Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

ping eye 2 plus no + possible find??


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 scruffynick

scruffynick

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 824 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 317681
  • Joined: 05/28/2014
  • Location:manchester, UK
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 649

Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:33 PM

I stumbled across some eye2s in a second hand shop and for the cheap price I was having them. So I did the usual and asked ping about them using the serial number....now these eye2s definitely do not have a plus sign in the cavity.
However,  Ping came back to me stating they were ping eye 2+ created in 1990. So have I stumbled across some sort after plus non + eye2s I wonder??


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#2 Fellaheen51

Fellaheen51

    Go Green

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,002 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 284154
  • Joined: 11/14/2013
  • Location:Michigan
GolfWRX Likes : 13423

Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:23 PM

Ping Eye 2 + no +.  The modified sole, more rounded toe design of the Eye 2+, but still made with the non-conforming Eye 2 grooves.  Made for appx. 6 months, from 11/89 to 4/90.  The sole and W stamp look quite different compared to Eye 2's, but no "+" in the back cavity.  After which Ping began adding a "+" below the pat numbers.  Not sure if Ping denoted the + no + models separately from the E2+.   Easiest to identify looking at wedges.  

Picture of my + no + SW.  Note the absence of a + below the Pat. Numbers.

Attached File  fullsizeoutput_e4f.jpeg   59.67K   17 downloads
Laissez les bons temps rouler!

OGA - Mitglied Nummer Sechs

2

#3 Nessism

Nessism

    To measure is to know...

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,311 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 131490
  • Joined: 06/23/2011
  • Location:Torrance, CA
GolfWRX Likes : 8183

Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:54 PM

Not rare.  Ping made tons of clubs back in those days.
Ping G400 driver w/Adila Rogue 125 Silver 60S
TEE XCG6 3 & 5 fairway woods & E8 hybrid
Mizuno Hot Metal irons w/Recoil 95's
Glide 50/55/60 wedges w/Recoil 110's
Ping Anser putter - the "real deal!"

3

#4 Snowman9000

Snowman9000

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 836 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 107588
  • Joined: 05/08/2010
  • Location:North central IL
  • Handicap:10.0
GolfWRX Likes : 225

Posted 14 June 2018 - 06:15 PM

Agree, they are not rare.  On the numbered irons, are the soles scalloped in the back?  Or straight across?  The former is the plus and the plus no plus.  The latter is the plain Eye2.

4

#5 SteveNZ

SteveNZ

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 498 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 319415
  • Joined: 06/07/2014
  • Location:Auckland, New Zealand
GolfWRX Likes : 492

Posted 14 June 2018 - 07:32 PM

It's not unusual for PING to use a serial number more than once - I have a set of BeCu Eye 2s that have re-used serial numbers.


5

#6 scruffynick

scruffynick

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 824 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 317681
  • Joined: 05/28/2014
  • Location:manchester, UK
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 649

Posted 15 June 2018 - 01:07 AM

 Fellaheen51, on 14 June 2018 - 04:23 PM, said:

Ping Eye 2 + no +.  The modified sole, more rounded toe design of the Eye 2+, but still made with the non-conforming Eye 2 grooves.  Made for appx. 6 months, from 11/89 to 4/90.  The sole and W stamp look quite different compared to Eye 2's, but no "+" in the back cavity.  After which Ping began adding a "+" below the pat numbers.  Not sure if Ping denoted the + no + models separately from the E2+.   Easiest to identify looking at wedges.  

Picture of my + no + SW.  Note the absence of a + below the Pat. Numbers.

fullsizeoutput_e4f.jpeg
Ta, that's them alright! Many thanks as I was wondering yesterday after my ping email

 Nessism, on 14 June 2018 - 04:54 PM, said:

Not rare.  Ping made tons of clubs back in those days.
I know but I was still excited to have something I've haven't had before

6

#7 scruffynick

scruffynick

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 824 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 317681
  • Joined: 05/28/2014
  • Location:manchester, UK
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 649

Posted 15 June 2018 - 01:11 AM

Just a question, I've researched a little and there's a few contradicting versions but I am ok to play these in a competition on my home course....in the UK??
Anyway, here's a picture of the sw!

Attached Files


Edited by scruffynick, 15 June 2018 - 02:07 AM.


7

#8 Christen_The_Sloop

Christen_The_Sloop

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,010 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 384674
  • Joined: 07/06/2015
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada and Kyoto, Japan.
GolfWRX Likes : 857

Posted Today, 07:53 AM

I've got a nice set of these 3-LW. Such great clubs.
D - Titleist 915 D3 Tour Ad MJ 6X
15 - Titleist 915 FD Attas G7 6X
18 - Royal Collection SFD X7 Speeder 757X
3-PW - Taylormade X300 - FCI DGS300
54 - KM Miura
60 - Ping Eye2 XG / Ping Eye2 BECU

Backups, Classics and Projects

Yamaha Sutton grinds SX25 3-PW
Hogan Redlines 3-E
Founders 200 series 3-P
Bridgestone Proisme 2-P
MT Tourney R58 3-P
Dunlop DP-30 3-P
Tourstage MR-23 US Spec. CB

8

#9 Nessism

Nessism

    To measure is to know...

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,311 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 131490
  • Joined: 06/23/2011
  • Location:Torrance, CA
GolfWRX Likes : 8183

Posted Today, 08:01 AM

 scruffynick, on 15 June 2018 - 01:11 AM, said:

Just a question, I've researched a little and there's a few contradicting versions but I am ok to play these in a competition on my home course....in the UK??
Anyway, here's a picture of the sw!

As I recall the UK had a slightly different take on the whole "Ping groove debacle" from back in the day.  From the USGA perspective the grooves are okay for comp use till 2024, other than in high level Am and pro events that require CC grooves.

Edit: + no + can be identified in part by the numbers cast into the cavity.  As your wedge shows the top number ends with ...577 and the second line...813.  Those numbers are a giveaway as to the groove type.  And contrary to what some people think, the grooves on those clubs are NOT sharp.  In fact, the snafu over the grooves is because Ping used a very generous radius where the groove meets the face.

Edited by Nessism, Today, 08:05 AM.

Ping G400 driver w/Adila Rogue 125 Silver 60S
TEE XCG6 3 & 5 fairway woods & E8 hybrid
Mizuno Hot Metal irons w/Recoil 95's
Glide 50/55/60 wedges w/Recoil 110's
Ping Anser putter - the "real deal!"

9

#10 Jagpilotohio

Jagpilotohio

    Wish I could Putt...

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,512 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 395936
  • Joined: 09/14/2015
  • Location:Columbus, OH
  • Handicap:2.3
  • Ebay ID:Jagpilotohio
GolfWRX Likes : 3005

Posted Today, 08:02 AM

 scruffynick, on 15 June 2018 - 01:11 AM, said:

Just a question, I've researched a little and there's a few contradicting versions but I am ok to play these in a competition on my home course....in the UK??
Anyway, here's a picture of the sw!

If you play in any amateur handicapped events and someone gives you a hard time about your grooves, you should kick them square in the family jewels and tell them to pull their head out of their arse.

9.5* Titleist 917 D3, KKDC 70 TX,  43.5"
14* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X 42"
16* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X, 41.5"
19* Titleist 816 H2 fuji 8.8X TS 40.0"
4-9 2016 Hogan PTx, KBS Tour V, 120X
Ping glide2 46-12, 50-12,
SM6 56-14 F (at 55), SM6 60-08 at 61
all Wedges recoil Prototype 125 F5's
33.5" Ghost spider slant neck.
Srixon Z-star XV

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#11 elwhippy

elwhippy

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,251 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 3536
  • Joined: 07/28/2005
GolfWRX Likes : 765

Posted Today, 09:50 AM

I would not use those in a comp in the UK. As far I know the UK take on the groove issue was simple. Plus in the back. OK. No plus non-conforming.

11

#12 scruffynick

scruffynick

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 824 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 317681
  • Joined: 05/28/2014
  • Location:manchester, UK
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 649

Posted Today, 04:41 PM

 Jagpilotohio, on 18 June 2018 - 08:02 AM, said:

 scruffynick, on 15 June 2018 - 01:11 AM, said:

Just a question, I've researched a little and there's a few contradicting versions but I am ok to play these in a competition on my home course....in the UK??
Anyway, here's a picture of the sw!

If you play in any amateur handicapped events and someone gives you a hard time about your grooves, you should kick them square in the family jewels and tell them to pull their head out of their arse.
Ha ha like it!

12



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors