Kyle Stanley WITB
Posted 25 July 2012 - 10:14 PM
Well when you think logically, the Project X 6.5 shaft is a very stiff shaft. It's stiffer than the x100 shaft, which seems to be plenty of shaft for many players on tour. The amount of people who can get a good flight out of a Project X 7.0 are very limited for it is a VERY stout shaft. I'm sure that Kyle can get a good flight out of it, but a slightly softer shaft gives a little more height in the longer irons and feel in the shorter irons.
PX 6.5 it's for sure not stiffer than DG x100. It's about 5-7g litter than x100. Maybe his 6.5 are tipped and likes to feel the weight in the clubhead more.
I played x100 for 10 years and I was tipping them bottom to get them a bit stiffer. Now I play PX 7.0 and they work perfect, more height, great feel, different weight repartition than DG, love them.
While the project x shaft is a bit lighter, it is also a bit stiffer. Look at any shaft chart and the project x 6.5 is equal to an FCM 7.0, while the x100 is equivalent to an FCM 6.8.
Posted 07 September 2012 - 12:48 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 04:21 PM
TEE CB1 15* - Attas Elements
TEE XCG 18* - Accra
Callaway Razr MB
VR Pro Forged 52*, 58*
Byron Morgan GSS DH89
Posted 05 January 2013 - 04:49 AM
TM RBZ Stage 2 Tour 14.5* Kaili 80X
Ping Anser 20* RIP Alpha 85S
Ping G25 4-6 Ping S56 7-W DG X100
Ping Tour S 51*, 56* DG X100 Nike VR 60*
Nike Method 007 Custom
Posted 05 January 2013 - 11:57 PM
Titleist 913F-D 15*
Nike Covert FWY Performance 19*
913H 21* | TM TP'14, 4-8 CB, 9-PW MC
Nike VR Pro 51*, 57* Tour Issue Wedges
Nike Method 001
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:54 PM
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:03 PM
RBZ Stage 2 Tour 18.5, 23.5 Kuro Kage
Callaway X Hot Pro 4-PW KBS Stiff
588 RTG 52,56,60 l Cameron Newport
Posted 14 January 2013 - 02:40 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users