
Kyle Stanley WITB
#61
Posted 24 July 2012 - 03:52 AM

#62
Posted 25 July 2012 - 10:14 PM
Raphdesousa, on 06 May 2012 - 02:09 AM, said:
ATAG, on 05 April 2012 - 07:51 PM, said:
CEPick, on 08 February 2012 - 10:40 PM, said:
Well when you think logically, the Project X 6.5 shaft is a very stiff shaft. It's stiffer than the x100 shaft, which seems to be plenty of shaft for many players on tour. The amount of people who can get a good flight out of a Project X 7.0 are very limited for it is a VERY stout shaft. I'm sure that Kyle can get a good flight out of it, but a slightly softer shaft gives a little more height in the longer irons and feel in the shorter irons.
PX 6.5 it's for sure not stiffer than DG x100. It's about 5-7g litter than x100. Maybe his 6.5 are tipped and likes to feel the weight in the clubhead more.
I played x100 for 10 years and I was tipping them bottom to get them a bit stiffer. Now I play PX 7.0 and they work perfect, more height, great feel, different weight repartition than DG, love them.
While the project x shaft is a bit lighter, it is also a bit stiffer. Look at any shaft chart and the project x 6.5 is equal to an FCM 7.0, while the x100 is equivalent to an FCM 6.8.
#63
Posted 28 August 2012 - 02:52 PM
#64
Posted 07 September 2012 - 12:48 PM
#65
Posted 17 December 2012 - 07:04 AM

#72
Posted 05 January 2013 - 11:57 PM
#73
Posted 06 January 2013 - 02:59 PM
#78
Posted 02 February 2013 - 02:37 AM












