QUOTE (TuffKukae @ Jun 22 2009, 11:25 PM)

stinkman, midas and baffler ! give it a frecken rest. You hate on Phil and show you man love for Tiger in every Phil thread. There is no doubt Tiger is by leaps and bounds the greatest player of his time, but damn get off his ballsack would you.
Um, what?
I don't "hate" on Phil. I actualy see him as he is.
Very good, but so far below tiiger as to be a joke. This is not emotion ... this is stats. I've been playing and watching golf for over four decades. I have perspective. To Phil lovers, you either love him, or your a "Phil hater". bullxxxx. Grow up.
The dude has 3 majors. Tiger has 14. You wanna love him? Cool. Love him. I'd never say anyone shouldn't have their favorites. I have mine. (Personally, Tiger, and Stricker, and Ernie, and ... Hofan, and Booby Jones ... all for different reasons).
What I am getting slightly puzzled by is the (really recent) trend in which "emotion" and "personality" is apparently more important than golf.
GLOVER won this tourney. Mahan was T6. Phil was T2. And apparently if you say "who cares whether T6 says he 'likes' T2" ... you're a "Phil hater".
I don't hate Phil. In fact, its much worse ... I'm completely indifferent. If he had won, I'd be lavishing praise on him (to the same degree I fully understand what an amazing win this was for Lucas).
I don't love or hate anyone ... I'm not a psychotic fan thast needs to see someone win ... nor needs to see someone lose. I look at ... GOLF.
I sat through at least a half dozen posts this weekend about Phil being an "everyman", about how much he is "loved", about how he "connects" with NY (OMG!!! he, like, actually made eye contact and gave fans thumbs up and even fist-bumped them!!! why can't, like, every pro do that?!!!").
Good greif, grow up. At the end of the day, he came in second, with two other guys.
I don't want to "connect" with the winner ... I want to see AMAZING GOLF.
Lucas did something astounding in the last hour of this tourney. Thefocus should be on HIM. Not whether Hunter Mahan thinks Phil isn't as much of an a****** as most of the tour thinks he is.
For Phil FANS ... I'm sure that means I'm a "hater".
From an objective perspective? Why in the hell should Hunter Mahan's views of Phil mickelson MATTER on a night when a young man - LUCAS GLOVER - outlasted the best in the world, on a visciously tough course ... and won by two strokes.
.
To Phil FANS ... annyone saying anything against Phil is a "hater".
Objectively? Phil lost. Hunter lost. Tiger lost. DD lost. Barnes lost.
Lucas Glover won.
If I'm a "hater" for not thinking it is important that Hunter thinks Phil is nice ... well, okay-dokey bucko, I gues I'm a Phil "hater".
When you actually grow up - you'll learn to
honor any man that wins a major on a brutally difficult course ... and realize that second place is meaningless.
Who cares if Phil is "nice"? In fact, in his glory days, Jack wasn't "nice. Hogan (in fact) was a total freaking a****** a lot of the time. But does anyone - 30 years later - remember the opinion the T6 player had of the T2 player on hogan's first major? ... Um ... no.
I don't know if you intended to sound so bitter in this post but you sound incredibly bitter. Is it just Phil Mickelson that makes you this cynical or is this how you approach every aspect of your life?
Also please read the bolded part of TuffKukae's post and the bolded portion of your post. Wait Tiger is better then Phil?