QUOTE(kenk7us2002 @ Mar 6 2008, 07:01 PM)

QUOTE(JoeJ @ Mar 6 2008, 06:57 PM)

fair enough. If you want to make a move away from the traditions of the game, and make it more 'mechanical' then it's not a bad solution. It's not what I want to see for the game though. The idea that every player has X amount of time to hit every shot simply does not allow for the intricacies of the game.
Joe I totally agree with you. Its a hard game and some play it slower than others. This is the PGA tour we are talking about and they play for a lot of dollars . I do not care how slow they play. But if you are going to regulate you have to come up with some clear cut rules and a timer on everyone. Its the only totally fair way.
Ken
Honestly, I don't care how much money they are playing for... pace of play is part of the rules and they should be held to that standard. Life isn't fair, and neither is golf. If a group is penalized due to the slow play of one then so be it. I can almost guarantee it won't happen a second time.
Also, once a group is on the clock it is easy to see who is taking up time. Each player is timed only when it is his/her turn to play, not when they are waiting for a ruling or another player to play.
You do not need a clock on everyone at all times; only out of position groups. If you are waiting for a group ahead to play, you are not out of position.
I do care how long it takes a pro to play. I am not a big fan of the whole role model thing so I'lll skip it this time around, but even leaving that out, I do not really want to sit in front of the television for 5 hours only because a player in a group has to take 5 minutes to sneak up on his ball before he hits it. Even without the time factor, I don't enjoy watching snail's pace golf.
Since I am the consumer of the product, I do actually, have a right to speak up. If enough people speak up, then change occurs.
It seems like an awful lot of consumers
and players are speaking up.