QUOTE(muxi87 @ Aug 24 2007, 01:41 PM)

QUOTE(KDMullins @ Aug 24 2007, 01:33 PM)

I gotta say I don't understand the theory behind charging a grand. They obviously have a website and the pros are wearing them to bring attention to the issue on a national, or even global, level...all of which is great...but who do they expect to buy them? There won't be 1% of the viewing audience that can afford to pay $1000 for a belt. When I first saw the story on the Golf Channel, I figured they got a company to donate the belts and they were going to charge $100 for them. I was going to buy one. I guess not.
gotta agree...I'd have to think they'd make more money OVERALL if they sold them for $100...I could see A TON of golf fans buying them for $100, but not many at $1000...who knows...???
Whereas I haven't researched it, I'd say there's probably something else the charity offers for a smaller contribution. But the belt is a great way to show that people have ponied up a nice hunk of cake for the charity. I don't think they're trying to move belts here -- I think they're simply providing something really special for those who can afford the contribution.
Who is expected to pay $50,000 a plate for a political fundraisinig dinner? Obviously only the people who can afford it. You have one event, crank up the price of admission, and make a boatload right there. And then you always accept contributions before and after, and of all sizes. Same principle applies here, I'd say.
The belts (and the guys on Tour wearing them) sound like a great idea.
/< / /2 /<