Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

P790 vs i200


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 pmang

pmang

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 220 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13466
  • Joined: 03/17/2006
  • Location:Mason City, Iowa
  • Ebay ID:pmangd
GolfWRX Likes : 22

Posted 09 October 2017 - 01:36 PM

Setting aside distance (since the lofts aren't the same) which do you find more forgiving? Which feels better?

Ping G400 10.5* X-Torsion S
Ping G400 3 & 5 FW AltaCB S
Ping G400 22* hybrid AltaCB70 S
Ping i200 5-GW AWT S
Ping Glide 2.0 54* & 58*
Odyssey Works #7H 34"

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#2 JDFish

JDFish

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 135069
  • Joined: 08/03/2011
  • Location:Pickerington, Ohio
  • Handicap:9
GolfWRX Likes : 83

Posted 09 October 2017 - 09:15 PM

I tested both of these during a recent fitting.  For me, the i200s were the best feel and fit.  I found the ball off of the P790s to have a spring like feel and extremely variable distance control.  The i200s were far more consistent in both distance (including mishits) and dispersion.  I tried both with Modus 105 shafts.
Callaway Epic 9.0 Adila Rogue Max 65S
Callaway XR 14.5*
Callaway XR 5 wood
Titleist 913H 21* hybrid
Ping i200 Nippon N.S.Pro Modus3 Tour 105S - 4-UW
Titleist Vokey SM6 54* S200
Evnroll ER8 33"

2

#3 Lobber

Lobber

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,085 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 54700
  • Joined: 04/29/2008
GolfWRX Likes : 359

Posted 09 October 2017 - 09:31 PM

I played I200s and own 790s.  Distance aside 790s are forged and feel much better in my hands than Ping I200s.  Sole and top line a bitter thinner on 790s but not by much.  790s are extremely long and yes I know the lofts are a bit more than the I200s.

3

#4 CBJ

CBJ

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 910 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 92543
  • Joined: 08/22/2009
  • Location:Columbus, OH
GolfWRX Likes : 80

Posted 11 October 2017 - 05:05 PM

I have both sets, distance is the same and in my opinion Ping feels slightly better. I play the i200’s with power spec lofts.
Taylormade M2 10.5* w/ Project X Hzrdus Yellow
Taylormade M2 L.I.F.T. 2 Iron w/ Project x Hzrdus Black
Taylormade P790 3-PW w/ Aerotech Steelfiber i95
Taylormade Milled Grind 50, 54, 58 degree
Evnroll ER2
Wilson Duo Urethane balls

4

#5 Cwing

Cwing

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,911 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 37012
  • Joined: 08/10/2007
  • Location:Go Big Blue!!! 8x Champs. Who Dey !!! Go Bengals,
  • Handicap:12.1
GolfWRX Likes : 1114

Posted 11 October 2017 - 05:27 PM

Im interested in both these irons as well as the g400. I current play g25. Can anyone comment on a height comparison? Distance differences esp for those with the i200 in power spec.

Edited by Cwing, 11 October 2017 - 05:29 PM.

Callaway Fusion 10.5* w/44.5" Recoil 450ES
Callaway XR 4 wood
Callaway Big Bertha 19* hybrid
PING k15 23* 4 hybrid
PING G25 5-U w/DG XP s300
Cleveland RTX 54* & 58*
PING Ketsch
Garmin g6/Caddytek V2
http://www.golfwrx.c...ings-witb-2013/

5

#6 sandy

sandy

    Major Winner

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 4,711 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 2351
  • Joined: 07/11/2005
GolfWRX Likes : 205

Posted 11 October 2017 - 07:04 PM

Try a set of the i200 s with the power spec lofts, which are close to the 790 lofts and surprise the distance differences completely disappears. I was surprised as the i200s arenít what could be called a thin faced iron, but with equivalent lofts they are just as long and in the long irons slightly longer.

6

#7 pmang

pmang

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 220 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13466
  • Joined: 03/17/2006
  • Location:Mason City, Iowa
  • Ebay ID:pmangd
GolfWRX Likes : 22

Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:58 PM

My initial questions was mainly forgiveness and feel. Distance isn't of concern. If one manufacturer's club say "8" on the bottom but is the other manufacturers "7" iron distance is irrelevant. It's just "smoke and mirrors" that the consumer has perceived that it is something better. It isn't, it's just got a different dress on now....
Ping G400 10.5* X-Torsion S
Ping G400 3 & 5 FW AltaCB S
Ping G400 22* hybrid AltaCB70 S
Ping i200 5-GW AWT S
Ping Glide 2.0 54* & 58*
Odyssey Works #7H 34"

7

#8 b.mattay

b.mattay

    New WRX'er

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 255 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 447380
  • Joined: 11/25/2016
  • Handicap:+2
GolfWRX Likes : 77

Posted 12 October 2017 - 12:01 AM

View Postsandy, on 11 October 2017 - 07:04 PM, said:

Try a set of the i200 s with the power spec lofts, which are close to the 790 lofts and surprise the distance differences completely disappears. I was surprised as the i200s aren't what could be called a thin faced iron, but with equivalent lofts they are just as long and in the long irons slightly longer.

I200's are a little bit bonkers in the long irons!! On Trackman, they increased my carry yardage with a 4 iron by 15 yards over my 714AP2's (235y vs 220y), along with a 20ft increase in apex height (135ft vs 115ft).

8

#9 SvenS3

SvenS3

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 201 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 69654
  • Joined: 11/22/2008
  • Handicap:6.2
GolfWRX Likes : 4

Posted 12 October 2017 - 10:26 AM

Maybe a dump Question, but what are Power Spec Lofts??

Just another Name for 1 or 2 degree stronger, or is it a special Head?
Driver: Taylormade M1 with Kiyoshi Gold 04
5 Wood: Adams TI 18 with PX Black 6.0
18 Degree MP H5 with KBS C-Taper Lite R
22 Degree MP H5 with KBS C-Taper Lite R
5-P Mizuno MP 5 with PX LZ 5.5
RTX 2 (50,54,58) Modus 120
Edel E1

9

#10 Bomber_11

Bomber_11

    Enjoy the Chase.

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 2,269 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 412188
  • Joined: 02/14/2016
  • Handicap:+1.1
GolfWRX Likes : 2808

Posted 12 October 2017 - 10:35 AM

P-790 feels better, launches higher, goes further, and looks better. Slightly thicker top line on the P-790.

i200 is just another cast Ping iron that neither blows you away, or disappoints you. Just solid clubs.

Taylormade Tour Issue M2 9.5* w/ Tensei CK Pro White 70TX
Taylormade M2 Tour 15* 3W w/ Tensei CK Pro White 80TX
Taylormade M2 Tour 19* 5W w/ Tensei CK Pro White 80TX
Nike VR Pro Blades 3-PW w/ Nippon Super Peening Blue X
Nike Engage 50SS/55TS/60DS w/ DG TI S400
Nike Method Oven Proto 006
Nike Tour Rzn Dot Platinum
Jones x Greyson Stand Bag

Work. Play. Win. Repeat.

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#11 golfnut1964

golfnut1964

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 363 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 342317
  • Joined: 09/28/2014
  • Location:canada eh
GolfWRX Likes : 286

Posted 12 October 2017 - 10:37 AM

Wow the op states his question isnt about length but feel and forgiveness and the very next post talks about length. Always get a kick how threads go off the rails. Im saying this cause im thinking of pulling the trigger on some i200s would like to hear response from those that play i200s about same thing the op stated.



11

#12 morgan1819

morgan1819

    Official Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 227651
  • Joined: 02/08/2013
  • Location:Michigan
  • Handicap:2.1
GolfWRX Likes : 339

Posted 12 October 2017 - 10:38 AM

View PostSvenS3, on 12 October 2017 - 10:26 AM, said:

Maybe a dump Question, but what are Power Spec Lofts??

Just another Name for 1 or 2 degree stronger, or is it a special Head?

Another name for strong lofts.

They can be useful if you are putting together a combo set, so you don't have gaps.  It can also be useful if you do have distance concerns, and want to have an apples to apples comparison with sets that have jacked lofts.

There are so many sets out there with strong lofts now, that many people have gone to 48 or 50 degree gap wedge setups.  The Power Spec lofts allow you to not have to change your wedges, if you are switching from a set of irons with similarly strong lofts.  It's good to have options.
...

Edited by morgan1819, 12 October 2017 - 10:42 AM.


12

#13 SvenS3

SvenS3

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 201 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 69654
  • Joined: 11/22/2008
  • Handicap:6.2
GolfWRX Likes : 4

Posted 12 October 2017 - 01:44 PM

Yeah, I know what strong Lofts are. I play strong Lofts for gapping :-).

Just thought it was maybe a special Head that Ping offers.

Thanks for the Feedback.
Driver: Taylormade M1 with Kiyoshi Gold 04
5 Wood: Adams TI 18 with PX Black 6.0
18 Degree MP H5 with KBS C-Taper Lite R
22 Degree MP H5 with KBS C-Taper Lite R
5-P Mizuno MP 5 with PX LZ 5.5
RTX 2 (50,54,58) Modus 120
Edel E1

13

#14 Cwing

Cwing

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,911 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 37012
  • Joined: 08/10/2007
  • Location:Go Big Blue!!! 8x Champs. Who Dey !!! Go Bengals,
  • Handicap:12.1
GolfWRX Likes : 1114

Posted 12 October 2017 - 05:55 PM

View Postpmang, on 11 October 2017 - 08:58 PM, said:

My initial questions was mainly forgiveness and feel. Distance isn't of concern. If one manufacturer's club say "8" on the bottom but is the other manufacturers "7" iron distance is irrelevant. It's just "smoke and mirrors" that the consumer has perceived that it is something better. It isn't, it's just got a different dress on now....

Sorry if it was taken as a thread jack but I am considering both of these and brought the topic of both height and distance into the conversation. I dont know the lofts of any of these irons but thought the i200 in power spec lofts would be comparable to the 790ís.

If height is the same, forgiveness is there and distance is close, Iíd likely go i200. The reasons would be that ping irons hold up as well if not better than anyone elseís from an appearance standpoint and are cheaper.

Edited by Cwing, 12 October 2017 - 06:00 PM.

Callaway Fusion 10.5* w/44.5" Recoil 450ES
Callaway XR 4 wood
Callaway Big Bertha 19* hybrid
PING k15 23* 4 hybrid
PING G25 5-U w/DG XP s300
Cleveland RTX 54* & 58*
PING Ketsch
Garmin g6/Caddytek V2
http://www.golfwrx.c...ings-witb-2013/

14

#15 doublehans

doublehans

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 503 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 312587
  • Joined: 05/01/2014
GolfWRX Likes : 159

Posted 13 October 2017 - 02:37 PM

I felt like the 790s were more forgiving but the i200 felt better. Yes, the 790s are forged, but it’s not like a one piece forging soft and the feel imo is more dominated by being a spring faced iron. I200 is also thin faced and tho not forged  the insert softens it up enough to feel not as hard as old ping castings. What differentiated the feel for me between the two tho wasn’t softness but rather I got much better feedback off the i200s, I had much less of a sense of what kind of shot I hit off the 790s (tho they were rocket launchers). That said, I only played 1round with the 790s (that weren’t mine) and had at least a dozen rounds with i200s (which I sold) so I have more experience with the i200s. I’m not sure about forgiveness, I thought they were both pretty forgiving, but I did have some issues with hooking my i200s, espeically in the longer irons that I didn’t notice with the 790s so I’d probably say 790, although of course that may not have been a forgiveness issue......


15

#16 18thbunker

18thbunker

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 292 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 143863
  • Joined: 10/24/2011
  • Location:Denver
GolfWRX Likes : 74

Posted 13 October 2017 - 03:10 PM

Got a chance to hit TM P790. Not sure about the feel on this club. Felt like I was hitting the ball with a sponge board. Soft...yes....but felt odd. I like the feel and f the I200 better.
driver - Titleist 915 D3 10.5
fairway - Ping I25 18 degree 5 wood
hybrid - Ben Hogan VKTR 19 & 23
Irons -   Mizuno MP68 3-PW
wedges Mizuno MP-T5 50-58
putter - Ping Sigma G Doon

16

#17 JDFish

JDFish

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 135069
  • Joined: 08/03/2011
  • Location:Pickerington, Ohio
  • Handicap:9
GolfWRX Likes : 83

Posted 13 October 2017 - 03:19 PM

View Postgolfnut1964, on 12 October 2017 - 10:37 AM, said:

Wow the op states his question isnt about length but feel and forgiveness and the very next post talks about length. Always get a kick how threads go off the rails. Im saying this cause im thinking of pulling the trigger on some i200s would like to hear response from those that play i200s about same thing the op stated.

Played my first 9 holes with my new i200s (not Power Spec) with Modus 105 S right out of the box, coming from MP53s with NS Pro 950 R (which I was fit for by the same fitter 4 or 5 years ago).  The i200s are a little "clickier" but I like them.  You can definitely tell where the ball is struck on the clubface.  The mishits feel almost the same as a flushed shot - and toe hits carry nearly as far (unlike the MP53s).  I found I had to change my setup a little by moving the ball back a little more in my stance (at least yesterday).  The look and feel, for me, exudes confidence.  I'm a fan and looking forward to 18 holes tomorrow and Sunday to get a better sense of them.

Edited by JDFish, 13 October 2017 - 03:22 PM.

Callaway Epic 9.0 Adila Rogue Max 65S
Callaway XR 14.5*
Callaway XR 5 wood
Titleist 913H 21* hybrid
Ping i200 Nippon N.S.Pro Modus3 Tour 105S - 4-UW
Titleist Vokey SM6 54* S200
Evnroll ER8 33"

17

#18 pmang

pmang

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 220 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13466
  • Joined: 03/17/2006
  • Location:Mason City, Iowa
  • Ebay ID:pmangd
GolfWRX Likes : 22

Posted 14 October 2017 - 03:13 PM

For what it's worth I bought i200's. they're solid. Fly predictable distances (when solidly struck) and the AWT stiff is easier for me to load than the DG105 s flex.
Ping G400 10.5* X-Torsion S
Ping G400 3 & 5 FW AltaCB S
Ping G400 22* hybrid AltaCB70 S
Ping i200 5-GW AWT S
Ping Glide 2.0 54* & 58*
Odyssey Works #7H 34"

18

#19 PerseveringGolf

PerseveringGolf

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,721 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 293167
  • Joined: 01/23/2014
  • Location:between a chair and monitor!
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 644

Posted 16 October 2017 - 03:36 PM

View Postpmang, on 14 October 2017 - 03:13 PM, said:

For what it's worth I bought i200's. they're solid. Fly predictable distances (when solidly struck) and the AWT stiff is easier for me to load than the DG105 s flex.
thats useful as I've used 105 and 95 and quite like them but theres something missing, maybe AWT has the missing link

View PostBomber_11, on 12 October 2017 - 10:35 AM, said:

P-790 feels better, launches higher, goes further, and looks better. Slightly thicker top line on the P-790.

i200 is just another cast Ping iron that neither blows you away, or disappoints you. Just solid clubs.
which puts me right off even trying them

View Postb.mattay, on 12 October 2017 - 12:01 AM, said:

View Postsandy, on 11 October 2017 - 07:04 PM, said:

Try a set of the i200 s with the power spec lofts, which are close to the 790 lofts and surprise the distance differences completely disappears. I was surprised as the i200s aren't what could be called a thin faced iron, but with equivalent lofts they are just as long and in the long irons slightly longer.

I200's are a little bit bonkers in the long irons!! On Trackman, they increased my carry yardage with a 4 iron by 15 yards over my 714AP2's (235y vs 220y), along with a 20ft increase in apex height (135ft vs 115ft).
result!!!

19

#20 rainkingjr

rainkingjr

    Major Winner

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 1,838 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 52783
  • Joined: 04/02/2008
  • Location:Baltimore, Maryland
GolfWRX Likes : 468

Posted 17 October 2017 - 09:56 AM

View Postgolfnut1964, on 12 October 2017 - 10:37 AM, said:

Wow the op states his question isnt about length but feel and forgiveness and the very next post talks about length. Always get a kick how threads go off the rails. Im saying this cause im thinking of pulling the trigger on some i200s would like to hear response from those that play i200s about same thing the op stated.

Just shows the obsession with distance. Always shows it's face.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20

#21 nanosg

nanosg

    Jorge Grande

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 58 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 75277
  • Joined: 02/14/2009
  • Handicap:5.9
GolfWRX Likes : 12

Posted 17 October 2017 - 10:13 AM

i200 in non-powers spec is the pic if you want more traditional loft/distance/spin.  P790 if you want a distance iron with the player PXG look, and I agree the look is really good.  Tyrell Hatton just won with I200s, but doubt you will every see a pro or very many, if any, low HC amateur playing P790 below a 4 iron.

My MP-25 and i200 were similar in spin and distance, hit P790 before a lesson with my pro the other day and distance was 15 yards additional carry dropping 1k+ of spin.  Feel was excellent, though, in the P790.  I could see P790 3 iron to replacing my MPH5, but hard to fix what ain't broke.
Callaway GBB Epic 9.0* w/ Aldila Rogue MAX 75X
Callaway GBB Epic 15* w/ Aldila Rogue Silver 70X

PXG 0317 19* w/ Aldila Rogue Black 95X HB
  or  Mizuno MPH5 (3) w/ Project X LZ 6.0
Mizuno MP-25 (4-P) w/ Project X LZ 6.0
Mizuno T7 50, 54, 60 w/ Project X LZ 6.0
SC Newport Select, custom dot, Matador midsize

21



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors