Posted 13 December 2012 - 08:15 AM
eddiea54, on 02 December 2012 - 03:16 PM, said:
TroyK, on 25 November 2012 - 05:00 PM, said:
TroyK, on 25 November 2012 - 04:49 PM, said:
Bettinardi LTD, on 20 November 2012 - 07:52 PM, said:
PGAPankey, on 20 November 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:
I have 2 leather HoF and they amazing quality. Had them for 2 years and they still look new. Much better than Piedmont imo.
Thank you for the comment
I sell the same straps as Piedmont in my TSS line and there NOWHERE near the quality of Flemings. You get what you pay for
I honestly could not disagree with you more on the quality of Piedmont products. I own four different belts and wear them every day. Piedmont has exceptional quality products at very reasonable pricing.
I like the fact that piedmont continues to expand there availability and combinations of skins. The cash covers and belts are top notch. My fear has been that their pricing would rise to meet their competitors but thank goodness it hasn't . I like to look good and be able to afford my golf habit .
He isn't saying Piedmont is not quality products. They're great. But what he is saying is that the quality of Piedmont products does not compare to the quality of HOF. HOF is a step above. Any of us that have products from each maker could tell you that. Nothing compares to HOF and that's why you pay more.
Exactly. Piedmont belts are very good quality! They are miles ahead of anything you get from Adidas, Puma, etc. and well worth the money. I'm only saying that imo the HoF are higher quality than the Piedmont which is reflected in the price. Kind of like saying a Rolls Royce is a nicer car than a BMW. Not saying that one isn't good, just that the other is better.
Titleist 913D3 8.5* - Matrix F6M2 Std
906F4 - Matrix Matte Blue Altus
910H 17* - Matrix Matte Blue Altus
AP2 714 - Steelfiber i110cw
Vokey TVD - 50*, 54*, 58*