How do you tell a Ping Eye 2 from a Plus no Plus?
Posted 08 November 2008 - 10:14 PM
Posted 08 November 2008 - 10:27 PM
Before tonight, I did not even know there was a Plus No Plus. Go figure.
Posted 08 November 2008 - 11:44 PM
The Eye2 has a more squarer look to it, and the sole is different than the Eye2+.
If you go to Ping's website and click on Classic irons and click on Eye2+'s, it will explain the differences.
Many people swear that the + no + is the holy grail of Ping's clubs, that they feel way better than the Eye2+, and that even though they're similar, they are very different. JMHO, but that simply isn't true. For all intent's and purposes, the Eye2+ and the + no + are essentially the same clubhead.
Posted 09 November 2008 - 10:55 AM
Edited by Redsoxfan, 09 November 2008 - 11:29 AM.
Posted 09 November 2008 - 11:12 AM
This is probably the best way to really know.
Posted 09 November 2008 - 11:50 AM
That's incorrect. I have a mint set of PING Eye2 +No+ irons (1-LW) that I ordered with the KT shafts back in March of 1990. PING verified the serial number for them is indeed for the +No+ model. The +No+'s were only produced for, I believe, a 3-4 months period before PING and the USGA settled the square groove controversy. The +No+ is essential the Eye2+ model (scalloped sole) with the older Eye2 square grooves. PING added the "+" to the cavity as a means to identify the newer Eye2+ models as having the revised square grooves (per the USGA agreement).
Posted 09 November 2008 - 12:16 PM
I'll just have to wait and see when they arrive whether they are plus or plus no plus. They have the KT-M shaft. I have been able to find out zero about the characteristics of those shafts. It probably won't matter though...if they heads check out...I'll probably send them back to Ping to re-shaft with DGS300 or ZZ65 and get them re-tumbled.
Viewing GolfWRX as Guest
Hi there. Wondering why this box is in your way from continuing to read down this awesome thread? Just join for free and you will never see it again.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users