Posted 23 August 2016 - 06:28 PM
We are getting so sidetracked here. The thread is about 4 handicaps vs LPGA pros. As almost everyone has said, a 4 handicap would get destroyed by the ladies
We get sidetracked by people who want to label posters as sexist, and by people posting about different scenarios than what the OP asked.
It's not sexist to say that men have a physical advantage over women. One poster has referenced games between the US women's national soccer team and teenage boys, which the women lost. Men also tend to compete with women in track and field in the same gaps, a 15-16 year old top sprinter will beat olympic champion women. I don't mean that to sexist...it's not sexist, it's just a fact. It's nothing against women. So if someone posts that a top amateur 15 year old boy could beat an LPGA pro, it's not a shot at women and it's not sexist....it's just most likely true
But a 4 handicap, the subject of the thread. Would get killed....
We don't have to pretend men and women are the same physically. It's not insulting anyone to concede that
Ping G LS Tec 9 w/ Tour 65
Callaway XR Pro 14 w/Diamana D+ 80
Callaway Steelhead XR 3 iron w/S300
Callaway Apex Pro 4-PW w/S300
Callaway MD Forged 52,56,60 w/S200
Odyssey Versa Works 1W Tank