Sergio will be Nr 1
#51
Posted 11 November 2008 - 03:44 PM
#52 Gallery_midasmulligan2000_*
Posted 11 November 2008 - 03:55 PM
lilgarcia, on Nov 11 2008, 03:44 PM, said:
You didn't really get under anyone's skin (well, maybe one or two people a little) ... but I also doubt you persuaded anyone that Sergio's slight improvement is anywhere close to the level that is a challenge to Tiger.
#53
Posted 11 November 2008 - 04:21 PM
cigarnut81, on Nov 11 2008, 05:58 PM, said:
And has the GREAT ONE never shanked? :
http://uk.youtube.co...h?v=DgOzOxfH8Wk
#55
Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:41 PM
HCEG1, on Nov 11 2008, 04:21 PM, said:
cigarnut81, on Nov 11 2008, 05:58 PM, said:
And has the GREAT ONE never shanked? :
http://uk.youtube.co...h?v=DgOzOxfH8Wk
A shank is as close to a perfect shot that you can get, when playing blades anyway, as the sweet spot is located near to the heel. Rather than get into some sort of very tiresome tirade with you TIGER guys we'll just have to wait and see who is number 1 come the Masters or after THE Open, (That's the British Open peckers and not US Open). Glad to see Garcia gets so under your skin Tiger lovers, just because he's getting closer. Problem is you've had it so easy for such along time you don't know how to play fair. Shame on you! Looking forward to 2009!!!!!!!
#56
Posted 11 November 2008 - 06:03 PM
anders, on Nov 11 2008, 05:41 PM, said:
HCEG1, on Nov 11 2008, 04:21 PM, said:
cigarnut81, on Nov 11 2008, 05:58 PM, said:
And has the GREAT ONE never shanked? :
http://uk.youtube.co...h?v=DgOzOxfH8Wk
A shank is as close to a perfect shot that you can get, when playing blades anyway, as the sweet spot is located near to the heel. Rather than get into some sort of very tiresome tirade with you TIGER guys we'll just have to wait and see who is number 1 come the Masters or after THE Open, (That's the British Open peckers and not US Open). Glad to see Garcia gets so under your skin Tiger lovers, just because he's getting closer. Problem is you've had it so easy for such along time you don't know how to play fair. Shame on you! Looking forward to 2009!!!!!!!
Garcia has gained fewer points this year than Tiger - 400.62 to 425.24. Garcia has lost way fewer points than Tiger - 192.95 to 646.99. Garcia may gain the number one points spot, but a simple analysis of the points tells the story.
Besides, it doesn't matter who is number one after the Masters, or the Open. What matters is who is number one once Tiger returns. I'm not a Tiger fan, I'm a realist. I'd love to see someone challenge Tiger, but the numbers tell me that Sergio isn't even close.
#57
Posted 11 November 2008 - 10:51 PM
And what's his lead now? And I'd think not playing is better than missing a cut, as far as losing points. I could be wrong, but that's my guess.
#58
Posted 11 November 2008 - 11:09 PM
El Crab, on Nov 11 2008, 10:51 PM, said:
And what's his lead now? And I'd think not playing is better than missing a cut, as far as losing points. I could be wrong, but that's my guess.
End of 2008, 11.97
End Jan 2009, 10.46
Masters, (week 14 09), 7.96
US Open (week 22? 09), 6.05
Sergio is currently 8.68, so if he maintains it, then he'll be number one around week 12 next year (roughly late Marchish).
For Tiger right now, missing cuts would be the same, because the minimum divisor of 40 is biting. That he's not playing rather than missing cuts will mean that when he comes back his average will go up more quickly, because each event he plays, he gets the points on the top of the fraction, without anything going on the bottom (the minimum of 40 will likely bite for a long time to come).
#60
Posted 12 November 2008 - 03:43 PM
DavidR, on Nov 12 2008, 10:08 AM, said:
So how many majors had greg norman won when he was world number 1 for the massive period of time?
#62
Posted 12 November 2008 - 08:46 PM
#63
Posted 13 November 2008 - 02:26 PM
Not likely but it may happen given there is a possibilty he could extend his treatment. BUT, W's take care of things like that.
#64
Posted 13 November 2008 - 04:00 PM
The Boom Bapp, on Nov 13 2008, 02:26 PM, said:
Not likely but it may happen given there is a possibilty he could extend his treatment. BUT, W's take care of things like that.
I'm not sure what you are talking about, but Sergio's total points are only a little over 100 less than Tiger's and his rank points are less than 8 behind Tiger.
What "W's" are you talking about?
#65
Posted 13 November 2008 - 04:38 PM
skinkman, on Nov 12 2008, 08:46 PM, said:
Vijay did it by winning a whole bunch of tournaments in a year, that happened to coincide with Tiger having a bad couple of years (by his standards). Vijay would never have got close to Tiger if Tiger had played 03 and 04 like he played 05-07 (or 99-02 for that matter). Looking at the archive on the rankings website, it looks like Vijay's peak was around 13.80 in mid-September of 04. That's less than Tiger's now and he's played one tournament in the last seven months.
Phil hasn't got there because when he was playing his best (probably around the beginning of 06), Tiger was playing well. That's pretty much all there is to it I think. Was Vijay in 04 better than Phil in 06? Who knows? But I don't think you can hand it to Vijay just because he made it to number one.
Tiger destroys everyone else in the rankings because his record in the majors is very good, but probably even more so, his record in the WGC events. Those have 65-75 points for the winner and he wins them like it's going out of fashion. By way of explanation, if Sergio had won all four majors this year, his ranking would be 14.60 right now, so he'd have just snuck past Tiger. Tiger's ranking right after the US Open was 21.54, which you can't do just by winning majors. Of course, at the time, Tiger had won 12 of his previous 25 tournaments (25 is all that's left on the ranking website) and it's runs like that as well as good performances in the majors that give you the ridiculous levels that Tiger has/had.
Sergio may get to number one and he may not - I think this depends on two things: when does Tiger come back and how good is he when he comes back. Outside of those, there's little Sergio can do, because he's not good enough to put in a run like Tiger can.
#66
Posted 14 November 2008 - 10:06 AM
HeadonaStick, on Nov 13 2008, 04:00 PM, said:
The Boom Bapp, on Nov 13 2008, 02:26 PM, said:
Not likely but it may happen given there is a possibilty he could extend his treatment. BUT, W's take care of things like that.
I'm not sure what you are talking about, but Sergio's total points are only a little over 100 less than Tiger's and his rank points are less than 8 behind Tiger.
What "W's" are you talking about?
The W's I am speaking are those Tiger will be collecting when he returns to the PGA. Sergio is a proven competitor and a great player on the Tour just not a consistent winner. If and when Sergio ever gets within a whisper away from #1 which will be unlikely to stick if he manages to peak that mountain, he is not good enough to stay.
Tiger's W's = Sergio's failure to reach the unatainable or even keep #1 in the WGR.
#67
Posted 14 November 2008 - 10:18 AM
scazz54, on Nov 10 2008, 10:42 PM, said:
littlepingman, on Nov 10 2008, 07:59 AM, said:
ummmm no. trevor immelman will present the jacket to the 2009 winner. so NO. and yes sergio and tiger are my favorite players, but sergio is NOT tiger woods! tiger is the greatest of all time and segio does not have a major yet, let alone 14. let him get 18 or more amajors and then say he'll better than tiger and tiger will kneel at his feet.
Wow. Someone has never heard of sarcasm...
#68
Posted 14 November 2008 - 10:35 AM
The Boom Bapp, on Nov 14 2008, 03:06 PM, said:
HeadonaStick, on Nov 13 2008, 04:00 PM, said:
The Boom Bapp, on Nov 13 2008, 02:26 PM, said:
Not likely but it may happen given there is a possibilty he could extend his treatment. BUT, W's take care of things like that.
I'm not sure what you are talking about, but Sergio's total points are only a little over 100 less than Tiger's and his rank points are less than 8 behind Tiger.
What "W's" are you talking about?
The W's I am speaking are those Tiger will be collecting when he returns to the PGA. Sergio is a proven competitor and a great player on the Tour just not a consistent winner. If and when Sergio ever gets within a whisper away from #1 which will be unlikely to stick if he manages to peak that mountain, he is not good enough to stay.
Tiger's W's = Sergio's failure to reach the unatainable or even keep #1 in the WGR.
The whole debate is speculation. How can anyone say that Sergio will never compete with Tiger! Do any of us know how Tiger will play after his injury? He also has a growing family!
Sergio has hit great form and improved his putting, you never know Sergio's game might have just clicked. Looking at the last 3 tournaments he's played in he has been awesome.
Either way it’s great for golf I’d rather see real competition than one player running away with it. However, I hope Woods beats Jack’s Major record as I have money on that!





Sign In
Register
Help


Quote








