You cannot be (naturally) slow and small and uncoordinated and make it sorry
Have to be outstanding in at least two and at worst average in third: size/strength, speed/agility, coordination/skill
Itís the same in most sports
You teach top players - why you argue with this?
Speed/agility/ coordination can be taught and are learned skills. Nobody is born knowing how to walk let alone run/skate. Plenty of top lacrosse players are smaller than 5í10. Best attack and Defenseman on my brothers D1 team were both 5í7, the attack was maybe 140lbs. Iíve been a professional in 2 different sports and am 5í7.
Yes I do teach top players and genetics have very little to do with their success. Youíre trying to make excuses why kids fail and your doing so before they even have a chance.
There are innate aptitudes for everything
Just because you can become proficient at something through hard work doesnít mean you can become really great
The best athletes have great genes and work really hard too
How can someone with less natural ability compete with someone who was ďborn with itĒ and busts butte
This is not controversial
Except that the things you claim people are born with arenít genetic. They are learned.
Running fast and big size are not learned
Even strength has limitations
Running reasonably fast is learned. And again big size isnít necessary. The average collegiate lacrosse player is 5í11 and 185lbs. UNCís top scorer in school history is 5í5. One of Villanovaís top players in last decade was 5í4 and 140lbs. Itís obvious you donít understand the game at all. Again my brother was a top lacrosse player in the state of FL and was 5í9 and 175lbs in high school. And heís actually quite slow running. He understands the game and is almost always in the right place at the right time and won 88% of his face offs his senior season. He learned to be skillful but is not a great athlete.