Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

Distance Correlation


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 yellowlover519

yellowlover519

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 89955
  • Joined: 07/28/2009
  • Ebay ID:yellowlover5
GolfWRX Likes : 60

Posted 04 November 2018 - 10:20 AM

Branded Chamblee tweeted the following:

Correlation of distance to scoring average on the @PGATOUR

1980-13%
1990-14%
2000-31%
2017-44%

Correlation of accuracy to scoring average on the @PGATOUR

1980-53%
1990-48%
2000-35%
2017-12%

The most challenging aspect of golf is eroding, and that erosion needs to stop.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#2 tiger1873

tiger1873

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 782 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 340777
  • Joined: 09/20/2014
  • Location:United States
GolfWRX Likes : 371

Posted 04 November 2018 - 12:01 PM

Distance always mattered in golf. Yes everyone can hit longer but you still need to have a short game.

I think the new equipment and longer game everyone has help short hitters more then long hitters. I thought back in the day Bobby Jones was 300 yards off the tee and a big reason he dominated the sport.  I also think the better equipment is what caused everyone to catch Tiger as well.



2

#3 MadGolfer76

MadGolfer76

    Admiration is the state furthest from understanding.

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,111 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 89700
  • Joined: 07/26/2009
  • Location:Maine
GolfWRX Likes : 10326

Posted 04 November 2018 - 12:20 PM

If the golfing Apocalypse is coming, I wouldn't rely on Brandel to be the one to tell us.
Mizuno ST-180 10.5/Mitsubishi Tensei Blue 60s
Mizuno JPX 900 15/Fujikura Speeder 661s
Mizuno Mp-54 3-Pw/Dynamic Gold s300
Mizuno T7 50, 54, 58/Dynamic Gold s300
Scotty Cameron Futura X7
Srixon Z-Star

WITB

3

#4 BertGA

BertGA

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 181 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 500442
  • Joined: 04/29/2018
  • Location:Georgia
GolfWRX Likes : 236

Posted 04 November 2018 - 12:49 PM

View Postyellowlover519, on 04 November 2018 - 10:20 AM, said:

Branded Chamblee tweeted the following:

Correlation of distance to scoring average on the @PGATOUR

1980-13%
1990-14%
2000-31%
2017-44%

Correlation of accuracy to scoring average on the @PGATOUR

1980-53%
1990-48%
2000-35%
2017-12%

The most challenging aspect of golf is eroding, and that erosion needs to stop.

What stats were they collecting in 1980 to determine “accuracy”? You can’t just say GIR equates to better accuracy, or always represents the more accurate player. Pros these days might prefer hitting a bunker and getting up and down from there over missing long on a domed green and rolling off. That may kill their “accuracy” stats if you are expecting them to hit the green.

4

#5 heavy_hitter

heavy_hitter

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,701 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 366715
  • Joined: 03/16/2015
GolfWRX Likes : 2307

Posted 04 November 2018 - 12:49 PM

View Postyellowlover519, on 04 November 2018 - 10:20 AM, said:

Branded Chamblee tweeted the following:

Correlation of distance to scoring average on the @PGATOUR

1980-13%
1990-14%
2000-31%
2017-44%

Correlation of accuracy to scoring average on the @PGATOUR

1980-53%
1990-48%
2000-35%
2017-12%

The most challenging aspect of golf is eroding, and that erosion needs to stop.

Disagree.  We are only talking about 1% of the golfers in the world that this “may” be true for.  These are the entertainers.  I don’t want to see someone bunt a runner to second.  I want to see homeruns.


5

#6 kekoa

kekoa

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,939 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 66944
  • Joined: 10/02/2008
  • Location:in the hole
  • Handicap:4-20
GolfWRX Likes : 1919

Posted 05 November 2018 - 01:37 AM

Lets face it, seeing guys bomb it is flat out fun and entertaining. A buddy of mine consistently hits it 320 but has a very hard time getting it within 15 -20 ft with wedge.  Whether he makes birdie or par the only thing guys are talking about is his ability to hit the long ball.

6

#7 mrshinsa

mrshinsa

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 102 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 476520
  • Joined: 07/26/2017
  • Location:Bay Area, CA
GolfWRX Likes : 62

Posted 05 November 2018 - 07:18 AM

I agree with this guy more...

https://www.golf.com...hit-more-greens


7

#8 CTgolf

CTgolf

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 345 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 124521
  • Joined: 03/14/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 235

Posted 06 November 2018 - 07:08 AM

Distance (off the tee) really only matters if it improves proximity to the hole for the shot in regulation.  Hitting one or two clubs shorter into the green helps, as does being able to take trouble like fairway bunkers and hazards out of play off the tee.

Players who are extremely accurate tend to be precise throughout the bag, so hitting a longer club on approach or avoiding trouble is not as much of an issue.   I actually see more top players who are middle to above average in distance but with great accuracy run into challenges when they try to start focusing on maximizing distance (happened to Luke Donald, now Lydia Ko and Jordan?).  The rare combo of extreme length and accuracy is what has created a new breed of elite world beaters. For the other 99.9% they should just stick with what got them there in the first place.

8



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors