QUOTE (CallawayOnly @ Jun 29 2009, 05:24 PM)

"Every course owner has the right to apply and enforce local rules." ... yes ... but
within limits. You cannot simply vote locally to decide (for instance) that a mulligan off the first tee is fine, or you can drop four club lengths from a path, or that players may only have 3 balls in their bag at the start of a round (etc., etc.). Specifically:
-------------------------------------------
33-8. Local Rules
a. Policy
The Committee may establish Local Rules for local abnormal conditions if they are consistent with the policy set forth in Appendix I.
b. Waiving or Modifying a Rule
A Rule of Golf must not be waived by a Local Rule. (my italics). However, if a Committee considers that local abnormal conditions interfere with the proper playing of the game to the extent that it is necessary to make a Local Rule that modifies the Rules of Golf, the Local Rule must be authorized by the USGA.
-------------------------------------------
In other words - specifying that only one ball may be played at a time? No problem, since this is actually already in the Rules of Golf - you're just affirming a Rule already in place ... in fact, you could even insist that the same brand and type of ball be used during the course of entire round. Dress code? Also no problem ... since it does not contravene anything in the Rules.
Its when you want to say "No practice on the course". In fact, Rule 7-2 does say there's no practice on the course - EXCEPT for the conditions that are stated in the Rule:
"A player must not make a practice stroke during play of a hole. Between the play of two holes, a player must not make a practice stroke,
except that he may practice putting or chipping on or near:
a. the putting green of the hole last played,
b. any practice putting green, or
c. the teeing ground of the next hole to be played in the round"
It further goes on to say that the Committee (the USGA name for the local rule-making body) may, for competitions, prohibit (a) and/or (b) ... but
NOT c ...
I do understand what you are saying about courtesy. Yeah - chipping (or, in fact, using any club) on a green is not prohibited ... but no golfer I know would do so save for an extreme condition (indeed ... it is the opposite that is more commonly the case ... golfers that putt from the fairway or fringe ... few amateurs are confident enough to use a wedge on a green). Same with chipping on the tee box. It is legal ... but most I see doing it (including myself) go out of their way not to damage the tee box.
Thing is, however, I hear a lot of people talk about the courtesy and responsibility individual golfers have, but very rarely hear anything about the responsibilities course management has. In fact, were they to live up to their responsibilities, a lot of these issues would go away.
For instance ... I have a friend that managed a course in Spain ... had serious problems on one green - a lot of people chipped. Why? The green was a big "hourglass" ... 25 feet wide at the top and bottom, 8 feet wide in the middle. Looked cool on paper ... but what did it lead to? You're on the left bottom bulge, and the pin is on the left top ... what can you do? Either putt through serious rough, or chip it over. Solution? Argue with people about chipping on the green (which he couldn't, its legal) ... or ... well, just re-design the green (which he did). Its every bit as hard (he put a bunch of levels in it) ... but there's no line on the green that requires jumping rough. Most pros (and pretty much all amateurs) would prefer a 40 foot putt to a 20 foot chip.
Same (IMO) with chipping on the tee box. Don't yell at golfers for doing it ...
manage around it. As someone tat has been subjected to 10 (and even 15) minute waits on teeboxes ... gotta say, if the management that forces me to do that then
lectures me about my "responsibilities" ... well, screw them.
For all the talk of bad, discourteous golfers, there's very little about how
poorly many courses are designed and run. A great deal of problems blamed on golfers can
easily be solved with intelligent management.