
OFFICIAL MIZUNO PICS - MP-630 Fast Track
#31
Posted 16 January 2010 - 05:14 AM

Titleist 910F 15º 3 Wood
PING G15 21.5º 7 Wood
PING G25 4-PW
SCOR 49º, 54º, 59º
TaylorMade DLL 35", AdiZero shoes
#32
Posted 17 January 2010 - 11:14 PM
#33
Posted 18 January 2010 - 10:06 AM
Having played the MP600 for the last couple of seasons I was impressed with ballflight, feedback, sound and looks but not so much with the fast track system and forgiveness (and headcover). I recently decided to go back to Callaway again for some added forgiveness and distance. I wonder if the fast track system and forgiveness improved on the MP630, the headcover definitely is! I don't like an open face, that is a bummer.
The fairwaywoods look really nice but my V-steel is so freakin good that Mizuno needs to bring a lot to the table to kick my V-steel out of the bag. Also the small size is not my cup of tea. I can imagine it is good for overall usability but because I am not hitting fairwaywoods of the deck anymore I only need a backup driver. Perhaps if I where to ad a little 4 or 5 wood...
#35
Posted 18 January 2010 - 03:06 PM

#36
Posted 19 January 2010 - 10:21 PM
#37
Posted 20 January 2010 - 08:12 PM
Driver - Great clean shape. Very sharp at address. The fast track system now goes more from heal to toe and all the way around the back of the clubhead. Clubface did not look to be shut at address on the 10.5 sample i was hitting. At impact the club made a great, solid sound. Very quiet compared to most drivers these days. This is still not a driver for every player. It will be popular with the good players who like something that looks good and is still playable for non-pros. Finally, Mizuno realized that the "exsar" shaft was a huge draw back in their wood line. The addition of the Mitsi Fubuki is nice. This might help level the playing field with other companies.
3 Wood - WOW! This thing is bad-freaking-a**! It is like a TEE on steriords! LOL. Even though the sample he has was a 15 with a regular shaft I was hitting it nearly as far as the driver with a low ball flight and plenty of roll. Seriously, i was cranking out 265yd shots with this thing over and over! From the top it looks great, very compact and simple. No silly decals or alignment aids. Same as with the driver, ditching the "exsar" for the Fubu is a great idea! Well done Mizuno.
Hybrid - Much improved but I still dont think Mizuno will sell a boat load of these things. I did not get a chance to hit this one as i was short on time but it looks great and sets up very nicely.
Overall, I think Mizuno will have a strong product to bring to the market but it is always going to be tough to get people to try their woods. Still just an iron company in my opinion. More offerings like this and that could certainly change!
#38
Posted 24 January 2010 - 01:22 AM
I can't wait.........
#39
Posted 24 January 2010 - 10:22 AM
- did you hit both drivers? How was the non Fasttrack driver if so?
- Did the 3 wood have a 73 gram Fubuki or same 60 something weight as driver?
#40
Posted 26 January 2010 - 08:30 PM

#41
Posted 29 January 2010 - 07:27 PM
Release date quoted as February
RRPs in £ sterling...
fast track driver 299
non ft driver 229
fw 169
hy 139
If it means anything looks like the driver shaft at least is 64g
#42
Posted 29 January 2010 - 11:40 PM
#43
Posted 30 January 2010 - 12:00 AM
Chunkylover77, on 26 January 2010 - 08:30 PM, said:
I could be wrong but any "made for" fubuki I have come across has the red lettered fubuki script like the one in the photo provided - ala callaway.
My genuine aftermarket fubuki shaft has a darker script.
#44
Posted 31 January 2010 - 12:15 AM
#45
Posted 31 January 2010 - 08:53 AM

#46
Posted 31 January 2010 - 11:25 AM
#47
Posted 31 January 2010 - 12:49 PM
gmoney77, on 31 January 2010 - 08:53 AM, said:
Shafts are "made for" and here are specs
Driver shaft for both
R 59g 4.5
S 61g 4.5
X 66g 4.0
Fairway
R 68g 4.5
S 71g 4.5
X 74g 4.0
They all had very high torque and you could feel how soft they were.
Fairways are very solid, best 5 wood head I have seen in a while, it will be in my bag.
Pricing quoted was:
MP-630 $299
MP-630 FT $499 (200 dollar jump, seemed high)
MP Fairway $249
For me, the MP-630 w/o FT is the way to go, just put a better shaft in that head and you will have a very nice driver, very traditional looking and clean.
Wow. That's heck of a price jump. Looks like I'll be trading my backups and old sets and whatever else I can throw back LOL
#48
Posted 31 January 2010 - 02:33 PM
#49
Posted 01 February 2010 - 05:43 AM
#50
Posted 01 February 2010 - 02:30 PM

#51
Posted 24 February 2010 - 10:23 AM
Personally I'm dissapointed the driver has the weighting gimmick on, not a fan of those systems.
#52
Posted 24 February 2010 - 12:34 PM
They offer all sorts of shafts for these - not just the fubuki (avixcore, graffaloy etc) at least in Europe pretty sure with no upcharge.
http://golf.mizunoeurope.com/woods/
#53
Posted 24 February 2010 - 02:18 PM
Titleist 910F 15*, Project X-8C4
PING i15 Hybrid 20*, UST Tour Red 85
Titleist AP2 712 (4-PW), DG S-300
Adams MB2 50*, Nike VR Forged 56*/60*
PING Anser 2 Milled, 35"
#54
Posted 24 February 2010 - 03:07 PM
#55
Posted 24 February 2010 - 04:39 PM

#56
Posted 24 February 2010 - 07:02 PM
BigPete, on 24 February 2010 - 04:39 PM, said:
Just like they don't want the black ni 68s...
Who knows how these decisions are made
#57
Posted 24 February 2010 - 07:37 PM
Quote
That was kinda the point I clumsily was trying to make
#58
Posted 24 February 2010 - 09:29 PM
#59
Posted 25 February 2010 - 05:13 AM
#60
Posted 26 February 2010 - 12:00 AM

Edited by keith723, 26 February 2010 - 10:55 AM.
Titleist 910F 15*, Project X-8C4
PING i15 Hybrid 20*, UST Tour Red 85
Titleist AP2 712 (4-PW), DG S-300
Adams MB2 50*, Nike VR Forged 56*/60*
PING Anser 2 Milled, 35"












