TM Burner Irons -- 1.0 VS 2.0
Posted 01 January 2011 - 11:17 PM
Seems the differences are merely cosmetic?
( Although I think the black looks a little better than the chrome)
Posted 01 January 2011 - 11:37 PM
I don't have either set, so I can not comment of the differences between them, other than the 2.0's short irons look a little bit smaller than the 1.0's.
Titleist 917F 16.5, Aldila Rogue Black 70 stiff
Cleveland DST 3 hybrid, Diamana Redboard regular
Titliest 712 AP1, 4-GW, Dynalite XP R300
Cleveland Rotex 2.0 54*
Callaway Mac Daddy PM Black 58*
Posted 02 January 2011 - 10:59 AM
Posted 02 January 2011 - 12:52 PM
Callaway Epic 3+ wood Matrix Red Tie 65Q4
Titleist 818 H1 18* and 21* Tensei Blue and 25* Tensei Red Hybrids
Titleist 816 AP1 6-GW Kuro Kage regular
Scratch DD 53 and 60
TM Tour Spider Day with Bettinardi spider CB long grip
OUUL stand bag
Titleist NXT Tour/Tour Soft
Posted 02 January 2011 - 10:08 PM
BTW, the R9's are great looking sticks and the predominant difference from the Burner's is less offset in the R9's, so the OP might want to look at the R9's instead of trying to
press offset from the Burner's. I had my R9's bent one degree strong so the lofts matched up with the Burner's, and I found distance to be very similar between them. I actually wanted more offset than the R9's.
Thanks for the info. I am thinking if I get them that I will go with TT DG SL's for the shaft.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users