Who else prefers the Euro telecasts
#1
Posted 22 January 2009 - 11:34 PM
Is it just me or do they care more about golf and less about ratings? I just prefer watching the announcers on the European tour because it seems like they're not trying to be celebrities, just parlay golf to you, the viewer... and they are quiet more. Anybody else agree?
#3
Posted 23 January 2009 - 12:02 AM
#6
Posted 23 January 2009 - 12:33 AM
Couldn't agree more. The Euro broadcasts are way better. No posturing, no inane analysis. Just golf coverage. I always love hearing "Hmmmm, I don't think he's going to like that one." It is so much better than "I can't believe he would hit it there." As if the guy was trying to hit it in the waist-high grass or plug one in a bunker.
#7
Posted 23 January 2009 - 12:43 AM
I hardly watch Bob Hope this week, much prefer to watch the Desert Swing tournaments, Abu Dhabi, Quatar and Dubai
It's all about golf and you avoid constantly having to listen to boring "essays", boring interviews and Rich Lerner talking and smiling like there were no tomorrow
#8
Posted 23 January 2009 - 02:30 AM
though the golf is definitely better state-side. for EPGA, some courses are so dull and gloomy - weather being a factor. they should get swing vision, trackman and shot tracker on the EPGA!
i'd LOVE to watch the masters with the euro guys commentating!
#9
Posted 23 January 2009 - 02:30 AM
i think it's the coverage that makes the european broadcasts so much better, so i'd take those even with the american announcers. that being said, those british announcers are fantastic.
#10
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:19 AM
The first is the announcers wind me up. They are way too dramatic and just seem to loud. I know it sounds daft but golf is a slow paced game and i don't like hearing people talk at 100mph and raise there voices.
The 2nd one is the commercial's /infomercials. IMO they are aimed at idiots. I hate the way they convey the products and its just way too cheesy.
#13
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:15 AM
I would much rather watch the Euro, Australazian(?) and even Nationwide Tour broadcasts. Here are my reasons:
The broadcasts starts with the two announcers in a beautiful place on the course. They simply inform us about and discuss the 9 or 10 players in contention. Then we go to the course and (at least on the Australazian broadcasts) get to watch those 9 or 10 players tee off. I really like that. Then they stick with it. They show the tournament as it unfolds. Nothing MORE and nothing less. If someone drops we usually find out why. If someone comes on, we find out why also.
Here is what I want out of a broadcast. I want it to feel like the two announcers and I have just got off of the shuttle bus and came through the entry gate. We have picked up the pairing sheets and are figuring out what to do. (refer to the above paragraph) We discuss our options and head off to see the action. I want the commentary to be like we are outside of the ropes watching the action. Some "he's got 226 to the front of the green and a tree blocking his entry on his left." Then show me the camera shot from behind the player. Then let him/her hit it and show me the result with a "that was a good swing there" or a "that wasn't a very good effort there." Nothing more. Then move on to the next shot. And if the camera picks up a gaagle of geese on a pond or a couple walking their dog on the adjoining beach for about 10 or 15 seconds that is fine with me. Because I look at that stuff when I am actually at a tournament.
The Euro, Auzzie and Nationwide coverages give me that. The PGA tour does not. Except for the majors, the PGA coverages usually shows me mostly the highest ranked players in that tourn. playing their rounds. Whether they are shooting 65s or 75s. I want to see the "tournament."
#14
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:43 AM
Renton, Doogie & the rest of the Euro announcing team have class.... they're all about the golf & that's what I like!
However I do like the technical gizmos from the PGA Tour telecasts; that adds much value.... and I really like Nantz, Feherty & Oosterhuis
TGC should fire Tilghman, Faldo & Lerner....and make bigger roles for Foltz & Dottie Pepper (she's terrific on the LPGA telecasts)
#15
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:50 AM
1) more golf shots, better leaderboard coverage.
2) better announcers in general, because they don't relate the events
in a manner that they are talking to dummies. I've never been a fan of an
announcer trying to explain to me what I just saw.
3) they are not over-dramatic.
4) I do like Johnny Miller
5) The Golf Channel acts like its a show production, featuring their announcers, analysists,
and such as the stars of the show with a few golf shots thrown in.
6) And American network coverage is twice as bad for the same rasons.
7) In addition to Johnny Miller, I also like David Ferherty, and some of the on course guys.
#16
Posted 23 January 2009 - 09:14 AM
That don't having annoucers saying they choked they call the golf how it is.
#21
Posted 23 January 2009 - 10:11 AM
What I like more about the Euro broadcasts is the content. LOTS more golf and less fluff, which, to me, is great. They seem to spend much less time on the human interest pieces, which to me is fine.
#23 Gallery_Tenementrock_*
Posted 23 January 2009 - 10:34 AM
But I also think Faldo is a great commentator and Miller has a unique perspective that's often interesting but I really don't like much else about US broadcasts. Can't stand the canned phoniness of Tilghman (what is this, the 1950s?); there is way too much self-serving commentary and pointless chatter and hyperbole and frankly these broadcasts are usually cheesy and overwrought.
#26
Posted 23 January 2009 - 10:52 AM
#27
Posted 23 January 2009 - 11:46 AM
(REALLY can't stand Lerner! Somebody needs to tell him he's not a great essayist / poet. He can't even do the basics of a simple interview. Ask an interesting question and let the golfer talk. Leave your ego at home Vince!)
#29
Posted 23 January 2009 - 12:21 PM
#30
Posted 23 January 2009 - 01:07 PM
The jabbering Americans seem to be constantly searching for that memorable "Yes, Sir!" call. I suspect cocaine abuse.
The punishing and relentless commercial breaks make USPGA golf virtually unwatchable, which is a shame.
Less Viagra and more African rhinos basking in mud pools please
#31 Gallery_Tenementrock_*
Posted 23 January 2009 - 01:32 PM
GtownBeerBelly, on Jan 23 2009, 01:07 PM, said:
The jabbering Americans seem to be constantly searching for that memorable "Yes, Sir!" call. I suspect cocaine abuse.
#33
Posted 23 January 2009 - 04:40 PM

Keep David Feherty, Vern Lundquist, Peter Oosterhaus, Gary McCord & Jim Nantz.
As far as the rest of these ego maniacal, elitest, blowhards such as Johnny and Lanny, PLEASE.....spare us and go jump off a bridge.
#34
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:20 PM
I must say that Nick Faldo isn't as bad as the rest of the announcers such as Johnny Miller
#36
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:13 PM
Plus every event is HD and they are using alot of High Speed HD camera's this season for super slow-mo shots which looks great and is a million times better than the awful swing vision I've seen on PGA Tour coverage. You can see all the small movements the players make in the swing to hit various shots, very impressive.
#38
Posted 24 January 2009 - 01:23 AM
The business of sports coverage is to extend beyond its core audience.....and if the sport gets in the way of that happening, something gets tweaked......
I turn to the European coverage - and am still happy just to watch the golf and the golfers.
#40
Posted 24 January 2009 - 11:19 PM
American golf adds way to many stories, blah blah blah. I do not care...
Show me the golf!





Sign In
Register
Help



Quote



















