Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

Playing with the TM P760s

Impressive

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 MCoz

MCoz

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 835 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 3519
  • Joined: 07/28/2005
  • Location:Napa, CA
  • Handicap:+1
GolfWRX Likes : 170

Posted 30 November 2018 - 04:37 PM

I am a month in playing with the TaylorMade P760 irons. IMO this is the best set of blades since the TM R9 TP "B"s and frankly they are better. The balance of these are superb. I have played blades primarily since the 60's when that's all there was for the most part. Only a handful of times have I strayed to a somewhat "game improvement" club due to the fact that I don't like offset clubs. The most notable exceptions were the TM Tour Burner irons in 2008 that saw me get to a +4 hdcp. But I gravitated  back thru the R9 TPs and into other Blades or cavity back blades. Of course the hdcp has gradually gone back to around a scratch (1 to +1). In '17 I moved to the M1 irons because I liked the looks and found them to be almost the "perfect" players type GI. I have numerous friends who followed me into those M1s, all low single digits. I preferred them to the very successful 790s because of the way they sat at address. The 750s (liked the looks, hated the distance loss) and the 770s (awkward offset in mid and long irons to my eye and still short) weren't quite for me. M3s were not an improvement for me vs the M1s.
Now the P760s come along and they are beautiful at address (the only look that counts!!). The balance and feel are great. Still I have never hit a 4 iron or 5 iron better than the M1s. So what I have done is matched those M1s with the P760 6 iron thru Pitching wedge. While some may think there would be gaps, let me explain: My M1s came from the Tour Dept and are 2* weaker than the standard set (thus also reducing the offset and the 760s are one degree stronger than standard. Both sets have the same shafts and are weighed to match. I still like the 760 long irons but the M1s are as perfect as I have ever hit. I can now work the ball better with the scoring clubs and they are much better with the knock down drilling shot into the wind. Yet they are still pretty forgiving.
I am back to zeroing in on the flags and at good distances. I am looking forward to more rounds in the 60's this coming year than in 2018!!

DRIVER- TaylorMade 2018 M3 440 Tour issue/Fuji Evolution  661 Speeder IV--S
3wd- TM 2017 M1 Fujikura Motore Speeder 661 Evolution IV -S
1i - Cleveland HiBore 16* Tour Dept 3.2 torque S tipped 1" (2-3i replacement)
Tour 5 - TM RBZ Stg 2 23.5* Fuji MCH 80-S
Irons 4 & 5  TM M1 Fuji Pro 95i - S , 6 thru PW TM P760 Fujikura Pro 95i-S  
SW- Cleveland RTX-3 CB 52* Bent to 53.5* V-MG Steelfiber 110- S
LW- TaylorMade HI TOE- Tour Dept small head, soft heel 4 way grind  60* bent to 59* Proj-X 6.0
Putter- Bobby Grace-- M.Coz Bandsaw Prototype

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#2 jonn443

jonn443

    Jonnystx

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,444 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 104882
  • Joined: 03/16/2010
  • Location:CT
GolfWRX Likes : 1049

Posted 30 November 2018 - 05:10 PM

Great review but I wouldn't consider these "Blades".

That's said, I agree...it's looks at address that's most important.
AB TP 10.5*/ DI6X
AB TP 3HL / 757
XTD 19*/ Fubuki Ax
DWS 24*/ VS Proto
J15 CB 5-PW/ Modus 3 125S
X-Forged MD (50*, 56* 60*)
Spider Si/ SS Mid SLim 2.0

2

#3 veebs007x

veebs007x

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 255 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 34937
  • Joined: 07/18/2007
  • Location:Bay Area, CA
  • Handicap:+4
GolfWRX Likes : 85

Posted 30 November 2018 - 05:14 PM

Great feedback but these certainly are not a blade. The short irons are a CB and the mid and long are a hollow body cavity.

3

#4 mrmikeac

mrmikeac

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 245 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 481854
  • Joined: 09/14/2017
  • Location:Waterford
  • Handicap:6.4
GolfWRX Likes : 297

Posted 30 November 2018 - 05:36 PM

Definitely not blades bud. Good write up but I do think you may be dealing with quite the honeymoon period lol. I found the P760ís did sit very nice at address and I didnít find the offset in the long irons to be as extreme as you know who put them out to be. With that being said, I would barely even put these in the players iron category, more of a players improvement category, these are extremely forgiving and easy to hit, the distances I found were a little inconsistent in the mid irons and I did notice quite a hot spot in the 6 iron, other than that I found these to be great irons and a good option for a mid to high hc who wants a smaller profile than the 790ís.
Driver: Titleist TS2, Kuro Kage Black Dual Core 50 Stiff
3 Wood: Exotics CBX, HZRDUS Red 65 6.0
3 Hybrid: Mizuno CLK, Fujikura Speeder Evolution HB 85 Stiff
2 Iron: Taylormade P790 UDI, HZRDUS Black 85 6.0
5-W: Mizuno JPX 919 Tour, Nippon Pro Modus Tour 120 Stiff
50 Degree: Mizuno S18, 8 Bounce, Gunmetal, Dynamic Gold S300
54 Degree: Mizuno S18, 12 Bounce, Gunmetal, Dynamic Gold S300
58 Degree: Mizuno S18, 8 Bounce, Gunmetal, Dynamic Gold S300
Putter: Bettinardi Queen B #9 34Ē
Ball: Taylormade TP5

4

#5 craz-e

craz-e

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,736 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 39596
  • Joined: 09/19/2007
  • Location:Cairns QLD, Australia
  • Handicap:3
GolfWRX Likes : 763

Posted 30 November 2018 - 05:46 PM

You lost me at blades

Driver = Titleist TS3, Even Flow White 6.0 (44.5")
5 Wood = Taylormade Burner

Irons = Miura 1957 Baby Blades Project X LZ 6.0 (4-PW)
Wilson Staff FG59 DG S300's (4-PW)
Titleist 718 MB Project X LZ 6.0 (4-PW)
Wedges = Titleist Vokey SM6 52*, 56* and 60*

Putter = Wilson Staff 8882
Ball = Titleist AVX

5

#6 LaymanM

LaymanM

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,610 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 130511
  • Joined: 06/11/2011
  • Location:Cincinnati, OH
GolfWRX Likes : 522

Posted 30 November 2018 - 07:54 PM

Glad you found a set that works for you but def not blades.
PING G400 Max 9*, Adidla Rogue Max 75x
Callaway 815 Alpha 3W and 5W Speeder 665 stiff
Srixon U65 4, Modus 105s
Srixon Z785 5-PW Modus 120s
Edel DVR 50, s200
SM7 54F / 58K
SC Studio Style Newport 2

6

#7 MCoz

MCoz

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 835 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 3519
  • Joined: 07/28/2005
  • Location:Napa, CA
  • Handicap:+1
GolfWRX Likes : 170

Posted 30 November 2018 - 09:10 PM

Hey guys, get over IT! For many years blades are not just butter knives and muscle backs. Thin soles and toplines clubs with small forged heads and little to no offset have been generally considered  blades whether or not they were muscle backs or thin cavity backs. The R9 TP "B"s were considered blades by the tour where they had a large amount of sets in play.
To make comments on one's interpretation that isn't necessarily hardfast is shortsighted and ill advised.
For decades I have been testing  golf equipment both prototypes and previews for several OEMs. I am not an unknown in the golf industry. So if all you have give is your definition of what a blade is, just don't comment and move on, don't bother to read me. I post for those who may want a view or some insight. Now I remember why I don't comment on this Site much anymore because of the lack of quality comments in favor of BS from people who think they know something.

What is a blade putter? No Ping putter or any copy is technically not a blade but they are often referred to as such as in "Blades" vs Mallets.
Old Tommy Armours, 8802s (and variations), BullsEyes, those are some of what was originally "blades". Terms have never been well defined only interpreted.

Edited by MCoz, 30 November 2018 - 09:20 PM.

DRIVER- TaylorMade 2018 M3 440 Tour issue/Fuji Evolution  661 Speeder IV--S
3wd- TM 2017 M1 Fujikura Motore Speeder 661 Evolution IV -S
1i - Cleveland HiBore 16* Tour Dept 3.2 torque S tipped 1" (2-3i replacement)
Tour 5 - TM RBZ Stg 2 23.5* Fuji MCH 80-S
Irons 4 & 5  TM M1 Fuji Pro 95i - S , 6 thru PW TM P760 Fujikura Pro 95i-S  
SW- Cleveland RTX-3 CB 52* Bent to 53.5* V-MG Steelfiber 110- S
LW- TaylorMade HI TOE- Tour Dept small head, soft heel 4 way grind  60* bent to 59* Proj-X 6.0
Putter- Bobby Grace-- M.Coz Bandsaw Prototype

7

#8 nofxnate28

nofxnate28

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 513028
  • Joined: 09/22/2018
GolfWRX Likes : 16

Posted 30 November 2018 - 10:21 PM

View PostMCoz, on 30 November 2018 - 09:10 PM, said:

Hey guys, get over IT! For many years blades are not just butter knives and muscle backs. Thin soles and toplines clubs with small forged heads and little to no offset have been generally considered  blades whether or not they were muscle backs or thin cavity backs. The R9 TP "B"s were considered blades by the tour where they had a large amount of sets in play.
To make comments on one's interpretation that isn't necessarily hardfast is shortsighted and ill advised.
For decades I have been testing  golf equipment both prototypes and previews for several OEMs. I am not an unknown in the golf industry. So if all you have give is your definition of what a blade is, just don't comment and move on, don't bother to read me. I post for those who may want a view or some insight. Now I remember why I don't comment on this Site much anymore because of the lack of quality comments in favor of BS from people who think they know something.

What is a blade putter? No Ping putter or any copy is technically not a blade but they are often referred to as such as in "Blades" vs Mallets.
Old Tommy Armours, 8802s (and variations), BullsEyes, those are some of what was originally "blades". Terms have never been well defined only interpreted.

I ordered a set of p760s so I'm more than appreciative for your review. Looking forward to these irons to give me a little forgiveness with a great look and profile.

8

#9 MCoz

MCoz

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 835 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 3519
  • Joined: 07/28/2005
  • Location:Napa, CA
  • Handicap:+1
GolfWRX Likes : 170

Posted 30 November 2018 - 11:12 PM

View Postnofxnate28, on 30 November 2018 - 10:21 PM, said:

View PostMCoz, on 30 November 2018 - 09:10 PM, said:

Hey guys, get over IT! For many years blades are not just butter knives and muscle backs. Thin soles and toplines clubs with small forged heads and little to no offset have been generally considered  blades whether or not they were muscle backs or thin cavity backs. The R9 TP "B"s were considered blades by the tour where they had a large amount of sets in play.
To make comments on one's interpretation that isn't necessarily hardfast is shortsighted and ill advised.
For decades I have been testing  golf equipment both prototypes and previews for several OEMs. I am not an unknown in the golf industry. So if all you have give is your definition of what a blade is, just don't comment and move on, don't bother to read me. I post for those who may want a view or some insight. Now I remember why I don't comment on this Site much anymore because of the lack of quality comments in favor of BS from people who think they know something.

What is a blade putter? No Ping putter or any copy is technically not a blade but they are often referred to as such as in "Blades" vs Mallets.
Old Tommy Armours, 8802s (and variations), BullsEyes, those are some of what was originally "blades". Terms have never been well defined only interpreted.

I ordered a set of p760s so I'm more than appreciative for your review. Looking forward to these irons to give me a little forgiveness with a great look and profile.
Thanks for the note. I am not here to sell stuff, as I don't live off of what I do for golf. I am all about the game and I have followers (not necessarily from this site) that appreciate how I can help enthusiasts. Grow the game! That is what is important! It was important to my dad who passed a few weeks ago. he was a very good player but he enjoyed the competition and the fellowship of golf and his friends although he out-lived almost all of them. My regret for him was that he never shot his age although he came close.
DRIVER- TaylorMade 2018 M3 440 Tour issue/Fuji Evolution  661 Speeder IV--S
3wd- TM 2017 M1 Fujikura Motore Speeder 661 Evolution IV -S
1i - Cleveland HiBore 16* Tour Dept 3.2 torque S tipped 1" (2-3i replacement)
Tour 5 - TM RBZ Stg 2 23.5* Fuji MCH 80-S
Irons 4 & 5  TM M1 Fuji Pro 95i - S , 6 thru PW TM P760 Fujikura Pro 95i-S  
SW- Cleveland RTX-3 CB 52* Bent to 53.5* V-MG Steelfiber 110- S
LW- TaylorMade HI TOE- Tour Dept small head, soft heel 4 way grind  60* bent to 59* Proj-X 6.0
Putter- Bobby Grace-- M.Coz Bandsaw Prototype

9

#10 WidespreadPanic

WidespreadPanic

    Wizard in the Corner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 425856
  • Joined: 05/19/2016
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Handicap:1.1
GolfWRX Likes : 2577

Posted 01 December 2018 - 12:51 AM

An iron that has speedfoam in it while also having a cavity back is certainly not a blade. With that being said, the cavity is as close to being not a cavity as a cavity can get. Very minimal.

But I do agree that they are very nice irons. I think the P770/750 are really nice irons, but there were minor things Iíd change about each, so I was looking forward to the 760. The initial pics turned me off but they look much better in person. They are on my radar for new irons (MP18-MB sc leading the way) and Iím going to hit them today.

Edited by WidespreadPanic, 01 December 2018 - 10:53 AM.

Taylormade M2 ('17) 10.5*
Cobra F7 15.5*
Taylormade M1 ('17) 19*
Mizuno MPH5 4i
Mizuno MP33 5-PW
Cleveland RTX 588 2.0 52**, 56**, 60**
Taylormade TP Red Ardmore 3
Taylormade TPx

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#11 titleistlefty33

titleistlefty33

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 21863
  • Joined: 11/16/2006
  • Location:TX/CA
  • Ebay ID:makersmarsh
GolfWRX Likes : 194

Posted 01 December 2018 - 06:11 AM

Great irons. Great write up. Appreciate you taking the time man
lead tape & Taylormade TP5X's

11

#12 Ed Settle

Ed Settle

    #InsideTMAG

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 5,420 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 64299
  • Joined: 08/27/2008
  • Location:Indianapolis, IN
  • Handicap:8.7
GolfWRX Likes : 1777

Posted 01 December 2018 - 07:37 AM

Thank you for the write up. I do think they are interesting irons.

But as you know on the Internet everybodyís an expert. So I appreciate your pushback on the naysayers. I guess Iím guilty of being snippy every once in a while. But that gets really old pretty quick
Twitter: @Ed_Settle

Driver: TM 2018 M3 460 10.5 Graphite Design IZ-6 X
Fairway 3w: TM 2016 Tour Issue M2 3/15* Graphite Design Tour Series F 7S
Fairway 5w:TM 2017 M2 Tour 5/18* Graphite Design GP shaft
Driving Iron: TM P-790 4/23* KBS Proto Hyb 85S
Irons: Testing: New Level 4-PW Nippon Modus 105 S
Wedges: New Level 50/54/TM 60 Hi-Toe Modus 115 Wedge
Putter: Toulon Garage Austin 34.5, Garage Columbus 34Ē, Garage Rochester 34", First Run Madison #11/100 34", Garage Colts Blue Indianapolis 34"
Ball: TM TP5
Bag: Vessel Black 14 way carry

My WITB

12

#13 Haloha

Haloha

    GOLFFER

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 124 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 396522
  • Joined: 09/19/2015
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Handicap:6
GolfWRX Likes : 10

Posted 01 December 2018 - 06:09 PM

View PostMCoz, on 30 November 2018 - 04:37 PM, said:

I am a month in playing with the TaylorMade P760 irons. IMO this is the best set of blades since the TM R9 TP "B"s and frankly they are better. The balance of these are superb. I have played blades primarily since the 60's when that's all there was for the most part. Only a handful of times have I strayed to a somewhat "game improvement" club due to the fact that I don't like offset clubs. The most notable exceptions were the TM Tour Burner irons in 2008 that saw me get to a +4 hdcp. But I gravitated  back thru the R9 TPs and into other Blades or cavity back blades. Of course the hdcp has gradually gone back to around a scratch (1 to +1). In '17 I moved to the M1 irons because I liked the looks and found them to be almost the "perfect" players type GI. I have numerous friends who followed me into those M1s, all low single digits. I preferred them to the very successful 790s because of the way they sat at address. The 750s (liked the looks, hated the distance loss) and the 770s (awkward offset in mid and long irons to my eye and still short) weren't quite for me. M3s were not an improvement for me vs the M1s.
Now the P760s come along and they are beautiful at address (the only look that counts!!). The balance and feel are great. Still I have never hit a 4 iron or 5 iron better than the M1s. So what I have done is matched those M1s with the P760 6 iron thru Pitching wedge. While some may think there would be gaps, let me explain: My M1s came from the Tour Dept and are 2* weaker than the standard set (thus also reducing the offset and the 760s are one degree stronger than standard. Both sets have the same shafts and are weighed to match. I still like the 760 long irons but the M1s are as perfect as I have ever hit. I can now work the ball better with the scoring clubs and they are much better with the knock down drilling shot into the wind. Yet they are still pretty forgiving.
I am back to zeroing in on the flags and at good distances. I am looking forward to more rounds in the 60's this coming year than in 2018!!

Great info and thanks, I'm not in the market for new irons (happy with mine) but I do enjoy a detailed write up from an experienced player!

Edited by Haloha, 01 December 2018 - 06:10 PM.

Bag of tricks
Driver: Callaway Rogue SZ 10.5 w/Graphite Design AD-DI 6X
Wood: Taylormade M1 3HL w/Graphite Design AD-DI 7X
Hybrid: Taylormade M1 4HY-21 w/Graphite Design AD-Di 95S
Irons:   Srixon 745 4-P  -2 flat/ +1strong  or  Callaway '18 X-Forged 5-PW DG AMT S400  -2 flat/ +2 strong
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM6-52/ SM5-56/SM6-60 Copper Lmt.Ed.
Putter: Scotty Cameron Holiday18 or Select M-1
Ball: Titleist Pro-V1X

13

#14 Longballjock

Longballjock

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 92 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 386888
  • Joined: 07/20/2015
  • Location:Scotland
  • Handicap:3.1
GolfWRX Likes : 49

Posted 01 December 2018 - 08:29 PM

This write up deserves a like. Hope you enjoy them for a while 👌👍
What's in the bag

Driver: Cobra F8 9*
       w/ UST elements Chrome
4wood : Taylormade "07" Burner TP 17.5*
       W/ Fujikura Blur 75x
Hyrbid: Adams super 9031 21.5*
       W/ Diamana D+ 82s
Irons : Lynx Prowler VT 5-pw
       W/ Recoil 780 F5
Wedges: Nike Forged 50* Engage 54*&60* (TS&DS)
       W/ Aldila Multicomp 105
Putter: Nike Method 001 Flow neck (oven Proto)

Ball: Callaway Chromesoft X

14

#15 High Plains Driver

High Plains Driver

    Chip Yipper Extraordinaire

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,306 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 5556
  • Joined: 08/27/2005
  • Location:West Texas
  • Ebay ID:*chaser*
GolfWRX Likes : 711

Posted 01 December 2018 - 08:51 PM

:stop:   Guys calling MCoz out without knowing who he is, who he knows, and what his connections are.

I am not brand loyal. I am just seriously OCD.

Driver:  Titleist 910 D2 9.5° (set to 8.5°)
Fairways: Titleist 910F 15° and 19° woods
Hybrids:  Cobra Baffler Multi-Metal 20° and 24°  
Irons:  Titleist AP2 712 5-PW
Wedges:  
Titleist SM4 52° and 58°
Putter:  Scotty Cameron Studio Stainless Newport

15

#16 ctonr

ctonr

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 206 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 54332
  • Joined: 04/23/2008
  • Location:Iowa
GolfWRX Likes : 56

Posted 01 December 2018 - 09:14 PM

Cheers Mcoz, well written review as usual.  Nice to hear from you, it's been a while.

16

#17 Jack Pearsall

Jack Pearsall

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,245 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 125708
  • Joined: 04/01/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 1167

Posted 02 December 2018 - 05:03 PM

Sorry to hear about ur Dad passing. Condolences.
MacGregor PCB Tours...the leopard of irons.

Taylormade SLDR TP 430 9*
MacGregor MT 13*
Titleist 909H 17*
Mizuno MP Fli Hi 21*
Mizuno Yoro MP-15 4-PW
Mizuno MP T7 52* 58*
Titleist SC Teryllium Two Newport Longneck

17

#18 lilcaeser

lilcaeser

    Advanced

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 458 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 10962
  • Joined: 02/01/2006
  • Handicap:4
  • Ebay ID:lilcaeser
GolfWRX Likes : 44

Posted 02 December 2018 - 05:17 PM

Hey MCoz ,,, can you give us a review against the R9 TP 'B's ? ,,still one of my fav clubs of all time ,or even the RAC TP MB's ? ,worth the upgrade to the 760's ? thanks for the write up , :golfer: ,,T

just read the other posts- condolences on Dad ( were all too young to pass )

Edited by lilcaeser, 02 December 2018 - 05:20 PM.


18

#19 MCoz

MCoz

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 835 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 3519
  • Joined: 07/28/2005
  • Location:Napa, CA
  • Handicap:+1
GolfWRX Likes : 170

Posted 05 December 2018 - 05:48 PM

View PostJack Pearsall, on 02 December 2018 - 05:03 PM, said:

Sorry to hear about ur Dad passing. Condolences.
Thanks, another of the "Greatest Generation" gone.
DRIVER- TaylorMade 2018 M3 440 Tour issue/Fuji Evolution  661 Speeder IV--S
3wd- TM 2017 M1 Fujikura Motore Speeder 661 Evolution IV -S
1i - Cleveland HiBore 16* Tour Dept 3.2 torque S tipped 1" (2-3i replacement)
Tour 5 - TM RBZ Stg 2 23.5* Fuji MCH 80-S
Irons 4 & 5  TM M1 Fuji Pro 95i - S , 6 thru PW TM P760 Fujikura Pro 95i-S  
SW- Cleveland RTX-3 CB 52* Bent to 53.5* V-MG Steelfiber 110- S
LW- TaylorMade HI TOE- Tour Dept small head, soft heel 4 way grind  60* bent to 59* Proj-X 6.0
Putter- Bobby Grace-- M.Coz Bandsaw Prototype

19

#20 MCoz

MCoz

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 835 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 3519
  • Joined: 07/28/2005
  • Location:Napa, CA
  • Handicap:+1
GolfWRX Likes : 170

Posted 05 December 2018 - 06:33 PM

View Postlilcaeser, on 02 December 2018 - 05:17 PM, said:

Hey MCoz ,,, can you give us a review against the R9 TP 'B's ? ,,still one of my fav clubs of all time ,or even the RAC TP MB's ? ,worth the upgrade to the 760's ? thanks for the write up , :golfer: ,,T

just read the other posts- condolences on Dad ( were all too young to pass )
I pulled out my old '9 TP Bs. I loved those clubs, I still have them (of course I still have most of the clubs I have used going back to my First Flights (pre-Palmer) and my Ping K1s pre-dot!
I think of the 760's as a follow up successor to both the B's and the Rac TPs. All are very accurate and playable for shotmakers. I was playing steel in the B's (C-Tapers 120s. On the Rac TP MBs I switched to Fuji MCI 100s. But a few years ago I switched to Fuji Pro 95i and I love these shafts in everything I have tried usually 1/2" over. It wasn't easy for me to go to lighter shafts but these have worked very well for me (and my elbows and hands). I still use the same weights I have used in Woods and utilities for the past 15+ years. I prefer the Fuji over the Aerotech although they are close.
Back to the comparisons, the 760s are slightly smaller heads than the others which look to be more similar to the 790s. I hit the 760's a little longer but with a slightly higher trajectory but shafts are different. The feel is similar but slightly softer in the new clubs and the workability appears to be even better also. These 760s are exacting clubs. At address they more similar to the R9 TP B's but even a little better. the flow from the shaft to the hosel to the leading edge is excellent.
{I have never liked that part of the Ben Hogans from way back to the Titleist AP whatevers. I used to like the Titleist Tour Model 88's from 3 decades ago, ambivalent about them since but that is my own visual issue}
I don't do this review lightly or in haste. This is the new and improved versions of the older models you asked about. I highly recommend to anyone playing "non-offset players clubs to look these over and test them out. I don't know what the graphite options are I had mine specially done. But I will say that these heads can use graphites.
since.

DRIVER- TaylorMade 2018 M3 440 Tour issue/Fuji Evolution  661 Speeder IV--S
3wd- TM 2017 M1 Fujikura Motore Speeder 661 Evolution IV -S
1i - Cleveland HiBore 16* Tour Dept 3.2 torque S tipped 1" (2-3i replacement)
Tour 5 - TM RBZ Stg 2 23.5* Fuji MCH 80-S
Irons 4 & 5  TM M1 Fuji Pro 95i - S , 6 thru PW TM P760 Fujikura Pro 95i-S  
SW- Cleveland RTX-3 CB 52* Bent to 53.5* V-MG Steelfiber 110- S
LW- TaylorMade HI TOE- Tour Dept small head, soft heel 4 way grind  60* bent to 59* Proj-X 6.0
Putter- Bobby Grace-- M.Coz Bandsaw Prototype

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20

#21 FairwayFred

FairwayFred

    Major Winner

  • Sponsors
  • 3,544 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 149
  • Joined: 04/22/2005
  • Location:Hwy 97, Mile Marker 55
GolfWRX Likes : 1890

Posted 05 December 2018 - 07:11 PM

Great review MCoz.  Always great to get your take.  Love to see reviews from old school forum guys who really know their stuff.
FREE AGENT CLUB HO NO MO!
Ari Techner
National Custom Works nationalcustomworks.com
ari@nationalcustomworks.com
IG: @nationalcustom
Twitter: @WorksNational
(still a huge club HO)

21

#22 Jagpilotohio

Jagpilotohio

    Go Bucks!!

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,504 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 395936
  • Joined: 09/14/2015
  • Location:Columbus, OH
  • Handicap:1.2
  • Ebay ID:Jagpilotohio
GolfWRX Likes : 5171

Posted 05 December 2018 - 07:38 PM

I must say, I was pleasantly surprised by them in the store last night. Didn’t have time to hit them.

Very nice shape, size, topline, pre worn leading edge,  progressive offset.   I still detest those lines on the back, but you don’t have to look at the back when you hit them.

I may have to pick up a set for a long term demo in the spring.  I doubt they can kick my PTx out of the bag though. The PTx are great sticks..
9.5* Cobra LTD,  Old school Grafalloy Blue, 43.5"
14* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X 42"
16* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X, 41.5" (set to 17*)
19* Titleist 816 H2 fuji 8.8X TS 40.0"
4-9 2016 Hogan PTx, KBS Tour V, 120X
Ping glide 2 46-12, 50-12, 54-14 (at 55) stealth, 60-10 (at 61) stealth, All wedges Recoil Proto 125 F5
33.5" Ghost spider slant neck.
Srixon Z-star XV

22

#23 wilymo

wilymo

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 111 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 419872
  • Joined: 04/09/2016
  • Ebay ID:wilymo
GolfWRX Likes : 41

Posted 05 December 2018 - 09:44 PM

Saw these in person finally and like most was pleasantly surprised at the looks. I don’t see why everyone is up in arms about the blades comment since it seems like even manufacturers throw the term around pretty loosely i.e. ping iblades. Either way, great review. Has anyone compares these to the AP2’s?

23

#24 jll62

jll62

    Major Winner

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 1,616 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 9627
  • Joined: 01/10/2006
  • Location:Minneapolis
  • Handicap:+4.2
GolfWRX Likes : 1218

Posted 05 December 2018 - 10:17 PM

 MCoz, on 30 November 2018 - 09:10 PM, said:

Hey guys, get over IT! For many years blades are not just butter knives and muscle backs. Thin soles and toplines clubs with small forged heads and little to no offset have been generally considered  blades whether or not they were muscle backs or thin cavity backs. The R9 TP "B"s were considered blades by the tour where they had a large amount of sets in play.
To make comments on one's interpretation that isn't necessarily hardfast is shortsighted and ill advised.
For decades I have been testing  golf equipment both prototypes and previews for several OEMs. I am not an unknown in the golf industry. So if all you have give is your definition of what a blade is, just don't comment and move on, don't bother to read me. I post for those who may want a view or some insight. Now I remember why I don't comment on this Site much anymore because of the lack of quality comments in favor of BS from people who think they know something.

What is a blade putter? No Ping putter or any copy is technically not a blade but they are often referred to as such as in "Blades" vs Mallets.
Old Tommy Armours, 8802s (and variations), BullsEyes, those are some of what was originally "blades". Terms have never been well defined only interpreted.

Believe me, those of us who have been around this site for any length of time, and also old sites, appreciate any and all MCoz posts.

As for the P760s...I was pleased to see your take on them. I finally had a chance to hit them last week at TM HQ and was very happy with the results. Looking forward to more time with them once spring rolls around.
TaylorMade M3 9.5, GD Tour AD GP-6s
TaylorMade M3 T3, Mitsubishi Tensei Pro White 70s
TaylorMade UDI 2, KBS C-Taper Lite 115 X
TaylorMade P-770 3, KBS C-Taper S
TaylorMade P-770 4, KBS C-Taper S+
TaylorMade RSi TP 5-PW, KBS C-Taper S+
TaylorMade Milled Grind 52 Raw, DG S400
TaylorMade Hi-Toe 60 (58), DG S400
TaylorMade DJ Itsy Bitsy Proto, 34"
TaylorMade TP5x #12

jll62's WITB

jll62 on Instagram

24

#25 dunn

dunn

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,179 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 124833
  • Joined: 03/19/2011
  • Location:so cal
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 1404

Posted 05 December 2018 - 11:26 PM

Lol, this is too funny but I'll be quiet



25

#26 MCoz

MCoz

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 835 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 3519
  • Joined: 07/28/2005
  • Location:Napa, CA
  • Handicap:+1
GolfWRX Likes : 170

Posted 06 December 2018 - 04:42 PM

 Jagpilotohio, on 05 December 2018 - 07:38 PM, said:

I must say, I was pleasantly surprised by them in the store last night. Didn’t have time to hit them.

Very nice shape, size, topline, pre worn leading edge,  progressive offset.   I still detest those lines on the back, but you don’t have to look at the back when you hit them.

I may have to pick up a set for a long term demo in the spring.  I doubt they can kick my PTx out of the bag though. The PTx are great sticks..
A couple of points I missed was that leading edge is really excellent and something that the older clubs don't have. I have ground leading edges on other clubs where these didn't need it because that is designed in.

One Negative point is the numbering on the soles are not easy to read due to a thin line "blockish" style. The 5,6,8,9 and P can be difficult at a glance which I don't recall in other sets of clubs.
DRIVER- TaylorMade 2018 M3 440 Tour issue/Fuji Evolution  661 Speeder IV--S
3wd- TM 2017 M1 Fujikura Motore Speeder 661 Evolution IV -S
1i - Cleveland HiBore 16* Tour Dept 3.2 torque S tipped 1" (2-3i replacement)
Tour 5 - TM RBZ Stg 2 23.5* Fuji MCH 80-S
Irons 4 & 5  TM M1 Fuji Pro 95i - S , 6 thru PW TM P760 Fujikura Pro 95i-S  
SW- Cleveland RTX-3 CB 52* Bent to 53.5* V-MG Steelfiber 110- S
LW- TaylorMade HI TOE- Tour Dept small head, soft heel 4 way grind  60* bent to 59* Proj-X 6.0
Putter- Bobby Grace-- M.Coz Bandsaw Prototype

26




Also tagged with Impressive

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors