QUOTE (MtlJeff @ Jun 7 2009, 10:26 PM)

QUOTE (Mainlinegolfer @ Jun 7 2009, 10:13 PM)

QUOTE (Mr.B @ Jun 7 2009, 07:33 PM)

QUOTE (MtlJeff @ Jun 7 2009, 07:10 PM)

the handicap system is both great and horrible, it's great because you can have tournaments where all skills levels compete...but there are always people who would rather win than play fair (which it sounds like in this case), and it's also much easier for a high handicap player to make pars than a low capper to make birdies. I recently lost a match with a friend of mine (both low handicaps) to a pair of 15-20's who got a shot on each hole and started -10 through 11 holes...we had no chance even at our best
handicap tournaments are never perfect
I think the handicap system is just horrible..... jmo though
The USGA handicap system is pretty damned impressive IF you take the time to understand its intent and methodology. Clueless, uninformed and dishonest people are horrible.
For the handicap system, read here:
http://usga.org/Rule-Books/Handicap-System...andicap-Manual/For some entertaining reading about sandbagging and the odds of shooting an "exceptional" score (Hint: it is statistically impossible for an "honest" handicap to shoot net scores of 53, 56, 57, and 63), see here:
http://www.popeofslope.com/sandbagging/index.htmlI'm not sure if you're calling me clueless, but i maintain that it's easier for a higher handicap to make a par than for a low handicap to make a birdie. I know a lot of double digit handicaps that will make 7-10 pars in a round and then have a few blowup holes. This is OK in some tournaments, but a lot of handicap events are teams/best ball formats. Low handicap players very rarely win these events...i don't hate the system, but just saying that's the way it tends to work in competitions
Most average golfers are uninformed (or clueless) about properly using the handicap systems and typically just have a visceral reaction to high handicappers winning net competitions. Alas, I also suffer from that feeling, but it doesn't make it true. The fact is, many golfers don't maintain accurate handicaps, intentionally or unintentionally, and, as I've written before, "garbage in, garbage out". It's not the system, it's the people.
No bogey golfer makes 18 bogies in a round; they all make some pars, maybe a birdie, and have a few "blow up holes". That's the nature of the game. It always amuses me that golfers tell their pro that "they are hitting the ball great, they are just
inconsistent", as if that is unique and insightful. The nature of the game is being inconsistent, certainly for the typical amateur hack. Consistency is the definition of a really good player.
As I've also posted before, the USGA handicap system makes an adjustment for "excellence" for the better golfer (multiplies by .96) but also adds "Slope" to a "Course Rating" so a handicap index maintained at a easier course is equated with a handicap at a more a difficult course, i.e. the bogey golfer (sloope) needs even more help on a difficult course than a scratch golfer (course rating).
As I've also posted before, As far as you playing team or better ball formats, the handicap system provides for adjusting handicaps in these formats for teams of varying handicaps by, say, multiplying by 90%.