TM Burner Irons -- 1.0 VS 2.0
Posted 01 January 2011 - 11:17 PM
Seems the differences are merely cosmetic?
( Although I think the black looks a little better than the chrome)
Posted 01 January 2011 - 11:37 PM
I don't have either set, so I can not comment of the differences between them, other than the 2.0's short irons look a little bit smaller than the 1.0's.
Cobra King LTD, 16*
Cleveland DST 3 hybrid, Diamana Redboard, Regular
Titliest 712 AP1, 4-GW, Dynalite XP R300
Cleveland Rotex 2.0 54* + 58*
Posted 02 January 2011 - 10:59 AM
Posted 02 January 2011 - 12:52 PM
Callaway GBB 3 wood clocked to 17 KK Silver Tini
Cobra Max 3 and 5 Hybrids
Cobra King F7 6-GW
Scratch DD 53 and 60
TM Tour Spider Day
OUUL stand bag
Posted 02 January 2011 - 10:08 PM
BTW, the R9's are great looking sticks and the predominant difference from the Burner's is less offset in the R9's, so the OP might want to look at the R9's instead of trying to
press offset from the Burner's. I had my R9's bent one degree strong so the lofts matched up with the Burner's, and I found distance to be very similar between them. I actually wanted more offset than the R9's.
Thanks for the info. I am thinking if I get them that I will go with TT DG SL's for the shaft.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users