[arkstorm]

To those of you who were involved in our prior discussion regarding Ping's minimum pricing policy and antitrust laws or if you just have too much time on your hands and are interested in antitrust case law generally...

A new case that came down from the US Supreme Court yesterday, Leegan Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. d/b/a Kay's Kloset No. 06-480 drastically changes the landscape of antitrust law in the U.S.

Essentially, this case holds that there will no longer be such a thing as a per se violation of sec. 1 of the Sherman Act.

This is just a follow up to the prior conversation because this new case changes the law substantially as well as the conclusion of that prior thread.

Regards,

AS