Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

Equal pay LPGA vs PGA -I disagree


84 replies to this topic

#61 lowheel

lowheel

    LOWHEEL

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,058 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 193008
  • Joined: 07/18/2012
GolfWRX Likes : 5640

Posted 11 January 2019 - 05:48 AM

View PostMtlJeff, on 10 January 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:02 PM, said:

Just read the article.  The goal seems to be equality of outcome.  As the sponsor that is their prerogative.

Or the goal is they want us to perceive that is their goal LoL.

AON leadership team on their website is 11/14 Male. Wonder what their internal pay discrepancies are ?

2M bucks for one of the largest insurance companies in the world isn't much. And look at the publicity it's gotten them about how much they care about pay inequality. It's money well spent regardless of what the tours actually generate. That same money gets you what, a single ad during the super bowl. It's a good PR move

Thats misleading as that industry is almost 80% male. Some industries/jobs are attractive to one sex not the other.

I personally love the LPGA and have played with and respect a ton of ladies on that tour over the years but dont understand what this company is trying to accomplish with this. Their money to burn i guess

Edited by lowheel, 11 January 2019 - 05:50 AM.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#62 BlackDiamondPar5

BlackDiamondPar5

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,936 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 71580
  • Joined: 12/30/2008
  • Location:Western NY
GolfWRX Likes : 3479

Posted 11 January 2019 - 06:10 AM

View Postdavep043, on 10 January 2019 - 03:58 PM, said:

I see two different things.  I can agree with the OP, in that your value is exactly what you can get for your time, just like the value of your house, or the value of a rental car.  That's especially true in entertainment, and really that's what all spectator sports are.  If people simply won't pay as for something (women's golf), then its not worth as much.  So I don't really have a problem with women golfers earning less than their male counterparts.

On the other hand, I have no problem with a company making a value judgement in deciding to offer the same pay-out for the man and woman who win their competition.  Its quite possible that AON believe the image boost they get from treating men and women equally will be worth the "extra" money they're offering the woman who wins.  More important, their image would take a beating of they offer the men's winner double the prize as the woman winner.
This ^^^

2

#63 Z1ggy16

Z1ggy16

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,402 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 430110
  • Joined: 06/22/2016
GolfWRX Likes : 2260

Posted 11 January 2019 - 08:12 AM

View PostKrt22, on 10 January 2019 - 04:03 PM, said:

View PostZ1ggy16, on 10 January 2019 - 02:44 PM, said:

I wish they made more because they are extremely talented. I think what Whan is doing here is very cool and is fair. Women can't help that people aren't viewing their talent in as high regard as they should.

One thing that is nice about LGPA events is that you know everybody there is a real golf fan. There's no ridiculous screaming, BABABOOEY's or MAAAASHED POTATOEZ to be heard. Just people enjoying the game being played by the top females in the world.

I've gone to Men's pro events and heard people there talking and they have no idea who any of the players are and generally just seem like people who like to go to sports events purely for drinking/social reasons.

I've always thought the ladies deserved more attention both socially and monetarily.

As terrible as it sounds, you just highlighted a big reason why the pay gap exists. Dingdongs who only attend events to spend $$$$ on booze and have fun are largely why PGA purses are larger.

In the world of sports/entertainment, viewership is everything. Case in point, instagram/twitter "social media influencers", an area completely dominated by females.
If I remember correctly.... When I went to the Women's US Open in 2017, beer wasn't even being served. Not sure why anybody would have wanted to drink anyway, it was a cool 95 degrees out and not a cloud in the sky. I drank 3 bottles of water, 2 bananas, 2 lemon iceys and I still ended up severely dehydrated after being there for about 7 hours.

Beer would have been a waste though because I'd say 80% of attendance were either Dad's with their little girls an older men and women. I felt like the other person there between the age of 25-40.

As far as purses for events... Does a majority of that money come from the cost of rights to broadcast, or ticket/food sales? Tickets for the Men's US Open were $125 I think... Women's were only $50. I'm sure the ticket price is based on demand, but that's a fairly large difference.
WITB
LTD Pro Kiyoshi HB 65X
LTD Kai'li 70X
P790 Modus 120X  or 818H2 (Shaft TBD)
Miura CB/MB Combo Modus 120X
Glide Stealth 2.0 50/10 (Testing SM7)
Glide Stealth 2.0 54/12 (Testing MD4 & SM7)
Glide Stealth 2.0 58/12 (Testing SM7 and MD4)
TP Black Copper Juno
TP5X
Sun Mountain 4.5 Bag
Puma Ignite Pwradapt

3

#64 pinhigh27

pinhigh27

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,170 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 73898
  • Joined: 01/27/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 2921

Posted 11 January 2019 - 08:22 AM

View PostKrt22, on 10 January 2019 - 04:50 PM, said:

View Postelwhippy, on 10 January 2019 - 04:34 PM, said:

Not a chance. The product is not as attractive to sponsors or viewers and the large non US contingent don't seem to bring in revenues from Asian businesses. And don't get me started on female tennis players earning the same at Wimbledon...45 mins for a match against up to 5 hours for men.

If they draw the same viewership, who cares how long the matches are?

More time for ads
How to be in better shape for golf?
Become a better athlete.
Don't worry about golf specific.
Compound lifts w/ linear progress
Don't forget the mobility work.
More results, more functional

Spin is not your enemy, everything is a trade-off.
17 * 1700 goes really far, but doesn't go very straight or consistent
8* 3500 goes really straight, but doesn't go very far
Answer for most is somewhere in the middle.
Pga tour driver avg launch conditions: 11* 2700

4

#65 Bluefan75

Bluefan75

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,440 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 56847
  • Joined: 05/30/2008
  • Location:London, ON
GolfWRX Likes : 999

Posted 11 January 2019 - 08:31 AM

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:19 PM, said:

View PostMtlJeff, on 10 January 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:02 PM, said:

Just read the article.  The goal seems to be equality of outcome.  As the sponsor that is their prerogative.

Or the goal is they want us to perceive that is their goal LoL.

AON leadership team on their website is 11/14 Male. Wonder what their internal pay discrepancies are ?

2M bucks for one of the largest insurance companies in the world isn't much. And look at the publicity it's gotten them about how much they care about pay inequality. It's money well spent regardless of what the tours actually generate. That same money gets you what, a single ad during the super bowl. It's a good PR move

You could be right, I don't know.  If its a PR move then I suppose time will tell if its a good one.  

The article is less than 1,000 words so I wouldn't say we can fully know what AON's end goal here is from such a small article.  The article is written in a way that makes me feel they are striving for equality of outcome.

Of course it's PR.  AON doesn't *care* about equal pay, etc.  They care about growing their companies and increasing the value for their shareholders.  One way they have felt might be possible is to do what they have done, because this thread is exactly what they want.  People are talking about AON.  

Don't fool yourself that a company has a goal that is something other than increasing its own value.  They do things along the way that will help, or not help, but claiming they are striving for equality of outcome is playing into their hands.  That is to say they have convinced you they are pushing a social goal rather than doing something for their business interests.

They have every right to do this, or not do this, but let's stop eating the pabulum from the flacks that this is about some kind of social message.  Someone said earlier that they would have gotten negative press if they offered a much bigger men's prize.  Yeah, I don't think so.  The number of people who actually care about this award is tiny.  But this move/stunt/whateveryouwanttocallit has generated publicity.  Which is what they want.


5

#66 GolfChannel

GolfChannel

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,156 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 25488
  • Joined: 02/13/2007
  • Location:Orlando, Florida
GolfWRX Likes : 293

Posted 11 January 2019 - 08:52 AM

When you only read the headline and assume it matches your own close-mindedness. Oh, what a time to be alive...
Driver: Who needs that kind of negativity in their life...
3 Wood: Callaway Rogue w/Project X Blue Evenflow 75
5 Wood: Callaway Rogue w/Project X Blue Evenflow 75
Hybrid: Titleist 816H1 21 Degree w/Accra 182H M3
Irons: Callaway Apex CF16 Nippon Modus 120
Wedges: Callaway MD3 50, 54, 58 & Honma TFW 62 Degree Forged
Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG No. 7
Ball: Taylormade TPx5

6

#67 I_HATE_SNOW

I_HATE_SNOW

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,131 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 47459
  • Joined: 01/29/2008
  • Location:Colorado
GolfWRX Likes : 473

Posted 11 January 2019 - 08:53 AM

View Postcnnmaverick, on 10 January 2019 - 02:24 PM, said:

I just read this article and disagree with some of the statements
https://www.golfchan...owerful-message

If there is less viewership, less high exposure sponsors, less history and frankly a lot less people are caring about female golf - why are people so hung up on making sure women get paid the same?

I whole-heartedly disagree with this notion. I believe you should be getting paid the same but only if you do the same work (blue / white collar jobs etc). But if you're paycheck depends on being a professional athlete entertainer etc... It's the size of the audience that matters, not what you do. Otherwise welcome to socialism at its best...

What's your take?

I'm still amazed that entertainers make so much money.

7

#68 smashdn

smashdn

    Let's cut them trees down.

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 55877
  • Joined: 05/15/2008
  • Location:KY
GolfWRX Likes : 370

Posted 11 January 2019 - 10:19 AM

View Postduffer987, on 10 January 2019 - 02:44 PM, said:

You're a muppet.

Don't drag innocent muppets into this.

8

#69 ebrasmus21

ebrasmus21

    Serial Shanker

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,403 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 250392
  • Joined: 05/13/2013
  • Location:CA
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 3688

Posted 11 January 2019 - 10:49 AM

View PostBluefan75, on 11 January 2019 - 08:31 AM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:19 PM, said:

View PostMtlJeff, on 10 January 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:02 PM, said:

Just read the article.  The goal seems to be equality of outcome.  As the sponsor that is their prerogative.

Or the goal is they want us to perceive that is their goal LoL.

AON leadership team on their website is 11/14 Male. Wonder what their internal pay discrepancies are ?

2M bucks for one of the largest insurance companies in the world isn't much. And look at the publicity it's gotten them about how much they care about pay inequality. It's money well spent regardless of what the tours actually generate. That same money gets you what, a single ad during the super bowl. It's a good PR move

You could be right, I don't know.  If its a PR move then I suppose time will tell if its a good one.  

The article is less than 1,000 words so I wouldn't say we can fully know what AON's end goal here is from such a small article.  The article is written in a way that makes me feel they are striving for equality of outcome.

Of course it's PR.  AON doesn't *care* about equal pay, etc.  They care about growing their companies and increasing the value for their shareholders.  One way they have felt might be possible is to do what they have done, because this thread is exactly what they want.  People are talking about AON.  

Don't fool yourself that a company has a goal that is something other than increasing its own value.  They do things along the way that will help, or not help, but claiming they are striving for equality of outcome is playing into their hands.  That is to say they have convinced you they are pushing a social goal rather than doing something for their business interests.

They have every right to do this, or not do this, but let's stop eating the pabulum from the flacks that this is about some kind of social message.  Someone said earlier that they would have gotten negative press if they offered a much bigger men's prize.  Yeah, I don't think so.  The number of people who actually care about this award is tiny.  But this move/stunt/whateveryouwanttocallit has generated publicity.  Which is what they want.

When the article and AON's CMO use terms like diversity, inclusion and equality how am I supposed to read it?  It's a PR move crafted by AON with political and social overtones.  

I watch sports to get away from politics and yet here I am.
G400 LST - TPT proto
TM M3 - Rogue Silver 110MSI 70S
21* Fourteen Type 7 Driving Iron - HZRDUS Black 6.5 105g
4 - PW Mizuno MP 18 MMC - SteelFiber FC115
50, 54, 60 RC Dual Bite - SteelFiber i125
Evnroll ER5
Snell MTB Black

9

#70 davep043

davep043

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,325 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 489076
  • Joined: 12/20/2017
  • Location:Reston, VA, and Southern Pines, NC
  • Handicap:3.8
GolfWRX Likes : 2013

Posted 11 January 2019 - 11:06 AM

View Postebrasmus21, on 11 January 2019 - 10:49 AM, said:

View PostBluefan75, on 11 January 2019 - 08:31 AM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:19 PM, said:

View PostMtlJeff, on 10 January 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:02 PM, said:

Just read the article.  The goal seems to be equality of outcome.  As the sponsor that is their prerogative.

Or the goal is they want us to perceive that is their goal LoL.

AON leadership team on their website is 11/14 Male. Wonder what their internal pay discrepancies are ?

2M bucks for one of the largest insurance companies in the world isn't much. And look at the publicity it's gotten them about how much they care about pay inequality. It's money well spent regardless of what the tours actually generate. That same money gets you what, a single ad during the super bowl. It's a good PR move

You could be right, I don't know.  If its a PR move then I suppose time will tell if its a good one.  

The article is less than 1,000 words so I wouldn't say we can fully know what AON's end goal here is from such a small article.  The article is written in a way that makes me feel they are striving for equality of outcome.

Of course it's PR.  AON doesn't *care* about equal pay, etc.  They care about growing their companies and increasing the value for their shareholders.  One way they have felt might be possible is to do what they have done, because this thread is exactly what they want.  People are talking about AON.  

Don't fool yourself that a company has a goal that is something other than increasing its own value.  They do things along the way that will help, or not help, but claiming they are striving for equality of outcome is playing into their hands.  That is to say they have convinced you they are pushing a social goal rather than doing something for their business interests.

They have every right to do this, or not do this, but let's stop eating the pabulum from the flacks that this is about some kind of social message.  Someone said earlier that they would have gotten negative press if they offered a much bigger men's prize.  Yeah, I don't think so.  The number of people who actually care about this award is tiny.  But this move/stunt/whateveryouwanttocallit has generated publicity.  Which is what they want.

When the article and AON's CMO use terms like diversity, inclusion and equality how am I supposed to read it?  It's a PR move crafted by AON with political and social overtones.  

I watch sports to get away from politics and yet here I am.
All advertising, including corporate sponsorship of golf tournaments, is PR.  You can't escape it, but you can do your best to ignore it.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#71 ebrasmus21

ebrasmus21

    Serial Shanker

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,403 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 250392
  • Joined: 05/13/2013
  • Location:CA
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 3688

Posted 11 January 2019 - 11:10 AM

^^^

Me during all commercials now

Posted Image
G400 LST - TPT proto
TM M3 - Rogue Silver 110MSI 70S
21* Fourteen Type 7 Driving Iron - HZRDUS Black 6.5 105g
4 - PW Mizuno MP 18 MMC - SteelFiber FC115
50, 54, 60 RC Dual Bite - SteelFiber i125
Evnroll ER5
Snell MTB Black

11

#72 Shilgy

Shilgy

    Legend

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,721 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 235237
  • Joined: 03/07/2013
  • Location:Phoenix
  • Handicap:3.1
GolfWRX Likes : 7237

Posted 11 January 2019 - 11:31 AM

View Postpinhigh27, on 11 January 2019 - 08:22 AM, said:

View PostKrt22, on 10 January 2019 - 04:50 PM, said:

View Postelwhippy, on 10 January 2019 - 04:34 PM, said:

Not a chance. The product is not as attractive to sponsors or viewers and the large non US contingent don't seem to bring in revenues from Asian businesses. And don't get me started on female tennis players earning the same at Wimbledon...45 mins for a match against up to 5 hours for men.

If they draw the same viewership, who cares how long the matches are?

More time for ads
IF the men's goes 5 sets. They might both go 3 sets.  This whole part of the conversation makes it sound like in golf they should get extra pay for winning if it goes into a playoff.  It is not an hourly job.  No the women do not deserve equal pay as they do not generate the eyeballs and interest that the mens do-in golf.  Tennis is a separate issue as iirc the ratings often are similar for the womens matches.
TM M3 440 10* Graphite Design AD IZ 6x
TM M1 3w 14*  Graphite Design BB7s
TM M2  5w 18* Fujikura Atmos TS Blue 8S or Srixon U65 18° Atmos Red 7s
Adams A12 UST Silver S 21°
Srixon Z765 5-AW Nippon Pro Modus3 125S
Titleist Vokey 54*F  58*S
Toulon Garage Rochester flow neck H5/ Toulon Rochester stock

To paraphrase Dr Seuss: Don't cry because the round of golf is over-smile because it happened .  :)

12

#73 bscinstnct

bscinstnct

    Legend

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,266 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 77664
  • Joined: 03/17/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 20015

Posted 11 January 2019 - 12:35 PM

It's a wonder that women don't realize that they could easily get paid as much or more than men instantly. All they have to do is band together and say,

Pay us or we won't talk to you anymore.

Women can hold their ground way longer than men can. Plus, we'd cave in out of fear of dying from hunger alone.

13

#74 Krt22

Krt22

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,122 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 261822
  • Joined: 07/05/2013
  • Location:East Bay
GolfWRX Likes : 2975

Posted 11 January 2019 - 12:49 PM

View Poststraightshot7, on 10 January 2019 - 09:32 PM, said:

View PostKrt22, on 10 January 2019 - 09:18 PM, said:

View Poststraightshot7, on 10 January 2019 - 09:14 PM, said:

View PostKrt22, on 10 January 2019 - 04:03 PM, said:

View PostZ1ggy16, on 10 January 2019 - 02:44 PM, said:

I wish they made more because they are extremely talented. I think what Whan is doing here is very cool and is fair. Women can't help that people aren't viewing their talent in as high regard as they should.

One thing that is nice about LGPA events is that you know everybody there is a real golf fan. There's no ridiculous screaming, BABABOOEY's or MAAAASHED POTATOEZ to be heard. Just people enjoying the game being played by the top females in the world.

I've gone to Men's pro events and heard people there talking and they have no idea who any of the players are and generally just seem like people who like to go to sports events purely for drinking/social reasons.

I've always thought the ladies deserved more attention both socially and monetarily.

As terrible as it sounds, you just highlighted a big reason why the pay gap exists. Dingdongs who only attend events to spend $$$$ on booze and have fun are largely why PGA purses are larger.

In the world of sports/entertainment, viewership is everything. Case in point, instagram/twitter "social media influencers", an area completely dominated by females. (and male golfers in general)



The large majority of PGA Tour revenue comes from network TV deals, not money spent at events.

Which is exactly why I said viewership as well. How popular an event is and how much viewership it gets scale together.

Tournament attendance and TV viewership really don't scale together though. Which is why I pointed that out.

The Phoenix Open is #1 in attendance but not even top 10 for TV viewership, for example.

I think you and I both know that is an outlier, given it's essentially a glorified frat party.

My point was, the PGA has far more leisure fans than the LGPA, likely highly related to their being far more leisure male golfers than females.

Edited by Krt22, 11 January 2019 - 12:50 PM.


14

#75 cdnglf

cdnglf

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,494 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 139540
  • Joined: 09/20/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 2017

Posted 11 January 2019 - 12:50 PM

View PostShilgy, on 11 January 2019 - 11:31 AM, said:

View Postpinhigh27, on 11 January 2019 - 08:22 AM, said:

View PostKrt22, on 10 January 2019 - 04:50 PM, said:

View Postelwhippy, on 10 January 2019 - 04:34 PM, said:

Not a chance. The product is not as attractive to sponsors or viewers and the large non US contingent don't seem to bring in revenues from Asian businesses. And don't get me started on female tennis players earning the same at Wimbledon...45 mins for a match against up to 5 hours for men.

If they draw the same viewership, who cares how long the matches are?

More time for ads
IF the men's goes 5 sets. They might both go 3 sets.  This whole part of the conversation makes it sound like in golf they should get extra pay for winning if it goes into a playoff.  It is not an hourly job.  No the women do not deserve equal pay as they do not generate the eyeballs and interest that the mens do-in golf.  Tennis is a separate issue as iirc the ratings often are similar for the womens matches.

Also, at the Tennis majors it is a shared event. One ticket to watch both men and women.


15

#76 buckeyefl

buckeyefl

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,172 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 259982
  • Joined: 06/29/2013
GolfWRX Likes : 3090

Posted 11 January 2019 - 01:41 PM

View Postcnnmaverick, on 10 January 2019 - 02:24 PM, said:

I just read this article and disagree with some of the statements
https://www.golfchan...owerful-message

If there is less viewership, less high exposure sponsors, less history and frankly a lot less people are caring about female golf - why are people so hung up on making sure women get paid the same?

I whole-heartedly disagree with this notion. I believe you should be getting paid the same but only if you do the same work (blue / white collar jobs etc). But if you're paycheck depends on being a professional athlete entertainer etc... It's the size of the audience that matters, not what you do. Otherwise welcome to socialism at its best...

What's your take?

Its the new "In thing". Nothing based in reality suggests that they should make the same money as you correctly pointed out.

View PostKjboisen, on 10 January 2019 - 02:29 PM, said:

View Postcnnmaverick, on 10 January 2019 - 02:24 PM, said:

I just read this article and disagree with some of the statements
https://www.golfchan...owerful-message

If there is less viewership, less high exposure sponsors, less history and frankly a lot less people are caring about female golf - why are people so hung up on making sure women get paid the same?

I whole-heartedly disagree with this notion. I believe you should be getting paid the same but only if you do the same work (blue / white collar jobs etc). But if you're paycheck depends on being a professional athlete entertainer etc... It's the size of the audience that matters, not what you do. Otherwise welcome to socialism at its best...

What's your take?

I believe they should be paid a lot more, but not the same.

Why?

16

#77 davep043

davep043

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,325 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 489076
  • Joined: 12/20/2017
  • Location:Reston, VA, and Southern Pines, NC
  • Handicap:3.8
GolfWRX Likes : 2013

Posted 11 January 2019 - 01:56 PM

Now that the thread has (predictably) veered towards a discussion of the appropriate pay rates, I'm going back to the original post.  The entire article was about Aon's choice to put up a prize for one man and one woman from their respective tours in a season-long competition.  The prize is the same for the man who wins as it is for the woman who wins.  Was Aon somehow WRONG for doing it that way?

17

#78 duffer987

duffer987

    $1300+ for Cally irons?!

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,831 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 201269
  • Joined: 09/03/2012
  • Location:Canadian in Texas
  • Handicap:8.0
GolfWRX Likes : 6967

Posted 11 January 2019 - 01:58 PM

View Postbuckeyefl, on 11 January 2019 - 01:41 PM, said:

View Postcnnmaverick, on 10 January 2019 - 02:24 PM, said:

I just read this article and disagree with some of the statements
https://www.golfchan...owerful-message

If there is less viewership, less high exposure sponsors, less history and frankly a lot less people are caring about female golf - why are people so hung up on making sure women get paid the same?

I whole-heartedly disagree with this notion. I believe you should be getting paid the same but only if you do the same work (blue / white collar jobs etc). But if you're paycheck depends on being a professional athlete entertainer etc... It's the size of the audience that matters, not what you do. Otherwise welcome to socialism at its best...

What's your take?

Its the new "In thing". Nothing based in reality suggests that they should make the same money as you correctly pointed out.


Some company's golf-related marketing effort involves handing out the same monetary value oversized cardboard cheque to a man and a woman. That is all.

There is no "new in thing" going on here and apparently your reality doesn't include reading the article.

18

#79 Krt22

Krt22

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,122 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 261822
  • Joined: 07/05/2013
  • Location:East Bay
GolfWRX Likes : 2975

Posted 11 January 2019 - 02:07 PM

View Postdavep043, on 11 January 2019 - 01:56 PM, said:

Now that the thread has (predictably) veered towards a discussion of the appropriate pay rates, I'm going back to the original post.  The entire article was about Aon's choice to put up a prize for one man and one woman from their respective tours in a season-long competition.  The prize is the same for the man who wins as it is for the woman who wins.  Was Aon somehow WRONG for doing it that way?

Not even remotely. Anyone who thinks otherwise is completely out of touch with the modern world. In this case it's clearly an exhibition, an exhibition with a purpose. If it's purely PR/optics or if its genuine drive for change is largely irrelevant IMO, so there cannot be anything inherently wrong about it.  With all of the on going discussions about golf dying, I see this as a good thing. If women are given more motivation to play golf and women's professional golf grows, the sport as a whole will benefit.

And anyone who thinks what a private sector company does has anything to do with "socialism" doesn't understand the meaning of the words they use.

Edited by Krt22, 11 January 2019 - 02:07 PM.


19

#80 duffer987

duffer987

    $1300+ for Cally irons?!

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,831 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 201269
  • Joined: 09/03/2012
  • Location:Canadian in Texas
  • Handicap:8.0
GolfWRX Likes : 6967

Posted 11 January 2019 - 02:16 PM

View PostKrt22, on 11 January 2019 - 02:07 PM, said:

And anyone who thinks what a private sector company does has anything to do with "socialism" doesn't understand the meaning of the words they use.
LOL! Ya that was almost as funny/depressing as the rest of the rant. I hope no one tells the OP how the NFL works ;)


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20

#81 Catty

Catty

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 493742
  • Joined: 02/16/2018
  • Location:Australia
  • Handicap:8
GolfWRX Likes : 41

Posted 11 January 2019 - 03:53 PM

View Postduffer987, on 11 January 2019 - 02:16 PM, said:

View PostKrt22, on 11 January 2019 - 02:07 PM, said:

And anyone who thinks what a private sector company does has anything to do with "socialism" doesn't understand the meaning of the words they use.
LOL! Ya that was almost as funny/depressing as the rest of the rant. I hope no one tells the OP how the NFL works ;)

There are many forms of socialism, but the most basic understanding is of social ownership and means of production.  Aon is a public company with a board managing shareholders money, which they take and give in the expedition of making more money. Capitalism.  So this company take shareholders money and spread it out equally regardless of the persons means of production.  That right there is your classic socialism.  I think the op knows more about socialism then some others here.

21

#82 lowheel

lowheel

    LOWHEEL

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,058 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 193008
  • Joined: 07/18/2012
GolfWRX Likes : 5640

Posted 11 January 2019 - 04:09 PM

View Postebrasmus21, on 11 January 2019 - 10:49 AM, said:

View PostBluefan75, on 11 January 2019 - 08:31 AM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:19 PM, said:

View PostMtlJeff, on 10 January 2019 - 05:10 PM, said:

View Postebrasmus21, on 10 January 2019 - 05:02 PM, said:

Just read the article.  The goal seems to be equality of outcome.  As the sponsor that is their prerogative.

Or the goal is they want us to perceive that is their goal LoL.

AON leadership team on their website is 11/14 Male. Wonder what their internal pay discrepancies are ?

2M bucks for one of the largest insurance companies in the world isn't much. And look at the publicity it's gotten them about how much they care about pay inequality. It's money well spent regardless of what the tours actually generate. That same money gets you what, a single ad during the super bowl. It's a good PR move

You could be right, I don't know.  If its a PR move then I suppose time will tell if its a good one.  

The article is less than 1,000 words so I wouldn't say we can fully know what AON's end goal here is from such a small article.  The article is written in a way that makes me feel they are striving for equality of outcome.

Of course it's PR.  AON doesn't *care* about equal pay, etc.  They care about growing their companies and increasing the value for their shareholders.  One way they have felt might be possible is to do what they have done, because this thread is exactly what they want.  People are talking about AON.  

Don't fool yourself that a company has a goal that is something other than increasing its own value.  They do things along the way that will help, or not help, but claiming they are striving for equality of outcome is playing into their hands.  That is to say they have convinced you they are pushing a social goal rather than doing something for their business interests.

They have every right to do this, or not do this, but let's stop eating the pabulum from the flacks that this is about some kind of social message.  Someone said earlier that they would have gotten negative press if they offered a much bigger men's prize.  Yeah, I don't think so.  The number of people who actually care about this award is tiny.  But this move/stunt/whateveryouwanttocallit has generated publicity.  Which is what they want.

When the article and AON's CMO use terms like diversity, inclusion and equality how am I supposed to read it?  It's a PR move crafted by AON with political and social overtones.  

I watch sports to get away from politics and yet here I am.

they're practicing the art of...

Posted Image

Edited by lowheel, 11 January 2019 - 04:09 PM.


22

#83 lowheel

lowheel

    LOWHEEL

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,058 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 193008
  • Joined: 07/18/2012
GolfWRX Likes : 5640

Posted 11 January 2019 - 04:11 PM

View Postebrasmus21, on 11 January 2019 - 11:10 AM, said:

^^^

Me during all commercials now

Posted Image


Im with you man its cringeworthy 24-7...

Edited by lowheel, 11 January 2019 - 04:12 PM.


23

#84 lowheel

lowheel

    LOWHEEL

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,058 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 193008
  • Joined: 07/18/2012
GolfWRX Likes : 5640

Posted 11 January 2019 - 04:13 PM

View Postbscinstnct, on 11 January 2019 - 12:35 PM, said:

It's a wonder that women don't realize that they could easily get paid as much or more than men instantly. All they have to do is band together and say,

Pay us or we won't talk to you anymore.

Women can hold their ground way longer than men can. Plus, we'd cave in out of fear of dying from hunger alone.

Posted Image

24

#85 tatertot

tatertot

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,006 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 87030
  • Joined: 06/29/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 3752

Posted 11 January 2019 - 04:33 PM

I think everyone who watches the PGA should watch the LPGA because that's fair.

And 50% of all jobs should be held by females and male, regardless of ability, because that's fair.

And men should have to give birth to half of all babies, because that's fair.

American sports leagues should be 72% white, 13% black, and 15% other, because that's fair.

We should make everybody live the exact same number of days, because that's fair.

Everybody should earn the same amount of money, no matter what they do or how well they do it, because that's fair.

We should have 1 TV channel, and "they" (whoever "they" are) can tell us what to watch, so we are all seeing the same thing and are equal.

No one should have to try and earn anything. No one should be able to spend their money the way the want to. We should all be told how to live, how to think and how to act in every aspect of our life. Only then will life be fair.

Driver: Adams Speedline Fast 11, 9°
Fairway: Adams Fast 10, 15*
Irons: Ping i200 3 iron, Ping iE1 4-PW
Wedges: Titleist SM7, 48º; Titleist SM5, 54º & 58º
Putter: Cleveland Classics Huntington Beach #1, 35"

25



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors