Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

* * * * - 3 votes

(A Review) TaylorMade Burner 2.0 Irons


222 replies to this topic

#1 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 05:10 PM

TaylorMade Burner 2.0 Irons Review



Pros:  An improved addition to their Burner line of G I irons.  Medium width sole, and with a thinnish  top line preferred by  many.  These irons will suit the needs of the serious golfer as well as the avid weekender.  The shorter heel to toe length frames the ball well, while offering the appearance of a players iron at address.  The sole, while not overly wide, skims through the turf with ease as would a much wider sole.


Cons:  These irons with the KBS tours do tend to launch the ball a bit higher.  Some have reported a lack of consistency with regards to distances with each iron but I have not found that to be true.  While not overly large in size, they are G I irons. Some have voiced their opposition to the cavity and it's busy look,  although I don't mind it at all.


Bottom Line:  The 2.0 are a good improvement over the most popular Burner 2009.  The new black steel and chromed sole, along with the carbon fiber look in the cavity make this a more attractive iron overall.  Distances were most consistent, as was ball flight, although a bit high .  Suits me fine. Some may not care for the added height  but all in all, a  much better performer than it's previous version.   For sure, these will be a solid performer for TaylorMade Golf's new lines for 2011.


The Review:  Taylormade Golf has made quite a good improvement over their previous model of Burner Irons. The balance and feel throughout the set has greatly improved in my opinion, and with the new blackened steel and chromed look,  their new appearance is quite striking.  Along with the new added blackened and chrome finish there seems to  be an added and a more durable  face finish, as well.   Maybe help to keep their great looks awhile longer. Posted Image

A much thinner top line, with an improved sole width as well as shorter from heel to toe exudes confidence rarely seen in a superior G I irons such as these.  I found the tendency to hit high straight to  slight draws or high fades quite easy compared to other irons in this G I category.  A very solid performer with that soft forged feel.


Whether you're a scratch player, a weekend warrior, or anywhere in between, these irons will fit  the largest portion of our golfing community -- quite possibly  more so than any of their previous  G I offerings.  Hands down  a winner here for TaylorMade Golf.

Photo comparison are TM Burner 2.0 vs. Miz MX 300.  I've used 9, 7, and 5 irons from each set for comparison.

[attachment=675939:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 006 (Medium).jpg]


[attachment=662638:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 001 (Medium).jpg]

[attachment=662639:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 002 (Medium).jpg]

[attachment=662640:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 011 (Medium).jpg]

[attachment=662641:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 004 (Medium).jpg]

[attachment=662642:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 013 (Medium).jpg]

[attachment=662643:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 015 (Medium).jpg]

[attachment=662644:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 023 (Medium).jpg]

References have been made with regards to the lengths of the TaylorMade irons.  Here is a comparison between the Burner 2.0 and the MX 300.  There might be 1/4 inch additional length difference between the two.  Very close.

[attachment=662645:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 030 (Medium).jpg]
[attachment=1050755:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 001 (Large).jpg]

[attachment=1050757:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 009 (Medium).jpg]

negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

1

#2 Sakman

Sakman

    @ryansako

  • Marshals
  • 5,909 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 1687
  • Joined: 06/15/2005
  • Location:N 41 34' 54.0491"

Posted 28 September 2010 - 05:50 PM

Very nice review Mac! TM is calling my name...

2

#3 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 05:55 PM

 Sakman, on 28 September 2010 - 05:50 PM, said:

Very nice review Mac! TM is calling my name...

Thank Ya Sak, I appreciate that.Posted Image


These are quite surprising, to say the least...They're making a believer out of me, Fo Sho!..Posted Image


negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

3

#4 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 07:39 PM

Just a bit about my game.  

My handicap for the last 8 years pretty much stays between 11 to 14, depending on how much free time I have.  And while describing what is strong or what is weak in a mid capper like me?  Driving is probably my weak link, and chipping and putting is my stronger suit.  

My iron play is mediocre, although distances with my irons are decent, and I can pretty much advance the ball the distance I'm wanting but ball trajectory for me is the less than stellar.  For example, from 150 yards out, whether using a 6 or a 7 iron, I might hit one high and reach or I might skull one...And that also might reach.Posted Image  I can do it all.  My most consistent trajectory is a mid ball flight with a slight draw. (true)Posted Image

With the New Taylor Made Burner 2.0's, they are assisting me with this weakness in my irons game, and I'm having a fun time hitting high soft shots for a change.  It's fun.Posted Image
negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

4

#5 Sakman

Sakman

    @ryansako

  • Marshals
  • 5,909 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 1687
  • Joined: 06/15/2005
  • Location:N 41 34' 54.0491"

Posted 28 September 2010 - 07:49 PM

How were the 2.0's on tight lies? This is where I really had troubles with the first gen Burner irons. By the looks of the sole of the 2.0's, I'm guessing this isn't much of an issue anymore.

Looking forward to trying these bad boys out!  :clapping:


5

#6 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 08:03 PM

 Sakman, on 28 September 2010 - 07:49 PM, said:

How were the 2.0's on tight lies? This is where I really had troubles with the first gen Burner irons. By the looks of the sole of the 2.0's, I'm guessing this isn't much of an issue anymore.

Looking forward to trying these bad boys out!  :clapping:


Posted Image 1st generation TM Burner 09's, were not one of my "moe"  favorite irons.   And tight lies?  Do you have to be in the short grass to have those?  Posted Image   Our conditions here since I've received my new irons, has been soft, and therefore it's been  pretty easy to get the ball up.  For me, these new Burner 2.0's seem to have less bounce than it's predecessor did, and that's alright by me.Posted Image
negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

6

#7 Jimbud

Jimbud

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,510 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 67683
  • Joined: 10/15/2008
  • Location:Singapore
GolfWRX Likes : 172

Posted 28 September 2010 - 08:42 PM

Thanks for the write up.  Appreciate the time you invested.
Titleist 915, 10.5 Driver
TM RBZ Stage 2 Tour 16.5 Faiway
Adams Idea Tech V4 18 Hybrid
Mizuno MP-64 irons  4-PW
Vokey 50, 54 & 58 wedges
Scotty Cameron Kombi S, 34

7

#8 Mizzy13

Mizzy13

    MJM 13

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 105 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 54076
  • Joined: 04/19/2008
  • Location:Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
GolfWRX Likes : 0

Posted 28 September 2010 - 09:30 PM

Great review.....did you find these as forgiving as the 09 burners or better?

 MrParr1Noid, on 28 September 2010 - 08:03 PM, said:

 Sakman, on 28 September 2010 - 07:49 PM, said:

How were the 2.0's on tight lies? This is where I really had troubles with the first gen Burner irons. By the looks of the sole of the 2.0's, I'm guessing this isn't much of an issue anymore.

Looking forward to trying these bad boys out!  :clapping:


Posted Image 1st generation TM Burner 09's, were not one of my "moe"  favorite irons.   And tight lies?  Do you have to be in the short grass to have those?  Posted Image   Our conditions here since I've received my new irons, has been wet, and therefore it's been  pretty easy to get the ball up.  For me, these new Burner 2.0's seem to have less bounce than it's predecessor did, and that's alright by me.Posted Image




8

#9 peteypro

peteypro

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 106 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 26627
  • Joined: 03/13/2007
  • Location:Philadelphia
  • Ebay ID:petepro10
GolfWRX Likes : 0

Posted 28 September 2010 - 09:35 PM

R THESE IN STORES ANYWHERE?

9

#10 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 09:45 PM

For myself, there is no comparison between the Burner 09 and the Burner 2.0 , 2011.  2011's are light years ahead  Posted Image in my opinion.

 Mizzy13, on 28 September 2010 - 09:30 PM, said:

Great review.....did you find these as forgiving as the 09 burners or better?

 MrParr1Noid, on 28 September 2010 - 08:03 PM, said:

 Sakman, on 28 September 2010 - 07:49 PM, said:

How were the 2.0's on tight lies? This is where I really had troubles with the first gen Burner irons. By the looks of the sole of the 2.0's, I'm guessing this isn't much of an issue anymore.

Looking forward to trying these bad boys out!  :clapping:


Posted Image 1st generation TM Burner 09's, were not one of my "moe"  favorite irons.   And tight lies?  Do you have to be in the short grass to have those?  Posted Image   Our conditions here since I've received my new irons, has been wet, and therefore it's been  pretty easy to get the ball up.  For me, these new Burner 2.0's seem to have less bounce than it's predecessor did, and that's alright by me.Posted Image



negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

10

#11 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 09:53 PM

 Jimbud, on 28 September 2010 - 08:42 PM, said:

Thanks for the write up.  Appreciate the time you invested.

Thanks lots.  Most people would prefer to read what a low capper is doing, rather than a mid hack like myself. Posted Image


 peteypro, on 28 September 2010 - 09:35 PM, said:

R THESE IN STORES ANYWHERE?

I'm not sure what the release date is on the Taylor Made Burner 2.0's.  But I'll check that out for you.

Thanks guys..Posted Image



negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

11

#12 jones137

jones137

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,550 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 24427
  • Joined: 01/22/2007
  • Location:Estero, FL
  • Ebay ID:roberson28
GolfWRX Likes : 74

Posted 28 September 2010 - 10:11 PM

Great pictures and review.

Can you compare these at all to the MX300's? I'm loving the 300's but you never know.
Titleist 915D2 9.5* Rogue Black 95MSI 60S
Callaway XHot Pro 15* Project X 6.5
Mizuno MP Fli Hi 2 Iron C-Taper X
Bridgeston J40CB 3-PW Project X 6.0
Ping Anser 54*,60* Project X 6.0
Taylormade Imola 8 35"

12

#13 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 10:37 PM

 jones137, on 28 September 2010 - 10:11 PM, said:

Great pictures and review.

Can you compare these at all to the MX300's? I'm loving the 300's but you never know.

I did use the Mizuno MX 300's to show a head size comparison, and a shaft length per iron number  but as far as comparing performance of one iron over another, I'd rather not do that, this is a review..  

But I will tell you this...The Taylor Made Burner 2009's  do not stand a candlestick  to the Taylor Made Burner 2.0, 2011's.   I was not a fan of the 2009's but I could easily bag these TM Burner 2.0's for the duration.
negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

13

#14 wick3d

wick3d

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 79 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 101831
  • Joined: 01/12/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 1

Posted 28 September 2010 - 11:19 PM

I was told they would be available October 15th by my local store not sure if that was shipping date from TM or shelf date.
Was the set used for review come with KBS shafts?
When i was placing my order i was told that KBS shafts were not an upgrade option only DG,Projects and Nippons
Ill most likely go with Nippon NS Pro 950

14

#15 DRGJR72

DRGJR72

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,115 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 7788
  • Joined: 11/14/2005
  • Location:Naples, Florida
  • Handicap:PGA
GolfWRX Likes : 196

Posted 28 September 2010 - 11:38 PM

Thanks for the in depth review....Gonna have to give these a peek.

Driver: GBB Epic Sub Zero
3W: Callaway DBD
Hybrid: Adams LSP
Irons: Bridgestone J40 cb
52, 56, 60 Fourteen
Putter: Depends on the week....

15

#16 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 28 September 2010 - 11:44 PM

 wick3d, on 28 September 2010 - 11:19 PM, said:

I was told they would be available October 15th by my local store not sure if that was shipping date from TM or shelf date.
Was the set used for review come with KBS shafts?
When i was placing my order i was told that KBS shafts were not an upgrade option only DG,Projects and Nippons
Ill most likely go with Nippon NS Pro 950


Mine were ordered with the KBS tours.  My new  best shafts.Posted Image

 DRGJR72, on 28 September 2010 - 11:38 PM, said:

Thanks for the in depth review....Gonna have to give these a peek.


It is fun to hit the high ball for a change.Posted Image


negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

16

#17 Styx

Styx

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 46889
  • Joined: 01/23/2008
  • Location:Austin, TX
GolfWRX Likes : 0

Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:03 AM

Good to hear, I can not wait to try them out.

17

#18 tbowles411

tbowles411

    Belen Mozo!

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 23,019 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 5624
  • Joined: 08/30/2005
  • Location:Northern Virginia (One day I hope to be a Texan!)
  • Handicap:Golf
GolfWRX Likes : 5075

Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:09 AM

Nice review.  It's going to be tough to choose a backup set...either these or the Adams V3 irons...
PING G Driver
PING G Fairway 3 Wood
PING G Hybrids (3, 4)
PING G Irons (5-UW)
PING Glide 2.0 (54SS, 58WS)
Scotty Cameron Golo5 CB
Ball: TaylorMade TP5/Srixon Q Star Tour (testing both)

18

#19 duffer888

duffer888

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,872 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 22282
  • Joined: 11/29/2006
GolfWRX Likes : 231

Posted 29 September 2010 - 11:32 AM

I think TM's policy on non-stock shafts with the 09 Burners was to make them standard length, so keep this in mind.
What's in the Swift X?
Ping driver
Callaway fairways
Ping irons
TM ball
SeeMore mFPG

19

#20 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 29 September 2010 - 12:42 PM

 duffer888, on 29 September 2010 - 11:32 AM, said:

I think TM's policy on non-stock shafts with the 09 Burners was to make them standard length, so keep this in mind.


Whereas I don't remember the length of my TM Burner 2009's, I am however, reviewing here, the Taylor Made Burner 2.0, 2011 model.  I have compared their lengths to the Miz MX 300's, iron to iron.   The last photos in my review will show that there is less than 1/4 inch difference between MX 300 and TM Burner 2.0's to the 5 to 5, 7 to 7, and 9 to 9.

I don't know if the KBS tour shafts are a custom offering or a stock offering.

negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20

#21 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 29 September 2010 - 04:48 PM

 tbowles411, on 29 September 2010 - 09:09 AM, said:

Nice review.  It's going to be tough to choose a backup set...either these or the Adams V3 irons...

This is always the fun part about golf and it's equipment decisions...Posted Image  The back up's to the back up set, to that other set that you're backing up too.Posted Image

Having Fun.Posted Image



negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

21

#22 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 29 September 2010 - 07:50 PM

An overall head size and length comparison between Taylor Made Burner 2.0 and Mizuno MX 300.  9, 7, and 5 irons.

[attachment=663253:TM Burner 2.0  review pics 028 (Large).jpg]
negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

22

#23 wick3d

wick3d

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 79 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 101831
  • Joined: 01/12/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 1

Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:23 PM

 MrParr1Noid, on 28 September 2010 - 11:44 PM, said:

Mine were ordered with the KBS tours.  My new  best shafts.Posted Image

I've the KBS90s in my CB2s love the high ball flight on those shafts. I was hoping i could get them in the Burner 2.0.  
I'm going to be ordering mine tomorrow...I wish i could order them with KBS :(
unfortunately my local store said its not an option. I may have to settle for Nippon NS Pro 950s
From what I've read not a bad shaft either.

Edited by wick3d, 29 September 2010 - 09:27 PM.


23

#24 jol

jol

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,269 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 110098
  • Joined: 06/27/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 133

Posted 30 September 2010 - 05:43 AM

When you order the 2.0s with optional shafts, are the lengths of each club the same as those with the stock shafts or are they "standard"?

Below are ths specs for the '09 Burners. In general the shafts are 1/4 inch longer than other manufacturers (standard) through the 7I and the difference increases per club to the 3I. The '09 3I is actually 3/4 inch longer than a "standard" one.


 wick3d, on 29 September 2010 - 09:23 PM, said:

 MrParr1Noid, on 28 September 2010 - 11:44 PM, said:

Mine were ordered with the KBS tours.  My new  best shafts.Posted Image

I've the KBS90s in my CB2s love the high ball flight on those shafts. I was hoping i could get them in the Burner 2.0.  
I'm going to be ordering mine tomorrow...I wish i could order them with KBS :(
unfortunately my local store said its not an option. I may have to settle for Nippon NS Pro 950s
From what I've read not a bad shaft either.


24

#25 jol

jol

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,269 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 110098
  • Joined: 06/27/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 133

Posted 30 September 2010 - 07:04 AM

I'm sorry, the chart didn't paste correctly.

3I through LW: in inches; 39.5, 38.875, 38.25, 37.625, 37, 36.5, 36. 35.5, 35.5, 35.25, 35


25

#26 MrParr1Noid

MrParr1Noid

    I never will forget ole what's his name ..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 6,659 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 382
  • Joined: 04/27/2005
  • Location:East of Eden
  • Handicap:39.9
GolfWRX Likes : 300

Posted 30 September 2010 - 11:36 AM

[attachment=663474:taylor made 2.0.JPG]
negative on the giant signature, ghostrider.

26

#27 cashtoclose

cashtoclose

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 461 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 23365
  • Joined: 12/31/2006
  • Handicap:3
GolfWRX Likes : 32

Posted 30 September 2010 - 01:10 PM

 wick3d, on 29 September 2010 - 09:23 PM, said:

 MrParr1Noid, on 28 September 2010 - 11:44 PM, said:

Mine were ordered with the KBS tours.  My new  best shafts.Posted Image

I've the KBS90s in my CB2s love the high ball flight on those shafts. I was hoping i could get them in the Burner 2.0.  
I'm going to be ordering mine tomorrow...I wish i could order them with KBS :(
unfortunately my local store said its not an option. I may have to settle for Nippon NS Pro 950s
From what I've read not a bad shaft either.


You got bad information...I've ordered a set with KBS 90 at no upcharge ship Oct 15th
Epic-Mits. Tensei CK Pro Orange
Epic-Mits. Tensei CK Pro Blue
Epic-Mits. Tensei CK Pro Blue
Epon
Vokey
Cameron 009

27

#28 craz-e

craz-e

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,234 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 39596
  • Joined: 09/19/2007
  • Location:Cairns QLD, Australia
GolfWRX Likes : 411

Posted 30 September 2010 - 01:30 PM

Excellent honest post. I will probably give them a hit sometime just to see if they can offer me anything extra over my AP2's. I think these irons are pretty smart looking, would also love to give the TP version of the original (japan release) a go.

28

#29 jol

jol

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,269 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 110098
  • Joined: 06/27/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 133

Posted 30 September 2010 - 02:34 PM

It looks like the specs for the '09 and 2.0 are almost the same except for the lie angle in the longer clubs.

But that didn't answer my question.  Are the shaft lengths the same as stock if you opt for the upgraded shafts? For exmple: the stock shaft for a 7 iron is 37 inches for the Burner, If I upgrade to say Nippon NS950s will the shaft also be 37 inches or 36.75 inches like most other manufacturers?


 MrParr1Noid, on 30 September 2010 - 11:36 AM, said:



29

#30 CROUSE99

CROUSE99

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 133 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 15689
  • Joined: 06/24/2006
  • Location:Jackson, Ms
GolfWRX Likes : 10

Posted 30 September 2010 - 04:47 PM

 jol, on 30 September 2010 - 02:34 PM, said:

It looks like the specs for the '09 and 2.0 are almost the same except for the lie angle in the longer clubs.

But that didn't answer my question.  Are the shaft lengths the same as stock if you opt for the upgraded shafts? For exmple: the stock shaft for a 7 iron is 37 inches for the Burner, If I upgrade to say Nippon NS950s will the shaft also be 37 inches or 36.75 inches like most other manufacturers?


 MrParr1Noid, on 30 September 2010 - 11:36 AM, said:


I am guessing you could specify any length you like when ordering upgraded shafts.  No different than specifying lie or loft adjustments.  The shop doing the ordering could call TM and verify if that is correct.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

30



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors