Brian Gay's Distances.....??????? 175yrd 7 iron....260yrd avg drive? can that be right??
#1
Posted 18 January 2009 - 12:48 PM
has him with a 7 iron distance of 175yds.....
and his avg drive is 260yds - shortest in the field (this week and last)...???
does he have issues with the driver...or is this a mistake..
#4
Posted 18 January 2009 - 01:16 PM
This is what made me to start questioning the golf channels numbers.
#5
Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:11 PM
my numbers are similarly skewed like Gay's...though a bit longer, i hit my 7 iron 195yds and my 4 iron 230ish...but my driver is in the 280-285 range total distance. Which is good but not as long as you'd think considering iron distance. I'll have rounds where i don't have a 300yd drive. I just don't go after drives the way some do
#6
Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:24 PM
#7
Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:27 PM
#8
Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:39 PM
#9
Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:42 PM
The guy is deadly with the flat stick and short game. His mental game is top notch --- think how persistant you'd have to remain being 30/40 yards further from the hole all week.
#12
Posted 18 January 2009 - 04:15 PM
And it's not surprising. I've played with a number of PGA professionals and they all average from 260 to 285. But they all hit the fairway and green on almost every hole.
#13
Posted 18 January 2009 - 05:25 PM
bstone boy, on Jan 18 2009, 04:15 PM, said:
And it's not surprising. I've played with a number of PGA professionals and they all average from 260 to 285. But they all hit the fairway and green on almost every hole.
of course distance matters. As it's been said earlier in this thread the guy has a great short game and iron game. Think of how much more he'd be in contention if he hit it 20yds longer off the tee.
distance doesn't matter at all for pros if they're playing against guys like us. But of course it matters when playing against other top pros.
it's like saying having 4.3 speed is irrelevant to NFL wide receivers. It's not necessary...but it certainly helps
#14
Posted 18 January 2009 - 09:23 PM
MtlJeff, on Jan 18 2009, 02:11 PM, said:
my numbers are similarly skewed like Gay's...though a bit longer, i hit my 7 iron 195yds and my 4 iron 230ish...but my driver is in the 280-285 range total distance. Which is good but not as long as you'd think considering iron distance. I'll have rounds where i don't have a 300yd drive. I just don't go after drives the way some do
Looks like you need to find a good club fitter with a launch monitor....if you can generate enough club head speed to hit a (normal lofted) 7 iron 195...and hit your drive 280...there's something wrong with your driver...
#15
Posted 18 January 2009 - 09:38 PM
Parzinski, on Jan 18 2009, 09:23 PM, said:
MtlJeff, on Jan 18 2009, 02:11 PM, said:
my numbers are similarly skewed like Gay's...though a bit longer, i hit my 7 iron 195yds and my 4 iron 230ish...but my driver is in the 280-285 range total distance. Which is good but not as long as you'd think considering iron distance. I'll have rounds where i don't have a 300yd drive. I just don't go after drives the way some do
Looks like you need to find a good club fitter with a launch monitor....if you can generate enough club head speed to hit a (normal lofted) 7 iron 195...and hit your drive 280...there's something wrong with your driver...
It's just about putting more of a premium on accuracy, with my driver on a launch monitor i averaged 304 total distance after putting the PL red on it on about 20 hits. But that's because you have nothing to lose so you put more of a full swing on it when you're on a monitor. Outside i tone it down and hit more in the 280-285 range. That's why i wonder if that's what a guy like Gay is doing aswell.
#16
Posted 19 January 2009 - 02:47 PM
#17
Posted 19 January 2009 - 03:15 PM
rockmastermike, on Jan 19 2009, 03:47 PM, said:
+1
#19
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:41 AM
#20
Posted 21 January 2009 - 11:10 AM
Most of the round, I'm mostly keeping up with them on my drives, however on the par 5's, I'm 50+ yards behind them. They swing 80% most of the time going for accuracy over distance, but let it out on the par 5's. On the par 3's, they're hitting 7 iron while I'm hitting 5 iron or more.
Someone mentioned that they bump their lofts. I think the opposite is just as likely. Many will tweak lofts weaker to fill gaps. It also makes more sense than tweaking stronger, thereby having negative bounce on your irons.
#21
Posted 21 January 2009 - 01:50 PM
#22
Posted 21 January 2009 - 02:39 PM
I can hit a 5i 205 carry . . . but it's lofted at 25* with 39.25" length . . . so it's actually more of a decent 4i than a long 5i. Then again in another set the 4i is lofted at 24* at 38.25" and flies about the same.
Also, if I were deadly with my long irons, why wouldn't I tone down the tee shot to ensure a nice lie for my long/mid irons?
Maybe he isn't so great from the first cut or rough with shorter irons, so he trades off fairway approaches with longer irons over rough approaches with wedges?
#25
Posted 22 January 2009 - 01:27 PM
I think I slide too much when I am using my driver as oppose to just twisting,but its nothing that $500 worth of lessons couldnt fix.Of course as we all know,in two weeks I would be back to my old self again.
#26
Posted 22 January 2009 - 01:40 PM
BEND OF THE RIVER GC, on Jan 22 2009, 10:38 AM, said:
I dont buy it.The other side of that argument is that he swings out of his shoes with his 7 iron.No one can argue that when he is hitting a 7 iron at a flag,accurecy isnt that important so he can swing like a maniac to get 175 out of his club
#29
Posted 07 February 2009 - 11:06 AM
birdieblair, on Jan 18 2009, 02:27 PM, said:
Ditto. For a while, everyone kept telling me, that you have to be big of the tee to be successful. That God this myth has been stopped.
#30
Posted 09 February 2009 - 01:23 PM
My irons (minus the 64, 58 and 52) are half an inch long, and my 5 iron is 1 degree strong. A full 5 iron (not trying to kill it) carry is right around 212 but with all the changes, it's more like a stock 4 iron.
#31
Posted 09 February 2009 - 02:12 PM
One reason for this statistical phenomena could be the fact that 1) only two drives per round are used; they are calculated on two holes facing opposite directions to counteract the effect of the wind; 2) the driving distance statistic is based purely on distance with the driver, no matter where the ball lands....even if it is in the rough or hazard, they still calculate the distance; 3) the early year Hawaii events seem to really yeild some outlandish driving statistics.
Here's some other stats; Brian Gay is:
20 in Scoring Average
9 in Greens in Regulation
1 in Driving Accuracy
It's also important to note that the driving accuracy statistic is calculated on every non-par three hole, regardless of the club used.
He's just above middle of the pack on putts per GIR and putts per round. It seems like to me, based on the stats, that Brian Gay simply places his premium on accuracy vs. distance. A 175 yard 7 iron is not crazy long...especially depending on the conditions. And, as previous posters have mentioned, with today's drivers, the best method of swinging an iron is very different from the best method of swinging a driver. While hitting down on your iron shots is the way to produce the best result, hitting down on today's drivers is not.
And, just for comparison, the 2009 leader is driving distance: Garrigus, is 121 out of 165 for driving accuracy. And, he is 70th in scoring average.
I would speculate that at 20th in scoring average, and 9th in greens in regulation, the "avg." distance stat is not hurting Brian Gay.
#32
Posted 09 February 2009 - 11:42 PM





Sign In
Register
Help
Quote

















