Replacing R510 TP
#4
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:00 PM
What does that Fubuki hit like? I love the Speeder 757 and Rombax. Also what is the difference between the TP and regular? As far as I can tell its only the shaft.
#5
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:03 PM
#6
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:11 PM
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 05:00 PM, said:
What does that Fubuki hit like? I love the Speeder 757 and Rombax. Also what is the difference between the TP and regular? As far as I can tell its only the shaft.
Correct, shaft is the only difference.
#7
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:26 PM
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 09:38 PM, said:
What clubs have you guys played that were similar? I am thinking 425 TP but I really don't know.
Any help is appreciated.
How about another r510tp?
Loads of them out there.
#8
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:30 PM
bluestreak, on May 16 2009, 05:26 PM, said:
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 09:38 PM, said:
What clubs have you guys played that were similar? I am thinking 425 TP but I really don't know.
Any help is appreciated.
How about another r510tp?
Loads of them out there.
I was thinking about that, but nice ones are going for $200+. How do I know these aren't about to crack as well? They have to be 7 years old or so.
#9
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:45 PM
#12
Posted 16 May 2009 - 05:15 PM
Mainlinegolfer, on May 16 2009, 05:05 PM, said:
I wasn't impressed with the 907D2, I haven't really looked at the 909's yet. The adjustability means NOTHING to me. The ability to swap shafts is intriguing but I would just leave the face square-slightly open and never touch the weights after I balanced them for neutral.
#13
Posted 16 May 2009 - 05:34 PM
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 06:15 PM, said:
Mainlinegolfer, on May 16 2009, 05:05 PM, said:
I wasn't impressed with the 907D2, I haven't really looked at the 909's yet. The adjustability means NOTHING to me. The ability to swap shafts is intriguing but I would just leave the face square-slightly open and never touch the weights after I balanced them for neutral.
Just my point-- in my opinion, after being fitted, further adjustability isn't really necessary (and may affect durabiity and playability). The Titleist 909 is NOT like the 907 and sits .5* open. Clean, simple, traditional shape (like the R510TP). I also still have a R510 TP with 757 Speeder.
#15
Posted 16 May 2009 - 06:53 PM
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 06:37 PM, said:
Thanks for the help.
Check the Titleist website. The specs of the stock and custom shafts are listed and there is also a graph comparing spin and launches of various shafts. I posted a link to the chart on Golfwrx a few weeks ago. It's a useful comparison of shafts whether or not one choses a Titleist driver.
#16
Posted 16 May 2009 - 07:02 PM
Adams 4250DF Tour Prototype
I've posted several times about this transition. Feel is equivalent, workability, distance forgiveness, look, it's all there. Tour only, but findable if you look around. Insight A4 9015D is also a good replacement, but 4250DF is a touch more equivalent to the R510TP.
Jeff
#18
Posted 16 May 2009 - 08:47 PM
#19
Posted 16 May 2009 - 09:55 PM
zivis2, on May 16 2009, 08:45 PM, said:
I was just going to chime in with this. I still have an 8.5* 510tp/757 in the bag as I've not been able to find anything good enough for change. Recently, I've been experimenting with the cobra D's and they're a great modern day alternative IMO. Deep face that sets up nicely, feels solid and satisfying to hit, hides the CC's well and drops low spin bombs with the right setup.
You will definitely need to go up in loft from the 510 though. These things are super low spin heads. Unfortunately, I wasn't aware just what that meant initially and picked up 8.5* that I'm now looking to get rid of. I just can't generate the speed needed to get the proper launch and flight, but I know this club can be a monster with the right shaft and loft. I'm thinking a 10.5* with a 757 would be money.
I'd try to demo one and see what you think.
#20
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:29 PM
Mainlinegolfer, on May 17 2009, 08:05 AM, said:
I had been playing the 510tp for years (great club). Mid way through last year I decided that it might be time to consider updating the driver. I hit all the TM drivers at the time and subsequently each new model they bought out. However nothing quite compared to the 510tp.
A couple of weeks ago I tried a 909D3 and was really happy with the results. So I went and had a fitting session and could not be happier with the outcome. Plays slightly longer than my 510tp and is just as consistent.
Worth while considering this option.
#21
Posted 16 May 2009 - 11:54 PM
I've had the same driver for three years and have tried to replace it several times with no luck. The R7 Limited did the trick!
#23
Posted 17 May 2009 - 12:08 AM
LKB1, on May 16 2009, 10:29 PM, said:
Mainlinegolfer, on May 17 2009, 08:05 AM, said:
I had been playing the 510tp for years (great club). Mid way through last year I decided that it might be time to consider updating the driver. I hit all the TM drivers at the time and subsequently each new model they bought out. However nothing quite compared to the 510tp.
A couple of weeks ago I tried a 909D3 and was really happy with the results. So I went and had a fitting session and could not be happier with the outcome. Plays slightly longer than my 510tp and is just as consistent.
Worth while considering this option.
I am intrigued. I will demo it tomorrow and see what its like.
#25
Posted 17 May 2009 - 06:56 AM
mrlogsdon29, on May 17 2009, 03:08 PM, said:
LKB1, on May 16 2009, 10:29 PM, said:
Mainlinegolfer, on May 17 2009, 08:05 AM, said:
I had been playing the 510tp for years (great club). Mid way through last year I decided that it might be time to consider updating the driver. I hit all the TM drivers at the time and subsequently each new model they bought out. However nothing quite compared to the 510tp.
A couple of weeks ago I tried a 909D3 and was really happy with the results. So I went and had a fitting session and could not be happier with the outcome. Plays slightly longer than my 510tp and is just as consistent.
Worth while considering this option.
I am intrigued. I will demo it tomorrow and see what its like.
Lets us know how you go and what you think.
I know once I had a demo made up after my fit session (to test on the course) I found it hard to go back to the 510tp.
#28
Posted 17 May 2009 - 05:55 PM
Mainlinegolfer, on May 16 2009, 06:34 PM, said:
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 06:15 PM, said:
Mainlinegolfer, on May 16 2009, 05:05 PM, said:
I wasn't impressed with the 907D2, I haven't really looked at the 909's yet. The adjustability means NOTHING to me. The ability to swap shafts is intriguing but I would just leave the face square-slightly open and never touch the weights after I balanced them for neutral.
Just my point-- in my opinion, after being fitted, further adjustability isn't really necessary (and may affect durabiity and playability). The Titleist 909 is NOT like the 907 and sits .5* open. Clean, simple, traditional shape (like the R510TP). I also still have a R510 TP with 757 Speeder.
I totally agree!
Also a long time R510 TP /757 Speeder player.
As far as looks and feel, 909D3 with the proper shaft is a fantastic newer version.
I wanted to go that way myself, but I need the extra launch of the 909D2
#31
Posted 17 May 2009 - 08:11 PM
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 05:30 PM, said:
bluestreak, on May 16 2009, 05:26 PM, said:
mrlogsdon29, on May 16 2009, 09:38 PM, said:
What clubs have you guys played that were similar? I am thinking 425 TP but I really don't know.
Any help is appreciated.
How about another r510tp?
Loads of them out there.
I was thinking about that, but nice ones are going for $200+. How do I know these aren't about to crack as well? They have to be 7 years old or so.
$200+??? That's eBay for ya...
Just snagged one the other day (head only) on the BST in perfect condition for $65. Still the best of the best...
#32
Posted 18 May 2009 - 01:09 AM
I think better is better not newer is better.
#34
Posted 21 May 2009 - 12:10 AM
Compared to another R510tp in the bin this one was a "10".
A while back I traded my R7TP/757 speeder to my son for his 580XD.
I missed the speeder shaft so I bought the 510TP. I should have bought R510TP in the first place years ago. (bought R7TP instead).
BTW, new or old this thing is long and you can't beat the feel.
Newer is not always better, just newer.
Halo
#35
Posted 21 May 2009 - 07:58 AM
mrlogsdon29, on May 17 2009, 08:38 PM, said:
glad you liked the D3!! Was it with the Titleist "made for" Voodoo??
As a long time R510TP with Speeder 757 fan I found it difficult to get anything newer that was as good. Went through R7TP/R7 425TP/R7 460TP/G2/Tour Burner TP/FT-5/R9 TP and still thought of how good the R510TP was.
Then I did a back to back test on the range between the R510TP (with Stiff Speeder 757) and my Tour Burner TP (with oem W/B 65g) and couldn't believe how soft and slow the R510TP felt on impact. For me it showed how the technology in the face feel had moved on as the TB TP felt far more "explosive" and was far longer. The 510 is still one the best ever but compared to something well fitted in todays technology it does feel a little old.
Wouldn't part with my R510TP but as the 757 Speeder is broken now (boohoo) it is in the garage and I'm on the look out for a 757 TP Ion shaft.
#37
Posted 21 May 2009 - 09:13 AM
mrlogsdon29, on May 17 2009, 03:38 PM, said:
Shall I PM my Paypal address so you can send my 10% commission?
BTW, I just ordered a 909D2 with a "real" Diamana Blueboard 73 x5ct - stiff. I really liked the 909D3 and considered it with a Blueboard or Fubuki 63. However, I just found the feel and trajectory (spin) of the 909D2 slightly better for my old guy "senior" swing (103mph); I decided on a Blueboard instead of Fubuki because it was more of a known commodity. I selcted 73 instead of 63 because was trying to balance the higher spinning D2 head (compared with D3) with a lower torque, more stable shaft (than the Blueboard 63).
I hope it works out.




Facebook Connect
Twitter Connect
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help
Quote












