The only thing Rogue blows is Logan.
As far as the Rogue being head above heels better than the M3 or M4 on off center ball speeds unvaldiated. I've seen just as good of ball speed from the M3 and M4 on off center hits as I do with the Rogue Subzero, Epic, G400. All are the same.
Only validation I need for me was the 4 hours over two days of trackman data I produced testing the m3 m4 vs my m1. Then m4 vs rogue and rogue sub zero. Rogue whipped them all. Especially m3 and subzero.
Just remember, just because you experienced better ball speeds with Rogue on off center hits does not mean that its the case for everyone.
The Rogue SZ is back in my bag, I love it, but I had an M3 440 prior to that and it blew my Rogue out of the water on off center hits and distance. Only reason I went back to the Rogue is because I hit more fairways with it.
So in my experience, the M3 440 is much faster off the face but just not as straight.
I’m talking rogue . Regular old rogue. Subzero is right there with m3-m4 on off center hits.
I get what you’re saying. But I don’t think it’s true this time. Rogue and G400 max are head and shoulders above TM this time in forgiveness . You should give the rogue a try vs subzero. Unless you just can’t get spin down any other way , you’re giving up some with subzero. I’m a high speed high spin player who hits down on it. And we found a combo of loft and shaft that took me to 2200 rpm average coming from 2800 average with a tour 17 m1 Head.
Not dissing Tm. I’m playing their putter and the 17 m1 is the best 3 wood I’ve ever owned. But they have some ground to make up in my opinion on rogue in the Driver dept.
Edited by bladehunter, 01 September 2018 - 04:30 PM.