9/3 Drill and much..much..more On Behalf of SliceFixer.
#82
Posted 03 March 2008 - 02:46 PM
#83
Posted 03 March 2008 - 03:01 PM
#84
Posted 03 March 2008 - 03:24 PM
juansky, on Mar 3 2008, 04:01 PM, said:
Well, maybe not in the exact way I teach it though.........and once you get the basic "framwork" of the 9 to 3 down cold you can then perform just about ANY swing drill from this basic framework.......
"Things to take into consideration is not moving the pelvic pivot forward"
Yep, weight is set left and stays there.......but in a more full version there is a weight transition......watch the kid with the Ignite staff bag sitting beside him..........
"but let the hands drop to about waist high"
The hands/arms are PULLED down by the pivot.......it could easily be described as "dropping," but, they are actually being PULLED "downplane"........IF you feel that you have to "drop and THEN turn" your arms are "out of synch".........
All in all, your correct......nothing revolutionary and I never said it was.........
And there is no volume as I had about 10 people in my bldg. at the time I was burning the stuff to dvd........wouldn't have worked unless you wanted to hear 5 or em' talking politics and the other 5 playing......
#85
Posted 03 March 2008 - 04:38 PM
Obviously the finish tells you a lot about how you got there so I *think* this should be important to me.
#86
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:01 PM
in my opinion, this is the best way to learn the swing and to groove it yourself-- find the release and work backwards to a fuller swing. this is so much better than someone telling you to "get your elbow here on the backswing" or "keep your head steady" with no clear picture of how you get the club through the impact zone from that point. and guys who are talking about "taking little swings" -- that isn't the point of the drill at all, but that has already been covered a few times now.
rank
#87
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:08 PM
slicefixer, on Mar 3 2008, 03:24 PM, said:
juansky, on Mar 3 2008, 04:01 PM, said:
Well, maybe not in the exact way I teach it though.........and once you get the basic "framwork" of the 9 to 3 down cold you can then perform just about ANY swing drill from this basic framework.......
"Things to take into consideration is not moving the pelvic pivot forward"
Yep, weight is set left and stays there.......but in a more full version there is a weight transition......watch the kid with the Ignite staff bag sitting beside him..........
"but let the hands drop to about waist high"
The hands/arms are PULLED down by the pivot.......it could easily be described as "dropping," but, they are actually being PULLED "downplane"........IF you feel that you have to "drop and THEN turn" your arms are "out of synch".........
All in all, your correct......nothing revolutionary and I never said it was.........
And there is no volume as I had about 10 people in my bldg. at the time I was burning the stuff to dvd........wouldn't have worked unless you wanted to hear 5 or em' talking politics and the other 5 playing......
#89
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:25 PM
juansky, on Mar 3 2008, 06:08 PM, said:
slicefixer, on Mar 3 2008, 03:24 PM, said:
juansky, on Mar 3 2008, 04:01 PM, said:
Well, maybe not in the exact way I teach it though.........and once you get the basic "framwork" of the 9 to 3 down cold you can then perform just about ANY swing drill from this basic framework.......
"Things to take into consideration is not moving the pelvic pivot forward"
Yep, weight is set left and stays there.......but in a more full version there is a weight transition......watch the kid with the Ignite staff bag sitting beside him..........
"but let the hands drop to about waist high"
The hands/arms are PULLED down by the pivot.......it could easily be described as "dropping," but, they are actually being PULLED "downplane"........IF you feel that you have to "drop and THEN turn" your arms are "out of synch".........
All in all, your correct......nothing revolutionary and I never said it was.........
And there is no volume as I had about 10 people in my bldg. at the time I was burning the stuff to dvd........wouldn't have worked unless you wanted to hear 5 or em' talking politics and the other 5 playing......
slice can answer when he has a minute, but my understanding is that this is the perfect feeling you are trying to ingrain. club releases to the left as the hands/arms turn with the body. exactly right.
#90
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:30 PM
juansky, on Mar 3 2008, 06:08 PM, said:
slicefixer, on Mar 3 2008, 03:24 PM, said:
juansky, on Mar 3 2008, 04:01 PM, said:
Well, maybe not in the exact way I teach it though.........and once you get the basic "framwork" of the 9 to 3 down cold you can then perform just about ANY swing drill from this basic framework.......
"Things to take into consideration is not moving the pelvic pivot forward"
Yep, weight is set left and stays there.......but in a more full version there is a weight transition......watch the kid with the Ignite staff bag sitting beside him..........
"but let the hands drop to about waist high"
The hands/arms are PULLED down by the pivot.......it could easily be described as "dropping," but, they are actually being PULLED "downplane"........IF you feel that you have to "drop and THEN turn" your arms are "out of synch".........
All in all, your correct......nothing revolutionary and I never said it was.........
And there is no volume as I had about 10 people in my bldg. at the time I was burning the stuff to dvd........wouldn't have worked unless you wanted to hear 5 or em' talking politics and the other 5 playing......
Your DEAD ON Juan........dead on.......
#92
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:35 PM
Golfdog, on Mar 3 2008, 06:25 PM, said:
Thanks for posting that vid. There is a lot of helpful stuff in there. I'm not sure why these little pissing contests pop up in these threads so often. I'm glad you're willing to stay above the fray and help us hackers.
Been dealing with "doubters"/"critics"/"sh#t disturbers" ALL of my life.......and to be honest, none of the criticism so far has been out of line or disrespectful IMOP.......there are a LOT of golfers who are VERY frustrated by prior teachers/instruction and they have a "chip" and then can "vent" a bit at times.......I KNOW I did at one time.....there are others who are jealous/envious whenever anyone gets any attention and just can't stand it and have to spout off.......don't see any of that so far..........and then there is the crowd who are TRYING to reinvent the wheel and are frustrated because it just keeps coming up round......and they are frustrated when they figure out they haven't invented anything.and that somebody else DOES already know what they think they "invented".......so criticism is "par" for this deal.......probably most others as well........NO worries as it takes a LOT to get me really "stirred up"......btw, I know I haven't "invented" anything beyond my WAY of teaching what I teach.......there are others who "know".....sometimes NOT very many "others," but there are others.......Tesla and Edison is one of the greatest examples......
#93
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:43 PM
dminn23, on Mar 3 2008, 03:38 PM, said:
Obviously the finish tells you a lot about how you got there so I *think* this should be important to me.
does this sound about right SF
#94
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:48 PM
Do you mean the target line? IF so, then perfect..........
arms left of chest Yep
, club shaft pretty vertical.....yep, about a 45........,
with the shoulders square to target. IF you mean "facing" the target........yep
Should I strive to end up there or am I misinterpreting the drill due to looking at it from the angles in the video. Sounds dead on.........
Obviously the finish tells you a lot about how you got there so I *think* this should be important to me Yessir, 100%.........I always say this, "with most players, the finish of a golf swing is not normally artificial, but, a result of what went on before it".........
#97
Posted 03 March 2008 - 08:19 PM
juansky, on Mar 3 2008, 05:34 PM, said:
Sounds like you just had you "eyes opened." I'm happy for you.
The point isn't distance though, just learning to ingrain a good solid impact with the arms and body working together correctly. When you get that down cold (could take a while) then you can stretch it out bigger and bigger over time 'till it turns into a full swing.
Good luck
#99
Posted 03 March 2008 - 08:51 PM
GOLF FTW, on Mar 3 2008, 08:47 PM, said:
why did hogan set up closed for drives?
i realized that when i set up closed i usually hit it straight to my target line, or hit a push-fade..
any answers?
Rather than "closed" I think of his driver set-up as more one in which he pulled his right foot back a few inches after setting up parallel left, since his upper body was still parallel to the target line. The right foot being pulled back allows for a deeper turn in the backswing, getting him more wound up for a fuller, more powerful swing, IMO. More a personal preference and not a "fundamental" IMO.
Oh, and see below. hehehe
#100
Posted 03 March 2008 - 08:53 PM
GOLF FTW, on Mar 3 2008, 09:47 PM, said:
why did hogan set up closed for drives?
i realized that when i set up closed i usually hit it straight to my target line, or hit a push-fade..
any answers?
Easy, allows a person to turn/wind "deeper" ....."wind up to their maximum"......which creates a more "inside" and shallower angle of attack, a longer ARC to create speed, and more potential energy to unload.......btw, if your constantly push fading try strengthening your grip SLIGHTLY........many times those pushes/fades stop immediately and you hit it dead straight to a slight draw........
#101
Posted 03 March 2008 - 09:09 PM
slicefixer, on Mar 2 2008, 07:30 PM, said:
Great, Great post.
one of the things I have come to admire about you SF is how you took all the knowledge you had accumulated from many teachers and molded them into your swing method. The way I had thought for some time now.
Great video BTW.
#102
Posted 03 March 2008 - 09:23 PM
slicefixer, on Mar 3 2008, 08:53 PM, said:
GOLF FTW, on Mar 3 2008, 09:47 PM, said:
why did hogan set up closed for drives?
i realized that when i set up closed i usually hit it straight to my target line, or hit a push-fade..
any answers?
Easy, allows a person to turn/wind "deeper" ....."wind up to their maximum"......which creates a more "inside" and shallower angle of attack, a longer ARC to create speed, and more potential energy to unload.......btw, if your constantly push fading try strengthening your grip SLIGHTLY........many times those pushes/fades stop immediately and you hit it dead straight to a slight draw........
i probably should do that, my grip is a little on the weak side. every now and again i bomb it straight with a slight draw, but, most of the time its about 15 yards shorter with a pushfade-ish ballflight. only with my driver.
maybe i'm swinging to hard?
i'm just so afraid of hooking it i've just dealt with the pushfades
#104
Posted 03 March 2008 - 10:28 PM
GOLF FTW, on Mar 3 2008, 10:23 PM, said:
slicefixer, on Mar 3 2008, 08:53 PM, said:
GOLF FTW, on Mar 3 2008, 09:47 PM, said:
why did hogan set up closed for drives?
i realized that when i set up closed i usually hit it straight to my target line, or hit a push-fade..
any answers?
Easy, allows a person to turn/wind "deeper" ....."wind up to their maximum"......which creates a more "inside" and shallower angle of attack, a longer ARC to create speed, and more potential energy to unload.......btw, if your constantly push fading try strengthening your grip SLIGHTLY........many times those pushes/fades stop immediately and you hit it dead straight to a slight draw........
i probably should do that, my grip is a little on the weak side. every now and again i bomb it straight with a slight draw, but, most of the time its about 15 yards shorter with a pushfade-ish ballflight. only with my driver.
maybe i'm swinging to hard?
i'm just so afraid of hooking it i've just dealt with the pushfades
Might be the driver/shaft.........could be the club is too long.......could be it's fade biased (in which case you just slap some tape in the heel.......which I HIGHLY recommend anyway and is the easiest way for an inside -out pusher to hit a draw/straight ball).......
#105
Posted 03 March 2008 - 10:30 PM
banshee, on Mar 3 2008, 11:02 PM, said:
Yes, a short iron........I recommend a SW/LW......once you get it down then you can move up to a 7 iron......nothing longer as there is no real benefit.....
#106
Posted 03 March 2008 - 11:37 PM
slicefixer, on Mar 3 2008, 10:30 PM, said:
banshee, on Mar 3 2008, 11:02 PM, said:
Yes, a short iron........I recommend a SW/LW......once you get it down then you can move up to a 7 iron......nothing longer as there is no real benefit.....
#107
Posted 04 March 2008 - 12:23 AM
JuNiOR
#108
Posted 04 March 2008 - 04:19 AM
I have tried this drill on and off with some success but looking at the angles at setup this could help me ingrain the feeling.
The drill looks great with the ball between the arms......another piece of SLICE MAGIC
#109
Posted 04 March 2008 - 07:32 AM
About Howell doing the 9 to 3 drill. In watching him, I'm thinking that he could do well from a little advice from Slicefixer. (side note, this must be from two-to-three years ago when CHIII left Leadbetter, cause in GD last year, CHIII is back to doing the "L to L" release in a spread.) He's almost got the drill down, but his release is a little bit "underneath" and "down-the-line." I wonder if this is why CHIII never took to the rotary swing changes that he was making and went running back to Leadbetter...
The "down-the-line" release is so very tough to get away from for some of us old-fashioned gun-slinging Freddy Couples admirers. It's something that I have struggled with as my last "hurdle" and ever since Slicefixer politely showed me I was incorrect in my understanding of the different releases, I've had a major breakthrough in my understanding of the swing. This 9-to-3 drill of yours Slice is the real deal. So simple, yet absolutely the penicilin for the flip release.
I've been playing this game since around the time of the bicentennial and been doing it at a fairly high level several of these decades. I've been to a dozen highly respected pros (three of them considered "great" teachers among their peers), but I think that Slicefixer has probably shown more insight then all of them combined. I agree with the statement above that you might want to get to Texarkana while the getting is good, cause there will be limited space in a short time.
Tim
#111
Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:33 AM
Much more work to do but I'm happy with the results thus far.
I think the thing that was absolutely, positively, truly, unquestionably, unambiguously, definitely, and precisely critical: The setup.
A good stance is not just getting the back shoulder lower, sticking the @a** out, and bending the knees. I see guys at the range constantly that are working on their swing, from behind, their setup looks like the Eiffel tower. NOT GOOD!
The critical thing for me with the shorter clubs is getting that left hip more in line with my left foot. This seems to be critical for kicking in that right knee and getting the reverse K position. A much different feeling if your not used to it, but it seems to set the tone for a simple turn. It tightens that swing up and I feel better rotation all the way around, the right hip is allowed to move back, very simple.
Just for clarification, this is what SF preached in that document that is going around, and for me, it is making a huge difference.
#112
Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:42 AM
#116
Posted 04 March 2008 - 11:49 AM
(keep in mind this is merely me paraphrasing stuff I've read from his past posts.)
#117
Posted 04 March 2008 - 11:53 AM
DieselMp32, on Mar 4 2008, 11:45 AM, said:
and what kind of grip does slice promote...? neutral, strong, weak...?
Certainly not stack and tilt. I would call it a pure rotary swing. Wait is on left side for shorter clubs to set you up for more compression, hitting down, trapping the hell out of it.
I don't know much about S&T, but I don't *think* they promote the Reverse K setup, where I know slice does.
As far as grip, I've never heard him promote a weak one, I would said neutral/strong. I would prefer to let him speak for himself. Actually, read the document floating around.
#118
Posted 04 March 2008 - 11:57 AM
DieselMp32, on Mar 4 2008, 12:45 PM, said:
and what kind of grip does slice promote...? neutral, strong, weak...?
not at all. he teaches you to "stack" your weight forward on the setup, but there is never any move toward the target with your head, and if he ever saw you "tilting" he would explain all that is wrong with that kind of move. he has explained this at length on the board if you do an advanced search. or you can wait about five minutes and that topic might come up again....
so, lots of "stack" but a fairly obvious pivot into your right side and a good hard rotation into the ball. passive arms and hands are a benefit here. if you can really educate your hands to allow the club to release instead of trying to release it, you will really "get" this swing, in my humble opinion, since it will eliminate half of the golf course. Or, as slice said to me after i was hitting high soft fades for a day and a half, you can stand on the first tee in any tournament, and no matter how nervous you might be, you will know that physics is your friend.
fantastic instruction, in my opinion. OK, I'll stop now, I am embarrassing him.
#119
Posted 04 March 2008 - 11:58 AM
i'm sure he'll revisit us here again, so i'll throw this out there for him...
when i hit 3/4 wedges and such i never shift any weight to the right side, is this what you are promoting for all your short irons, even full shots...?
what are you teaching as far as mid-long irons and woods, as far as weight distribution and shift during the swing...?
i've been taught setup with my weight distributed evenly, and then as i turn to drop my weight to the inside of my right foot, and turn around it...
apparently you teach to initiate the downswing with the unwind, and not so much of a bump...? is that true for all clubs...?
#120
Posted 04 March 2008 - 12:09 PM
The "stack" in S&T is the fact that the "upper and lower swing centers" (centers of gravity of upper and lower torso) are vertically stacked at address. Slice does not teach this. He wants to see some axis tilt at address (face-on view spine angle). AKA "reverse K set-up." This is crucial to his teaching philosophy. Watch the video again and see the stick drawing he overlayed on the player from behind. You could have 90% of your weight on your front foot at address and still have a "reverse K" posture. What will appear "stacked" in Slice's set-up is the front leg & side (foot, hip, shoulder) when swinging a short or mid-iron.
When you turn (pivot) from this set-up, there will be a weight transfer to the back foot, but most definitely not a shift or sway.





Sign In
Register
Help



Quote











