7 Comments

1. 

   Mike

   Feb 1, 2015 at 6:31 pm

   I’ve hit one. It’s a great looking driver and it’s as long as “today’s technology” drivers.

   Reply Report comment
2. 

   Roger

   May 28, 2013 at 5:35 am

   Wow….just like a TM R7 425 TP. Copy a Classic, now that’s
   a compliment to Taylormade.
   I managed to set the weights up just fine on my R7 st 3 wood,
   Cheers!
   Re hi performance hi value shafts..Try AXE.

   Reply Report comment
3. 

   JQ

   May 25, 2013 at 11:31 pm

   I’m amazed at how a company with such beautiful iron offerings can introduce such lackluster new drivers (and everything else for that matter) over and over again. However, maybe I shouldn’t judge this club on looks or technology…I played KZG blades for a year and they were great. I only replaced them because I won some Clevelands.

   Reply Report comment
4. 

   Joe Golfer

   May 22, 2013 at 12:58 am

   Hopefully for that price, you can choose from a group of very good shafts.
   Seems like many companies still use cruddy shafts, despite all the other technology.
   And some of these companies, like Fourteen Golf, are boutique companies, and by that I mean that they sell for a very high price to a small number of people who think that they have to have the very best (even if it isn’t really any better than what others are offering nowadays).
   Many years ago, it used to be that certain companies or clubs were significantly better, but nowadays it seems like you can get an excellent driver (or any other club) from numerous companies.
   Same goes for shafts. These “boutique” shaft companies, such as Oban, may make very good shafts. But who among us really wants to spend $400+ for a shaft. I’ll admit that I’d recommend a good aftermarket shaft over the stock shaft in most clubs nowadays, but some of these smaller companies are simply pricing themselves out of the market.

   Reply Report comment
5. 

   yo!

   May 16, 2013 at 1:30 pm

   kzg just described a golfer with an inconsistent swing. that golfer is probably not going to be helped by this driver either.

   Reply Report comment
6. 

   Rob

   May 16, 2013 at 12:10 pm

   Does anyone else find the statement from KZG a little insulting? Hey KZG, 2004 called and wants it’s technology back. Not only are you releasing technology that’s been available for over 9 years, you’re also insulting your customers by telling them they don’t know how to turn a wrench and move a screw from one hole to the next. Granted we all don’t have access to a launch monitor but we do have access to a driving range. I’m pretty sure most golfers can set things, hit some shots, and change them on the range to find what the like best. No, not all swings are consistent but you can very easily get a feel for what does and doesn’t work and eliminate some settings immediately.

   Anyways, the golf technology world has moved on to better things and KZG should at least try and keep up or gracefully bow out.

   Reply Report comment
   • 

     Kevin

     May 16, 2013 at 12:29 pm

     Way to go to Rob. I couldn’t agree with you more. $399 for 2004 technology. Hilarious!

     Reply Report comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.