Maybe both PHIL and TIGER played Finchem Think so?
#1
Posted 04 September 2007 - 09:06 PM
Next year they need to start all points at zero after the second tournament if they want full participation....
#2
Posted 04 September 2007 - 09:13 PM
If you put the cash out there on the 1st tee or 18th green like they do at the World Series of Poker final table, it will give these guys something real to play for...not some retirement bonus that they won't see for a couple more decades.
Just my opinion, of course.
#3
Posted 04 September 2007 - 09:36 PM
eyezlee, on Sep 4 2007, 10:06 PM, said:
Next year they need to start all points at zero after the second tournament if they want full participation....
tpariff, on Sep 4 2007, 10:13 PM, said:
If you put the cash out there on the 1st tee or 18th green like they do at the World Series of Poker final table, it will give these guys something real to play for...not some retirement bonus that they won't see for a couple more decades.
Just my opinion, of course.
I doubt that Tiger & Phil sat down to plan anything together and I think it's been established that the $10 million is not an annuity but a real payment that's put into the winner's retirement plan this year, which yes, cannot be accessed til retirement, but could grow to $30 or $40 million by that time.
Having said that: (1) fix the FEDEX schedule so that it's realistic for the best players to play in every event, (2) eliminate the pro-ams for these events so that they're treated like major championships, (3) make every player play in every event or they're out, and (4) the money should be paid out at the conclusion of the Tour Championship in regular dollars whether it's on a table by the 18th green or direct deposited into their bank accounts.
#7
Posted 05 September 2007 - 09:06 AM
#8
Posted 05 September 2007 - 09:10 AM
eyezlee, on Sep 4 2007, 10:06 PM, said:
That would only make things worse. If points are reset after the first two tournaments, the players at the top would have no incentive to play the first two. They'd already have enough points to qualify for the top seventy. Woods, Mickelson, etc. would not have played either of the first two events.
#9
Posted 05 September 2007 - 09:47 AM
there was another thread that led me to believe that the money wasn't placed into the account until the player retired, which would make the value of the money today around $380,000 depending on the players age and if the player's initials were TW. In other words if you invested $380,000 today, in 25 years when Tiger or whoever retires it would be worth $10M.
Either way it's kind of pathetic playing for a retirement fund. Is there really a rash of old pro golfers out there pan-handling and living in flop houses?
#10
Posted 05 September 2007 - 09:56 AM
scotton, on Sep 5 2007, 10:47 AM, said:
there was another thread that led me to believe that the money wasn't placed into the account until the player retired, which would make the value of the money today around $380,000 depending on the players age and if the player's initials were TW. In other words if you invested $380,000 today, in 25 years when Tiger or whoever retires it would be worth $10M.
Either way it's kind of pathetic playing for a retirement fund. Is there really a rash of old pro golfers out there pan-handling and living in flop houses?
And there is an interesting article on Yahoo sports that says Tiger could end up with as much as a billion dollars in his retirement account. It assumes he wins 7 Fedex Cups, keeps winning other tournaments at the same pace as he is now, and his retirement account earns 9% per year. Unbelievable!
#11
Posted 05 September 2007 - 10:04 AM
1. Deduct 1000 points for a missed cut.
2. Deduct 1000 points for a no show. Same as a missed cut.
3. Add 1000 points for low score of the day, 900 for second low, etc for best 5 or 10 low scores each day. This way if you make the cut on the number you have something to play for other than money.
All 3 suggestions will get some significant movement in the point standings.
Evanpar
#12
Posted 05 September 2007 - 10:12 AM
#13
Posted 05 September 2007 - 10:14 AM
emc, on Sep 4 2007, 10:47 PM, said:
Great point...
Commissioner Finchem needs to get the focus off what is best for him and onto what is best for the tour... he needs to L-I-S-T-E-N to Phil and Tiger...
#14
Posted 05 September 2007 - 10:18 AM
#19
Posted 05 September 2007 - 06:44 PM
#20
Posted 05 September 2007 - 08:04 PM
#21
Posted 05 September 2007 - 09:04 PM
jdkfla, on Sep 5 2007, 03:44 PM, said:
This may be the most self-serving post I've ever seen here.
#23
Posted 05 September 2007 - 09:09 PM
#24
Posted 05 September 2007 - 11:37 PM
It appears the 10 mil goes into their retirement account now. So if Tiger won, his 10 mil would be worth 123 million when he turns 65. The article basically says if tiger wins 7 fed-ex cups he could have 1 billion in a retirement account. Crazy!
#25
Posted 06 September 2007 - 12:50 AM
Hawkeye03, on Sep 5 2007, 09:37 PM, said:
It appears the 10 mil goes into their retirement account now. So if Tiger won, his 10 mil would be worth 123 million when he turns 65. The article basically says if tiger wins 7 fed-ex cups he could have 1 billion in a retirement account. Crazy!
Based on other articles and player reactions, it sounds like the author has confused the Fedex deferred annuity with the Tour retirement plan where players get an immediate chunk of money put into their accounts.
This is the same sleight of hand that state and national lotteries use where they say you are going to get 10 million, but it is is paid out over 20 or 25 years. In this case, it is even worse since you can't even start to collect until the later of 45 or tour retirement. It's a way to make people think that the prize is really great, but the reality is far different.
#27
Posted 06 September 2007 - 01:40 AM
#29
Posted 06 September 2007 - 12:28 PM
alcap26, on Sep 5 2007, 10:06 PM, said:
Regardless of the way points are calculated, how anyone can not have a positive reaction to the FedEx cup after seeing Phil, VJ and Tiger playing together for the first two day, I don't know. You'll NEVER get that matchup in a regular tournament.
Not only that, we might get to see it again in a week!
#30
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:21 PM
jdkfla, on Sep 5 2007, 07:44 PM, said:
I think phil did man up, he went to see his kids off to the first day of school. I will also be late to work or take the day off for me kids going to school the first time. That is what real men do!
#31
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:36 PM
#32
Posted 06 September 2007 - 06:44 PM
sheppy335, on Sep 6 2007, 04:21 PM, said:
jdkfla, on Sep 5 2007, 07:44 PM, said:
I think phil did man up, he went to see his kids off to the first day of school. I will also be late to work or take the day off for me kids going to school the first time. That is what real men do!
I am not saying you never take off work for family, but everyones job has times that you can't miss even if you wanted to. The tour gives these players riches beyond belief and the system would have worked with full participation. Phil could have flown home on his private jet, spent time with his family and still played this week. I will watch golf with or without Phil/Tiger, but I am in the minority. Real men live up to their responsibilities, the TOUR will keep his children rich for ever, and the Tour needed him and he dropped the ball.
#36
Posted 07 September 2007 - 10:08 AM
personally, i'm kinda glad i got to "see" phil, veej and tiger play in the same group 2 days, and phil and tiger in all 4. i could care less that tiger skipped the week before and phil is skipping the week after. it's like a bonus as far as i'm concerned, cause if it wasn't for this deal, we wouldn't have seen either one of them at all until the TC.
and i could double care less about the payout. these guys are NOT playing for the money at this point.
#37
Posted 07 September 2007 - 12:23 PM
#38
Posted 07 September 2007 - 03:16 PM
sheppy335, on Sep 6 2007, 03:21 PM, said:
jdkfla, on Sep 5 2007, 07:44 PM, said:
I think phil did man up, he went to see his kids off to the first day of school. I will also be late to work or take the day off for me kids going to school the first time. That is what real men do!
Couldn't have said it better myself!
Thanks for reducing the amount I was going to have to type!!
#39
Posted 08 September 2007 - 12:14 PM
#40
Posted 08 September 2007 - 12:31 PM
Tiger and Phil are not the only ones that took a week off or dissed the commissh
Ernie did Verplank did and Ernie made some comments.
Both Phil and Tiger make the tour as much money as the tour makes them if not more.
The bottom line is they work for themselves and they work when they want too.
If I had that kind of money I damn sure would.





Sign In
Register
Help


Quote











