<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ping G10 4 Wood Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/</link>
	<description>G.WRX News Crew</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-2467</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-2467</guid>
		<description>Agree that the PING is great. Just as you, I frequenty use the fairwy woods from the tee-box. Until now no problem ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that the PING is great. Just as you, I frequenty use the fairwy woods from the tee-box. Until now no problem &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Siegel</title>
		<link>http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>I would go for the regular flex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go for the regular flex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor</title>
		<link>http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Hey, I'm looking for the G10 4 wood draw model with the TFC 129F shaft, but I'm stucked between regular and stiff. Swingspeed 97-99 (5 wood). Any surgestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m looking for the G10 4 wood draw model with the TFC 129F shaft, but I&#8217;m stucked between regular and stiff. Swingspeed 97-99 (5 wood). Any surgestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Replaced my 6 year old tight lies two with this club and the difference is night and day.  I have hit the G10 4 wood off the tee, off grass, and off bare dirt, and it performs well in all those conditions.  Both the club head shape and weighting, and the TFC shaft, appear to be real winners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replaced my 6 year old tight lies two with this club and the difference is night and day.  I have hit the G10 4 wood off the tee, off grass, and off bare dirt, and it performs well in all those conditions.  Both the club head shape and weighting, and the TFC shaft, appear to be real winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSchteeve</title>
		<link>http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSchteeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfwrx.com/BagChatter/2007/10/08/ping-g10-4-wood-review/#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Certainly works for me.  Clubhead seems the perfect size and depth for both fairway and teebox.  TFC shaft smooth yet reasonably tight; misses do favor the left side but reflect the swing made - nothing comes out of nowhere as far as any unexpected performance issues.  Club honestly performs with pretty good forgiveness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly works for me.  Clubhead seems the perfect size and depth for both fairway and teebox.  TFC shaft smooth yet reasonably tight; misses do favor the left side but reflect the swing made - nothing comes out of nowhere as far as any unexpected performance issues.  Club honestly performs with pretty good forgiveness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
