
Mizuno jpx 800 vs. 800 pro
#2
Posted 07 July 2011 - 06:45 AM
The Non Pro 6 iron flew 200 yards, the Pro version flew190 with a slight fade.
I almost bought the Pro version because it looks better, but I stuck with the non pro.
#3
Posted 07 July 2011 - 08:05 AM
DBC, on 07 July 2011 - 06:45 AM, said:
The Non Pro 6 iron flew 200 yards, the Pro version flew190 with a slight fade.
I almost bought the Pro version because it looks better, but I stuck with the non pro.
I understand. I need to give the non-pro a look. i dont like an iron that has too much offset and looks big. I used to have the mx 200s and those were perfect. Just wondering what kind of reveiws the non pros are getting.
#5
Posted 07 July 2011 - 11:14 AM

#6
Posted 07 July 2011 - 11:50 AM
ladahl, on 07 July 2011 - 08:34 AM, said:
Golfsmith and others are selling the MX-300's for a great price.
Great clubs! Almost like the mx-200 and JPX 800 Pro were combined
I respectfully disagree. The OP is looking for something more forgiving than the 800 pros. I own the 300s, but the 800 pros are more forgiving.
#7
Posted 07 July 2011 - 11:57 AM
msdamailman, on 07 July 2011 - 08:05 AM, said:
If the 200s were perfect, why not find another set rather than taking a chance on something else? What made you go to the 800 pros in the first place? You must have decided that something was lacking in the 200s. IMO, there is no perfect club, it's just deciding which compromises you're going to accept.
I personally didn't care for the regular 800s, but then again, I didn't care for the 200s either. Couldn't hit either one well, go figure. Much prefer the 800 pros, mx 300s, etc.
#8
Posted 07 July 2011 - 12:03 PM
BlkNGld, on 07 July 2011 - 11:50 AM, said:
ladahl, on 07 July 2011 - 08:34 AM, said:
Golfsmith and others are selling the MX-300's for a great price.
Great clubs! Almost like the mx-200 and JPX 800 Pro were combined
I respectfully disagree. The OP is looking for something more forgiving than the 800 pros. I own the 300s, but the 800 pros are more forgiving.
Dont get me wrong, I love the 800 pros. They are my second forged set. First was the mx 200s and i told myself i would never stray from forged irons after those and never stray from Mizuno for that matter as long as Mizuno continues to produce game improvement forged irons. I just was wondering if there was anyone that tried both(800 and 800 pro) or owned both that kept one over the other and why. Anybody?
Edited by msdamailman, 07 July 2011 - 12:04 PM.
#10
Posted 07 July 2011 - 03:14 PM

#12
Posted 08 July 2011 - 06:00 PM
Ranking players-GI I would go:
MP53
MP52
MX300
JPX800 pro
MX200
JPX800
msdamailman, on 07 July 2011 - 12:03 PM, said:
BlkNGld, on 07 July 2011 - 11:50 AM, said:
ladahl, on 07 July 2011 - 08:34 AM, said:
Golfsmith and others are selling the MX-300's for a great price.
Great clubs! Almost like the mx-200 and JPX 800 Pro were combined
I respectfully disagree. The OP is looking for something more forgiving than the 800 pros. I own the 300s, but the 800 pros are more forgiving.
Dont get me wrong, I love the 800 pros. They are my second forged set. First was the mx 200s and i told myself i would never stray from forged irons after those and never stray from Mizuno for that matter as long as Mizuno continues to produce game improvement forged irons. I just was wondering if there was anyone that tried both(800 and 800 pro) or owned both that kept one over the other and why. Anybody?
#14
Posted 13 July 2011 - 04:52 PM
i told myself i would never stray from forged irons after those and never stray from Mizuno for that matter as long as Mizuno continues to produce game improvement forged irons. I just was wondering if there was anyone that tried both(800 and 800 pro) or owned both that kept one over the other and why. Anybody?
[/quote]
You know that the pros are forged but the 800s are not, right?
The 800s are good clubs. When I hit them I thought they were fine, but similar to the X20s that were in my bag at the time. The main difference was that some shots with the 800s were quite a bit longer, probably due to the hot face. That's nice for bragging rights, but when it comes to scoring having distances vary is not something I want.
800 pros were more consistent, had better feel, and I actually hit them better.
#16
Posted 13 July 2011 - 06:07 PM
Like what was said above, the feel is a litltle better with the pros, but what you give up in feel is made up for in control and distance. I'm a 4 index and thought the regular 800's were easier to launch high and land soft.
I must also say, the GS95 shaft fits me better as well. I was fit for the DGS300 full weight at the end of last season, but it must have been a really really good day because I have gone back 2x and the optimizer has said lightweight is the way for me.











