
Hey guys. I just wanted to give my unbiased review of the newest offering from UST which is the VTS shaft. VTS stands for Variable Torque System, and the design of the shaft is to spread the torque across the entire length of the shaft versus a specific area of the shaft (i.e. tip, midsection, or butt). What the shaft engineers have done is created a shaft that has a lot of feel regardless of how high (4.5) or how low (2.5)without feeling boardy. There are three torque values available for each weight class and each flex. What this translates into is there is potentially a shaft in that line up for everyone.
Initially, I was kind of skeptical of the concept as I typically play low torque, tip-stiff shafts as I’m classified as a high-spin/ high ball hitter. Normally, I would gravitate from UST prior to the release of the Attas T2 line. The Attas T2 was closer to what I expect in a shaft but not exactly what I really want in shaft being that the shaft always felt light. Enter the VTS. The two profiles I tested were the black and the red. Ironically, the colors simply respond to torque values.
The two heads these were tested in were the Callaway FT Tour and the Nike VR Tour. Oddly enough, after destroying two of the FT Tour heads and one VR Tour, we were able to find one of each to stand up to the paces we were going to put them through. Initially, we pit the marked lofts of 8.5 through the paces but after checking them the loft on the Callaway was actually well over 9 and the Nike closer to 10. After selecting heads with similar spec’d lofts of 9* testing would begin. Each shaft was tipped .50 inches and the static weight was approximately 78 grams ungripped.
I quickly noticed that the initial launch was about 1.5 to 2 degrees higher in the black than the red and had spin in an area (3,000 plus) that would be unplayable for me (roughly 14* - 16*). This equates to about a 280 yard or so carry which really wouldn’t be that bad on a wet course. However, I typically play at sea level, so this presents its own set of problems when the ball needs to be flighted down and maneuvered.
The following are the averages of the day of testing and evaluation:
FT Tour with VTS Black FT Tour with VTS Red
Launch Avg. 15.8 Launch Avg. 14.8
Spin Avg. 3200 Spin Avg. 2700
Carry Avg. 281 Carry Avg. 289
VR Tour with VTS Black VR Tour with VTS Red
Launch Avg. 15.0 Launch Avg. 14.6
Spin Avg. 2700 Spin Avg. 2200
Carry Avg. 290 Carry Avg. 302
I have been able to thoroughly play test these shafts on my home course. There are a couple of spots that I haven’t seen in quite awhile. This was due to two heads that left the “sheepfold” awhile ago in exchange for more accuracy (the venerable 282 and the FT-5T LCG). The first hole is actually driveable if it is slightly wind-aided. On this particular day it was and I managed to find the right side of the green at pin-high. I managed to miss a total of 3 fairways during this particular round so I won’t rule out the honeymoon experience. However, during the play-testing the red version performed much better for me than the black. Shot shapes with the VR Tour versus the Ft Tour were extremely easy to execute and my normal left miss was completely eliminated in exchange for a slight tail-fade. As noted in one of the earlier discussions, the dispersion is much better than I expected and is a substantial improvement over my previous driver shaft choice.
All in all, UST has created a winner and is a good product that even the average Joe can take advantage of. Based on the feedback that I got from UST, most of the big hitters gravitated to the red version in either X or XX during testing.
Initially, I was kind of skeptical of the concept as I typically play low torque, tip-stiff shafts as I’m classified as a high-spin/ high ball hitter. Normally, I would gravitate from UST prior to the release of the Attas T2 line. The Attas T2 was closer to what I expect in a shaft but not exactly what I really want in shaft being that the shaft always felt light. Enter the VTS. The two profiles I tested were the black and the red. Ironically, the colors simply respond to torque values.
The two heads these were tested in were the Callaway FT Tour and the Nike VR Tour. Oddly enough, after destroying two of the FT Tour heads and one VR Tour, we were able to find one of each to stand up to the paces we were going to put them through. Initially, we pit the marked lofts of 8.5 through the paces but after checking them the loft on the Callaway was actually well over 9 and the Nike closer to 10. After selecting heads with similar spec’d lofts of 9* testing would begin. Each shaft was tipped .50 inches and the static weight was approximately 78 grams ungripped.
I quickly noticed that the initial launch was about 1.5 to 2 degrees higher in the black than the red and had spin in an area (3,000 plus) that would be unplayable for me (roughly 14* - 16*). This equates to about a 280 yard or so carry which really wouldn’t be that bad on a wet course. However, I typically play at sea level, so this presents its own set of problems when the ball needs to be flighted down and maneuvered.
The following are the averages of the day of testing and evaluation:
FT Tour with VTS Black FT Tour with VTS Red
Launch Avg. 15.8 Launch Avg. 14.8
Spin Avg. 3200 Spin Avg. 2700
Carry Avg. 281 Carry Avg. 289
VR Tour with VTS Black VR Tour with VTS Red
Launch Avg. 15.0 Launch Avg. 14.6
Spin Avg. 2700 Spin Avg. 2200
Carry Avg. 290 Carry Avg. 302
I have been able to thoroughly play test these shafts on my home course. There are a couple of spots that I haven’t seen in quite awhile. This was due to two heads that left the “sheepfold” awhile ago in exchange for more accuracy (the venerable 282 and the FT-5T LCG). The first hole is actually driveable if it is slightly wind-aided. On this particular day it was and I managed to find the right side of the green at pin-high. I managed to miss a total of 3 fairways during this particular round so I won’t rule out the honeymoon experience. However, during the play-testing the red version performed much better for me than the black. Shot shapes with the VR Tour versus the Ft Tour were extremely easy to execute and my normal left miss was completely eliminated in exchange for a slight tail-fade. As noted in one of the earlier discussions, the dispersion is much better than I expected and is a substantial improvement over my previous driver shaft choice.
All in all, UST has created a winner and is a good product that even the average Joe can take advantage of. Based on the feedback that I got from UST, most of the big hitters gravitated to the red version in either X or XX during testing.














