Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

* * * * * 1 votes

Callaway Chrome Soft Truvis Balls are not balanced!!


76 replies to this topic

#61 Hot Rod 71

Hot Rod 71

    #TheWRX

  • BST Volunteer Mods
  • 8,077 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 108037
  • Joined: 05/15/2010
  • Location:RVA
  • Handicap:low
GolfWRX Likes : 6309

Posted 05 June 2017 - 01:53 PM

 North Butte, on 05 June 2017 - 01:42 PM, said:

This whole discussion reminds me of the cranky old "clubfitter" guys who want you to bring your brand-new Titleist or Callaway irons in to "check the frequencies" on their meter. They'll show you how they may be marked "S" but some of them have higher frequencies than X-flex hard-stepped and others are almost as low as Senior. That's why you ought to have bought some frequency matched, spined, PURE'd, custom blueprinted Hireko irons from them instead.


I'm no crusty old clubfitter, but I've seen what you describe with my own two eyes. A few years back a friend had a TM driver with the stock Stiff flex shaft in it. Couldn't hit it to save his life and after several rounds with it not performing he almost tossed it. We had a demo day and a local club-builder with a mobile shop was there. My friend asked him about his experience with the club and the builder said bring it to me.

He put it on the frequency machine and it came out at a soft senior flex. The builder offered to swap it out with one he knew was a Stiff flex and my friend accepted. He took it to the range and starting hitting it well. It was a whole new driver.

Callaway Rogue 10*- PX EvenFlow Black 65X
Callaway Epic 16* - Aldila Tour Blue 75X
Callaway 2018 X-Forged 4-PW - DGTI AWT S400
Callaway MD2 52, 56, 60 - DGTI S400
Yes! Jenny Tour
2018 Callaway Chrome Soft X

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


1

#62 tbowles411

tbowles411

    Tiger and Phil friendly: The Apocalypse is upon us..

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 23,901 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 5624
  • Joined: 08/30/2005
  • Location:Northern Virginia (One day I hope to be a Texan!)
  • Handicap:Golf
GolfWRX Likes : 5837

Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:19 PM

 Hot Rod 71, on 05 June 2017 - 01:53 PM, said:

 North Butte, on 05 June 2017 - 01:42 PM, said:

This whole discussion reminds me of the cranky old "clubfitter" guys who want you to bring your brand-new Titleist or Callaway irons in to "check the frequencies" on their meter. They'll show you how they may be marked "S" but some of them have higher frequencies than X-flex hard-stepped and others are almost as low as Senior. That's why you ought to have bought some frequency matched, spined, PURE'd, custom blueprinted Hireko irons from them instead.


I'm no crusty old clubfitter, but I've seen what you describe with my own two eyes. A few years back a friend had a TM driver with the stock Stiff flex shaft in it. Couldn't hit it to save his life and after several rounds with it not performing he almost tossed it. We had a demo day and a local club-builder with a mobile shop was there. My friend asked him about his experience with the club and the builder said bring it to me.

He put it on the frequency machine and it came out at a soft senior flex. The builder offered to swap it out with one he knew was a Stiff flex and my friend accepted. He took it to the range and starting hitting it well. It was a whole new driver.
It happens more than you realize.  We measure each frequency before we build so we verify what a company sends us before we start.  We usually order a specific CPM so we know it's going to be as close to right as possible.  Then we will PURE them to take more of the variation out.
PING G Driver
PING G Fairway 3 Wood
PING G Hybrids (3, 4)
PING G Irons (5-UW)
PING Glide 2.0 (54SS, 58WS)
PING Sigma G Piper 3
Ball: Titelist DT Trusoft

2

#63 IHFN

IHFN

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,511 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 12257
  • Joined: 02/19/2006
  • Location:Huntsville, Al
GolfWRX Likes : 463

Posted 07 June 2017 - 09:19 PM

I'm not sure how many other pro's besides Bryson do this, but it's interesting to say the least.  I've done some testing with putts and based on orientation it appears there is a slight bias to where you put the balance point.  I know there are video's with Rife where he discusses similar biases based on his testing with the new Evnroll grooves.  He said the ball can have just as much of a impact as the grooves do.  

I will say since I've started doing this, I have putted better, but who knows if it's based on this.  I did another dozen of ProV1's tonight and 6 were balanced.  It took 10 minutes to do a dozen so it's not like I'm wasting away my life doing this test.

If you think it's impossible for it to make a difference, that's fine and that's your opinion.  Nothing I say will convince you otherwise.  I just want to provide information for people that may want to try this and see what they get.  It's obvious and undeniable there is a difference to the balls based on the balance point in the salt water.  The question is whether that does anything to ball flight or ball roll.

The tests the USGA did on golf balls was based on the seam of the ball.  I'm not sure if they've done any testing in regards to something like this.
TM M3 440 Project X Even Flow Blue 6.0 65 tipped 2 inches
TM '17 M1 15 degree Hzrdus Black 6.5 75 tipped 2 inches
TM '17 M1 19 degree Hzrdus Red 6.5 75 tipped 2 inches

TM P730 3-PW Project X LZ 6.0

Vokey SM6 54 (Bent to 53) S200 Steel Gray
Wedge Works V Grind 58 (Bent to 59) S200 Oil Can

Scotty Super Rat I

3

#64 fusionvic

fusionvic

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 92 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 278903
  • Joined: 10/03/2013
  • Location:Michigan
  • Handicap:32
  • Ebay ID:fusionvic
GolfWRX Likes : 2

Posted 01 April 2018 - 04:16 PM

Has anyone tested a balanced golf ball vs unbalanced on a Trackman to see if there's any delta on spin, carry, etc??
Driver: 2017 TMAG M1 9.5 @ 11.5, Fuji 56S
Woods: Callaway XR Pro 3W 16* (PX LZ 5.5)
Hybrid:  Callaway XR Pro 20* 3H (PX LZ 5.5)
Irons: Adams XTD 4-PW, Matrix Ozik White Tie (Reg)
Wedges: Ping Glide 47 SS, 54 SS, 58 ES - TFC419I Reg
Putter: Cleveland Huntington Beach #4, 35"

4

#65 DLiver

DLiver

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,513 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 55921
  • Joined: 05/16/2008
GolfWRX Likes : 615

Posted 01 April 2018 - 05:11 PM

FYI, you need to slice balls perfectly in half in order for the cores to appear to be centered. Any angle in the cut, and anything less than a perfectly straight cut will make the core appear off center.

Please resume tilting at windmills :happy:


5

#66 Uhit

Uhit

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 829 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 450896
  • Joined: 01/06/2017
GolfWRX Likes : 248

Posted 02 April 2018 - 02:24 PM

 DLiver, on 01 April 2018 - 05:11 PM, said:

FYI, you need to slice balls perfectly in half in order for the cores to appear to be centered. Any angle in the cut, and anything less than a perfectly straight cut will make the core appear off center.

Please resume tilting at windmills :happy:

I see windmills flooded by the sea...

...because if you let the balls float in a nearly saturated salt water solution...

...you don`t need to cut them in half to see whether they are unbalanced or not.


btw

I have cut several balls from different manufacturers in half, and some are nearly perfect centered, and some are not,
and that is less depending from the way I cut it, than the way they were manufactured.

6

#67 GSDriver

GSDriver

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 493210
  • Joined: 02/10/2018
  • Location:DFW TX
  • Handicap:4
GolfWRX Likes : 6

Posted 02 April 2018 - 10:17 PM

I see sales of those golf ball COG finders making a comeback ,,, I remember the kids when they were little bought me one for Father's Day.  We ran same ball through it a few times, never agreed with previous 'center' once.

I hit golf balls, I don't cut them apart...Golf Digest does that for me every couple of years :-)
Epic Speeder 661
Razr Fit Xtreme 4/7 woods
Epic Hyrbrid 23*
Apex Pro 5-P Recoil 110
MD Slate Forged 52
PM Grind 58
- a host of Odysseys

7

#68 MadGolfer76

MadGolfer76

    Admiration is the state furthest from understanding.

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,150 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 89700
  • Joined: 07/26/2009
  • Location:Maine
GolfWRX Likes : 9162

Posted 02 April 2018 - 10:35 PM

Would the center have become displaced due to the pressure from the cutting process?
Driver: Cobra F7+/ ?
Fairway: Cobra King LTD Black 4/ ?
Hybrids: Cobra F7 19.5, 22.5/ ?
Irons: Mizuno Mp-54 4-Pw/Dynamic Gold s300
Wedges: Mizuno T7 52, 58/Dynamic Gold s300
Putter: Scotty Cameron Futura X7
Ball: Titleist ProV1x


WITB

8

#69 Uhit

Uhit

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 829 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 450896
  • Joined: 01/06/2017
GolfWRX Likes : 248

Posted 03 April 2018 - 02:08 AM

 GSDriver, on 02 April 2018 - 10:17 PM, said:

I see sales of those golf ball COG finders making a comeback ,,, I remember the kids when they were little bought me one for Father's Day.  We ran same ball through it a few times, never agreed with previous 'center' once.

I hit golf balls, I don't cut them apart...Golf Digest does that for me every couple of years :-)

I think it is pretty obvious, that a multi layer ball, where the layer thickness varies, behaves differently depending on where you hit it...
...in addition to the disadvantage of a decentered center of gravity - similar to a mud ball.

Someone who doesn't like balls with a big seam, has no reason to like decentered balls...
...especially at a premium price point.

btw, I own no COG finder, because salt and water is more effective for this task.

Edited by Uhit, 03 April 2018 - 02:11 AM.


9

#70 third-times-a-charm

third-times-a-charm

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 332 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 464568
  • Joined: 04/22/2017
GolfWRX Likes : 122

Posted 03 April 2018 - 09:01 AM

 DLiver, on 01 April 2018 - 05:11 PM, said:

FYI, you need to slice balls perfectly in half in order for the cores to appear to be centered. Any angle in the cut, and anything less than a perfectly straight cut will make the core appear off center.

Please resume tilting at windmills :happy:

thats now how any of this works

Long Live Nike

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


10

#71 Snowman9000

Snowman9000

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 718 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 107588
  • Joined: 05/08/2010
  • Location:North central IL
  • Handicap:9.9
GolfWRX Likes : 188

Posted 03 April 2018 - 09:14 AM

Most of you must be too young to have read the Dave Pelz Putting Bible?  If I'm not mistaken, he devoted some space to this.  He tested the effect of an unbalanced ball on how it tracked on a putt.

A quick search gave me this, which includes a short summary of Pelz's thoughts.
http://clubmaker-onl...m/article_1.htm

Pelz has also tested the effect of hitting on the edge of a dimple.  It matters too.  Where we want to stop worrying about these things is a personal decision.

I would also point out a fairly obvious possibility that some percentage of tour pros only get or only deploy balls that have been found to be balanced.  If so, then they can pull one out of the bag, mark and play it, as observed.  Doing that does not mean they don't already know they are balanced. I'd bet a hundred bucks that Bryson D is not the only one who makes sure to used balanced golf balls.

Edited by Snowman9000, 03 April 2018 - 09:23 AM.


11

#72 Hat Trick

Hat Trick

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 462 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 216173
  • Joined: 12/15/2012
  • Location:Buffalo, NY
GolfWRX Likes : 139

Posted 15 April 2018 - 08:34 PM

I don't know much about this issue, but I know the balls today are better than the balls I played with 45, 35, 25, and 15 years ago (so are my clubs too).

12

#73 broth518

broth518

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 869 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 1867
  • Joined: 06/24/2005
  • Location:Southern California
  • Ebay ID:nikegolfer518
GolfWRX Likes : 110

Posted 15 April 2018 - 08:47 PM

Callaway doesn't make all the parts of their golf ball thus the QA is compromised. Only Titleist, Bridgestone and Srixon control all parts of their ball - choose wisely!

13

#74 Break81

Break81

    Broke80

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,435 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 263738
  • Joined: 07/13/2013
  • Location:Chino Hills
  • Handicap:9.5
  • Ebay ID:marcbogey
GolfWRX Likes : 472

Posted 15 April 2018 - 10:34 PM

 broth518, on 15 April 2018 - 08:47 PM, said:

Callaway doesn't make all the parts of their golf ball thus the QA is compromised. Only Titleist, Bridgestone and Srixon control all parts of their ball - choose wisely!
    I have had my best rounds with Callaway and Srixon.  Could be a fluke but any small imperfections are dwarfed by the imperfections in my swing. :)

Edited by Break81, 15 April 2018 - 11:29 PM.

Cobra F7+ - Stiff
   Cobra F7 - 5/6 set at 17*
  Ping 22 degree Hybrid
Mizuno JPX850 Forger 4-GW - XP115 S300
Callaway Forged 52 degree
Titleist 55 F grind / 60 M grind
EVNROLL ER5 or Cleveland #6
   Srixon XV - K3 - Vice Pro

14

#75 dan360

dan360

    Paisano

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,858 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 8694
  • Joined: 12/13/2005
  • Location:Olympia lowlife...
GolfWRX Likes : 6088

Posted 15 April 2018 - 11:15 PM

Well, now I know whose pie to plant a hair on the night before the tournament.

As of 20APR2018

TaylorMade M1 '17 440 9 HZRDUS Yellow
TaylorMade M1 '17 3HL KuroKage
Mizuno MP-H5 Hitogami 1 iron Modus 120
Mizuno MP-59 3-PW S300 1 soft step +.5 2 flat
Mizuno MP-T11 54(bent to 52)/60 S300 +.5 1 flat
PING Anser Jim Wells tour 34"
Callaway Chrome Soft Truvis
OUUL h2oProof stand bag black

15

#76 Millbrook

Millbrook

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,514 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 216859
  • Joined: 12/20/2012
  • Location:East Yorkshire UK
GolfWRX Likes : 433

Posted 17 April 2018 - 11:24 AM

Those of you who are doing the salt test have it wrong. Use Epsom salt not table salt.
All comments are made from the point of
view of my learning and not a claim
to expertise.

16

#77 QuigleyDU

QuigleyDU

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,752 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 62095
  • Joined: 08/01/2008
  • Location:reno nv
  • Ebay ID:reederc2
GolfWRX Likes : 1037

Posted 17 April 2018 - 11:55 AM

my question is, if the core of the ball is off center and biased to one side. (not that circles have sides, but you get my point) would you get better performance off the tee with the core closest the the impact side or further away, towards the target line?
driver: SRIXON Z745
fairway: NIKE VAPOR 13*
3-4 IRON: MIZZY MP H5 GD AMT X100.
5-PW IRONS: MP5 DG AMT X100
WEDGES; CLEVELAND rtx 3.0 RAW
PUTTER; PING SIGMA G SHEA H
BALL; various, ask me that day.

17



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors