juansky
Jun 12 2009, 10:39 AM
I don't know much about Brian Gay but it seems to me that he can really go low on a consistent basis.
I know he won the Verizon Heritage by a whopping 10 strokes and now he's looking to make another run at the St. Jude Classic.
Can anybody out there shine some light on this fellow for me?
I would love to see how he contends in the U.S. Open next week with Tiger on the field.
riesman20
Jun 12 2009, 10:47 AM
Right now he sure is!!!!
Wait until the end of the year and then we can see if it just lighting in a bottle.
trapsmv15
Jun 12 2009, 10:50 AM
The Boom Bapp
Jun 12 2009, 10:54 AM
Brian has certainly found something in his swing, the guy has been around a long time (since '94) and all I think he needed was a breakthrough to boost his confidence. He is no doubt making Mizuno look good along with Jonathan Byrd. Luke better pick up the pace, his fellow staffers are creating some well needed buzz.
Atta kid Brian, push the lead farther and farther, I am pulling for another W for you.
6 birds and 1 bogey thru 13 so far.
Here is his complete stats:
Brian Gay
twgolf
Jun 12 2009, 11:03 AM
Brian Gay is a great player, but the one thing he lacks to be competitive every week is distance. He is an excellent putter and great with his wedge game and a straight driver of the ball. He does very well at courses that do not put a premium on distance. (ie) Verizon, and St. Jude. However as far as the US Open, I really doubt he will be a contender or able to go low. Bethpage is very long and will not suit his type of game. 571 yards of par 4 is tough to over come when you are short off the tee. Distance off the tee will be at a premium there and probably at every major venue from here on, exept for the Masters. Other players in his same catergory are Furyk, Leonard, and Tim Clark. Hitting seven and six irons is a lot easier and more accurate into greeens that a four or three iron.
ZBigStick
Jun 12 2009, 11:02 AM
These guys are good!
With two PGA victories, yes he is that good.
He is a very accurate driver and a very solid putter even when compared to the World's Best. He is not long enough off of the tee to compete at Bethpage Black.
kekoa
Jun 12 2009, 11:08 AM
From what I've seen, the guy is super straight and can roll the ball too.
I really don't see him contending at Bethpage though due to raw distance. FWIW, I heard on the GC that the course could play in the neighborhood of 8,400 if its soft out there. WTF!!!!
thenation48
Jun 12 2009, 11:09 AM
with kiper on the bag, he can do it! GO KIP
DDEM25
Jun 12 2009, 11:29 AM
He has to win this week to get in the open.
bfactor1282
Jun 12 2009, 11:53 AM
I believe his last two competitive rounds are both 64's (including the final round at Colonial), with a solid chance to add a 3rd here. And these aren't easy or short courses.
Maybe this will force them to actually show him play some tomorrow and do a better analysis of his swing. The Lynn Blake TGM camp must be ecstatic!
juansky
Jun 12 2009, 11:53 AM
I think he will win this week.
All tour winners have one thing in common, they can putt.
I think Brian has a great chance of playing well at the US Open, as as long as the putter is working well. I think distance is overrated, it always comes down to the short game.
Richie3Jack
Jun 12 2009, 06:56 PM
Brian has always had a great short game and in particular a fantastic putter. He's never been that long, but he's maybe 5'7" tall (they list him at 5'10" and if that's the case, Tiger is 6'5" tall)
Yes, he's that good.
He basically didn't know a whole lot about the golf swing until he started working with Lynn Blake and then they found a swing meant for him and he's got it so well down and actually understands it so well that now he's one of the better ballstrikers on Tour.
Before I went to Blake's teaching protege, Ted Fort, I asked a friend who was at a Tour even Gay was playing at to watch him and see what he thought. He called me up and said that he followed Gay for 7 holes and remarked of just how 'pure' he hits every shot and he's deadly accurate. So basically Gay transformed himself from a decent ballstriker with a great short game to a fantastic ballstriker with a great short game.
The only problem is that he recently suffered a rib injury and that hurt his back and neck and that's why he didn't do a whole lot after his Verizon victory.
Unfortunately, I don't see Bethpage fitting him. It's just too freaking long and it's not your typical US Open design where a premium must be placed on accuracy. Thusly, Tiger will probably win because it's more of a bomber's course and Tiger is best of the bombers by far. I do think if Gay can keep this up he can (or should) make the Ryder Cup and I can see him giving those Euros fits all day long.
3JACK
Richie3Jack
Jun 12 2009, 06:59 PM
QUOTE (juansky @ Jun 12 2009, 12:53 PM)

I think he will win this week.
All tour winners have one thing in common, they can putt.
I think Brian has a great chance of playing well at the US Open, as as long as the putter is working well. I think distance is overrated, it always comes down to the short game.
True, the problem is that distance is the great equalizer in golf. When Brian is playing a course pretty much like a par 72 and somebody like JB Holmes plays it as a par 68, that's a big advantage in Holmes' favor. Doesn't mean Gay cannot beat him or beat him the majority of the time, but it's still an advantage. And make no mistake about it, Brian Gay works on a lot of things to help improve his distance, but he's just not going to sacrifice consistency and accuracy for it. He really is only short off the tee, he can hit his irons as far as most of the golfers on Tour.
3JACK
gtowngolfer
Jun 12 2009, 09:06 PM
Southwind is actually a long course. Its a par 70 7000 yard layout which is like a par 72 7800 layout. The par 4's are pretty long and so are the par 3's.
ZBigStick
Jun 13 2009, 12:50 AM
QUOTE (gtowngolfer @ Jun 12 2009, 10:06 PM)

Southwind is actually a long course. Its a par 70 7000 yard layout which is like a par 72 7800 layout. The par 4's are pretty long and so are the par 3's.
Playing at a par 70, it is not a short course by tour standards, but I think your math is off.
bobsuruncle
Jun 13 2009, 03:00 AM
I much prefer the players who can think their way around a course, are in control of their trajectory and have a super short game... the bomb and gauge is way over rated.
This is also why I think TW is the greatest (vs Jack) because when Jack was playing, the other guys who were not genuinely good, didn't have the benefit of technology to help them keep up with or beat Jack.
tko112204
Jun 13 2009, 12:54 PM
Right, a Par 70 at 7000 yards is actually more like a Par 72 at 7250 or so. If you were to add 125 yards or so to each par 4 to make them legitimate par 5's, then you're probably in the right neighborhood.
Ben
TitleistWI
Jun 13 2009, 01:37 PM
Grian Gay's only real weakness in his game is distance. He isnt a long hitter. He hits the ball very straight and his shortgame and putting is pretty good though.
If its a course where accuracy is more important than distance, Brian can beat anyone in the world.
frozen_rope
Jun 13 2009, 01:48 PM
He's no different than any other player with a Tour card. When the putts go in they shoot low scores. Gay is a better putter than most.
Nobody ever shoots a good score putting poorly, ever. If a guy starts to have some high finishes and, or, wins, it means he is making putts.
QUOTE (juansky @ Jun 12 2009, 10:39 AM)

I don't know much about Brian Gay but it seems to me that he can really go low on a consistent basis.
I know he won the Verizon Heritage by a whopping 10 strokes and now he's looking to make another run at the St. Jude Classic.
Can anybody out there shine some light on this fellow for me?
I would love to see how he contends in the U.S. Open next week with Tiger on the field.

jduncanm3
Jun 13 2009, 03:03 PM
LOL, when clampett wanted to talk about gay's swing and TGM, kostis changed the subject. and the next time he commented on a swing was moulders' and he went out of his way to stress how he went from being too technical to just going out and playing now ... which i took as a knock on TGM.
i think it's time to get some new blood as swing analyst. kostis been around too long, i'd love to hear someone else like clampett get to say what he wants and break down swings
Fore18
Jun 13 2009, 03:51 PM
Read Clampett's book and you might chnge your mind on wanting him to comment.
GolfChannel
Jun 13 2009, 03:57 PM
Even better, could you imagine a golfer with Gay's accuracy and Tiger's distance? That's the golfer of the future.
jduncanm3
Jun 13 2009, 04:08 PM
QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 04:51 PM)

Read Clampett's book and you might chnge your mind on wanting him to comment.
i did and would love to hear him, would be a breath of fresh air. its too bad he doesnt have the disposition to force the issue w/ kostis.
Fore18
Jun 13 2009, 04:44 PM
QUOTE (jduncanm3 @ Jun 13 2009, 04:08 PM)

QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 04:51 PM)

Read Clampett's book and you might chnge your mind on wanting him to comment.
i did and would love to hear him, would be a breath of fresh air. its too bad he doesnt have the disposition to force the issue w/ kostis.
I did'nt care much for it but thats just me, I guess Kostis just has the higher rank with the network and tour. I like McCord the best he is funny.
Dr.John
Jun 13 2009, 05:02 PM
Actually Clampett's book was genius. Didn't really talk about or favor one swing over another, but stressed the importance of impact, which is the only thing that effects the ball. I think if more players concerned themselves with impact, ball first contact, rather than swing "positions" then you would see handicaps really go down.
Fore18
Jun 13 2009, 05:37 PM
QUOTE (Dr.John @ Jun 13 2009, 05:02 PM)

Actually Clampett's book was genius. Didn't really talk about or favor one swing over another, but stressed the importance of impact, which is the only thing that effects the ball. I think if more players concerned themselves with impact, ball first contact, rather than swing "positions" then you would see handicaps really go down.
I understand that is important and to be very open minded about what he has wrote could you explain one thing for me please. Why would you start your divot 4inches infront of the ball and when you get a driver in hand you are going to hit the ball in the ground..? Just IMO
Dr.John
Jun 13 2009, 05:40 PM
Re-read the book. The divot doesn't start 4 inches in front of the ball. The deepest part of the divot is 4 inches in front of the ball.
Fore18
Jun 13 2009, 05:40 PM
QUOTE (Dr.John @ Jun 13 2009, 05:40 PM)

Re-read the book. The divot doesn't start 4 inches in front of the ball. The deepest part of the divot is 4 inches in front of the ball.
But what happens with the driver?
jduncanm3
Jun 13 2009, 07:23 PM
QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 06:40 PM)

QUOTE (Dr.John @ Jun 13 2009, 05:40 PM)

Re-read the book. The divot doesn't start 4 inches in front of the ball. The deepest part of the divot is 4 inches in front of the ball.
But what happens with the driver?
no divot of course, but the shallowest part of the arc is approx. 4" ahead of ball
Fore18
Jun 13 2009, 07:52 PM
QUOTE (jduncanm3 @ Jun 13 2009, 07:23 PM)

QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 06:40 PM)

QUOTE (Dr.John @ Jun 13 2009, 05:40 PM)

Re-read the book. The divot doesn't start 4 inches in front of the ball. The deepest part of the divot is 4 inches in front of the ball.
But what happens with the driver?
no divot of course, but the shallowest part of the arc is approx. 4" ahead of ball
So to me that means you are hitting the ball on a downward blow way past your aim point with a drive. I don't know if I would like that but it might be great for some others who like trapping a driver thru LW. So many different ways you can get it done I guess.
juansky
Jun 13 2009, 09:19 PM
QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 07:52 PM)

QUOTE (jduncanm3 @ Jun 13 2009, 07:23 PM)

QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 06:40 PM)

QUOTE (Dr.John @ Jun 13 2009, 05:40 PM)

Re-read the book. The divot doesn't start 4 inches in front of the ball. The deepest part of the divot is 4 inches in front of the ball.
But what happens with the driver?
no divot of course, but the shallowest part of the arc is approx. 4" ahead of ball
So to me that means you are hitting the ball on a downward blow way past your aim point with a drive. I don't know if I would like that but it might be great for some others who like trapping a driver thru LW. So many different ways you can get it done I guess.
Ideally you want to hit up with the driver, more carry and distance. Trapping a driver will give you less distance and less carry but a bit more roll.
honketyhank
Jun 13 2009, 09:38 PM
Back on track more or less: Does Brian do snoose? He always looks like he is about to spit something out from his bottom lip. As an ex-smoker, I sympathize, but sometimes he even looks like a major league pitcher from the 1950's, about to spout out a big wad before the big pitch to strike out Mickey Mantle. I hope not on the green (or tee).
Re TGM, there are some great YouTube videos of him and Lynn Blake doing lessons. Search them out. Lynn marches to his own drum beat, but is well worth listening too in his other videos as well. A great resource.
Richie3Jack
Jun 13 2009, 09:48 PM
The being 'too technical' stuff spewed out by Kostis is just typical crap from a guy who was a highly overrated teacher even in his prime who is (and really has been) woefully behind the times to make himself look like he's not so out-dated.
Believe me, when Brian Gay steps up on the practice range before a tournament and then steps up to the tournament tee, he works off of feel. And it's probably amazingly simple swing feel thought.
3JACK
dana dahlquist
Jun 13 2009, 10:55 PM
I think its funny that guys say he's not a long hitter. He hits it far enough, in fact I think he will do well at the USOpen. Straight is long and a good putter he is. ( sorry Yoda talk) Thats a good mix.
Same thing happend to Charlie last year at a major they kept saying oh he's not a long hitter. For his size he really long, kept up to Garcia a few times if not past on two holes. Its all A to B and stay in the zone, who can do that best.
As for Kostis and Faldo it would be nice to hear from some people that know about the golf swing for once.
jduncanm3
Jun 14 2009, 02:57 AM
people need to realize that straight/short hitters can be VERY AGGRESSIVE players, in terms of the lines they take. im not a short hitter so i have no reason to defend them, but people shouldnt equate "straight" with "conservative." their "straightness" allows them to be aggressive. zack johnson, for example, is a very aggressive player .... he has no problem firing at pins from the short side. gay on the par 5 on the back yesterday took a line over trees and straight at the flag, whereas the longer allenby played to the center.
jduncanm3
Jun 14 2009, 03:39 AM
QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 08:52 PM)

QUOTE (jduncanm3 @ Jun 13 2009, 07:23 PM)

QUOTE (Fore18 @ Jun 13 2009, 06:40 PM)

QUOTE (Dr.John @ Jun 13 2009, 05:40 PM)

Re-read the book. The divot doesn't start 4 inches in front of the ball. The deepest part of the divot is 4 inches in front of the ball.
But what happens with the driver?
no divot of course, but the shallowest part of the arc is approx. 4" ahead of ball
So to me that means you are hitting the ball on a downward blow way past your aim point with a drive. I don't know if I would like that but it might be great for some others who like trapping a driver thru LW. So many different ways you can get it done I guess.
i dont equate forward swing bottom with trapping. trapping i think of a shut blade player like parnevik. if anything he appears to hit it marginally heavy by tour standards (i.e. rear swing bottom) from a steep angle with a shut face.
drivers due to shaft length will have the shallowest arc and thus the forward bottom is minimal delofting. also, remember that the ball travels on the clubface for over an inch so by time it exits the it's delofted even less. a forward bottom really just insures solid contact, lag and minimal deceleration. i wouldnt get too caught up in what it means in terms of loft.
juansky
Jun 14 2009, 10:56 AM
QUOTE (jduncanm3 @ Jun 14 2009, 02:57 AM)

people need to realize that straight/short hitters can be VERY AGGRESSIVE players, in terms of the lines they take. im not a short hitter so i have no reason to defend them, but people shouldnt equate "straight" with "conservative." their "straightness" allows them to be aggressive. zack johnson, for example, is a very aggressive player .... he has no problem firing at pins from the short side. gay on the par 5 on the back yesterday took a line over trees and straight at the flag, whereas the longer allenby played to the center.
You bring up a great point about the straight hitters. Because of their control over the ball flight and trajectory, they can be aggressive. Whereas the long hitters like Allenby have much less control and therefore don't play as agressive for the most part. I myself play aggressive, I'm not playing in any tournaments so why hold back, just let it rip and have some fun out there.
neotheonlyone
Jun 14 2009, 03:36 PM
Bottom line is that the man is a great putter. He seems to stand closer to the ball than most. Anyone else notice that?!?!
PreppySlapCut
Jun 14 2009, 06:32 PM
QUOTE (neotheonlyone @ Jun 14 2009, 04:36 PM)

Bottom line is that the man is a great putter. He seems to stand closer to the ball than most. Anyone else notice that?!?!
Stands very upright as well, which makes his stroke look much more SBST. He really doesn't have to manipulate it at all. Beautiful stuff.
Asleep
Jun 14 2009, 06:36 PM
Congratulations to
Brian Gay on another impressive win, and kudos again to
Lynn Blake for helping turn this guy's career around
in a big way!
yuck
Jun 14 2009, 06:39 PM
The New Loren Roberts
scores
Jun 14 2009, 09:30 PM
I like everything about the guy and I wish him the best at bethpage my only question will he be long enough to make the fairways. I was at the last one and there were palyers aiming for the walk way cut into the rough because they could not make the fairways. I was standing there when Nick price told the official hey tight fairways. i think it was the 10th hole
Anyway I wish a guy like Brian Gay the best out there knowing how hard he has worked after I read the articles posted about the guy
Freddy300
Jun 14 2009, 10:25 PM
Gay shot 18 under par? Pretty incredible weekend. I watched for a few minutes today and on one par 3 - he missed a hole in one by about 16 inches.
hoganfan924
Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM
The guy's a lights out putter and he's been hitting tons of Fairways and Greens in Reg. That's the formula for success on tour and especially in a US Open. I'd say he's got a good chance except for the lack of distance which may make it impossible for his approach shots to hold the greens at Bethpage.
hurricanewarning
Jun 14 2009, 10:48 PM
I'm so sorry for his last name...but it goes well with the his fashion style LOL. Seriously he is definitly Mizuno's top staffer by far, Luke isn't their top anymore.
TaylorMadeAP25
Jun 14 2009, 10:56 PM
brian gay is by far one of the best long iron players on tour, he hits his 4 i as if it is a 7i !
juansky
Jun 14 2009, 11:06 PM
QUOTE (hurricanewarning @ Jun 14 2009, 10:48 PM)

I'm so sorry for his last name...but it goes well with the his fashion style LOL. Seriously he is efinitly Mizuno's top staffer by far, Luke isn't their top anymore.
Luke needs to put the paintbrush down start focusing on golf again.
But Mr. Gay is the real deal, I would'nt change a thing about his game. His distance off the tee is just perfect for his aggressive iron play. In contrast, let's look at Allenby, this guy is by far longer but the fellow can't sink a putt to save his life, not to mention his lack of trajectory and distance control too. I really think Gay has a ligitimate chance to play well at the Open, it would be a great feat if can post a top 10 for sure.
bfactor1282
Jun 14 2009, 11:28 PM
So his last 5 rounds on the PGA Tour (counting the 4th round at the Nelson) are 64-64-66-66-66.
Wow. That's just filthy good.
gtowngolfer
Jun 14 2009, 11:52 PM
You are right my math is off.
Freddy300
Jun 15 2009, 12:09 AM
QUOTE (bfactor1282 @ Jun 15 2009, 12:28 AM)

So his last 5 rounds on the PGA Tour (counting the 4th round at the Nelson) are 64-64-66-66-66.
Wow. That's just filthy good.
Just crazy. The guy is deadly with his irons and is in the fairway on probably every drive.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.