced by an RBZ.............what's more the price of TEE's are amazing..........
TM R1 Super TP Black/Oban Kiyoshi 04
Adams XTD/Fubuki 3 Wood
Callaway Diablo Hybrid 2&3
Ping ISI Becu 4-PW
Odyssey Tank Cruiser #7
Odyssey Dual Force 52 & 56 Wedges

#8 Belt Sanders

Belt Sanders

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 106 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 92433
  • Joined: 08/21/2009
  • Location:Houston
  • Ebay ID:Liasheree4
GolfWRX Likes : 0

Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:23 PM

If you usually hit a 4 wood off the fairway about 200 - 215 yds, how far did you hit these 2?

#9 tbuford

tbuford

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 126 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 95734
  • Joined: 10/03/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 5

Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:23 PM

not a great comparison based upon shaft differences...also, the tour rbz head would be a little more in line for your testing....

#10 collingsom1a

collingsom1a

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 662 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13616
  • Joined: 03/22/2006
  • Location:Omaha, NE
  • Handicap:6
  • Ebay ID:c10sbg
GolfWRX Likes : 18

Posted 06 February 2012 - 09:27 PM

View PostBelt Sanders, on 05 February 2012 - 11:23 PM, said:

If you usually hit a 4 wood off the fairway about 200 - 215 yards, how far did you hit these 2?
I hit them both about 3 - 5 yds longer than I normally do.. That's an average.....some were shorter, some were longer.  Not the 17 yds like I have seen some ads say.  Thats ridiculous statement for an average player.  

I have seen about 5 people try the club, all without 17yds yds increase.  Most were about the same, maybe some were 3-5 yds longer.

Hey man, I'm the dude

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with existing members and access to certain forums. Join our community today and enter into a chance to win a free regular giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

#11 TJC

TJC

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 168 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 135196
  • Joined: 08/04/2011
  • Location:Colorado
  • Handicap:+0.5
GolfWRX Likes : 2

Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:04 AM

I haven't tried the rbz but im currently gaming the tee cb1 old school fairway woods and i don't see how anything could be longer than this except for maybe the tee cb2, and they are very accurate too, don't tend to balloon.
Taylormade SLDR GD AD-DI
Tmag SLDR 16.5 Speeder tour spec 6.2x
Taylormade SLDR 21 GD AD DI
Taylormade Rbladez/MB combo
Taylormade Tour Preferred 52, 56 ATV, 60
Taylormade Maranello Tour issue

#12 Stinger82

Stinger82

    Major Winner

  • BST Volunteer Mods
  • 3,057 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 82167
  • Joined: 05/06/2009
  • Handicap:11
GolfWRX Likes : 245

Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:13 AM

View Posttbuford, on 05 February 2012 - 11:23 PM, said:

not a great comparison based upon shaft differences...also, the tour rbz head would be a little more in line for your testing....

The tour head would be better up against the tee cb series...the regular rbz is exactly what you should compare the xcg line to, both are the higher spinning of their respective lines...

And op I found the same thing against my f11 and r11 3 woods when compared to the rbz...personally, I agree with you its hype. And I have no desire to play a 43.5" 3 wood, control over distance all day with fairway woods boys
Nike VRS 9.5* w/ GD Tour AD DI
Adams XTD super fairway 14.5 w/ ??
Adams Super Hybrid 17* w/ Oban Revenge
Titleist AP2 4-GW w/ dgs300
Odyssey Protype #7
Vokey TVD M 54* & Scratch DW 58*

#13 collingsom1a

collingsom1a

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 662 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13616
  • Joined: 03/22/2006
  • Location:Omaha, NE
  • Handicap:6
  • Ebay ID:c10sbg
GolfWRX Likes : 18

Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:51 AM

View PostTJC, on 08 February 2012 - 01:04 AM, said:

I haven't tried the rbz but im currently gaming the tee cb1 old school fairway woods and i don't see how anything could be longer than this except for maybe the tee cb2, and they are very accurate too, don't tend to balloon.
I good buddy of mine hits the CB2 and he tested it up against the RBZ 3 wood and hit his CB2 as far or slightly farther than the RBZ.  The ball speed was higher for him with the CB2.
Hey man, I'm the dude

#14 vix02

vix02

    Major Winner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,024 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 89110
  • Joined: 07/20/2009
  • Location:MB, Canada
GolfWRX Likes : 63

Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:55 AM

I'll be testing my stock CB4 4wood against the RBZ this Friday...

I'm a TM fan but I don't see any TM fairway beating TEE Fwy

I still don't understand why TEE clubs don't carry any resale value....they are bombers
TM SLDR 12* Speeder 661
TM SLDR 14* Speeder 757
PING Anser 17* SPX Silver 100
Titleist 712u 3, PING S55 4-PW PXi 6.5
Vokey TVD K 54, 60 TI S400
Odyssey MXM Versa #7 35''

#15 SHIVAN

SHIVAN

    Major Winner

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 2,788 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 113964
  • Joined: 08/30/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 349

Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:00 AM

Aren't the CB2, CB3, XCG5 and CB4 all .83 COR?  If so, this comes as no surprise.


#16 JJK947

JJK947

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,162 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 36028
  • Joined: 07/31/2007
  • Location:Connecticut, Virginia Tech
GolfWRX Likes : 117

Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:01 AM

View Postcollingsom1a, on 13 February 2012 - 10:51 AM, said:

View PostTJC, on 08 February 2012 - 01:04 AM, said:

I haven't tried the rbz but im currently gaming the tee cb1 old school fairway woods and i don't see how anything could be longer than this except for maybe the tee cb2, and they are very accurate too, don't tend to balloon.
I good buddy of mine hits the CB2 and he tested it up against the RBZ 3 wood and hit his CB2 as far or slightly farther than the RBZ.  The ball speed was higher for him with the CB2.

Now that's what I like to hear!  

I am not surprised that someone would gain 17 yards over previous taylormade product, the last couple FW's they have put out have been average ball speed and spinny.  Take some spin off, add .5" in length, and make the face closer to what other companies have been doing for years and that is 10-15 yards easy over r9/r11.  Simple physics in combination with the COR limit says that the RBZ can't be any longer than the TEE and other's who have come close to the COR limit.
Cobra Bio Cell Pro - Diamana D+ 72
Callaway X2Hot Deep 12.5 - Tour Green 75
Callaway X2Hot Deep 18.5 - Tour Green 75
Mizuno MP4 3-PW - True Temper Black Gold
Mizuno MP T4 54.09, 60.05 - DG X100
Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport 2
WITB Link

#17 topr

topr

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,178 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 124780
  • Joined: 03/18/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 268

Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:18 AM

I like the methodology of your testing, hitting enough balls to elliminate varaibles and radar schmadar,..drive to the businees end and see the results first hand...old school

For those that say maybe the tour head may have tested differently you can say the say the same thing about the TEE CB head, that would also be a good shootout also.
Nice job OP



#18 ksavy17

ksavy17

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,374 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 6145
  • Joined: 09/21/2005
  • Location:Milwaukee
GolfWRX Likes : 114

Posted 13 February 2012 - 12:49 PM

is it really fair to compare titanium to steel? obviously go with what works but TMade did chose to go steel to make the product more affordable as well
SLDR S TP 10* w/Ahina 60X
Nike CP 2.0 15* w/Whiteboard 83X
Nike CP 2.0 19* w/Blueboard 93X
TP "B" 09 3-PW w/DG X100
Vr Pro 52*, 58* w/DG TI S400
SC SS Newport Beach

#19 TCMP

TCMP

    Disguised

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,744 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 34660
  • Joined: 07/15/2007
GolfWRX Likes : 24

Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:32 PM

View Postksavy17, on 13 February 2012 - 12:49 PM, said:

is it really fair to compare titanium to steel? obviously go with what works but TMade did chose to go steel to make the product more affordable as well
On that note why not put the RBZ up against the Wishon 949mc? Its steel and just as long as the TEE stuff out there. The COR on the 949mc is. 830 and has been since 2004. It has already been done with steel for 8 years.

#20 TCMP

TCMP

    Disguised

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,744 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 34660
  • Joined: 07/15/2007
GolfWRX Likes : 24

Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:38 PM

Also if I knew that I was going to be paid $10 for every yard further I hit the RBZ I would definitely find a way to hit it further than the club I was comparing it to. Whether that be swinging my own club slower or the RBZ faster. They did this at several PGA superstores in Florida.

I like your method of testing BTW.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with existing members and access to certain forums. Join our community today and enter into a chance to win a free regular giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

#21 dangerman77

dangerman77

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 252 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 127310
  • Joined: 04/23/2011
  • Location:Mid Hudson Valley
  • Handicap:Wife
GolfWRX Likes : 85

Posted 13 February 2012 - 02:51 PM

Everyone knows orange balls are 10-15 yards longer than yellow ones.    This shootout was obviously an anti-Taylor Made sham, and the RBZ was doomed to fail.

#22 collingsom1a

collingsom1a

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 662 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13616
  • Joined: 03/22/2006
  • Location:Omaha, NE
  • Handicap:6
  • Ebay ID:c10sbg
GolfWRX Likes : 18

Posted 05 March 2012 - 10:03 PM

View Postdangerman77, on 13 February 2012 - 02:51 PM, said:

Everyone knows orange balls are 10-15 yards longer than yellow ones.    This shootout was obviously an anti-Taylor Made sham, and the RBZ was doomed to fail.
Not at all.

The RBZ was clearly outdone by the exotics, plain and simple.

The RBZ might be best for you.....but for me, they just didn't get the job done.
Hey man, I'm the dude

#23 jokerusn

jokerusn

    Mr. J

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 2,493 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 447
  • Joined: 04/30/2005
  • Location:Northern NJ
  • Ebay ID:jokerusn
GolfWRX Likes : 122

Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:39 AM

I just stumbled on to this topic and while I was reading through it, I came across one of the funniest (coincidental) posts I have ever seen. Check this out:

RBZfail.jpg

:busted2::cheesy: :cheesy:

Edited by jokerusn, 06 March 2012 - 09:39 AM.

290 / 3Deep / RBZ Tour / Idea Pro
07 X Forged / Scratch / Odyssey

#24 LOVE4LPGA

LOVE4LPGA

    TOUR GRADE POSTER

  • Unregistered
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 799 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 84151
  • Joined: 05/28/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 119

Posted 06 March 2012 - 01:02 PM

Likewise, my experience with stock TM FW (not Tour; non TP) clubs is that they are designed for high launch. High launch even appears in 2008 on the model names of the FW and hybrid clubs of that time.

That H L engineering appeals to a lower average SS like mine. But the threat of a baloon shot is always looming.

I've always wondered if a particular ball type would balance that off? I guess a "low launch" ball.

What is an example of "low launch" ball ?  Are they still polite around the greens ?




View Postscratch14, on 04 February 2012 - 08:20 PM, said:

View PostQegurezi, on 04 February 2012 - 08:13 PM, said:

Sounds like the RBZ spun too much (obviously if it was ballooning).The Tour would arrest this. I'm skipping the standard and just going to try the Tour model.

Trying the Tour model might fix this, or maybe try a different shaft. I haven't hit the RBZ, but in the past, I've found a lot of TMs stock shafts to spin WAY too much.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors