Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

* * * * * 17 votes

New and Improved Shaft Chart


714 replies to this topic

#601 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 17 October 2016 - 10:14 AM

View PostQMany, on 17 October 2016 - 09:17 AM, said:

Howard, I'm sorry if this has already been addressed. I play KBS Tour X (no stepping) but +1/2". I've always wondered how does that extra length affect the profile, flex, etc.? Thank you.

We dont really change flex, not in such a way we should worry about it, since length is way more important to start with.
But, depending on what chart we use, ON THE PAPER we can sometimes see a difference to flex but did it really change?

Example we have a club thats 37.50 (standard #6 iron length) and that club measure xxx CPM on Kaufmanns chart for flex and thats "S"
Now we make the same club 0.5 inch longer, and SW value raise by 3 points, so CPM drops by 3.
On Kaufmanns chart, the flex slope is 7.3 CPM pr inch, or 3.65 CPM for each 0.5, so if the club only went down 3 equal to SW points, flex actually went stronger by 0.65 vs Kaufmanns chart.

If we use RIFLE FCM chart for irons post 2012, the CPM slope is 8.5 cpm pr inch, or 4.25 pr 0.5, and if the club only went down by 3 CPM, we actually went 1.25 CPM stronger...

BUT, the actual shaft, in your case a KBS TOUR, DONT have the same flex slope in its original design as either Kaufman or RIfles chart, so if we shall be able to judge it at all, we have to know the flex slope for the actual set. For a set like DG X100, we are close to 9 CPM pr inch, or close to 4.5 for each club both ways, so again, does it change MORE or LESS than SW value influence, VS the actual slope on that model, then we can put a number on it if we went stronger or weaker. in General, Shafts with a "stiff" butt goes stronger when we go longer, while a "soft" butt goes weaker.

Butt CPM ONLY, is ONLY good to judge 2 IDENTICAL shafts to se if the really are identical, not to compare 2 different shafts, and what ever number is shows, its not a value directly compatible with "feel" since we only measure a tiny bit of the shaft.

So where do we end up? maybe the flex value was 6.8 and became 6.92, or maybe 6.71, would you be able to notice?
If you was a robot, 1 CPM on flex would cause a flight with 1 feet higher apex and in your case maybe up to 0.5 yards, but i doubt you will see the same for the same reason. If ball flight changes, its a flatter swing plane and less negative AoA, and thats normal when we go longer.

Edited by Howard Jones, 17 October 2016 - 10:23 AM.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#602 tercoidegw

tercoidegw

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 231 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 15042
  • Joined: 05/26/2006
  • Location:Corrientes, Argentina
  • Ebay ID:tercoide
GolfWRX Likes : 10

Posted 17 October 2016 - 11:38 AM

View PostHoward Jones, on 17 October 2016 - 09:10 AM, said:


Its a big step from R400 HS1 to PX 6.5 but it seems like 125 grams or more is what you like, so i would suggest you go by weight, feel and dispersion, and then just tweak static lofts to get the desired ball flight.
Remember that the ball has no clue about where loft came from, so if its a "flighted shaft" who adds loft before impact in the long irons, or those heads is given 0.5 to 1 more loft, flight, spin and distance is the same as it would be if a shaft made the difference,

Since the shaft you mention is both strong and soft, what they have in common is a rather stiff mid to tip, (no high launch models) and a weight of 125 to 129 grams when you like it, so maybe a S400 SS2 at FCM 5.4 - 5.5 would fit the bill? They end up at about 128.5 grams with a flight pattern like MID launch vs standard vs S200-S300 at the same weight.

Attachment R400 to S400.PNG

THANKS!!!

It's nice you've confirmed my calculations. I will keep the set with R400hs and make another with PX6.5 ssx2.

I'm also planning to use part of the S400 set in the wedges like this:

60 8 iron shaft
56 7 iron shaft
52 6 iron shaft

as the original S400 wedge that they have is a bit too stiff for my swingspeed (more notory in the 52, were most bad shots are made)
M1 8.5 Tour AD-BB6s
Stage2 14.5 Kailli 7S, Rescue 17 NVS 7S
  TM MB 12 R400 hs
   Nike 52 , 56, TT 60 S400
    Callaway DART 34"

2

#603 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 17 October 2016 - 12:13 PM

If KBS S flex as 120 was to low weight PX 6.5 SS" will be to light too.
You start from 125 grams / 38.50 = 3.24 grams pr inch, so when you go SS2, you loose 3.24 grams and is now down at 121.7  and thats "equal" to KBS tour who was to light for you.

If you look those numbers over again, i started from S400 at 132 grams and went SS2 both for flex and flight reasons, and we ended up with a 128.5 grams MID flight shaft profile and flex who should be within your preference zone.

Edited by Howard Jones, 17 October 2016 - 12:14 PM.


3

#604 tercoidegw

tercoidegw

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 231 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 15042
  • Joined: 05/26/2006
  • Location:Corrientes, Argentina
  • Ebay ID:tercoide
GolfWRX Likes : 10

Posted 17 October 2016 - 04:29 PM

View PostHoward Jones, on 17 October 2016 - 12:13 PM, said:

If KBS S flex as 120 was to low weight PX 6.5 SS" will be to light too.
You start from 125 grams / 38.50 = 3.24 grams pr inch, so when you go SS2, you loose 3.24 grams and is now down at 121.7  and thats "equal" to KBS tour who was to light for you.

PX 6.5 fligthed is 130grs AFAIK
M1 8.5 Tour AD-BB6s
Stage2 14.5 Kailli 7S, Rescue 17 NVS 7S
  TM MB 12 R400 hs
   Nike 52 , 56, TT 60 S400
    Callaway DART 34"

4

#605 SmoothStroker81

SmoothStroker81

    I'd rather be driving a Kirkland

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 191 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 441810
  • Joined: 09/28/2016
  • Location:Half Moon Bay
  • Ebay ID:jeff21ut
GolfWRX Likes : 35

Posted 17 October 2016 - 06:02 PM

Late to the party, but thanks for all the great info!  It goes a long way!

Driver: Taylormade M2 9.5 Rogue 125 70TX
3W: Taylormade M2 15 Tour AD Di-7X
5W: Taylormade M1 19 Tour AD Di-7X
2i & 4i Honma TW-U Forged w/ Nippon Modus 105X
5i-PW: Miura CB-57 w/ Nippon Modus 120X
Wedges: 52, 56, 60 Vokey SM6
Putter: Black Lab BL-1
Bag: Ping Hoofer

5

#606 interstate_45

interstate_45

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 340405
  • Joined: 09/18/2014
  • Location:Iowa, United States
  • Handicap:+2
GolfWRX Likes : 28

Posted 28 November 2016 - 05:18 PM

helpful.. i owe you both
2017 Taylormade M2 10.5* Kuro Kage DC 60 X
2017 Taylormade M1 17* Kuro Kage Silver 70 S
Titleist 915 H 17* Diamana White 90 X
Nike VR Forged Combo 3-PW (PW 49*) Project X 6.5
Titleist SM6 54.8M & 60.4L Project X 6.5
2017 Taylormade Spider Tour Black DJ
Titleist Pro V1X

6

#607 ProjectX_Mizuno

ProjectX_Mizuno

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,299 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 58891
  • Joined: 06/25/2008
  • Handicap:+1.2
GolfWRX Likes : 43

Posted 01 December 2016 - 06:01 PM

Awesome info Howard! I have followed this thread since day one.

I have always been intrigued by KBS C-Taper shafts. On paper, they should be the perfect shaft for me. However, the few times that I have tried them I had a hard time feeling the club head through the swing. It was almost like there was a counter balance weight in the butt of the shaft. Have you experienced this at all with these shafts?

7

#608 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 02 December 2016 - 03:49 AM

View PostProjectX_Mizuno, on 01 December 2016 - 06:01 PM, said:

Awesome info Howard! I have followed this thread since day one.

I have always been intrigued by KBS C-Taper shafts. On paper, they should be the perfect shaft for me. However, the few times that I have tried them I had a hard time feeling the club head through the swing. It was almost like there was a counter balance weight in the butt of the shaft. Have you experienced this at all with these shafts?

I only made a few sets with KBS shafts (My shop had True Temper products only), so im not deeply into balance point of them, but if C-taper is like KBS Tour, the balance point is a bit higher up in the shaft vs DG and PX, but a gram or 2 added to the head should take care of that, so try some lead tape on the head.

8

#609 BobBadger

BobBadger

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 149 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13552
  • Joined: 03/20/2006
GolfWRX Likes : 2

Posted 05 December 2016 - 02:16 PM

Apologies if this is a dumb question, but have Kbs changed the fcm of the c tapers. Their website suggests that for the S the fcm is between 4.5 (assume this ssx2) and 6.0 (assume hs), which should leave the straight in freq as 5.5 ish. The really helpful chart on this thread puts straight in S flex as 6.2. Has it changed over the years or is it my understanding?

Be gentle �� Thanks

Edited by BobBadger, 05 December 2016 - 03:11 PM.


9

#610 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 05 December 2016 - 03:05 PM

View PostBobBadger, on 05 December 2016 - 02:16 PM, said:

Apologies if this is a dumb question, but have Kbps changed the fcm of the c tapers. Their website suggests that for the S the fcm is between 4.5 (assume this ssx2) and 6.0 (assume hs), which should leave the straight in freq as 5.5 ish. The really helpful chart on this thread puts straight in S flex as 6.2. Has it changed over the years or is it my understanding?

Be gentle �� Thanks

No thats a good question, i have not noticed so i will have to check it up.

EDIT: - seems like you look on Parallels? the chart is for Tapers, and ive changed the value from 6.1 to 6.2 to make it fit with the FCM system from Rifle who is measured with a SW value of D3 while KBS uses D2

Edited by Howard Jones, 05 December 2016 - 03:23 PM.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#611 trying2scratch

trying2scratch

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 831 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 203751
  • Joined: 09/19/2012
  • Location:London, ON
GolfWRX Likes : 177

Posted 05 December 2016 - 04:08 PM

Hoping you may be able to point me in the right direction.  I currently play KBS Ctaper Stiff ssx2 +.25".  The launch is a little higher than I would like and not a huge fan of the feel.  Kind of like I have to swing too hard load the shaft, was better after soft stepping but still not ideal. Originally this is why I tried to soft step, but think now that the shaft profile just doesn't work for me.  I'm 6'3 and 215lbs.

I'm planning on having my irons re shafted to play between 1-1.5" over std length.  39" 5 iron working down in 3/8" steps and PW-LW same length.

Do you have any experience with TT XL lite shafts?  They are low cost option, Do you know where the fit on the FCM chart?  

I also have a set of KBS Tour V x flex that I could extend but not sure of the FCM of those either.

11

#612 BobBadger

BobBadger

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 149 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13552
  • Joined: 03/20/2006
GolfWRX Likes : 2

Posted 05 December 2016 - 05:12 PM

View PostHoward Jones, on 05 December 2016 - 03:05 PM, said:

View PostBobBadger, on 05 December 2016 - 02:16 PM, said:

Apologies if this is a dumb question, but have Kbps changed the fcm of the c tapers. Their website suggests that for the S the fcm is between 4.5 (assume this ssx2) and 6.0 (assume hs), which should leave the straight in freq as 5.5 ish. The really helpful chart on this thread puts straight in S flex as 6.2. Has it changed over the years or is it my understanding?

Be gentle �� Thanks

No thats a good question, i have not noticed so i will have to check it up.

EDIT: - seems like you look on Parallels? the chart is for Tapers, and ive changed the value from 6.1 to 6.2 to make it fit with the FCM system from Rifle who is measured with a SW value of D3 while KBS uses D2

Ah yes, it was the parallels trimming instructions. However, it is does raise the question about a straight in c taper S parallel/taper having relatively/considerable difference in FCM? Would you expect it to be that large (6.2 vrs 5.5ish)?

12

#613 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 06 December 2016 - 12:49 AM

View Posttrying2scratch, on 05 December 2016 - 04:08 PM, said:

Hoping you may be able to point me in the right direction.  I currently play KBS Ctaper Stiff ssx2 +.25".  The launch is a little higher than I would like and not a huge fan of the feel.  Kind of like I have to swing too hard load the shaft, was better after soft stepping but still not ideal. Originally this is why I tried to soft step, but think now that the shaft profile just doesn't work for me.  I'm 6'3 and 215lbs.

I'm planning on having my irons re shafted to play between 1-1.5" over std length.  39" 5 iron working down in 3/8" steps and PW-LW same length.

Do you have any experience with TT XL lite shafts?  They are low cost option, Do you know where the fit on the FCM chart?  

I also have a set of KBS Tour V x flex that I could extend but not sure of the FCM of those either.

I never used TT XL shafts, but they are " VERY stiff to flex" compared to others, but i would advice you NOT to use the shaft for ball flight issues, its not a good idea, especially in your case. First of all its only players with a late release who would see a difference to ball flight from the shaft profile, for others its only a feel and dispersion matter, and those 2 are the most important. If you are a late release player, then C-Taper should have been the way to go, but if its launching to high, only a even stronger flex would change that, and you feel its to strong already, so hold on to what you feel, and DONT try to find a shaft to solve it, you want find a shaft that can fix it all.

Start the hunt for "the right shaft" by WEIGHT, then go by feel and dispersion, and leave ball flight to static loft. We can bend most heads 2 up or down on loft, and thats way more than we can influence ball flight with vs using a shaft profile or flex to make it, so leave ball flight to static loft when the shaft is found.

C-Taper S flex taper has a build CPM of 321 as a #5 iron (FCM 6.2), while TT Lite XL is 333 as S (FCM 7.4)
Tip to butt ratio makes TT Lite XL a higher launching profile than C-Taper, so the shaft as a hole does not seems to be what you want.
TT Lite XL as R flex has a build CPM of 312 as a #5 iron (FCM 5.3) as a compare.

13

#614 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 06 December 2016 - 12:56 AM

View PostBobBadger, on 05 December 2016 - 05:12 PM, said:

View PostHoward Jones, on 05 December 2016 - 03:05 PM, said:

View PostBobBadger, on 05 December 2016 - 02:16 PM, said:

Apologies if this is a dumb question, but have Kbps changed the fcm of the c tapers. Their website suggests that for the S the fcm is between 4.5 (assume this ssx2) and 6.0 (assume hs), which should leave the straight in freq as 5.5 ish. The really helpful chart on this thread puts straight in S flex as 6.2. Has it changed over the years or is it my understanding?

Be gentle �� Thanks

No thats a good question, i have not noticed so i will have to check it up.

EDIT: - seems like you look on Parallels? the chart is for Tapers, and ive changed the value from 6.1 to 6.2 to make it fit with the FCM system from Rifle who is measured with a SW value of D3 while KBS uses D2

Ah yes, it was the parallels trimming instructions. However, it is does raise the question about a straight in c taper S parallel/taper having relatively/considerable difference in FCM? Would you expect it to be that large (6.2 vrs 5.5ish)?

Tapers is Constant weight, Parallels is descending weight so we talk 2 different animals and then you CANT expect them to be "equal" because they are not. Im no expert on KBS, so if you want more specs to compare C-Tapers Taper tip vs Paralells in different tip trim, go to this link and choose Chapter 5 - DFSi listing, and then go to page 181 and 182

http://www.hirekogol...itting-addendum

14

#615 trying2scratch

trying2scratch

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 831 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 203751
  • Joined: 09/19/2012
  • Location:London, ON
GolfWRX Likes : 177

Posted 06 December 2016 - 10:56 AM

Thanks Howard, great info as always.

Another quick question, would the fact they are soft stepped twice mean they are actually playing lighter weight than straight in? Could that have an effect on the ball flight also?

Cheers!


15

#616 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 06 December 2016 - 03:50 PM

View Posttrying2scratch, on 06 December 2016 - 10:56 AM, said:

Thanks Howard, great info as always.

Another quick question, would the fact they are soft stepped twice mean they are actually playing lighter weight than straight in? Could that have an effect on the ball flight also?

Cheers!

That depend on if we talk Constant weight shaft (mostly tapers) or descending weight shafts (mostly parallels)
Constant weight shafts loses weight when we soft step, and adds net weight if hard stepped, while descending weight shafts do not change.

16

#617 ZeeJizzle

ZeeJizzle

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 428300
  • Joined: 06/07/2016
  • Location:Redlands
  • Ebay ID:Megadonk24
GolfWRX Likes : 25

Posted 21 December 2016 - 12:27 AM

Can anybody compare PXI 6.5 to c-taper 120s HS 1 time?

17

#618 hoselrocketman

hoselrocketman

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 250 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 175370
  • Joined: 04/15/2012
GolfWRX Likes : 40

Posted 24 December 2016 - 03:16 PM

View Postsmoky25, on 18 July 2011 - 04:52 PM, said:

Howard did all the work. I'm just the messenger. But since you're offering, I'll take a Bud Lite.
  No.  He said a beer.  Not a Bud Lite......

18

#619 KirkNo-yes

KirkNo-yes

    Tour Winner

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 537 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 419042
  • Joined: 04/04/2016
  • Location:The Woodlands
  • Handicap:+3.5
GolfWRX Likes : 1163

Posted 05 February 2017 - 10:24 AM

Howard- thank you so much for all the time you have devoted to this forum.  couple of questions.

1. I played the project x flighted 6.0 for over a decade, they don't make them anymore- If I wanted to replicate that in a set of irons with regular project X shafts 4-pw could you spell out exactly what shafts I would need to purchase? which end to cut on each?

2. Because of them not making that shaft anymore it has forced me to experiment with DG- I ss X7's twice and loved the performance in them (especially longer irons) but man they are heavy shafts and I'm 42. would love to have something that doesn't feel that heavy but performs close. I then have tried X-100 as they are close to the same FCM on the scale as X7 ss2x's . But they feel stiffer and are very inconsistent. I need help. Considering soft stepping a set of X-100's to see what they feel like or hs a set of S400's. thoughts? I play a draw and I like to feel the kick thru impact.
Driver - PING G400 LST 8.5 w/ Kuro Kage Silver 60g X
3wood- Titleist 917 15deg F2 w/ HZRDUS T1100 85 gram 6.5
5wood- Titleist 917 18deg F2 w/ HZRDUS T1100 95gram 6.5
Hybrid - Adams Prototype 18deg w/ Graphite Design AD 95 X
Irons- 4-9 - Titleist Tour Issue 718 AP2 w/ KBS C Taper Lite 115 X
Wedges- SM6 46deg Vokey F Grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400, SM6 50deg F grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400 , Vokey Prototype 54 V grind 10deg bounce w/ DG Tour Issue S400 low bounce, SM6 58deg K grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400
Putter - Scotty Cameron 1995 Gun Blue Laguna with micro step shaft.
Ball - 2017 Titleist Pro V1x

19

#620 bcflyguy1

bcflyguy1

    Enjoying my coffee...

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,964 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 120229
  • Joined: 01/08/2011
  • Location:My own kind of paradise
  • Handicap:0
GolfWRX Likes : 959

Posted 05 February 2017 - 11:46 PM

View PostKirkNo-yes, on 05 February 2017 - 10:24 AM, said:

Howard- thank you so much for all the time you have devoted to this forum.  couple of questions.

1. I played the project x flighted 6.0 for over a decade, they don't make them anymore- If I wanted to replicate that in a set of irons with regular project X shafts 4-pw could you spell out exactly what shafts I would need to purchase? which end to cut on each?

2. Because of them not making that shaft anymore it has forced me to experiment with DG- I ss X7's twice and loved the performance in them (especially longer irons) but man they are heavy shafts and I'm 42. would love to have something that doesn't feel that heavy but performs close. I then have tried X-100 as they are close to the same FCM on the scale as X7 ss2x's . But they feel stiffer and are very inconsistent. I need help. Considering soft stepping a set of X-100's to see what they feel like or hs a set of S400's. thoughts? I play a draw and I like to feel the kick thru impact.

If you haven't yet, think test driving PX LZ in 6.5 would be a good idea.  A little lighter, and more of a kick-y feel at impact.

Edited by bcflyguy1, 05 February 2017 - 11:47 PM.

Never forget that the luxury of being
wrong is not enough to make you right.
WITB Link

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20

#621 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 06 February 2017 - 01:33 AM

View PostKirkNo-yes, on 05 February 2017 - 10:24 AM, said:

Howard- thank you so much for all the time you have devoted to this forum.  couple of questions.

1. I played the project x flighted 6.0 for over a decade, they don't make them anymore- If I wanted to replicate that in a set of irons with regular project X shafts 4-pw could you spell out exactly what shafts I would need to purchase? which end to cut on each?

2. Because of them not making that shaft anymore it has forced me to experiment with DG- I ss X7's twice and loved the performance in them (especially longer irons) but man they are heavy shafts and I'm 42. would love to have something that doesn't feel that heavy but performs close. I then have tried X-100 as they are close to the same FCM on the scale as X7 ss2x's . But they feel stiffer and are very inconsistent. I need help. Considering soft stepping a set of X-100's to see what they feel like or hs a set of S400's. thoughts? I play a draw and I like to feel the kick thru impact.

Standard PX and flighted is not exactly the same shafts, but if you are using 0.370 heads and shafts you might get very close.
Before you make a full set, try 1 long club like your #4 iron using a #3 iron 6.5 who then gets soft stepped once.

Flighted was descending weight, and long irons was close to 1 PX flex stronger soft stepped once
Short was close to 1 PX flex softer, but hard stepped once, and since we cant hard step a PW you will have to do that by tip trim, so its only possible to get in that area using 0.370 shafts and heads.

21

#622 Xander_Reigns

Xander_Reigns

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 77 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 421810
  • Joined: 04/20/2016
  • Location:Castle Pines, CO
  • Handicap:2
  • Ebay ID:leolovesgolf
GolfWRX Likes : 21

Posted 07 February 2017 - 02:47 PM

Awesome thread here. Thanks for all of the info!
TaylorMade Tour Issue M1 8.5*/Tensei CK Pro White 70TX
Titleist 915 Fd 18*/Diamana D+ 80TX
Titleist 712u 3i/Tour Issue HZRDUS Black 105 6.5
Miura 1957 CB 4-P/C Taper 130x
Miura 1957 51* 55*/C Taper 130x
Fourteen Raw 60*/C Taper 130x
Scotty Cameron Circle T Futura X5
TaylorMade TP5X
Projekt Kozmak Bag

22

#623 Frakes

Frakes

    Member

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 103 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 52598
  • Joined: 03/30/2008
  • Location:Fishers, IN
  • Ebay ID:sportse
GolfWRX Likes : 14

Posted 07 February 2017 - 05:19 PM

I haven't seen any answers regarding the steelfiber shafts?  For example, where does the 110cw S and X flex fall in this chart?

23

#624 mtg

mtg

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 440414
  • Joined: 09/13/2016
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Handicap:0
GolfWRX Likes : 22

Posted 07 February 2017 - 11:47 PM

View PostKirkNo-yes, on 05 February 2017 - 10:24 AM, said:

Howard- thank you so much for all the time you have devoted to this forum.  couple of questions.

1. I played the project x flighted 6.0 for over a decade, they don't make them anymore- If I wanted to replicate that in a set of irons with regular project X shafts 4-pw could you spell out exactly what shafts I would need to purchase? which end to cut on each?

2. Because of them not making that shaft anymore it has forced me to experiment with DG- I ss X7's twice and loved the performance in them (especially longer irons) but man they are heavy shafts and I'm 42. would love to have something that doesn't feel that heavy but performs close. I then have tried X-100 as they are close to the same FCM on the scale as X7 ss2x's . But they feel stiffer and are very inconsistent. I need help. Considering soft stepping a set of X-100's to see what they feel like or hs a set of S400's. thoughts? I play a draw and I like to feel the kick thru impact.

Not nearly as knowledgeable as Howard, but some shafts you might want to give a try are Dynamic Gold Pro. Like the PX flighted they are a descending weight set. EI profiles on golfshaftreviews.com show the DG pro x is almost identical to a PX 6.5. Weights on the DG pro are between 125-129 in x flex, so lighter than X7. Having swung them myself I think they'd give you the kick you're looking for, but they're pretty stable at the same time (not unlike PX). I like them a lot more than regular DG.  
PXvsDGProChart.png
Epic SZ 9* - Copperhead 70tx
Titleist 917 F2 14* - Kuro Kage XM 70tx
Callaway Apex 21* - KK Hybrid 80x
TM UDI 23* & 26*; MP-4 (6-P) - PX 6.5ss
Vokey SM6 (50F, 54M, 58K) - DG S400
TEE Tour Proto DG v1.2

24

#625 KirkNo-yes

KirkNo-yes

    Tour Winner

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 537 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 419042
  • Joined: 04/04/2016
  • Location:The Woodlands
  • Handicap:+3.5
GolfWRX Likes : 1163

Posted 09 February 2017 - 10:12 PM

Question to you guys- does the PX LZ 6.0 play the same stiffness as the PX 6.0? I know they have different shaft characteristics but If I love the 6.0 flex would I be happy with 6.0 in the LZ or should I go to a 6.5

Driver - PING G400 LST 8.5 w/ Kuro Kage Silver 60g X
3wood- Titleist 917 15deg F2 w/ HZRDUS T1100 85 gram 6.5
5wood- Titleist 917 18deg F2 w/ HZRDUS T1100 95gram 6.5
Hybrid - Adams Prototype 18deg w/ Graphite Design AD 95 X
Irons- 4-9 - Titleist Tour Issue 718 AP2 w/ KBS C Taper Lite 115 X
Wedges- SM6 46deg Vokey F Grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400, SM6 50deg F grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400 , Vokey Prototype 54 V grind 10deg bounce w/ DG Tour Issue S400 low bounce, SM6 58deg K grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400
Putter - Scotty Cameron 1995 Gun Blue Laguna with micro step shaft.
Ball - 2017 Titleist Pro V1x

25

#626 bcflyguy1

bcflyguy1

    Enjoying my coffee...

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,964 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 120229
  • Joined: 01/08/2011
  • Location:My own kind of paradise
  • Handicap:0
GolfWRX Likes : 959

Posted 09 February 2017 - 10:49 PM

View PostKirkNo-yes, on 09 February 2017 - 10:12 PM, said:

Question to you guys- does the PX LZ 6.0 play the same stiffness as the PX 6.0? I know they have different shaft characteristics but If I love the 6.0 flex would I be happy with 6.0 in the LZ or should I go to a 6.5

I've been an X100 guy for a long time, and moving to the LZ 6.5 has been a very good thing.  Can't really speak to PX 6.0 or 6.5 as I never liked them enough to put them in a set of irons, but the feel of the LZ at the top (seems to load a little more readily at the top while still being stable through the ball) is really nice.  Wish I could shed light on how they compare to the regular PX, but I have a very droppy transition from the top and the sensation of lack of loading from PX was troublesome to me.

Hope that helps a bit, sorry if it muddles the picture even more.
Never forget that the luxury of being
wrong is not enough to make you right.
WITB Link

26

#627 KirkNo-yes

KirkNo-yes

    Tour Winner

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 537 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 419042
  • Joined: 04/04/2016
  • Location:The Woodlands
  • Handicap:+3.5
GolfWRX Likes : 1163

Posted 10 February 2017 - 07:45 PM

View Postbcflyguy1, on 09 February 2017 - 10:49 PM, said:

View PostKirkNo-yes, on 09 February 2017 - 10:12 PM, said:

Question to you guys- does the PX LZ 6.0 play the same stiffness as the PX 6.0? I know they have different shaft characteristics but If I love the 6.0 flex would I be happy with 6.0 in the LZ or should I go to a 6.5

I've been an X100 guy for a long time, and moving to the LZ 6.5 has been a very good thing.  Can't really speak to PX 6.0 or 6.5 as I never liked them enough to put them in a set of irons, but the feel of the LZ at the top (seems to load a little more readily at the top while still being stable through the ball) is really nice.  Wish I could shed light on how they compare to the regular PX, but I have a very droppy transition from the top and the sensation of lack of loading from PX was troublesome to me.

Hope that helps a bit, sorry if it muddles the picture even more.

No it totally helps. appreciate it. all info is good info in trying to figure out how to compare things
Driver - PING G400 LST 8.5 w/ Kuro Kage Silver 60g X
3wood- Titleist 917 15deg F2 w/ HZRDUS T1100 85 gram 6.5
5wood- Titleist 917 18deg F2 w/ HZRDUS T1100 95gram 6.5
Hybrid - Adams Prototype 18deg w/ Graphite Design AD 95 X
Irons- 4-9 - Titleist Tour Issue 718 AP2 w/ KBS C Taper Lite 115 X
Wedges- SM6 46deg Vokey F Grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400, SM6 50deg F grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400 , Vokey Prototype 54 V grind 10deg bounce w/ DG Tour Issue S400 low bounce, SM6 58deg K grind ported w/ DG Tour Issue S400
Putter - Scotty Cameron 1995 Gun Blue Laguna with micro step shaft.
Ball - 2017 Titleist Pro V1x

27

#628 mtg

mtg

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 440414
  • Joined: 09/13/2016
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Handicap:0
GolfWRX Likes : 22

Posted 12 February 2017 - 10:55 AM

Overall stiffness should be pretty close on the LZ but its going to feel a lot different. The mid shaft will flex more and you'll probably perceive more stiffness in the tip than the regular PX. If you've ever swung Modus 120 the feel is similar, if not quite as extreme. They're also lighter - even though TT says both 6.0s are 120 grams the LZ plays closer to 117 and regular PX is closer to 124. I think most would say the LZ feels softer, that said I'd lean towards the 6.5 LZ if you're looking at them. Can experiment and soft step if needed.
Epic SZ 9* - Copperhead 70tx
Titleist 917 F2 14* - Kuro Kage XM 70tx
Callaway Apex 21* - KK Hybrid 80x
TM UDI 23* & 26*; MP-4 (6-P) - PX 6.5ss
Vokey SM6 (50F, 54M, 58K) - DG S400
TEE Tour Proto DG v1.2

28

#629 BlackM00Nlight

BlackM00Nlight

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,848 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 422626
  • Joined: 04/26/2016
  • Location:Iowa
  • Handicap:6
GolfWRX Likes : 720

Posted 13 February 2017 - 11:51 AM

Without scrolling through 21 pages, does anyone know the numbers for the AMT X-100 shaft in where it falls on the graph?
Mizuno JPX 900 Driver Speeder Evolution II 661X
Mizuno JPX 900 3 wood Speeder Evolution II 661X
Nike Vapor Pro Combo 2-A wedge AMT X100 (plus 1/2" 3 up)
Nike Engage Dual Sole 58 DG S400 (plus 1/2" 3up)

Evnroll ER2 34" putter
Nike RZN Tour Black
Nike Performance Cart IV Black/Silver
Nike Vapor Fly Umbrella
Nike Lunar Control Vapor Black and White
Bag Boy Tri-Swivel II Push-Cart Black

29

#630 Howard Jones

Howard Jones

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,218 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 100881
  • Joined: 12/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2550

Posted 13 February 2017 - 02:13 PM

View PostBlackM00Nlight, on 13 February 2017 - 11:51 AM, said:

Without scrolling through 21 pages, does anyone know the numbers for the AMT X-100 shaft in where it falls on the graph?

In terms of flex, AMT is equal to regular DG


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

30



2 user(s) are reading this topic

1 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


    fettuccine

GolfWRX Sponsors