Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

* * * * * 2 votes

Could Augusta National Have a Local Rule Banning Leaving the Pin In?


240 replies to this topic

#61 GolfTurkey

GolfTurkey

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 514 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 448908
  • Joined: 12/13/2016
GolfWRX Likes : 425

Posted 04 February 2019 - 05:38 AM

Well if Augusta want to get ridiculous with local rules... I watched Chess boxing for the first time recently. Some German guy look a few good shots from a Russian and then made a terrible move to give away his queen and lose the game.


Golf boxing you leave the pin in and play 2 holes then box one round with a playing partner and repeat. I can think of a few fun pairings like Sergio with Koepka and Reed with Rahm.

Edited by GolfTurkey, 04 February 2019 - 06:11 AM.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#62 xxio

xxio

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,413 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 541
  • Joined: 05/06/2005
  • Location:Cebu, Philippines
GolfWRX Likes : 467

Posted 04 February 2019 - 05:41 AM

They should local rule allowing the use of non conforming drivers and wedges in Augusta. :)

2

#63 SNIPERBBB

SNIPERBBB

    Hit Ball Hard

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,995 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 79142
  • Joined: 04/04/2009
  • Location:SE Ohio
  • Handicap:6
GolfWRX Likes : 597

Posted 04 February 2019 - 06:33 AM

View Postmjen43, on 04 February 2019 - 12:06 AM, said:

View PostSNIPERBBB, on 03 February 2019 - 06:03 PM, said:

View Postwfrogge1, on 03 February 2019 - 05:53 PM, said:

Absolutely they could

Anyone can make their own changes to the Rules. Then of course, you are not playing Golf. Just a game that resembles it.

What game is football? Youth, high school, NCAA, NFL, CFL?

What game is basketball? Youth, high school, NCAA, Euro, NBA?

What is baseball? Youth, high school, NCAA, MLB?

All other sports have different rule subsets and I think most would consider it them all to be the same sport. I don’t see why golf has to play by the same rules for every level or event. It would still be golf if AN made some rule improvements, the USGA doesn’t own golf.
NBA is not basketball.
2016 M1 9.5 tuned to 7.5
TM r15 3 wood
Adams Idea Pro 2h/4h
Mizuno JPX 900 HM 5-GW
Vokey SM7 48* F Grind
Vokey SM7 54* F Grind
Vokey SM7 58* M Grind

3

#64 Vindog

Vindog

    Don't order the schnitzel. They're using schnauzer!

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,264 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 131959
  • Joined: 06/29/2011
  • Location:Maine, the final frontier
GolfWRX Likes : 7345

Posted 04 February 2019 - 07:58 AM

People forget that the "committee" at ANGC couldn't even handle a drop procedure correctly..  Why do we think they would be any better than the USGA?

It's just a flagstick people.
run of the mill driver with stock shaft
a couple of outdated hybrids
shovel-ier shovels
wedges from same shovel company
some putter with a dead insert and
a hideous grip

4

#65 Roadking2003

Roadking2003

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,812 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 406342
  • Joined: 12/21/2015
  • Location:Austin
  • Handicap:8.7
GolfWRX Likes : 2383

Posted 04 February 2019 - 10:27 AM

View Postwkuo3, on 03 February 2019 - 10:33 PM, said:

By all means the Augusta National could impose a local rule for the tournament ....

What local rule would they impose?  The only valid local rules are those defined by the USGA.  If you use other rules, then you are not playing by the rules of golf.  

I'm 100% sure that ANGC wants to play by the rules of golf.


5

#66 Roadking2003

Roadking2003

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,812 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 406342
  • Joined: 12/21/2015
  • Location:Austin
  • Handicap:8.7
GolfWRX Likes : 2383

Posted 04 February 2019 - 10:28 AM

View Postmaamold, on 03 February 2019 - 11:36 PM, said:

View PostJagpilotohio, on 03 February 2019 - 02:33 PM, said:

Why would they possibly care?

Because leaving the pin in is a measured advantage.

So is cleaning your ball on the green.  And that's within the rules.

6

#67 Roadking2003

Roadking2003

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,812 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 406342
  • Joined: 12/21/2015
  • Location:Austin
  • Handicap:8.7
GolfWRX Likes : 2383

Posted 04 February 2019 - 10:30 AM

View Postmjen43, on 03 February 2019 - 11:59 PM, said:

View PostRoadking2003, on 03 February 2019 - 08:56 PM, said:

View Postmjen43, on 03 February 2019 - 02:22 PM, said:

Sure they can.

No, they can't if they want to play by the rules.  Local rules are defined by the USGA.

Rules as defined by the USGA. The USGA doesn't own golf though so i wouldn't have a problem if they wanted to play by different rules, which is certainly something AN could do.

ANGC could do anything.  They could allow mulligans.  THey could allow gimmes.   But they wont because they will always play by the USGA rules.

7

#68 Roadking2003

Roadking2003

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,812 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 406342
  • Joined: 12/21/2015
  • Location:Austin
  • Handicap:8.7
GolfWRX Likes : 2383

Posted 04 February 2019 - 10:32 AM

View PostVindog, on 04 February 2019 - 07:58 AM, said:

People forget that the "committee" at ANGC couldn't even handle a drop procedure correctly..  

???? please explain.

8

#69 hollabachgt

hollabachgt

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 642 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 38283
  • Joined: 08/27/2007
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Handicap:2.0
GolfWRX Likes : 319

Posted 04 February 2019 - 10:50 AM

It's not like ANGC had an issue with the optics of the pin staying in during the last phase when it was legal. There are plenty of film on the masters website showing players in the late 50's and 60's putting with the flag unattended from distance.

If it's an advantage to putt with the pin in, and everyone has the priveledge to decide whether the pin stays in or not, then there is no advantage to the field. The only difference is scoring compared to history. When was the rule finally changed that forced the pin's removal? was the scoring for the next year substantially different?

If not, who cares?

9

#70 nsxguy

nsxguy

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,465 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 431858
  • Joined: 07/08/2016
  • Location:Florida
  • Handicap:3.7
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 04 February 2019 - 11:09 AM

View Postmaamold, on 03 February 2019 - 11:40 PM, said:

View PostClub Guru, on 03 February 2019 - 02:45 PM, said:

1. Augusta could use pins that aren’t conducive to keeping them in for putts if they want to negate this awful rule.
2. I may puke if I see someone win the masters this year with a putt on 18 that clanks in off the flag stick.

That's a great point, Augusta could just change to pins with a larger lower portion, one large enough that the ball has no chance of going in the hole if it's left in.

ALSO against the Rules of Golf.


BTW, we've had 4 full PGA tournaments so far this year under the new Rules. And Euro and LPGA and web.com.

Has anybody seen a putt go in they were SURE would NOT have gone in had the stick been OUT ?

I haven't. But then I haven't watched all that much coverage. :dntknw:

Edited by nsxguy, 04 February 2019 - 11:12 AM.

Callaway Fusion 9* Project X Handcrafted Hzrdus Black "60" 6.0
Adams A12 Pro hybrids, 16*, 20*, 23*, Aldila VS Proto Stiff

Titleist 816 AP-1 5-PW, DGS300
Cleveland RTX-3 50*, 56*, 64*

Ping Sigma 2 Tyne
Titleist AVX

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#71 TerpFangolfer

TerpFangolfer

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 533 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 292881
  • Joined: 01/22/2014
  • Location:Maryland
  • Handicap:6.2
GolfWRX Likes : 243

Posted 04 February 2019 - 11:10 AM

View Postwobgon, on 03 February 2019 - 11:45 PM, said:

View Postmaamold, on 03 February 2019 - 11:36 PM, said:

View PostJagpilotohio, on 03 February 2019 - 02:33 PM, said:

Why would they possibly care?

Because leaving the pin in is a measured advantage.
To whom?

great post...it may be an advantage...but, for everyone equally (if they choose to use it)!

I just think they never considered the "optics" for TV golf? Leaving the pin in is fine for us weekend hacks...but it does look weird/funny to see it on TV :taunt:
TM R1
TM Rbz Stage2 3w (15) & 3 hyb (19)
Mizuno MP-64 4-Pw
Mizuno MP-T5 50-7
Titleist Vokey SM-4  54-8  & 58-12
Ping TR 1966 Anser2

11

#72 nsxguy

nsxguy

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,465 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 431858
  • Joined: 07/08/2016
  • Location:Florida
  • Handicap:3.7
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 04 February 2019 - 12:19 PM

View PostTerpFangolfer, on 04 February 2019 - 11:10 AM, said:

View Postwobgon, on 03 February 2019 - 11:45 PM, said:

View Postmaamold, on 03 February 2019 - 11:36 PM, said:

View PostJagpilotohio, on 03 February 2019 - 02:33 PM, said:

Why would they possibly care?

Because leaving the pin in is a measured advantage.
To whom?

great post...it may be an advantage...but, for everyone equally (if they choose to use it)!

I just think they never considered the "optics" for TV golf? Leaving the pin in is fine for us weekend hacks...but it does look weird/funny to see it on TV :taunt:

ANYTHING so radically different will look weird,,,,,,,,,,,, until it doesn't,,,,,,,,,,,,, (cool)
Callaway Fusion 9* Project X Handcrafted Hzrdus Black "60" 6.0
Adams A12 Pro hybrids, 16*, 20*, 23*, Aldila VS Proto Stiff

Titleist 816 AP-1 5-PW, DGS300
Cleveland RTX-3 50*, 56*, 64*

Ping Sigma 2 Tyne
Titleist AVX

12

#73 davep043

davep043

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,625 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 489076
  • Joined: 12/20/2017
  • Location:Reston, VA, and Southern Pines, NC
  • Handicap:3.8
GolfWRX Likes : 2377

Posted 04 February 2019 - 01:33 PM

View Postdeadsolid...shank, on 03 February 2019 - 11:25 PM, said:

View PostMudguard, on 03 February 2019 - 11:22 PM, said:

I couldn't see any serious tournament doing something so drastic. The USGA and R&A would simply remove the tournament from Order of Merits, World Rankings etc, so the tournament could certainly exist and the winner would get a jacket and prize money but it would no longer be a major (the debate on how a tournament is actually a major is another discussion) and therefore become less attractive to players.

I think'ths  Masters can pretty much do whatever they want without ever jeopardizing their status. The USGA ands R &A don’t determine what is a major, and it won’t ever get less attractive to the players.
I have to agree with this, the Committee at the  Masters could use a non-approved local rule, which would put it specifically outside of what the Committee is allowed to do under the Rules of Golf.  So then the USGA gets into a pissing contest, says if you don't use our rules, you can't use ANY of our (copyrighted) Rules, you have to write your own.  I can't see either one happening, but they COULD do it.

View Postmaamold, on 03 February 2019 - 11:40 PM, said:

View PostClub Guru, on 03 February 2019 - 02:45 PM, said:

1. Augusta could use pins that aren’t conducive to keeping them in for putts if they want to negate this awful rule.
2. I may puke if I see someone win the masters this year with a putt on 18 that clanks in off the flag stick.

That's a great point, Augusta could just change to pins with a larger lower portion, one large enough that the ball has no chance of going in the hole if it's left in.
The diameter of the pin is not allowed to be greater than 0.75 inches.  Most of us are accustomed to 0.5" diameter pins, so using the maximum size could at least change the statistics around leaving the pin in, to the point where VERY few players would do it. Its interesting that, prior to Jan 1, there was a recommendation that the flagstick be no larger than 0.75", but not a specific requirement.

13

#74 new2g0lf

new2g0lf

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,177 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 114437
  • Joined: 09/06/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 2212

Posted 04 February 2019 - 02:14 PM

I was under impression local rules can be applied in the absence of USGA rules on a topic but can't not supersede existing rules.  That's why clubs and Tours can specify dress codes, restrict use of golf carts or define their own course markings but they cannot change existing rules.  In the case of the flag stick, the rule is written so that it's the golfers decision to leave the flag in or out prior to making a stroke but permits and recognizes both methods so I'm not sure if it's a violation of the rules for a tournament committee to remove the option.
Driver - Ping G400 MAX 10.5*
Woods - XXIO 10 3W
Hybrids - XXIO 10 3H, 4H, 5H
Irons - Home - PXG Gen 2 0311P 5-GW Away - Ping i500 5-AW
Wedge - Vokey TVD 56* K Grind
Putter - Seemore Nashville mFGP2 SS Mallet Black
Ball - KSig, TM TP5X, Snell MTB

14

#75 davep043

davep043

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,625 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 489076
  • Joined: 12/20/2017
  • Location:Reston, VA, and Southern Pines, NC
  • Handicap:3.8
GolfWRX Likes : 2377

Posted 04 February 2019 - 02:23 PM

View Postnew2g0lf, on 04 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said:

I was under impression local rules can be applied in the absence of USGA rules on a topic but can't not supersede existing rules.  That's why clubs and Tours can specify dress codes, restrict use of golf carts or define their own course markings but they cannot change existing rules.  In the case of the flag stick, the rule is written so that it's the golfers decision to leave the flag in or out prior to making a stroke but permits and recognizes both methods so I'm not sure if it's a violation of the rules for a tournament committee to remove the option.
In order to remove the option, they would have to be able to enforce it with a penalty of some kind.  This is from 8L in Committee Procedures:

Quote

Committee must not impose penalties when the Rules do not impose them, for example, penalizing a player who failed to total his or her score on the scorecard in stroke play.
So the Committee must not impose a penalty on something that is expressly NOT penalized under the Rules.


15

#76 Roadking2003

Roadking2003

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,812 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 406342
  • Joined: 12/21/2015
  • Location:Austin
  • Handicap:8.7
GolfWRX Likes : 2383

Posted 04 February 2019 - 02:24 PM

View Postnew2g0lf, on 04 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said:

I was under impression local rules can be applied in the absence of USGA rules on a topic but can't not supersede existing rules.  That's why clubs and Tours can specify dress codes, restrict use of golf carts or define their own course markings but they cannot change existing rules.  In the case of the flag stick, the rule is written so that it's the golfers decision to leave the flag in or out prior to making a stroke but permits and recognizes both methods so I'm not sure if it's a violation of the rules for a tournament committee to remove the option.

The USGA has listed all available local rules.  Other local rules cannot be added by a golf course.   Dress codes and cart rules do not modify the rules of golf so they are not local rules.

I don't think there is any option for a tournament committee to override the new "leave the flagstick in" rule.

16

#77 farmer

farmer

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,594 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 70095
  • Joined: 12/02/2008
GolfWRX Likes : 3411

Posted 04 February 2019 - 02:53 PM

IF there is ever a quantifiable, statistical advantage to leaving the flagstick in, then everyone will leave it in place.  Otherwise, this is a tempest in a very small teacup that will have no real world effect on the game.

17

#78 sui generis

sui generis

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,683 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 132389
  • Joined: 07/05/2011
  • Location:Asheville
GolfWRX Likes : 2512

Posted 04 February 2019 - 02:59 PM

USGA: NO AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL RULE ON FLAGSTICK AT THE MASTERS
JACK ROSS JANUARY 28, 2019160 VIEWS

It appears that players will be able to putt with the flagstick in the hole at the Masters tournament if they choose – even if it looks weird.

Reports circulated in the golf media recently that the Augusta National Golf Club was considering implementing a local rule for the Masters that would prohibit players from leaving the flagstick in the hole while putting. Under the new rules that became effective January 1, it is no longer a penalty if a ball played from the putting green strikes the flagstick. [Rule 13.2a(2)] Player reaction to the new rule is mixed.

Now, we all know that the Masters is “a tradition unlike any other” in many ways. The club has a long history of controlling virtually every detail of the tournament. For decades, they restricted television coverage to the back nine, and banned Gary McCord from the CBS broadcasting team for referring to “body bags” around the “bikini-waxed” greens. “Patrons” (never use the term “spectators”) are prohibited from carrying cell phones and may not solicit autographs on the course or (God forbid) run between holes. Caddies are still required to wear the traditional white jumpsuits.

So when reports surfaced that Augusta National was considering a local rule prohibiting putting with the flagstick in the hole, observers took it as just another effort to preserve the unique traditions of the Masters. Putt with the flagstick in the hole? You might as well uproot the azaleas and forsythia, let the caddies wear shorts, and organize raucous cheering sections at Amen Corner like the 16th hole of the Waste Management Phoenix Open.

As it turns out, Masters chairman Fred Ridley ultimately indicated that the club would probably not adopt such a rule. “We think it’s important that there be some consistency in top championship golf, and so you can expect that the Masters tournament will look very much, if not the same, as what you’re seeing in the major championships and professional tours.”

For the rest see this:
https://golfcontentn...at-the-masters/
Knowledge of the Rules is part of the applied skill set which a player must use to play a round of competitive golf.

18

#79 new2g0lf

new2g0lf

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,177 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 114437
  • Joined: 09/06/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 2212

Posted 04 February 2019 - 05:28 PM

View Postdavep043, on 04 February 2019 - 02:23 PM, said:

View Postnew2g0lf, on 04 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said:

I was under impression local rules can be applied in the absence of USGA rules on a topic but can't not supersede existing rules.  That's why clubs and Tours can specify dress codes, restrict use of golf carts or define their own course markings but they cannot change existing rules.  In the case of the flag stick, the rule is written so that it's the golfers decision to leave the flag in or out prior to making a stroke but permits and recognizes both methods so I'm not sure if it's a violation of the rules for a tournament committee to remove the option.
In order to remove the option, they would have to be able to enforce it with a penalty of some kind.  This is from 8L in Committee Procedures:

Quote

Committee must not impose penalties when the Rules do not impose them, for example, penalizing a player who failed to total his or her score on the scorecard in stroke play.
So the Committee must not impose a penalty on something that is expressly NOT penalized under the Rules.

Makes sense, thanks for responding with the quote from 8L.
Driver - Ping G400 MAX 10.5*
Woods - XXIO 10 3W
Hybrids - XXIO 10 3H, 4H, 5H
Irons - Home - PXG Gen 2 0311P 5-GW Away - Ping i500 5-AW
Wedge - Vokey TVD 56* K Grind
Putter - Seemore Nashville mFGP2 SS Mallet Black
Ball - KSig, TM TP5X, Snell MTB

19

#80 new2g0lf

new2g0lf

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,177 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 114437
  • Joined: 09/06/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 2212

Posted 04 February 2019 - 05:30 PM

View Postdavep043, on 04 February 2019 - 02:23 PM, said:

View Postnew2g0lf, on 04 February 2019 - 02:14 PM, said:

I was under impression local rules can be applied in the absence of USGA rules on a topic but can't not supersede existing rules.  That's why clubs and Tours can specify dress codes, restrict use of golf carts or define their own course markings but they cannot change existing rules.  In the case of the flag stick, the rule is written so that it's the golfers decision to leave the flag in or out prior to making a stroke but permits and recognizes both methods so I'm not sure if it's a violation of the rules for a tournament committee to remove the option.
In order to remove the option, they would have to be able to enforce it with a penalty of some kind.  This is from 8L in Committee Procedures:

Quote

Committee must not impose penalties when the Rules do not impose them, for example, penalizing a player who failed to total his or her score on the scorecard in stroke play.
So the Committee must not impose a penalty on something that is expressly NOT penalized under the Rules.


Makes sense, thanks for responding with the quote from 8L. I'm curious then about how tournament committees impose penalties on minimalist golf tournaments where the number of clubs permitted is less than the USGA rule of 14?  Is minimalist golf and other forms of is not considered a tournament played under USGA rules?

Edited by new2g0lf, 04 February 2019 - 10:21 PM.

Driver - Ping G400 MAX 10.5*
Woods - XXIO 10 3W
Hybrids - XXIO 10 3H, 4H, 5H
Irons - Home - PXG Gen 2 0311P 5-GW Away - Ping i500 5-AW
Wedge - Vokey TVD 56* K Grind
Putter - Seemore Nashville mFGP2 SS Mallet Black
Ball - KSig, TM TP5X, Snell MTB

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20

#81 widow-maker

widow-maker

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,585 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 309105
  • Joined: 04/16/2014
  • Location:Michigan
  • Handicap:2.7
  • Ebay ID:reiner53brown
GolfWRX Likes : 1714

Posted 04 February 2019 - 05:51 PM

What would make anyone think that Augusta National members would move away from the Rules of Golf?  Their membership is a microcosm of USGA deportment.  I would think that most of them are in lockstep with the changes, and some of their members were probably part of the Rules Committee that instituted the changes.  By the time the Masters arrives, people won't be talking about the rules changes much at all because everybody will be used to them.

21

#82 davep043

davep043

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,625 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 489076
  • Joined: 12/20/2017
  • Location:Reston, VA, and Southern Pines, NC
  • Handicap:3.8
GolfWRX Likes : 2377

Posted 04 February 2019 - 06:26 PM

View Postwidow-maker, on 04 February 2019 - 05:51 PM, said:

What would make anyone think that Augusta National members would move away from the Rules of Golf?  Their membership is a microcosm of USGA deportment.  I would think that most of them are in lockstep with the changes, and some of their members were probably part of the Rules Committee that instituted the changes.  By the time the Masters arrives, people won't be talking about the rules changes much at all because everybody will be used to them.
What will we have to argue about if the rules are all set in and accepted?

22

#83 illum1na71

illum1na71

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 265 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 131095
  • Joined: 06/20/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 145

Posted 04 February 2019 - 06:49 PM

Who cares?

23

#84 Vindog

Vindog

    Don't order the schnitzel. They're using schnauzer!

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,264 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 131959
  • Joined: 06/29/2011
  • Location:Maine, the final frontier
GolfWRX Likes : 7345

Posted 04 February 2019 - 07:35 PM

View PostRoadking2003, on 04 February 2019 - 10:32 AM, said:

View PostVindog, on 04 February 2019 - 07:58 AM, said:

People forget that the "committee" at ANGC couldn't even handle a drop procedure correctly..  

???? please explain.

If they could have, they would have let Tiger off scot free.
run of the mill driver with stock shaft
a couple of outdated hybrids
shovel-ier shovels
wedges from same shovel company
some putter with a dead insert and
a hideous grip

24

#85 Mudguard

Mudguard

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,136 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 114531
  • Joined: 09/08/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 375

Posted 04 February 2019 - 10:44 PM

View Postnew2g0lf, on 04 February 2019 - 05:30 PM, said:

Makes sense, thanks for responding with the quote from 8L. I'm curious then about how tournament committees impose penalties on minimalist golf tournaments where the number of clubs permitted is less than the USGA rule of 14?  Is minimalist golf and other forms of is not considered a tournament played under USGA rules?

You can play whatever rules you like if you don't submit the card for a handicap. You could hand it in for the tournament, but if there are rules limiting the number of clubs (instead of 14) you're no longer playing under the rules of golf. If it doesn't alter your handicap, then it doesn't matter.


25

#86 rangersgoalie

rangersgoalie

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,715 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 290733
  • Joined: 01/07/2014
  • Location:CA
GolfWRX Likes : 3319

Posted 04 February 2019 - 11:20 PM

View PostFrankensteins Monster, on 03 February 2019 - 05:35 PM, said:

View PostOutBackHack, on 03 February 2019 - 05:33 PM, said:

Well the answer to your question is yes.
So can we shut this thread down please....
Not correct. The only way they can say they’re going to prohibit leaving the flag in is if they say they’re not going to play by the USGA rules. A local rule CANNOT be made about the flagstick if they’re playing by USGA rules.

Just to be contrarian, and it’s for fun....
But, what would happen if Augusta said we are NOT abiding by the flagstick rule, and we are still using the old lateral and regular hazard rules for the Maters only?

What is the penalty?  USGA jail?  None of the participants can post their scores for handicap purposes?
They choose to play by USGA rules.  Those rules are not laws, just rules by an organization that organized itself to do this

I just think it’s funny how it seems ironclad that anyone MUSt play by all the rules   So be them said, so be them written!

Sorry, a lot of cough syrup lately!  :)

Ps   Can’t see any way Augusta does not play by the rules as written, or a reason not to

26

#87 Mudguard

Mudguard

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,136 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 114531
  • Joined: 09/08/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 375

Posted 05 February 2019 - 12:32 AM

View Postrangersgoalie, on 04 February 2019 - 11:20 PM, said:

Just to be contrarian, and it’s for fun....
But, what would happen if Augusta said we are NOT abiding by the flagstick rule, and we are still using the old lateral and regular hazard rules for the Maters only?

What is the penalty?

There would be no penalty. The USGA would simply remove the following and apply it to another tournament like The Players (which possibly has similar perks, I haven't looked).

A Masters win gives you a five-year exemption on the PGA Tour, and a five-year exemption into the U.S. Open, British Open and PGA Championship. You also receive an invitation to the following year’s Tournament of Champions, which takes place in Maui at the Kapaula Resort during the first week of January and is reserved only for PGA Tour winners. Oh yeah — there’s no cut in that event either.

A Masters win is worth 600 PGA Tour FedEx Cup points, so a player will be well on his way to qualifying for the BMW Championship and Tour Championship at the end of the season — two more tournaments with no cut. And for players hoping to make this year’s Ryder Cup team, points-earning power is doubled at the Masters and other major championships.

The 100 world ranking points he gets for winning can easily catapult him into the rankings’ elite zone — meaning invitations to World Golf Championships, where there is no cut and thus, a continued flow of money. (Regular PGA Tour and European Tour event winners are generally awarded between 40 and 70 world ranking points, depending on the strength of the field.)

27

#88 rangersgoalie

rangersgoalie

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,715 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 290733
  • Joined: 01/07/2014
  • Location:CA
GolfWRX Likes : 3319

Posted 05 February 2019 - 01:30 AM

Well, the Usga has no say on the 5 year exemption on pga tour or the world rankings.
Tournament of champions  and Players Championship either as they are pga tour controlled.
The Usga has no say in world rankings points or pga tour exemptions

If the R and A and UsGA want to get rid of the exemption for their majors, they could.

Of course the pga tour could also drop those two events from being official money and wins if we want to escalate the pissing contests.
And the PGA could decide to write their own rules of golf that the PGA TOUr could choose to use, basically putting a torpedo in the side of the Usga

All absurd, almost as absurd as the Augusta National not getting in lockstep with the Usga rules as written, which is why I said it was all in fun

28

#89 HitEmTrue

HitEmTrue

    @HitEmTrue1

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,989 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 93756
  • Joined: 09/04/2009
  • Location:North Texas
GolfWRX Likes : 1766

Posted 05 February 2019 - 05:29 AM

View Postrangersgoalie, on 05 February 2019 - 01:30 AM, said:

And the PGA could decide to write their own rules of golf that the PGA TOUr could choose to use, basically putting a torpedo in the side of the USGA

“Karsten filed a $100 million antitrust suit, and the PGA Tour responding by filing a $100 million countersuit. The case had been scheduled to go to trial April 20 in U.S. district court in Phoenix.

As part of the agreement, the Tour agreed to drop its ban on Ping clubs, which had never been enforced because of a court injunction against the action. The Tour also agreed to acknowledge that the United States Golf Association is the principal rule-making body of golf.”

http://articles.orla...olf-association





29

#90 lowheel

lowheel

    LOWHEEL

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,371 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 193008
  • Joined: 07/18/2012
GolfWRX Likes : 6084

Posted 05 February 2019 - 07:09 AM

They can and they should, ridiculous rule to begin with

Edited by lowheel, 05 February 2019 - 07:10 AM.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

30



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors