How do you tell a Ping Eye 2 from a Plus no Plus?
Posted 08 November 2008 - 10:14 PM
Posted 08 November 2008 - 10:27 PM
Before tonight, I did not even know there was a Plus No Plus. Go figure.
Posted 08 November 2008 - 11:44 PM
The Eye2 has a more squarer look to it, and the sole is different than the Eye2+.
If you go to Ping's website and click on Classic irons and click on Eye2+'s, it will explain the differences.
Many people swear that the + no + is the holy grail of Ping's clubs, that they feel way better than the Eye2+, and that even though they're similar, they are very different. JMHO, but that simply isn't true. For all intent's and purposes, the Eye2+ and the + no + are essentially the same clubhead.
Posted 09 November 2008 - 10:55 AM
Edited by Redsoxfan, 09 November 2008 - 11:29 AM.
Posted 09 November 2008 - 11:12 AM
This is probably the best way to really know.
Posted 09 November 2008 - 11:50 AM
That's incorrect. I have a mint set of PING Eye2 +No+ irons (1-LW) that I ordered with the KT shafts back in March of 1990. PING verified the serial number for them is indeed for the +No+ model. The +No+'s were only produced for, I believe, a 3-4 months period before PING and the USGA settled the square groove controversy. The +No+ is essential the Eye2+ model (scalloped sole) with the older Eye2 square grooves. PING added the "+" to the cavity as a means to identify the newer Eye2+ models as having the revised square grooves (per the USGA agreement).
Posted 09 November 2008 - 12:16 PM
I'll just have to wait and see when they arrive whether they are plus or plus no plus. They have the KT-M shaft. I have been able to find out zero about the characteristics of those shafts. It probably won't matter though...if they heads check out...I'll probably send them back to Ping to re-shaft with DGS300 or ZZ65 and get them re-tumbled.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users