QUOTE(nikeguy @ Sep 7 2006, 09:11 AM) [snapback]280596[/snapback]
QUOTE(sandy @ Sep 6 2006, 08:04 PM) [snapback]280224[/snapback]
QUOTE(greyman09 @ Sep 6 2006, 11:10 AM) [snapback]279862[/snapback]
Goes to show that Mizuno is a top club of choice when money is not involved. I always heard the rumor that his Titleist irons were Mizunos badged titleist. Who knows though. MP-29 was a great set of sticks.
Always remember the mantra Nike Blades are copied/restamped Titleist Blades which were copied/restamped Mizunos which were copied/restamped MacGregors. So by the six degrees of freedom Tiger is playing MacGregors. Barry should be very pleased.
Guys...Has anyone see the Equiping a Tiger on the Golf Channel??? His Nike Blades made by Tom Stites look nothing like Titleist Blades. Tom Stites is one of if not the Best Proffessional Club Makers, why would he need to copy anything? I guess there is a lot of resentment toward Nike Dominance on Tour!

You obviously don't understand sarcasm Paranoid Nikey Guy. That was just the silliness that has been going around various sites for years. If you had any inside knowledge (ie. talked to the guys that build/built Tiger's irons) you would know that when they disassembled Tiger's Titleist irons to try to copy them they discovered what could only be called a mess of assembly (lead powder, lead plugs, wood dowels, head weights all over hell and gone, etc.). Finding that they set about duplicating the weight, feel, specs without trying to "copy" the messes as they put it. Anyone that puts the Mizunos (14 and 29), Titleist 841s, Titleist Ts, Nike Blades beside each other can see they have nothing in common other than urban legend.
You are right about Nike's dominance on Tour. Guess what if you switched Tiger to any company they would easily jump into the top two or three.