Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

Launch monitors


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 Golfingdawg19

Golfingdawg19

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 354301
  • Joined: 12/27/2014
GolfWRX Likes : 105

Posted 09 December 2017 - 03:09 PM

Iím thinking about getting a launch monitor for Christmas. My plan is to use it mainly to keep up with swing speed and figure out my club distances. I was told the ES 14 was a good option. Iíve also heard good things about the Swing Caddie 2. Trying to keep the cost under $500. Anyone have any comments on either of those two units?


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#2 Golfrnut

Golfrnut

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,774 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 132818
  • Joined: 07/12/2011
  • Location:Eastern NC
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 09 December 2017 - 04:01 PM

You are not getting a launch monitor with any real accuracy.  If you are looking to get accurate measurements, you need to forget about those two mentioned.  They don't really measure anything accurately to give you anything more than a random guess based on a lot of predetermined calculations.  At minimum you would have to look at something like the FS MEVO or Skytrak and go up from there.  Neither of those are without some nuances to using them.  The others like the ES 14 are merely toys that don't collect near enough data to give you accurate numbers.
TM Supertri V2 w/ AD DI (Testing a new one that's on probation)
Callaway 3Deep w/ 73 BB or Stage 2 3W w/ 73 BB
Stage 2 3H w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway Apex UT 21* w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway X Prototype MBs 4-PW w/ Steelfiber AMI 99s
Callaway MD3 52* & 58* PM grind (both X100 8 iron SS)
Odyssey MXM 1W

2

#3 Golfingdawg19

Golfingdawg19

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 354301
  • Joined: 12/27/2014
GolfWRX Likes : 105

Posted 09 December 2017 - 04:15 PM

I’m mainly interested in swing speed and club distances. Both of those devices should be able to handle that.

3

#4 Golfrnut

Golfrnut

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,774 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 132818
  • Joined: 07/12/2011
  • Location:Eastern NC
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 09 December 2017 - 05:13 PM

Nope, you are going to get nothing but a random guess as far as distance goes from either of those. They do not measure ball spin, launch angles, etc thatís needed to even begin to accurately calculate distance.
TM Supertri V2 w/ AD DI (Testing a new one that's on probation)
Callaway 3Deep w/ 73 BB or Stage 2 3W w/ 73 BB
Stage 2 3H w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway Apex UT 21* w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway X Prototype MBs 4-PW w/ Steelfiber AMI 99s
Callaway MD3 52* & 58* PM grind (both X100 8 iron SS)
Odyssey MXM 1W

4

#5 Golfingdawg19

Golfingdawg19

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 354301
  • Joined: 12/27/2014
GolfWRX Likes : 105

Posted 10 December 2017 - 10:50 AM

http://www.ernestspo...m/es14-pro.html

The unit offers a wide range of statistical information including club speed, launch angle, ball speed, smash factor, spin rate & distance.



5

#6 Krt22

Krt22

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,984 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 261822
  • Joined: 07/05/2013
  • Location:East Bay
GolfWRX Likes : 2070

Posted 10 December 2017 - 11:03 AM

The ES14 pro only measures ball speed and club speed, all other parameters (mainly spin and launch angle) are estimates based on what club you select and it uses those estimates to calculate carry distance.

Long story short, its not very accurate for dialing in distances for most golfers.

I agree with golfrnut, I'd get a Mevo or Skytrack

Edited by Krt22, 10 December 2017 - 11:05 AM.


6

#7 Golfrnut

Golfrnut

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,774 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 132818
  • Joined: 07/12/2011
  • Location:Eastern NC
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 10 December 2017 - 11:19 AM

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 10 December 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:

http://www.ernestspo...m/es14-pro.html

The unit offers a wide range of statistical information including club speed, launch angle, ball speed, smash factor, spin rate & distance.

And their advertisements are completely misleading.  It measures almost none of that as Krt said.
TM Supertri V2 w/ AD DI (Testing a new one that's on probation)
Callaway 3Deep w/ 73 BB or Stage 2 3W w/ 73 BB
Stage 2 3H w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway Apex UT 21* w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway X Prototype MBs 4-PW w/ Steelfiber AMI 99s
Callaway MD3 52* & 58* PM grind (both X100 8 iron SS)
Odyssey MXM 1W

7

#8 robs291

robs291

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 29 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 411248
  • Joined: 02/05/2016
  • Location:NJ
  • Handicap:9
GolfWRX Likes : 13

Posted 13 December 2017 - 06:52 AM

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 09 December 2017 - 03:09 PM, said:

I'm thinking about getting a launch monitor for Christmas. My plan is to use it mainly to keep up with swing speed and figure out my club distances. I was told the ES 14 was a good option. I've also heard good things about the Swing Caddie 2. Trying to keep the cost under $500. Anyone have any comments on either of those two units?
I tested the Swing Caddie against Trackman during a lesson indoors last winter. I entered all my lofts in the SC and the irons were consistently +/- 1-2 yards of carry on full shots compared to Trackman, which is close enough for me at my level. On an outdoor range compared to my laser got the same results. I didn't test short shots (30-70 yards ) compared to Trackmak, but on the range most looked reasonable with a few suspect as by my eye and laser. As the clubs got longer the accuracy went down, but even my 4 iron was mostly within reason. I don't recall how my hybrids tested, but the driver and 3W vs Trackman...forget it. Once in a while it was close, but the driver and 3W could be off as much as 20-30 yards. Results outside vs laser were similar.

I got it because I bought new irons and it helped me with my new yardages. It's an OK toy but one size doesn't fit all. In that price range I am not sure what will. I don't regret the purchase and do use it on occasion for my irons only.

Hope that helps.

Hope that helps.

8

#9 Skedaddle

Skedaddle

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 217 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 314325
  • Joined: 05/11/2014
GolfWRX Likes : 25

Posted 17 December 2017 - 04:21 PM

But you might have standard launch and spin that 5hey use in their modelling. Driver spin and launch massively affects distance so to just base on ballspeed is erroneous

View Postrobs291, on 13 December 2017 - 06:52 AM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 09 December 2017 - 03:09 PM, said:

I'm thinking about getting a launch monitor for Christmas. My plan is to use it mainly to keep up with swing speed and figure out my club distances. I was told the ES 14 was a good option. I've also heard good things about the Swing Caddie 2. Trying to keep the cost under $500. Anyone have any comments on either of those two units?
I tested the Swing Caddie against Trackman during a lesson indoors last winter. I entered all my lofts in the SC and the irons were consistently +/- 1-2 yards of carry on full shots compared to Trackman, which is close enough for me at my level. On an outdoor range compared to my laser got the same results. I didn't test short shots (30-70 yards ) compared to Trackmak, but on the range most looked reasonable with a few suspect as by my eye and laser. As the clubs got longer the accuracy went down, but even my 4 iron was mostly within reason. I don't recall how my hybrids tested, but the driver and 3W vs Trackman...forget it. Once in a while it was close, but the driver and 3W could be off as much as 20-30 yards. Results outside vs laser were similar.

I got it because I bought new irons and it helped me with my new yardages. It's an OK toy but one size doesn't fit all. In that price range I am not sure what will. I don't regret the purchase and do use it on occasion for my irons only.

Hope that helps.

Hope that helps.


9

#10 Tzoid

Tzoid

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 920 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 5124
  • Joined: 08/14/2005
  • Location:Maryland
  • Handicap:5
  • Ebay ID:twallermizman
GolfWRX Likes : 340

Posted 17 December 2017 - 11:02 PM

View Postrobs291, on 13 December 2017 - 06:52 AM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 09 December 2017 - 03:09 PM, said:

I'm thinking about getting a launch monitor for Christmas. My plan is to use it mainly to keep up with swing speed and figure out my club distances. I was told the ES 14 was a good option. I've also heard good things about the Swing Caddie 2. Trying to keep the cost under $500. Anyone have any comments on either of those two units?
I tested the Swing Caddie against Trackman during a lesson indoors last winter. I entered all my lofts in the SC and the irons were consistently +/- 1-2 yards of carry on full shots compared to Trackman, which is close enough for me at my level. On an outdoor range compared to my laser got the same results. I didn't test short shots (30-70 yards ) compared to Trackmak, but on the range most looked reasonable with a few suspect as by my eye and laser. As the clubs got longer the accuracy went down, but even my 4 iron was mostly within reason. I don't recall how my hybrids tested, but the driver and 3W vs Trackman...forget it. Once in a while it was close, but the driver and 3W could be off as much as 20-30 yards. Results outside vs laser were similar.

I got it because I bought new irons and it helped me with my new yardages. It's an OK toy but one size doesn't fit all. In that price range I am not sure what will. I don't regret the purchase and do use it on occasion for my irons only.

Hope that helps.

Hope that helps.


  Correct me if I'm wrong but Trackman and FlightScope  aren't intended nor do they work indoors hitting into a screen or net .  I was under the impression that the entire flight of the ball needed to be captured for them to accurately provide data.

  Foresight GC2 with HMT or GC Quad supposedly are better indoors and Sky Trak on the lower end.

Edited by Tzoid, 19 December 2017 - 11:06 PM.

Ping G400 Driver Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 60
Ping G400 3 Wood Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 70
Ping G25 20 degree Hybrid
ONOFF KURO 2015 4-PW N.S Pro Modus3 Tour 120S
Vokey SM6 50F 54S 58M
Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Studio Stainless
Titleist Pro V-1X

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#11 benzenbe

benzenbe

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 402790
  • Joined: 11/12/2015
  • Location:NYC
  • Handicap:12
GolfWRX Likes : 41

Posted 18 December 2017 - 09:01 PM

View PostTzoid, on 17 December 2017 - 11:02 PM, said:

  Correct me if I'm wrong but Trackman and FlightScope  aren't intended nor do they work indoors hitting into a screen or net .  I was under the impression that the entire flight of
the ball needed to be captured for them to accurately provide data.

  Foresight GC2 with HMT or GC Quad supposedly are better indoors and Sky Trak on the lower end.
Trackman works indoors, but being a radar system it will clearly be much more accurate outdoors.  Foresight's GC Quad is the most accurate indoor system available right now.
Custom Fit by True Spec Golf (NYC):
Callaway Epic Sub Zero (9.5*) with UST Elements Platinum
TM M2 3HL (16.5*) with Graphite Design Tour AD Fairway

TM M2 5W (18*) with Graphite Design Tour AD Fairway
Srixon Z765 (4-GW) with KBS C-Taper

Titleist Vokey SM6 (56* and 60*) with KBS 610

Off-the-Shelf:
Evnroll ER5 Hatchback

11

#12 Krt22

Krt22

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,984 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 261822
  • Joined: 07/05/2013
  • Location:East Bay
GolfWRX Likes : 2070

Posted 19 December 2017 - 05:30 PM

View PostTzoid, on 17 December 2017 - 11:02 PM, said:

View Postrobs291, on 13 December 2017 - 06:52 AM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 09 December 2017 - 03:09 PM, said:

I'm thinking about getting a launch monitor for Christmas. My plan is to use it mainly to keep up with swing speed and figure out my club distances. I was told the ES 14 was a good option. I've also heard good things about the Swing Caddie 2. Trying to keep the cost under $500. Anyone have any comments on either of those two units?
I tested the Swing Caddie against Trackman during a lesson indoors last winter. I entered all my lofts in the SC and the irons were consistently +/- 1-2 yards of carry on full shots compared to Trackman, which is close enough for me at my level. On an outdoor range compared to my laser got the same results. I didn't test short shots (30-70 yards ) compared to Trackmak, but on the range most looked reasonable with a few suspect as by my eye and laser. As the clubs got longer the accuracy went down, but even my 4 iron was mostly within reason. I don't recall how my hybrids tested, but the driver and 3W vs Trackman...forget it. Once in a while it was close, but the driver and 3W could be off as much as 20-30 yards. Results outside vs laser were similar.

I got it because I bought new irons and it helped me with my new yardages. It's an OK toy but one size doesn't fit all. In that price range I am not sure what will. I don't regret the purchase and do use it on occasion for my irons only.

Hope that helps.

Hope that helps.


  Correct me if I'm wrong but Trackman and FlightScope  aren't intended nor do they work indoors hitting into a screen or net .  I was under the impression that the entire flight of
the ball needed to be captured for them to accurately provide data.

  Foresight GC2 with HMT or GC Quad supposedly are better indoors and Sky Trak on the lower end.
They still work, but they require more distance between the radar unit and the net so they can capture enough of the ball flight, and from there distance is calculated based on their ball flight models.  Basically the more of the ball flight that is recorded the more accurate the reading.

12

#13 Tzoid

Tzoid

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 920 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 5124
  • Joined: 08/14/2005
  • Location:Maryland
  • Handicap:5
  • Ebay ID:twallermizman
GolfWRX Likes : 340

Posted 20 December 2017 - 12:56 AM

View PostGolfrnut, on 10 December 2017 - 11:19 AM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 10 December 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:

http://www.ernestspo...m/es14-pro.html

The unit offers a wide range of statistical information including club speed, launch angle, ball speed, smash factor, spin rate & distance.

And their advertisements are completely misleading.  It measures almost none of that as Krt said.

  So the GolfWRX review on the product is misleading as well?  I'm curious if you owned one or have data on the claim it's a "Toy"

       http://www.golfwrx.c...launch-monitor/
Ping G400 Driver Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 60
Ping G400 3 Wood Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 70
Ping G25 20 degree Hybrid
ONOFF KURO 2015 4-PW N.S Pro Modus3 Tour 120S
Vokey SM6 50F 54S 58M
Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Studio Stainless
Titleist Pro V-1X

13

#14 Golfrnut

Golfrnut

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,774 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 132818
  • Joined: 07/12/2011
  • Location:Eastern NC
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 20 December 2017 - 04:48 AM

View PostTzoid, on 20 December 2017 - 12:56 AM, said:

View PostGolfrnut, on 10 December 2017 - 11:19 AM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 10 December 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:

http://www.ernestspo...m/es14-pro.html

The unit offers a wide range of statistical information including club speed, launch angle, ball speed, smash factor, spin rate & distance.

And their advertisements are completely misleading.  It measures almost none of that as Krt said.

  So the GolfWRX review on the product is misleading as well?  I'm curious if you owned one or have data on the claim it's a "Toy"

   http://www.golfwrx.c...launch-monitor/

Not sure what your trying to get at. The WRX article clearly mentions that only head speed and ball speed are measured.  That's it. The other numbers are arbitrary numbers that are not measured...at all. They are there for show, nothing more. And no, they aren't accurate as they measure nothing...you can't say something is accurate based on nothing more than numbers that are randomly thrown out based on the software. That's not accurate, that's random guessing. So yes, they are toys. They do no pbysically measure any data other than ball speed and make a guess on what you might be hitting it.

ES's website is far from forthcoming on how they come to display their data.  Many assume that it works like many of the other Doppler units out there and measures all the data when it fact that is nowhere near the case.  They are preying on the consumer assuming they are getting measured data when it's nothing more than random numbers displayed on screen.

And to answer your other question above in the other post....the only thing the high end Doppler units really have trouble with indoors is spin axis because they do not measure it indoor mode.  That comes into effect when we talk offcenter hits and the gear effect.  Outside of that, the numbers are accurate and comparable to each other as well as the other photo-capture based units.

Edited by Golfrnut, 20 December 2017 - 07:36 AM.

TM Supertri V2 w/ AD DI (Testing a new one that's on probation)
Callaway 3Deep w/ 73 BB or Stage 2 3W w/ 73 BB
Stage 2 3H w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway Apex UT 21* w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway X Prototype MBs 4-PW w/ Steelfiber AMI 99s
Callaway MD3 52* & 58* PM grind (both X100 8 iron SS)
Odyssey MXM 1W

14

#15 bbp1

bbp1

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 113 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 4251
  • Joined: 08/03/2005
  • Location:New Orleans
GolfWRX Likes : 11

Posted 20 December 2017 - 07:26 AM

I love my GC Quad. I built an indoor simulator/practice area that has about 10 feet of run room between the point of impact and the screen. Works great. I wish the FSX software  would hurry up and get more depth to it.

I had a Skytrak before the GCQuad and liked it alot too, though it would miss the shot occasionally, and of course doesnt give club head data. I liked the bag mapping feature on Skytrak software

Driver-Taylormade M3 10.5-1
3-5 Woods-Taylormade M3
Callaway Epic Hybrid 20degree
Irons 4-9- Taylormade P790
Wedges 46,52,60 Vokey SM-7
Putter- which week is it?
HCP 4.3

15

#16 Tzoid

Tzoid

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 920 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 5124
  • Joined: 08/14/2005
  • Location:Maryland
  • Handicap:5
  • Ebay ID:twallermizman
GolfWRX Likes : 340

Posted 20 December 2017 - 09:52 AM

View PostGolfrnut, on 20 December 2017 - 04:48 AM, said:

View PostTzoid, on 20 December 2017 - 12:56 AM, said:

View PostGolfrnut, on 10 December 2017 - 11:19 AM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 10 December 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:

http://www.ernestspo...m/es14-pro.html

The unit offers a wide range of statistical information including club speed, launch angle, ball speed, smash factor, spin rate & distance.

And their advertisements are completely misleading.  It measures almost none of that as Krt said.

  So the GolfWRX review on the product is misleading as well?  I'm curious if you owned one or have data on the claim it's a "Toy"

   http://www.golfwrx.c...launch-monitor/

Not sure what your trying to get at. The WRX article clearly mentions that only head speed and ball speed are measured.  That's it. The other numbers are arbitrary numbers that are not measured...at all. They are there for show, nothing more. And no, they aren't accurate as they measure nothing...you can't say something is accurate based on nothing more than numbers that are randomly thrown out based on the software. That's not accurate, that's random guessing. So yes, they are toys. They do no pbysically measure any data other than ball speed and make a guess on what you might be hitting it.

ES's website is far from forthcoming on how they come to display their data.  Many assume that it works like many of the other Doppler units out there and measures all the data when it fact that is nowhere near the case.  They are preying on the consumer assuming they are getting measured data when it's nothing more than random numbers displayed on screen.

And to answer your other question above in the other post....the only thing the high end Doppler units really have trouble with indoors is spin axis because they do not measure it indoor mode.  That comes into effect when we talk offcenter hits and the gear effect.  Outside of that, the numbers are accurate and comparable to each other as well as the other photo-capture based units.


The number being there for just "show" arbitrary or not are pretty damn close to the unit that's not a toy.  I guess it's Snake Oil ?

Posted Image
Ping G400 Driver Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 60
Ping G400 3 Wood Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 70
Ping G25 20 degree Hybrid
ONOFF KURO 2015 4-PW N.S Pro Modus3 Tour 120S
Vokey SM6 50F 54S 58M
Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Studio Stainless
Titleist Pro V-1X

16

#17 Golfrnut

Golfrnut

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,774 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 132818
  • Joined: 07/12/2011
  • Location:Eastern NC
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 20 December 2017 - 10:08 AM

View PostTzoid, on 20 December 2017 - 09:52 AM, said:

View PostGolfrnut, on 20 December 2017 - 04:48 AM, said:

View PostTzoid, on 20 December 2017 - 12:56 AM, said:

View PostGolfrnut, on 10 December 2017 - 11:19 AM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 10 December 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:

http://www.ernestspo...m/es14-pro.html

The unit offers a wide range of statistical information including club speed, launch angle, ball speed, smash factor, spin rate & distance.

And their advertisements are completely misleading.  It measures almost none of that as Krt said.

  So the GolfWRX review on the product is misleading as well?  I'm curious if you owned one or have data on the claim it's a "Toy"

   http://www.golfwrx.c...launch-monitor/

Not sure what your trying to get at. The WRX article clearly mentions that only head speed and ball speed are measured.  That's it. The other numbers are arbitrary numbers that are not measured...at all. They are there for show, nothing more. And no, they aren't accurate as they measure nothing...you can't say something is accurate based on nothing more than numbers that are randomly thrown out based on the software. That's not accurate, that's random guessing. So yes, they are toys. They do no pbysically measure any data other than ball speed and make a guess on what you might be hitting it.

ES's website is far from forthcoming on how they come to display their data.  Many assume that it works like many of the other Doppler units out there and measures all the data when it fact that is nowhere near the case.  They are preying on the consumer assuming they are getting measured data when it's nothing more than random numbers displayed on screen.

And to answer your other question above in the other post....the only thing the high end Doppler units really have trouble with indoors is spin axis because they do not measure it indoor mode.  That comes into effect when we talk offcenter hits and the gear effect.  Outside of that, the numbers are accurate and comparable to each other as well as the other photo-capture based units.


The number being there for just "show" arbitrary or not are pretty damn close to the unit that's not a toy.  I guess it's Snake Oil ?

Posted Image


Seeing as how you don't seem to have any experience with actual units or seeing the results of multiple people on them, I can assure you that when you have a larger demographic of people on a unit, the accuracy of a unit that "guesses" at numbers does not have any real accuracy at all.  Irons, + - a few degrees of launch and +- a couple hundred RPMs of spin do not vary too much in carry distance but total distance and decent angle based on roll can be huge.  And that doesn't mean that the majority of players all launch the ball even within a few degrees of each other as the variance is very spread out, same goes for spin.

Start talking about drivers and the variance becomes very large and not even close to accurate except for a few individuals that might fit into the "default" profile that the ES units have programmed.  Someone just posted a review of the ES16 in another thread.  It's supposed to be their more "advanced" launch monitor, and it's junk in terms of accuracy.  There are plenty of reviews that say the same thing.

There are very large difference between what's out there on the market that is "accurate" and in comparison, the two aren't even close.
TM Supertri V2 w/ AD DI (Testing a new one that's on probation)
Callaway 3Deep w/ 73 BB or Stage 2 3W w/ 73 BB
Stage 2 3H w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway Apex UT 21* w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway X Prototype MBs 4-PW w/ Steelfiber AMI 99s
Callaway MD3 52* & 58* PM grind (both X100 8 iron SS)
Odyssey MXM 1W

17

#18 Tzoid

Tzoid

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 920 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 5124
  • Joined: 08/14/2005
  • Location:Maryland
  • Handicap:5
  • Ebay ID:twallermizman
GolfWRX Likes : 340

Posted 20 December 2017 - 10:31 AM

Thanks for the feedback....  So if you don't spend the money for a Flight Scope , Trackman or a Foresight product like GC2 or Quad you're buying a Toy that guesses at the actually outcome based on preset predicted numbers.  

       I'll wait and see what technology brings us in hopefully the near future.  My teaching pro uses Flight Scope and I value what I see when I spend time on it as I'm a very analytical person.  

    spin numbers,  dynamic loft, face angle and attack angle in my opinion tell the real story and drastically can improve ball striking
Ping G400 Driver Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 60
Ping G400 3 Wood Aldila Rogue Silver 110 M.S.I. 70
Ping G25 20 degree Hybrid
ONOFF KURO 2015 4-PW N.S Pro Modus3 Tour 120S
Vokey SM6 50F 54S 58M
Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Studio Stainless
Titleist Pro V-1X

18

#19 Golfrnut

Golfrnut

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,774 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 132818
  • Joined: 07/12/2011
  • Location:Eastern NC
GolfWRX Likes : 2170

Posted 20 December 2017 - 10:46 AM

View PostTzoid, on 20 December 2017 - 10:31 AM, said:

Thanks for the feedback.... So if you don't spend the money for a Flight Scope , Trackman or a Foresight product like GC2 or Quad you're buying a Toy that guesses at the actually outcome based on preset predicted numbers. I'll wait and see what technology brings us in hopefully the near future. My teaching pro uses Flight Scope and I value what I see when I spend time on it as I'm a very analytical person. spin numbers, dynamic loft, face angle and attack angle in my opinion tell the real story and drastically can improve ball striking


Closest you are going to get right now is the MEVO or SKYTRAK if looking for something that is measuring all the right ball data.  Both still have their shortcomings, but that's about as cheap as you can go to this point and get something that collects enough data to make an informed calculation.  Little higher would be the FS XI, some club data would be the XI+, then continue going up from there into the GC2, higher end FS units etc.  I've seen some used X2 units going for 3500-4000.  Accuracy is still going to cost us money....
TM Supertri V2 w/ AD DI (Testing a new one that's on probation)
Callaway 3Deep w/ 73 BB or Stage 2 3W w/ 73 BB
Stage 2 3H w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway Apex UT 21* w/ i80 Steelfiber
Callaway X Prototype MBs 4-PW w/ Steelfiber AMI 99s
Callaway MD3 52* & 58* PM grind (both X100 8 iron SS)
Odyssey MXM 1W

19

#20 clos8

clos8

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 75 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 469968
  • Joined: 06/01/2017
GolfWRX Likes : 10

Posted 25 January 2018 - 09:40 PM

ES14 is a close guess but not very accurate. I sold mine and got a skytrak. Have never looked back. For the price IMHO its the best bang for your buck. I use it almost daily and it has helped me incredibly.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20

#21 Golfingdawg19

Golfingdawg19

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 354301
  • Joined: 12/27/2014
GolfWRX Likes : 105

Posted 26 January 2018 - 10:00 PM

Supposedly Mevo is coming out with a new model real soon so you may want to wait a few months.

21

#22 jbsg02

jbsg02

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 242 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 428788
  • Joined: 06/12/2016
GolfWRX Likes : 95

Posted 04 April 2018 - 07:29 PM

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 26 January 2018 - 10:00 PM, said:

Supposedly Mevo is coming out with a new model real soon so you may want to wait a few months.

Where have you heard this?

22

#23 Golfingdawg19

Golfingdawg19

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 354301
  • Joined: 12/27/2014
GolfWRX Likes : 105

Posted 05 April 2018 - 09:33 PM

I spoke with someone who went to the PGA show and this is what they were told. Recently I heard from someone associated with flightscope that there are some updates to the current software coming but not a new model. They said not to expect a new model for about 18 months.

23

#24 jbsg02

jbsg02

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 242 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 428788
  • Joined: 06/12/2016
GolfWRX Likes : 95

Posted 05 April 2018 - 10:55 PM

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 05 April 2018 - 09:33 PM, said:

I spoke with someone who went to the PGA show and this is what they were told. Recently I heard from someone associated with flightscope that there are some updates to the current software coming but not a new model. They said not to expect a new model for about 18 months.

That seems about right for this kind of product, probably not something they're updating on a yearly basis.  If they just refined it a bit and added spin axis that would be amazing.

Edited by jbsg02, 05 April 2018 - 10:56 PM.


24

#25 games

games

    Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they are yours.

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,354 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 248161
  • Joined: 04/30/2013
  • Location:Wisconsin
GolfWRX Likes : 594

Posted 07 April 2018 - 08:18 AM

View Postjbsg02, on 05 April 2018 - 10:55 PM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 05 April 2018 - 09:33 PM, said:

I spoke with someone who went to the PGA show and this is what they were told. Recently I heard from someone associated with flightscope that there are some updates to the current software coming but not a new model. They said not to expect a new model for about 18 months.

That seems about right for this kind of product, probably not something they're updating on a yearly basis.  If they just refined it a bit and added spin axis that would be amazing.

I think the current MEVO is about as good as it is going to get from a performance standpoint.  Flightscope said they may eventually put out a skills app, but without lateral dispersion, it will only be a distance challenge.

My guess:  The next generation MEVO will add spin axis, lateral dispersion, and practice range simulation at a price point of $1000-$1400.

They who are enamoured of practice
without knowledge are like the mariner
going to sea without a rudder or compass
and who navigates without a course.

25

#26 jbsg02

jbsg02

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 242 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 428788
  • Joined: 06/12/2016
GolfWRX Likes : 95

Posted 07 April 2018 - 09:14 AM

View Postgames, on 07 April 2018 - 08:18 AM, said:

View Postjbsg02, on 05 April 2018 - 10:55 PM, said:

View PostGolfingdawg19, on 05 April 2018 - 09:33 PM, said:

I spoke with someone who went to the PGA show and this is what they were told. Recently I heard from someone associated with flightscope that there are some updates to the current software coming but not a new model. They said not to expect a new model for about 18 months.

That seems about right for this kind of product, probably not something they're updating on a yearly basis.  If they just refined it a bit and added spin axis that would be amazing.

I think the current MEVO is about as good as it is going to get from a performance standpoint.  Flightscope said they may eventually put out a skills app, but without lateral dispersion, it will only be a distance challenge.

My guess:  The next generation MEVO will add spin axis, lateral dispersion, and practice range simulation at a price point of $1000-$1400.

That would be perfect, if they can still keep a relatively small size and price it around $1000 that would be huge.  Just don't include any other club path data and it won't cannibalize their higher end monitors like the Xi Tour or X3.

26

#27 Stuart G.

Stuart G.

    Legend

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,135 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 174728
  • Joined: 04/12/2012
  • Location:New Hampshire
GolfWRX Likes : 5818

Posted 08 April 2018 - 05:06 AM

View Postgames, on 07 April 2018 - 08:18 AM, said:

I think the current MEVO is about as good as it is going to get from a performance standpoint.

The biggest room for improvement in the current model is to alleviate the (official) "Need" to use the metallic stickers outdoors.

27



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors