MP57 or titleist AP2
#4
Posted 02 February 2008 - 09:09 AM
The only other differences between the two is that the MP57 will have that buttery soft Mizuno forged feel ( too soft for me) and the Titleist will have a bit more click to them similar to other Titleist forgings, but not quite the same.
If you would like I can take 6 iron pics of the MP-57 next to the AP2 for comparison.
#9
Posted 02 February 2008 - 02:37 PM
I'm in the same dilemma as well. Aesthetically, the ZB's look far better than the AP2's and the 695CB's look far better than the ZB's, but I'm not sure how they would compare playability/forgiveness wise. I like the lines on the J33 CB's but the long irons would be too difficult to hit. The MP57's look like the logical choice here, even if they are offset a bit more and have a thicker topline than the others.
#11
Posted 02 February 2008 - 06:41 PM
#12
Posted 02 February 2008 - 06:58 PM
Adam
#13
Posted 09 February 2008 - 05:30 PM
The MP57 has more offset and (at least from looking at the pictures) a slightly bigger clubface.
On the other hand, the AP2 has slightly more bounce.
Could you post a picture that helps to compare the width of the sole?
Does anyone know what the swingweight on the MP 57 with the PX shaft is?
#19
Posted 10 February 2008 - 10:13 PM
TigerEarl, on Feb 10 2008, 10:48 AM, said:
thx
The MX900's are much more forgiving than the 701's and even more so than the 57's. The biggest reason I switched from the 900's was due to the increased offset; since switching to the 701's w/ DGold S300's I've realized the shaft on the 900's caused some of my draw/hooks with the 900s as well due to the low kick point in the Dynalite Gold SL's. I am much happier with the ball going where I aim it but I have lost 10 yards per club (go figure-this will require further comparison as it has been pretty windy everytime I've hit the 701's). If I could get that distance back I would be pretty happy. I might be looking at some AP2's myself even though I've always prefered the feel and finish of Mizzies. When I look at them in the golf shop they have the look of a Rolex in the jewelry store-pure bling IMO
If it's any help, when I first hit the 701's, I thought I had made a bad mistake due to the lack of forgiveness but after hitting the 900's again I realized it was that my swing hadn't come out of hybernation yet. After finding my swing again and getting back to turning instead of swaying I am really liking my 701's but my guess is that the AP2's will be a little more forgiving and possibly get the ball up higher due to the tungsten in the sole (similar to 900's and others). Whatever you do hit 'em all and often before making a decision.
#20
Posted 10 February 2008 - 10:23 PM
How do the AP2's compare to the MP-57 when it comes to working the ball? How does the forgiveness compare to the MX-25 irons?
Scott
#23
Posted 11 February 2008 - 10:55 AM
#24
Posted 11 February 2008 - 11:19 AM
#27
Posted 11 February 2008 - 12:39 PM
I like the AP2's and I would play them but, they just look so busy with their design on the back of the club. Looks for me are nice but not to that extent.
#29
Posted 26 February 2008 - 04:03 PM
Also, has anyone tried the idea of taking the badge off the AP2's? I think that the clubs would look very clean if it was possible!
#30
Posted 26 February 2008 - 04:45 PM
#31
Posted 26 February 2008 - 04:54 PM
Larry Swing, on Feb 26 2008, 01:45 PM, said:
Second that- I have hit both and would put the AP2's on top in terms of playability and feel on mishits, but the 57s on top in feel on dead center contact.
Overall, I would definitely go with the AP2s unless price is an issue. I think they strike a very good blend of workability vs forgiveness, espescially on high/low face contact. I hit a couple almost thin and still got a very high trajectory out of them- very impressive for such a small package.
Really, neither iron is going to hold you back as a player- theyre both freakin awesome. It almost blows my mind that we're debating which is better when 10 years ago people were playing with macgregor vip blades
#36
Posted 26 February 2008 - 06:50 PM
golf983, on Feb 26 2008, 05:37 PM, said:
I've been told diggers and especially if you tend to hit DG's too high, the PX's have a slightly stiffer tip which their web site says gets the ball up in a hurry but then it planes out instead of continuing upward like DG's.
#37
Posted 26 February 2008 - 07:30 PM
DFW15, on Feb 26 2008, 05:38 PM, said:
I was considering that until I played the AP2s. The AP2s are plenty easy to hit in my opinion. I am going to stick with my 585H 21° and AP2 4-PW.
Kevin
#38
Posted 03 March 2008 - 07:11 PM




Facebook Connect
Twitter Connect
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help


Quote


















