News

Growth of the Game of Golf

Published

19 years ago

Jul 28, 2007

The United States is Experiencing Stagnant Growth in the Game of Golf

Is slow growth a temporary problem or a permanent one? What are the solutions to this growth problem in the game?

According to the National Golf Foundation year-to-date rounds in the United States are down 9 percent. In 2006 rounds were up almost 1 percent for the year, due in part to unseasonably warm weather in the northeast during the winter months. In 2005, rounds were down 1 percent for the year. Is this stagnant growth a continuing trend, and if so what are the issues prompting it? Let’s look at some of these issues and determine if this is a growing trend or just a blip on the warning screen.

Weather

Golf is one of the few sports that is completely reliant on weather. If the weather is poor, then you cannot play. For example in the winter months in the North, most places are either too cold or covered with snow or ice. The weather is fantastic in the Southeastern and Southwestern parts of the country during the winter, and that is when they are at their busiest. The summer months cause areas like Florida and certain parts of the desert areas to slow down dramatically. This is due in large part to the high heat and unpredictable weather. Conversely other parts of the country, like the north, are in full season and generating their additions to the total rounds played. So does weather play an important role in rounds played? Absolutely, but it is not the only factor to be concerned with regarding the growth of the game.

Price to Play

Price is a concern of every business not just golf. In the market system under which we operate in, demand is driven by price and vice versa. If there are an over abundance of golf courses, and not enough golfers, the price will go down in order to attract customers. Conversely, if there is a shortage of golf courses, and greater amount of golfers than the courses can handle, the prices will increase. That is what is known as basic supply and demand theory. What about private clubs and high end public facilities you ask? Well, they feel the crunch of economics and economic wellness as well. Think about a private club in your area; now imagine that a similar private club is constructed across the street, but the membership dues are 10,000 dollars less. What is going to happen? Assuming that the golf courses are on par with one another, the golf course that is charging more is going to lose a lot of their members to the new golf course, as well as any new potential members. Why? Because for less money you get the same product as you would across the street. The same would hold true for a public course in the same situation. This is in essence what has happened to the golf industry. The building craze was responsible for over building golf courses to the point that they were averaging 1 new golf course built per day. This was great for the golfer, as they had a multitude of choices, and the prices to play seemed to hold constant. Something had to change, because this could not continue for ever could it? No it could not, there were not enough golfers to sustain this growth, and courses began to lose money, and some eventually had to shut down. This shut down and growing lack of competition has caused the price to play golf to soar over the past few years, ultimately not good for the golfer. There are fewer golf courses being built than a few years ago, the prices at the courses that are still there are increasing, and the rounds are getting longer as the golf courses are becoming more crowded due to the shortage of places to play. This has driven a lot of golfers to get their golfing fix at the driving range. More and more people are opting to just hit balls and practice, than go golfing every week. Picture the golfer who might have played 50 times a year, now he is down to half of that. Prices have made the golfer make a choice, do I want to spend this money on a round of golf or do I want to spend it on something else? He or she ultimately makes the choice that is the best for him or her and their situation. If the prices continue to escalate ahead of what people can afford, the same trend could persist, and this situation may not bode well for the current middle to low income golfer and the industry itself.

Price of Equipment

The price of equipment has soared right in line with the price to play golf. Drivers that used to cost $200-250 dollars now are in the $500-800 dollar range. Putters are in the same boat. The top of line putter used to cost $75 dollars, now the entry level quality putter is $100 dollars and the top of the line collector putters can cost up to many thousands. This trend holds true for just about all aspects of golf equipment. This is a game where if you want to have your own set of clubs, it can cost you $200-400 dollars just to get a decent starter or used set. Not to mention, there is a coolness factor attached with clubs, and if you are one of those people who cares what others think, there is no way you are going to have a starter set. Equipment is pretty pricey for a lot of people, and then on top of that add the cost of playing golf per week, and this is recipe for stagnant growth. It is a lot cheaper for people to rent or borrow one club to hit some range balls, instead of going out, buying a whole new set of clubs, and then heading out to the course to play.

Equipment companies flood the market with new products every year in hope of catching some of those consumer dollars and they do manage to catch quite a few of them. The estimated worldwide market for golf club sales is $3.9 billion dollars. They are there to make a profit, and I for one do not blame them for that at all. We live in a market system and that is the reason they are in business, to make money. The problem that I see is, especially in the United States, they are potentially scaring some people away from the game due to the extremely high prices for some of the latest and greatest equipment. The die hard golfers need the new clubs like a kid needs a sugar fix, and this is what the golf companies know. The newer golfers on the other hand, tend to not know a lot about equipment, so they don’t know what to, or what not to buy. Seeing a price tag of $1,000 dollars or more, for a name brand, full set of clubs, bag, shoes, and balls is a potential deal breaker. But again, as I mentioned earlier with regard to the price to play golf, at some point there will be a price that is too high, and then the prices will fall as the demand for new equipment does. We have seen some evidence of that in the past years, as some of the “top of the line” driver prices have started to go down slightly, instead of constantly rising where they were getting to be $750 dollars. I don’t blame the golf club companies for trying to make money, quite the contrary actually, but like all the other areas mentioned, they have to look at the long term health of the game. If they want to help make sure the game is still there many years from now, along with the nice profits that they are seeing today, they need to make sure they are aiding the growth of the game as well, and not inhibiting it with prices that are too high.

Time

Golf is a sport that is very time consuming. A round of golf can take upwards of 5 hours depending on where you play, add that to the travel time and a beer or two after the round, and that my friends, is a full day. Pace of play has been a hot topic with many golfers and has been cited as a reason for decline in play. It is definitely part of the problem, but not the entire part of it. Golf has always been a social game, especially back in the early part of the century when most people who played it were wealthy, and/or in the upper crust of society, as they were the only ones that could afford the clubs, and had the money to play the game. Not only did they have the money to play, but they also had the free time to play. There is a segment of golfers that are not wealthy, and they work full time jobs, sometimes two, and most are unable to “get away” for a few hours at lunch, or move a meeting, so time is a major concern for them. They are the one day a week players, or weekend warriors. Some of these “warriors” might prefer not to waste one of their days off spending 8 hours at the golf course. Part of this is the fault of poor pace of play, and part of this is because of the overcrowding caused by golf course closures/lack of openings, and part of it is the socializing associated with the 19^th hole after the round with your buddies. There are obvious ways to make sure that you play fast, you could play early, play nine, and possibly play at non-peak times. But if you are going to go to a course on the weekend with your buddies, play 18, have some lunch and beers, and reminisce over the round, plan on a long day. Time concerns are not the only reason why the growth of the game has slowed, but could be yet another viable reason that may add to it.

Tiger Boom

Finally let’s look at what I call the “Tiger Boom”. Since his first day in the national spot light, Tiger Woods has caused the world of golf to step back and watch. He is different, not only in the way that he plays and dominates the sport, but his ability to transcend it in so many other avenues. He is a special person with special talents, and we are fortunate to bear witness to what he is doing for not only golf, but society as well. He is opening doors for people who never had the chance to play golf. He is changing the face of golf, allowing golf to be cool and accessible like never before, not just some stuck up snobby sport for the elite. With the inception of the Tiger Woods foundation, and the First Tee, there was a tremendous amount of hope that this new influx of golfers would be the boom that the sport needed. Why have we not seen this major influx? Shouldn’t Tiger have been the answer to all of our problems regarding the growth of the game? Shouldn’t he be the savior because of his far reaching popularity? Television ratings suggest that could be the case. When Tiger plays the ratings are double and sometimes triple a non-Tiger event. But the answer is no, he is not the savior of the growth of the game. His impact on the game is remarkable, but until the people that he has opened the doors for are able to utilize those abilities, the growth will not be realized. Golf is still too expensive and unavailable to many people, including the people that are helped by the Tiger Woods Foundation and The First Tee. So it is going to take time to see this if this influx of new golfers affects the overall rounds played and spurs the new growth of the game of golf.

What is the answer?

What is the answer to why the growth of golf is stagnant in the United States? Is it a permanent problem or is it a temporary issue that will work itself out? Only time will tell. I don’t have an exact answer but I do have an opinion. I can tell you that the golf industry, from a rounds standpoint, is not doing as well as it was a few years ago. Golf course closures, the price of golf increasing at an alarming rate, the time to play golf (being an all day affair at some places), and the cost of equipment continuing to increase, are all things that need to be examined. In my opinion golf growth in America will continue to stay stagnant due to a combination of the above mentioned areas. But then there will be a trickle down of sort. At some point the prices are going to get too high and they are going to drive to many people away from the sport, which will then cause the business people in the industry to take notice. Very similar to the stock market, or the housing market, the golf industry has a bubble and it will burst at some point. Some say that it already has happened in the United States, with all of the golf course closures, but I personally don’t think it has burst yet. Over the next few years, rounds will continue to decrease and the industry will continue to lose golfers because of bad business practices from golf courses, golf management companies, and golf manufacturing companies. Greed is good according to Gordon Gecko, but it can also be bad, if you slap the hand that feeds you too many times, he will stop feeding you. Unless the prices to participate in this great sport are checked, too many people are going to be left out, and in turn, all golfers, aside from the wealthy, are going to suffer. If it gets too expensive, only the wealthy are going to be able to afford to play, if and when that happens, there would not be enough of them to sustain the industry as a whole, and the game of golf could suffer dramatically.

I feel that in order to grow the game of golf there needs to be a consolidated effort from many different areas; all working together to help make sure that the game of golf is healthy. The PGA of America, The USGA, the golf course owners association, and the club manufacturers all need to come together and form some sort of a unit that will oversee the wellness of the game. Right now I am fairly certain that none of the above mentioned organizations have any say in what the other does, and vice versa. It might be better if they could work together to improve the game as a whole, not just in a part here or a part there. That way there can be a checks and balances type situation, where we can make sure that everyone’s immediate interest is in promoting the game, and participating in its growth and sustainment.

News

5 Things we Learned Saturday at the U.S. Women’s Open

Published

15 hours ago

Jun 7, 2026

Ronald Montesano

Despite Colin Jost being so over the expression That was not on my bingo card, so much of what happened on Saturday at Riviera was precisely defined by that 2026 catch-phrase. Seasoned professionals faltered while young amateurs soared. Leaders posted par rounds while afterthoughts amassed birdie after day-three birdie. What transpired set up the potential for the best duels in USWO history. In the mixing bowl are the world’s number one, former champions, former contenders, and a host of the game’s top names.

Over the first three days, Riviera has played more like a golden-age gem than it ever has in modern times. Players are using greenside slopes and fairway cambres to propel the ball into proper position. Green speeds are manageable, yet daunting from the absolute worst place (read: above) in relation to the hole location. Nothing is unfair (fingers crossed for the same in two weeks on Long Island) and everything is earned.

Could it be Nelly, or Charley, or Sei Young or In-gee? How about Gaby or Jennifer, Nasa or Ruoning? All have contended before in the U.S. Women’s Open, but only In-gee Chun has raised the Semple trophy in triumph. A Hollywood sound stage is set for a dramatic finish, but prior to the conclusion, let’s revisit the five things that we learned on Saturday at the U.S. Women’s Open.

Saturday Thing One: Nelly Korda is tied at the top

If it were anyone else, after consecutive rounds of 67, the dam would break. That’s not the case with Korda. If anything, we expect that she might go lower on Sunday, to the tune of 65, and walk off with her first U.S. Women’s Open title.

We know that ruling bodies and host clubs adore name champions. They salute all victors, but the success of a current top golfer, a media darling, or a proven veteran serves to legitimate and venerate the event and the venue. The USGA and Riviera would be thrilled to have Nelly Korda as a champion.

What will propel the three-time major titleist to a fourth grand slam victory? Another 67, for starters. Reaching double-digits under par would place the Floridian in a marvelous space. It would require Sei Young to keep pace, and would demand that all the trailers post 66 or better.

Saturday Thing Two: How about those amateurs?

1 2 3 5 6 10 13 16 17 18

Those are the holes that Maria Jose Marin (68), Aphrodite Deng (68), and Asterisk Talley (66) birdied on Saturday. That’s a minus-ten ringer score for the trio. As we sleep one more sleep before the final round, consider that Marin and Deng are four strokes back of the leaders, while Talley is five shots behind. To have three amateur golfers within striking distance of the top ladder rung is heady stuff. Can Talley possibly follow up her minus-five with another one on Sunday? Even that might not be enough. How about Marin and Deng. Can they drop a mid-60s scorecard on the professionals, and throw a scare into them? Our intuition suggests no on both counts, but the potential for a top-five amateur finish is certainly in the cards.

Saturday Thing Three: the Korean Kontingent

Sei Young Kim and In-gee Chun would win any partner event this week, given their current form. Kim will tee off with Nelly Korda in the last game, and she will have a front-row seat to Chun’s performance, as In-gee will play in the game just ahead. Of the two, Sei Young appeared to have less control over her shots, as a substantial number of spproach shots turned inordinately left.. Time and again, her short game bailed her out of the bogeytown prison, although she did miss a fair number of short putts. Dumbo (aka Chun) seemed more in control from tee to green, but will need to channel her early-2020s self to insert herself into the narrative.

Saturday Thing Four: Kupcho’s Komeback

It’s not like she went very far away, but Jennifer Kupcho’s 69 on day three had to be gratifying. The Colorado native and Wake Forest alumna was in fine Friday position to make a statement and expand her lead. She had posted 66 on Thursday, but fell off form on day two with 73. There were 67s and 68s at Riviera that day, but Kupcho’s birdie production fell from seven to two, as her bogey line increased from two to four. She reduced the bogey output on Saturday, and redoubled birdies to four. She finds herself precisely one shot off the lead, in a tie with In-gee Chun, her Sunday walkabout mate.

What will Kupcho need on day four, to provide an opportunity for victory? Fairways and greens always help, but that electric, day-one start of birdies on holes one, two, and three will be massive. Stay on the proper side of the green-center bunker on six, and survive the dautning holes. Kupcho has made bogey on 13 and 15 twice in three days. Should she come to the final stretch in a place of power or hope, those two holes will test her worth and mettle. Kupcho has also played the closing triumvirate of holes in par or better, each of the three days. That sort of clutch-time performance will stand her well on day four.

Saturday Thing Five: How will it all transpire?

No one expects that both of the top two will struggle on Sunday. One of them will shoot 68, to reach nine-under par. That means that the trailers will have to light up the western sky with fireworks, to keep pace. There is a golfer with nine, top-ten finishes in major championships, who has never won a major. That golfer is Nasa Hataoka, and she is poised to break through and make a victory out of her tenth, top ten finish at a major. Hataoka finished T2 and T4 in this event in, respectively, 2021 and 2023. A missed cut in 2025 was a shock to the system, but the Japanese golfer will bounce back in style and claim the title.

News

5 Things we Learned: Friday at the U.S. Women’s Open

Published

2 days ago

Jun 6, 2026

Ronald Montesano

Dumbo flies again! There is certainly a half-generation of golf fans without the slightest idea of how well In-gee Chun, aka Dumbo, can golf her ball. The Korean was the It Girl from 2015 to 2018. She won three LPGA events, with two being major championships. She returned to Korea to cure her homesickness, but made the occasional foray back to the Americas. In 2022, she captured a fourth LPGA title and, guess what? It was a third, unique major title.

The halfway cut line was set at four over par. Those at plus-five and beyond had their stay in Tinseltown cut short, at least when it comes to working rounds of golf. Among the 87 who fell on the high side of the cut line, Lydia Ko stood out as the biggest name. Others given a two-day furlough were Lilia Vu, Megha Ganne, Chizzy Iwai, and Leona Maguire. Making the cut on the number are Lottie Woad, Celine Boutier, Mao Saigo, and amateur Asterisk Talley. If you follow world football, imagine the feeling of relegation on a weekly basis. That’s the 36-hole cut in professional golf.

We learned five things on Friday at Riviera Country Club, and we’d love to share them with you. Find a comfy place and brighten the screen on your device. It’s time for Five Things We Learned on day two at the US Women’s Open.

Part One: the biggest movers

A golfer’s feel appears or slips away overnight. Although Saturday is known collectively as Moving Day, it doesn’t come with as sudden and final a feeling as Friday. Move the wrong way on Friday and you’re down the road. Improve in the proper direction and you save your week. Both Mao Saigo and Rio Takeda opened with plus-five rounds of 76, then signed for 70 on day two, and made the cut on the number.

Moving the other way were Stephanie Kyriacou (70-78) and Ina Yoon (68-79). Their respective eight- and eleven-shot declines propelled them from title contention to tournament departure. Minjee Lee and Minji Kang (seven shots higher) along with Rose Zhang (five shots) made the cut, but saw their opportunity for victory take a serious body shot.

Part Two: the leaders

Allison Lee and Ruoning Yin took the conservative path to the 36-hole medal. Lee posted four birdies and a bogey for a total of 68 on day two. Yin had two birdies and sixteen pars for her second consecutive card of 69. Their 138 places them one shot clear of the aforementioned Dumbo Chun, who followed an opening 71 with 68. First-round leader Jennifer Kupcho added seven shots to her total, from an opening-day 66 to a follow-up 73, yet remained within the inner circle of leaders at -3, tied with Chun and four others. Four more golfers sit at minus-two, two shots behind the top duo. An even dozen of golfers sits within two shots of the lead.

The day’s biggest move of gravitas came from Nelly Korda. After a disappointing 73 on Thursday, the world number one improved six shots, thanks to a five-birdie round of 67. Korda slid inside the top ten with her recovery, and certainly reclaimed her place as most frightening chaser at Riviera. No one is likely to shoot in the low 60s at Riviera, but Korda just might post a mid-sixties score on Saturday, to seize the lead on Sunday morning.

Part Three: Ams verse Champs

Five current amateur golfers were among the 68 golfers to reach the weekend. Kiara Romero posted the best non-pro score on Friday, a one-under 70, to move from plus-two to plus-one figures. She is joined there by Aphrodite Deng, who reversed those numbers for her two rounds. Maria Jose Marin (143), Farah O’Keefe (145), and Asteriks Talley (146) joined the #WeDidIt brigade to earn a spot for the final two rounds.

Six former US Open champions, led by In-gee Chun(2015), also punched a ticket for round three. Allison Corpuz (2023), Maja Stark (2025), Ariya Jutanugarn (2018), A Lim Kim (2020), and Minjee Lee (2022) preserved their dream of a second US Open trophy for the mantle. Nineteen amateurs failed to earn a post for the final 36-holes, while five former champions joined them on the sidelines. Yuka Saso, twice a winner in this event in the past half-decade, missed the cut by five shots. 24 amateurs against eleven former titleists suggests that it is easier for the young to qualify, but harder for them to find success.

Part Four: the golf course

Scoring went up by .6 shots per player, from round one to round two. Statistically speaking, it became harder to make the cut as the day wore on. Birdies dropped by 50, while pars remained constant. Both bogeys and doubles increased markedly. The first and the sixth holes played under par on the front nine, while the second and ninth were nearly tied for most difficult traces on the road to the turn.

Coming home, holes ten, twelve, fifteen, and eighteen played as an impregnable quadrilateral. Odds are, you gave a shot back on each of them. Despite number seventeen’s accessibility for birdie, no one got out of the back nine alive. If conditions continue toward the extreme, Riviera will extract a pound of flesh from the contenders over the weekend.

Part Five: what to expect

From my vantage point, the tee times to watch are the 4:55 EST and the 5:05 slots. Nelly Korda pegs her ball in the sixth-last pairing with Sora Kamiya. The little-known Kamiya will get an up close and personal look at the crowds that follow the best in the world. Korda will need to ignore Kamiya’s expected struggles and golf her own ball. Ten minutes later, Lauren Coughlin begins play with Casandra Alexander at her side. It’s a similar situation, with the experienced Coughlin alongside an unseasoned partner.

Both Sei Yong Kim and Gaby Lopez have turned in strong performances, and their 5:15 pairing might produce some explosive numbers. From back in the pack, the tasty duo of Brooke Henderson and Jeeno Thitikul at 4:20, might see double digits in birdies. The unexpected at unknown Riviera is likely, so your guess is as good as mine.

News

5 Things we Learned: Thursday at the U.S.. Women’s Open

Published

3 days ago

Jun 5, 2026

Ronald Montesano

Gone are the days when the U.S. Women’s Open was held at Scenic Hills or Churchill Valley. Fine courses that they are (or were, as Churchill Valley went bankrupt a decade ago) there is something to be said for the venue. Not all Women’s Open playings need to take place on Men’s Open venues, but some should. This week in Los Angeles, the Women’s Open visits Riviera Country Club for the first time. Down the road, we will visit Inverness, Oakmont, Interlachen, Oak Hill, Chicago Golf, and Merion. That is quite the murderer’s row (1927 Yankees reference) of golf clubs.

What can we expect from the 2026 tournament? Greatness and uncertainty. Unlike the PGA Tour, which visits Riviera each February, the LPGA does not, so the women will not have nearly the body of work over the George C. Thomas layout. Maybe that’s a good thing. Maybe they’ll play #10 smarter than the men do. Maybe they’ll figure some things out that their male counterparts can not. For today, we’ll try to find five things to learn, and share them with you.

First, this ain’t your momma’s U.S. Open course

How do we know? Well, so far, only one previous champion currently sits inside the top thirty. That would be Minjee Lee, the 2022 winner at Southern (NC) Pines. Lee made par on her first nine holes, the inward side at Riviera. She dropped birdie putts on the first and ninth holes (ten and eighteen for her day) and tallied another seven pars, for 69. She sits three shots off Jennifer Kupcho’s opening 66. Don’t worry about Kupcho; we’ll get to her. After Lee, defending champion Maja Stark ranks T30 at even par, joined by three other, former winners.

What Minjee did, is the sort of thing that wins U.S. Open titles. She guided her ship safely past swells, and made a move when the waters calmed. The fewer the bogeys, the more likely Minjee figures in the outcome on Sunday evening in Pacific Palisades. Off the tee, Lee was unmatched. She hit 14 of 14 fairways. Her iron play was a bit loose in comparison. She putted for birdie on 12 of 18 holes, which meant that her recovery short game was on point. Lee was ten yards longer on measured driving holes than the field average, and was below the field average (a good thing) in putting.

Second, the amateurs beat a loud drum

Three of the world’s top amateur golfer posted 70, placing them four off the lead, in a tie for 14th place. Canada’s Aphrodite Deng, Spain’s Paula Francisco Llaño, and Colombia’s Maria José Marin, showed the professional world that their game is strong. Both Deng and Francisco Llaño collected five birdies on the day. Should they match that output on day two, and minimize the foozles, they’ll be the topic of conversation on Saturday morning. Marin, the 2026 Augusta National Women’s Amateur champion and an NCAA team semifinalist last week, played a game similar to Minjee Lee: few mistakes and few taken risks.

The last amateur to post the low medal score for 72 holes was Jenny Chuasiriporn in 1998. She lost a playoff to Se Ri Pak, who matched her plus-six effort at Blackwolf Run. The last amateur to win the U.S. Women’s Open was Catherine Lacoste in 1967. The amateurs are stronger than they’ve ever been, but the professionals have not allowed them to close the gap. A victory by one of the college set would be a cannon shot heard round the world. Could it happen? Absolutely. Is it likely? Not at all.

Third, let’s talk Kupcho

Jennifer Kupcho won the inaugural Augusta National Women’s Amateur. She won three times on tour in 2022, including the Chevron, a major title. She won a fourth event in 2025, but has not established the winning credentials projected on her after 2022’s marvelous coming-out.

Kupcho hails from Colorado, and spent four years in the Carolina Piedmont, at Wake Forest Universtiy. Neither of those locales cries out I’ll be at home at Riviera, but here we are, after a seven-birdie performance. Kupcho posted birdie on each of her first three holes, and added four more (against two bogeys) to assume a one-shot advantage over Korea’s Sei Young Kim.

Kupcho drove the ball decently, approached moderately well, but putted lights out on Thursday. Her 26 putts were tied for best in show on day one. There might just be something about the putting surfaces at Riviera that aligns with Kupcho’s vibe. If that is the case, just get the ball on the green, anywhere, and let the flatstick do the lifting.

Fourth, how young is Sei Young?

Sei (pronounced “So”) Young Kim won a dozen times from 2015 to 2020. She took time off from winning until 2025, shen she captured a thirteenth LPGA title. Like Kupcho, Kim has hardware from one major event, the 2020 Women’s PGA Championship. How to explain the five years away from victory? No idea. When Sei Young was in contention during the prime of her career, the outcome was a foregone conclusion.

What to expect over the next three days at Riviera? Anyone’s guess. It might be the 2015-2020 Sei Young, or it could be the 2021-2025 version. Kim began her day with birdies at 10 and 11, then settled into a stretch of pars before her solitary bogey at the 4th (her 13th) hole. Kim regained her composure and reeled in three birdies to close the front nine. Her four-under performance trails Kupcho alone, and there is a real chance that Sei Young will produce a second score in the 60s and take a bit of control of the tournament.

Fifth, we’re giddy for Gaby

Although I cannot place my finger on why, it seems that each year, Gaby Lopez pops up on the U.S. Open leaderboard. She hasn’t figure out how to remain in contention, but here we are, in 2026, and Lopez is once again in the mix. The three-time champion on the LPGA circuit had a stunning first nine holes, turning in minus-five. She reached six deep at her tenth hole, but then gave three shots back coming home. Which Gaby will show up on Friday, and for how long? If back-nine Gaby can somehow channel front-nine Gaby, all outcomes are within reach. If the loose play continues, Lopez’ wiki page will add one more T41 to her majors column.