QUOTE (Cmartingolf @ Aug 24 2009, 10:44 PM)

QUOTE (dpark @ Aug 12 2009, 02:19 AM)

A big thumbs down for Tetherow. I played there recently in the Oregon Mid-Am. It is an AMAZING piece of golf property but they really need to do a lot of work on the course to make it more "balanced". The risk/reward ratio on the course is totally out of whack. Most of the holes you shouldn't hit driver. Pretty much the only holes for driver are 9 and 18. The rest you should be hitting fairway woods, hybrids or irons off the tee to keep all the tall grass "eyebrows" and fairway bunkers out of play.
The clubhouse is great, the staff is great, but the course is just nuts. I have no problem with difficult. I do have a problem where you hit a tee shot 300 yards down the middle of the fairway and have your ball end up in a 10x10 fairway grassy mound that you could not see from the tee and you can't do anything other than punch out. That gets stupid real fast.
Tetherow is certainly polarizing. A ton of people love it and a ton don't like it at all.
Thanks for the nice comments about the staff! I'm the club manager and work hard to assemble a fun team that takes care of our guests.
The Mid-Am was a disappointment for me too. I wanted you guys to play better. I'm sorry you had a hard time. The gent that won shot 151. The weather was a little sketchy, but the otherwise the course was set up pretty fairly. Sure, you could have played a soft parkland style course with tees, poa greens and a bunch of trees lining each hole, but what's the fun in that, 99% of the courses look that way in the PNW. Close your eyes, walk a mile and you'll find one.
A little variety isn't a bad thing.
I've heard a hundred people tell me "they hit a 300 yard drive right down the middle into a grassy knob." I get a little tired of hearing that comment. You may have hit it 300 yards, but it wasn't the right shot for the hole. You are obviously a talented player and know how to read a yardage book (which are free btw) and those knolls are all marked precisely.
A lot of Mid-Am players opted not to take a caddie. I wouldn't dream of not taking a caddie a course like St. Andrews or any other links style course. Knowledge of each hole is vital.
All non-member players are assigned a forecaddie to assist with playing which is included in the fee.
Again, sorry you didn't enjoy the course. It is pretty wild and not for everyone.
Cheers
Hi Martin,
The fact that there were at least 10 areas of the course (that I counted, there are probably more) where work was done to remove grassy mounds, grass bunkers etc. tells me that the course needed changes to make it more fair. IMO, there is still more work that needs to be done until it is "playable" and the risk/reward ratio is more in balance.
The fact that you have TOP golfers like Jim Dunlap and Scott Hval shooting rounds in the 80s tells me that there is something "dodgy" about the course. These guys know how to play golf.
If you feel the course is fine in its current state, then we will have to agree to disagree. I won't be back anytime soon unless I hear that more improvements have been made. I have 3 rounds under my belt there which is enough to know if I like a course or not (I don't).
No one I played with either day plans to go back. No one from my club (one of which was a +2 golfer) who competed plans to go back.
You have a spectacular piece of land, a great clubhouse and great staff. But if people are playing the course once and never want to come back, you seriously need to re-evaluate your "product" and the customers you want to attract and retain on future visits.
Perhaps the percentage of people that play Tetherow and love it are enough to keep the course a viable ongoing concern. If so, great. If not, then you need to consider making some changes so that the course isn't quite so polarizing.